Tag Archives: likely-inspired

Josh Duggar to Danica Dillon: You Can’t PROVE I Assaulted You!

As his court battle with Danica Dillon draws closer, Josh Duggar’s lawyers are doing everything in their power to try and discredit  the former adult film star. Dillon claims Duggar paid her for sex , then manhandled and verbally abused in her such a way that she suffered physical injuries and permanent emotional trauma. Duggar now claims he’s never even met Dillon , and his attorneys reportedly plan to argue that she’s extorting their client in hopes that he’ll pay her off in order to avoid further negative publicity. Josh claims he has photographic proof that he was not with Dillon on the day in question, but clearly his lawyers aren’t taking any chances, as they’ve asked the judge to make Dillon furnish evidence that she was abused before the trial proceeds. On Friday, Duggar’s lawyers filed papers with the following request: “ Presumably, if this matter is of such importance to her that she would file a public complaint, make accusations about Defendant on national television and demand more than half a million dollars, producing some documentation of her losses and injuries and the names of people who have knowledge about her allegations within the time set by this Court and required by its rules should be feasible .” Legal experts say Josh’s lawyers were hoping to stop the proceedings before they even reach the pre-trial conference stage, but it seems the judge wasn’t having it. The motion was rejected, and both parties are still scheduled to come face-to-face for a conference that’s scheduled for January 21. You can expect Josh’s lawyers to continue pulling out all the stops between now and then. View Slideshow: Josh Duggar Sex Scandal Timeline: How His Family’s Empire Crumbled

Here is the original post:
Josh Duggar to Danica Dillon: You Can’t PROVE I Assaulted You!

Josh Duggar to Danica Dillon: You Can’t PROVE I Assaulted You!

As his court battle with Danica Dillon draws closer, Josh Duggar’s lawyers are doing everything in their power to try and discredit  the former adult film star. Dillon claims Duggar paid her for sex , then manhandled and verbally abused in her such a way that she suffered physical injuries and permanent emotional trauma. Duggar now claims he’s never even met Dillon , and his attorneys reportedly plan to argue that she’s extorting their client in hopes that he’ll pay her off in order to avoid further negative publicity. Josh claims he has photographic proof that he was not with Dillon on the day in question, but clearly his lawyers aren’t taking any chances, as they’ve asked the judge to make Dillon furnish evidence that she was abused before the trial proceeds. On Friday, Duggar’s lawyers filed papers with the following request: “ Presumably, if this matter is of such importance to her that she would file a public complaint, make accusations about Defendant on national television and demand more than half a million dollars, producing some documentation of her losses and injuries and the names of people who have knowledge about her allegations within the time set by this Court and required by its rules should be feasible .” Legal experts say Josh’s lawyers were hoping to stop the proceedings before they even reach the pre-trial conference stage, but it seems the judge wasn’t having it. The motion was rejected, and both parties are still scheduled to come face-to-face for a conference that’s scheduled for January 21. You can expect Josh’s lawyers to continue pulling out all the stops between now and then. View Slideshow: Josh Duggar Sex Scandal Timeline: How His Family’s Empire Crumbled

Here is the original post:
Josh Duggar to Danica Dillon: You Can’t PROVE I Assaulted You!

MTV Apologizes For Racist Eva Longoria-America Ferrera Tweet

There was plenty of controversy to be stirred by the 2016 Golden Globe Awards on Sunday night. Eva Longoria and America Ferrera Present at the Golden Globes Like when Ricky Gervais confronted Mel Gibson about that whole “sugar tits” thing. Or when Leonardo DiCaprio possibly threw some shade at Lady Gaga . Or, heck, pretty much any time Gervais opened his mouth during his opening monlogue. At one point during the ceremony, meanwhile, MTV Australia decided to get in on the scandalous act. It all started when Eva Longoria and America Ferrera came out to present the award for Best TV Actor in a Drama. The actresses engaged in a very well-received bit about Latina stereotypes, an exchange likely inspired by the Golden Globes’ own mistake when the show’s Twitter account referred to Ferrera as “Gina Rodriguez” when she announced the nominations back in November. View Slideshow: Golden Globe Awards 2016: The Best Moments in GIFs! After viewing the presentation, MTV Tweeted in an attempt at humor: “Where are the English subtitles? We have no idea what @AmericaFerrera and @EvaLongoria are saying #GoldenGlobes.” The backlash came quickly and strongly, with MTV deleting the message and then offering up the following apology: “Our Tweet was in reference to @EvaLongoria & @AmericaFerrera’s #GoldenGlobes joke. We sincerely apologise for causing offence. “We get it was a bad call. We’ll leave the humour to @rickygervais.” It’s like they always say: you can joke about almost anything. But the most controversial the territory, the funnier the joke better be, Check out Longoria and Ferrera’s humorous interaction above and then drool over all the impressive red carpet fashion below: View Slideshow: 2016 Golden Globes Red Carpet: A Feast For The Eyes

Excerpt from:
MTV Apologizes For Racist Eva Longoria-America Ferrera Tweet

MTV Apologizes For Racist Eva Longoria-America Ferrera Tweet

There was plenty of controversy to be stirred by the 2016 Golden Globe Awards on Sunday night. Eva Longoria and America Ferrera Present at the Golden Globes Like when Ricky Gervais confronted Mel Gibson about that whole “sugar tits” thing. Or when Leonardo DiCaprio possibly threw some shade at Lady Gaga . Or, heck, pretty much any time Gervais opened his mouth during his opening monlogue. At one point during the ceremony, meanwhile, MTV Australia decided to get in on the scandalous act. It all started when Eva Longoria and America Ferrera came out to present the award for Best TV Actor in a Drama. The actresses engaged in a very well-received bit about Latina stereotypes, an exchange likely inspired by the Golden Globes’ own mistake when the show’s Twitter account referred to Ferrera as “Gina Rodriguez” when she announced the nominations back in November. View Slideshow: Golden Globe Awards 2016: The Best Moments in GIFs! After viewing the presentation, MTV Tweeted in an attempt at humor: “Where are the English subtitles? We have no idea what @AmericaFerrera and @EvaLongoria are saying #GoldenGlobes.” The backlash came quickly and strongly, with MTV deleting the message and then offering up the following apology: “Our Tweet was in reference to @EvaLongoria & @AmericaFerrera’s #GoldenGlobes joke. We sincerely apologise for causing offence. “We get it was a bad call. We’ll leave the humour to @rickygervais.” It’s like they always say: you can joke about almost anything. But the most controversial the territory, the funnier the joke better be, Check out Longoria and Ferrera’s humorous interaction above and then drool over all the impressive red carpet fashion below: View Slideshow: 2016 Golden Globes Red Carpet: A Feast For The Eyes

Excerpt from:
MTV Apologizes For Racist Eva Longoria-America Ferrera Tweet

‘South Park’ Creators Say Muhammad Episode Was Censored Without Their Approval

Trey Parker and Matt Stone claim Comedy Central censored the controversial episode after they submitted it. By Gil Kaufman Trey Parker and Matt Stone Photo: Maury Phillips/ WireImage Over the years, “South Park” creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone have tried to be equal-opportunity offenders on their gleefully trash-talking cartoon, taking on everything from the Catholic church to Scientology, the mentally challenged and just about every other interest group in between with a wildly irreverent, bleep-tastic bent. But when their comic depiction of the Muslim prophet Muhammad drew strong threats for the pair this week, they said their network, Comedy Central, stepped in and took evasive action. The episode in question showed Muhammad — whose depiction in print many Muslim’s consider forbidden — dressed as a bear. A radical Muslim Web site posted a threat against the two if the material aired, which included a reference to the Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gogh, who was brutally murdered in 2004 by Muslim extremists over his documentary about violence against Islamic women. “We have to warn Matt and Trey that what they are doing is stupid and they will probably wind up like Theo van Gogh for airing this show,” read the post. “This is not a threat, but a warning of the reality of what will likely happen to them.” The post was accompanied by a graphic picture of Van Gogh as well as the addresses of the Comedy Central offices in New York and the “South Park” production company in Los Angeles. An accompanying montage featuring photos of Parker and Stone and Van Gogh over audio from a radical Islamic preacher ends with the words “the dust will never settle down.” In the end, all references to Muhammad, including long stretches of dialogue and the offending image — which was covered up by a large black “censored” bar — were bleeped from the show by Comedy Central in the second of a two-part episode. On Thursday night, the duo posted a statement about the controversy on their Web site, writing, “In the 14 years we’ve been doing South Park we have never done a show that we couldn’t stand behind. We delivered our version of the show to Comedy Central and they made a determination to alter the episode. It wasn’t some meta-joke on our part. Comedy Central added the bleeps. In fact, Kyle’s customary final speech was about intimidation and fear. It didn’t mention Muhammad at all but it got bleeped too. We’ll be back next week with a whole new show about something completely different and we’ll see what happens to it.” A spokesperson for Comedy Central (which is owned by MTV Networks) had no comment. The offending episode was set up last week in a show in which some of the hundreds of celebrities who’ve been skewered by “South Park” over the years threaten to file a class-action lawsuit against the titular Colorado town if South Park didn’t fly in the prophet, who they believe has the power to save them from ridicule. In the second part, which aired this week, Muhammad does arrive, dressed in a bear costume. The “South Park” site notes that the pair do not have the approval to stream their original version of the episode online, so it’s unclear which bleeps were theirs and which were inserted by Comedy Central. This is not the first time Parker and Stone have walked this fine line. In a two-part 2006 episode about censorship, they tried to depict Muhammad but were censored by the network, though the prophet did make an appearance in a 2001 episode as part of the Super Best Friends, a superhero-like gathering of religious icons. The network’s decision was likely inspired not just by the Van Gogh murder and threat, but by the international uproar in 2005 over cartoons in a Danish newspaper that showed various images of Muhammad, including one in which the prophet wore a bomb as a turban.

Original post:
‘South Park’ Creators Say Muhammad Episode Was Censored Without Their Approval