Tag Archives: hostility

Oops: Lib Columnist Bemoans Non-existent ‘All-white’ Senate

On Thursday, National Newspaper Publishers Association columnist Julianne Malveaux wrote that Marco Rubio, along with two Asian-American Senators, one Hispanic Senator, and two black Senate candidates are all in fact white men. Malveaux, also the president of Bennett College, decried the travails of Kendrick Meek, the black Democrat vying for his party’s nomination for US Senate in Florida. “If Meek can’t pull this one off,” Malveaux wrote, “the United States Senate will become, again, a segregated body.” She also used the terms “lily-white” and “all-white” to describe the racial makeup of a Meek-less Senate. Readers must be forgiven for their confusion, given that another candidate for Senate in Florida, Marco Rubio, is not white, but Hispanic. In fact, excluding Roland Burriss, Illinois’s lame duck Senator, the Senate has three non-white members: Daniel Inouye and Daniel Akaka of Hawaii are both of Asian descent, and Robert Menendez is of Hispanic descent. There are also black Senate candidates beyond Meek: Alvin Greene in South Carolina, and the less-known but infinitely more qualified Georgia Labor Commissioner Michael Thurmond. How to explain Malveaux’s bizarre contention? Your guess is as good as ours.

Read more from the original source:
Oops: Lib Columnist Bemoans Non-existent ‘All-white’ Senate

MSNBC Panel Members Aghast at Proposition that Obama Administration is Hostile to Business

Appearing on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” publisher Mort Zuckerman called the Obama administration out for being “without a doubt the most hostile administration to business and to the role of business that we’ve had in decades.” Panel members Mika Brzezinski and John Heilmann seemed shocked at the severity of the criticism, however. “Where is the hostility?” John Heilmann, columnist for New York Magazine, asked with incredulity. When Zuckerman responded that the administration deals with businessmen as shady characters trying to rip off the middle class, Heilmann simply called it rhetoric. “I don’t know if that’s a good use of words,” show host Mika Brzezinski remarked about Zuckerman’s claim of hostility. Heilmann claimed that the administration could definitely have been tougher on Wall Street. Its policy ended up “in a modest, moderate place,” he stated. “It ended up in the center, nowhere near as far to the left or the populist right as it could have,” remarked Heilmann on Obama’s dealings with Wall Street. Zuckerman is no Republican cheerleader, either, as his campaign donations would make it seem. The transcript of the segment, which aired on July 9 at 8:22 a.m. EDT, is as follows: JOHN HARRIS, Editor-in-Chief, Politico: The White House is concerned about the perception that it’s anti-business. I had an interview yesterday with Rahm Emanuel, who really underscores just how seriously they’re taking this. He responded with real heat to the perception that Obama is anti-business. He didn’t say this directly, but the clear message was “Would you guys just stop your whining? And don’t listen so much to the rhetoric about BP, or about Wall Street. Look at our policies.” He’s saying business should love us. The money and the stimulus package, most of that went to private sector companies to spend, so that was good. He said we didn’t take the more liberal positions on health care, went with an incrementalist plan. That’s good for business. Even the financial regulation, he says, gives business the sort of regulatory, clear expectations,.takes away uncertainty, the markets hate uncertainty, gives them the stability they need. He says business should love us. Of course, business does not love Obama. And incidentally, some of the things Rahm is saying, his own Democratic Party activists wouldn’t love. Because he’s talking about how Obama is free trade, and tough on teachers unions. (…) MORT ZUCKERMAN, Editor-in-Chief, U.S. News & World Report: I mean, I don’t know how [Rahm Emanuel] can make those allegations about the business world. It’s without question the most hostile administration to business and to the role of business that we’ve had in decades, and he’s saying it’s not hostile to business. It’s totally hostile to business. MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Hostile? JOHN HEILMANN: Where is the hostility? (Crosstalk) ZUCKERMAN: Where is the hostility? What are you talking about? Every time they make a reference – he just came out with a program for the expansion of exports. And you read, it says “we are not supporting those people, those unscrupulous, dishonest businessmen who are trying to rip off the middle class. No, no, no, we are going to help the other business people.” What is he talking about? JOHN HEILMANN: That’s rhetoric! That’s rhetoric! ZUCKERMAN: You let me tell you, rhetoric is damn important when you want to make a long-term investment. You want to have a sense of confidence. This has been the most anti-business administration. And the whole business community feels it. BRZEZINSKI: Did you feel that at the job summit, when you went there? ZUCKERMAN: You’re darn right I did. BRZEZINSKI: Wow. Okay. I don’t know if that’s a good use of words. HEILMANN: I’ve thought about this. I wrote a piece about this a while ago, about Wall Street and Obama. If you think about the existing political climate in the country, what the country would like to see done to Wall Street, what the Obama administration could have done politically, if it had wanted to, in terms of the populism out there in the country, it ended up in a modest, moderate place. It ended up in the center, nowhere near as far to the left or the populist right as it could have. PAT BUCHANAN: Oh it sounds like they got the worst of both worlds. If the business community thinks they’re hostile, and they didn’t get the populist community, who did they get? Ken Shepherd contributed to this report.

See the article here:
MSNBC Panel Members Aghast at Proposition that Obama Administration is Hostile to Business

WaPo’s David Weigel Again Exposed Trashing the Right He’s Supposed to Cover

Many conservatives, including a number of NewsBusters contributors, have been skeptical of Washington Post blogger Dave Weigel since he was hired in March to cover the right. Time and again, those concerns have been vindicated as Weigel has ridiculed a number of conservatives and conservative positions. It seems that the Washington Post has little interest in an objective blog-based approach to the news — something this humble blogger has noted previously . Likewise, Weigel seems to have little interest in covering the right with an even hand; he has consistently shown his disdain for the movement and its members. The website Fishbowl DC today published a number of excerpts of emails from Weigel to an email list created by fellow Post blogger Ezra Klein ridiculing various conservatives. He says he hopes Matt Drudge will “set himself on fire” and dubbed Tea Party protesters “Paultard[s],” a crude reference to Ron Paul. Weigel also apparently does not appreciate being made fun of. After the Washington Examiner’s gossip blog Yeas and Neas published a piece taunting his dance moves, Weigel called on members of the email list to refrain from linking to any Examiner content. Weigel took heat in May for calling gay marriage opponents ” bigots ” and for stating on his Twitter account , “I hear there’s video out there of Matt Drudge diddling an 8-year-old boy. Shocking.” NewsBusters contributor Dan Gainor called Weigel out on his inappropriate statements, noting that his new employment at the Post required a heightened degree of professionalism that he may not have been used to. Apparently that message was lost on Weigel. As a reporter for an organization as prominent as the Post, Weigel should not be surprised when he catches flack for making unprofessional and inappropriate statements. Weigel has taken to his blog to apologize for and defend the most recent comments. But his excuses really do not make any difference. The comments he is trying to defend demonstrate his hostility towards conservatives and conservatism. A journalist who reverts to name-calling and derisive criticism of those who is charged with covering cannot seriously claim to be covering them fairly. “I feel [Weigel’s] column often looks for ways that make conservatives look bad,” wrote Gainor in March, “while his opposite number, the Post’s Ezra Klein, is an open liberal and spends his time making the left look good.” Who knows, maybe that was the point all along.

Continue reading here:
WaPo’s David Weigel Again Exposed Trashing the Right He’s Supposed to Cover