Tag Archives: overton-window

Beck and O’Reilly Strike Back At Stephen King: We Should Go Visit Him

Glenn Beck and Bill O’Reilly on Thursday had some fun at author Stephen King’s expense. As NewsBusters reported Monday, King in an Entertainment Weekly column called Beck “crazy” and a “nutcase.” When O’Reilly asked his guest if he knew who King was, Beck marvelously responded, “He’s the guy that usually when I release my books at the same time, he’s No. 2.” After the “O’Reilly Factor” host read the EW quote to Beck, the fun really started (video follows with transcript and commentary, relevant section at 4:08):   O’REILLY: All right. Do you know who this guy, Stephen King, is? BECK: Who? O’REILLY: Stephen King. Do you know him, the author? BECK: Oh, yes. He’s the guy that usually when I release my books at the same time, he’s No. 2. O’REILLY: OK. So you think he’s jealous of you. He lives up in Maine, this guy. He writes about spooky things. BECK: Yes. Actually… O’REILLY: A little like you. BECK: I am a huge fan. O’REILLY: “The Overton Window,” very, very frightening. So maybe he’s jealous. But this is what he… BECK: Biggest selling fiction of the — of the year. O’REILLY: Of the year. Your book. Not Stephen King. You. BECK: Huh? O’REILLY: Here’s what King writes in Entertainment Weekly. BECK: Yes. O’REILLY: Let me quote it to you: “I sort of dig on Glenn Beck. He reminds me of certain people you encounter in big cities. You know, the ones wearing robes, sandals and signs but claiming the world is going to end because American men are eating too much red meat and American women are wearing their pants too tight. He’s crazy, but like those urban nut cakes, he actually seems to believe what he is saying.” Stephen King. BECK: I think he meant that in a good way. O’REILLY: Yes. BECK: No, look, here’s the thing. So what he’s saying is you’re a nut cake. But I’m a sincere nut cake. O’REILLY: That’s true. BECK: I’m sincerely crazy. O’REILLY: Uh-huh. BECK: I appreciate that, Stephen. Stephen King is the guy who called me Satan’s younger brother. And if I’m not mistaken, called Bill O’Reilly Satan’s mentally challenged older brother. O’REILLY: You would come off better. BECK: I’m the younger brother. O’REILLY: Right. BECK: He got that right. O’REILLY: I’m old and mentally challenged. BECK: Not too much. Not too much. O’REILLY: Here’s my question: should you and I take the Bold Fresh Tour up to Maine. BECK: Yes. I would love that. O’REILLY: OK. BECK: Could we? O’REILLY: And rent a place near King’s place and then, after the show, lead the whole crew over to his house for coffee. BECK: We could gather arms and — I mean, lock arms, not gather arms. That would be crazy. Lock arms and sing “Kumbaya.” And then he can come out and tell us spooky stories. O’REILLY: You know… BECK: I’ll wear a sandwich sign. O’REILLY: I used to think that I was the most misunderstood person. BECK: Right. O’REILLY: But now, I know that I’m not. BECK: Yes, no. It’s Stephen King. O’REILLY: Right. There you go. Glenn Beck, everybody. Nice. For the record, despite writing some fabulous books in his time, King is a nutcase. Readers are reminded that in April 2006, the horror author made a truly disgusting comment to a bunch of high school students at the Library of Congress: I don’t want to sound like an ad, a public service ad on TV, but the fact is if you can read, you can walk into a job later on. If you don’t, then you’ve got, the Army, Iraq, I don’t know, something like that. It’s, it’s not as bright. So, that’s my little commercial for that. When NewsBusters called him out for this, he actually posted the following instructions to his fans at his website: I live in a national guard town, and I support our troops, but I don’t support either the war or educational policies that limit the options of young men and women to any one career-military or otherwise. If you agree,  find Sheppard on the internet , and send him an email: “Hi, Noel-Stephen King says to shut up and I agree.”  Needless to say, I got a LOT of e-mail messages in the days that followed. Talk about nutcases!

Follow this link:
Beck and O’Reilly Strike Back At Stephen King: We Should Go Visit Him

Beck-Bashing WaPo Book Critic Acts Offended, As If He Didn’t Imply Violent Tea Party Uprising

On his radio show, Glenn Beck responded to Washington Post book critic Steven Levingston’s audacious claim that Beck’s new novel The Overton Window may be a terrorist’s inspirational handbook. Beck objected to the idea that it’s ridiculous that Tea Party protesters would be nonviolent. “Show me the violent Tea Party, Washington Post. Show them to me.” Levingston wrote: “Molly and her crowd assert their Second Amendment right to bear arms and are well stocked with weapons. They even make their own ammunition. Their insistence on nonviolence appears as disingenuous as anything out of the mouth of their nemesis, the insidious manipulator of reality Arthur Gardner.” In response to Beck on his Political Bookworm blog , Levingston weirdly claimed Beck had taken his review out of context: Most serious among his off-the-cuff language this morning was: “The Washington Post writes as future fact that [the book] will be found in a bag of ammunition at some point after a violent shooting.” Please read the review again, Mr. Beck. Here’s what I actually wrote, as a conditional statement — not as a future fact: “If the book is found tucked into the ammo boxes of self-proclaimed patriots and recited at “tea party” assemblies, then Beck will have achieved his goal.” And where is the mention of a violent shooting? This complaint is more disingenuous than Beck’s fictional characters. Levingston’s entire review implies repeatedly, from the “ammo boxes” line forward, that Beck’s “goal” is a violent uprising. (See previous sentence about “disingenuous” nonviolence while making their own ammo.) Levingston’s somehow overlooking that he concluded the review by mentioning a violent terrorist bombing: “The Overton Window” risks falling into the tradition of other anti-government novels such as “The Turner Diaries” by William L. Pierce, which became a handbook of extremists and inspired Timothy McVeigh to blow up the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City in 1995. Levington cannot be sincerely outraged that he was misinterpreted, that he didn’t insist that it’s likely (and intended) that Beck’s book will lead to dead people. PS: Time book reviewer Alex Altman also panned the Beck book, but contained his conservative-bashing within more civil boundaries: For Beck’s millions of acolytes, however, the one-dimensional characters and half-baked plot will be less important than his message, which will channel their anxieties about perceived assaults on our freedom. “Perceived” assaults on our freedom? As if conservatives are merely imagining massive government spending increases, the federal takeover of auto companies, the top-down reorganization of the health sector, and other allegedly fictional happenings.

Read more:
Beck-Bashing WaPo Book Critic Acts Offended, As If He Didn’t Imply Violent Tea Party Uprising