Source: Jamie McCarthy/VMN18 / Getty Kylie Tries To Teach Stormi Some New Words Awww, Stormi is starting to speak and Kylie Jenner, being the savvy businesswoman she is, tried to teach her some new and important words; “Kylie Cosmetics”. Unfortunately, Stormi isn’t digesting all the syllables and consonants in “Kylie Cosmetics”, but she does speak! Press play and here Stormi say “Da Da”. It’s CUTE! Stormi did the job, even if she didn’t do the work. Kylie’s video of her teaching her baby “new words” gathered over 21 million views. Soon after, Kylie posted up this notice that special winter version of her cosmetics would be dropping today. the packaging features and wintry design and comes with items likes “Snow Angel Kylighter, Winter Kissed Blush and You’re Perfect perfecting powder”. Are you loving the presentation??? Back to Stormi, here’s another perfect shot of her with mommy Kylie. Cute!
Source: Fotonoticias / Getty It’s no secret that Rihanna’s Fenty Beauty is making waves within the beauty industry , but after less than six months on the market the company is projected the to outsell both Kim Kardashian West and Kylie Jennner’s cosmetic lines . Rihanna's Fenty Beauty Is on Track to Outsell Kylie Cosmetics https://t.co/yVmpMMf9eY pic.twitter.com/qt2inyGyLc — Glamour Beauty (@glamour_beauty) February 2, 2018 Fenty sales in the first month were reportedly five times that of Kylie Cosmetics and continued to lead in following months. In addition, Fenty shoppers are spending more money on Rihanna’s product line than top sellers KKW, Kylie, and Kat Von D . Rihanna was applauded for debuting 40 shades of foundation. Is inclusivity the key to company’s growing success?
Earlier today, The Hollywood Gossip published an article claiming that there is reason to believe that Kim Kardashian is romantically involved with Marquette King , a punter for the Oakland Raiders. There is no factual basis to this claim. We regret the error, and we would like to issue our sincerest apologies to Mrs. Kardashian West, her husband, Mr. Kanye West, and to Mr. King. The speculation in the article was based on information that previously appeared on The Inquisitr, Terez Owens, and Hollywood Life. Those sites have since retracted their reports, and it is now incumbent upon THG to follow suit. We regret any harm we may have caused in reporting on this unsubstantiated rumor, and we hope that this retraction will help to stanch the flow of misinformation that might be detrimental to any parties involved. We would like to reiterate that there is no reason to believe that Mrs. Kardashian West is any romantically involved with Mr. King or has ever been unfaithful to Mr. West. While the word “Gossip” is in our name, we at THG pride ourselves on bringing you the most up-to-date and accurate celebrity news available. However, the nature of online media in 2016 means that we occasionally fall victim to inaccurate or unfounded reports. We feel that on those occasions, it is our obligation to both our readers and to the parties about whom we are reporting to accept responsibility and clarify the matter to the best of our ability. We hope that Mrs. Kardashian West, Mr. West, Mr. King, and anyone who feels they were misled by this morning’s report will accept our sincerest apology. We would also like to take this opportunity to renew our commitment to identifying facts as facts and rumors as rumors. The events of the past few months have reminded us all of the crucial role played by members of the media with regard to the presentation of information to large audiences. Whether we’re reporting on a frivolous matter for entertainment purposes, or an important issue that deserves your full attention, it is our goal to make our readers feel that they have no reason to question the accuracy of the facts they find on THG. We hope today’s error has not caused you to lose trust in our ability to achieve that goal.
As his court battle with Danica Dillon draws closer, Josh Duggar’s lawyers are doing everything in their power to try and discredit the former adult film star. Dillon claims Duggar paid her for sex , then manhandled and verbally abused in her such a way that she suffered physical injuries and permanent emotional trauma. Duggar now claims he’s never even met Dillon , and his attorneys reportedly plan to argue that she’s extorting their client in hopes that he’ll pay her off in order to avoid further negative publicity. Josh claims he has photographic proof that he was not with Dillon on the day in question, but clearly his lawyers aren’t taking any chances, as they’ve asked the judge to make Dillon furnish evidence that she was abused before the trial proceeds. On Friday, Duggar’s lawyers filed papers with the following request: “ Presumably, if this matter is of such importance to her that she would file a public complaint, make accusations about Defendant on national television and demand more than half a million dollars, producing some documentation of her losses and injuries and the names of people who have knowledge about her allegations within the time set by this Court and required by its rules should be feasible .” Legal experts say Josh’s lawyers were hoping to stop the proceedings before they even reach the pre-trial conference stage, but it seems the judge wasn’t having it. The motion was rejected, and both parties are still scheduled to come face-to-face for a conference that’s scheduled for January 21. You can expect Josh’s lawyers to continue pulling out all the stops between now and then. View Slideshow: Josh Duggar Sex Scandal Timeline: How His Family’s Empire Crumbled
As his court battle with Danica Dillon draws closer, Josh Duggar’s lawyers are doing everything in their power to try and discredit the former adult film star. Dillon claims Duggar paid her for sex , then manhandled and verbally abused in her such a way that she suffered physical injuries and permanent emotional trauma. Duggar now claims he’s never even met Dillon , and his attorneys reportedly plan to argue that she’s extorting their client in hopes that he’ll pay her off in order to avoid further negative publicity. Josh claims he has photographic proof that he was not with Dillon on the day in question, but clearly his lawyers aren’t taking any chances, as they’ve asked the judge to make Dillon furnish evidence that she was abused before the trial proceeds. On Friday, Duggar’s lawyers filed papers with the following request: “ Presumably, if this matter is of such importance to her that she would file a public complaint, make accusations about Defendant on national television and demand more than half a million dollars, producing some documentation of her losses and injuries and the names of people who have knowledge about her allegations within the time set by this Court and required by its rules should be feasible .” Legal experts say Josh’s lawyers were hoping to stop the proceedings before they even reach the pre-trial conference stage, but it seems the judge wasn’t having it. The motion was rejected, and both parties are still scheduled to come face-to-face for a conference that’s scheduled for January 21. You can expect Josh’s lawyers to continue pulling out all the stops between now and then. View Slideshow: Josh Duggar Sex Scandal Timeline: How His Family’s Empire Crumbled
There was plenty of controversy to be stirred by the 2016 Golden Globe Awards on Sunday night. Eva Longoria and America Ferrera Present at the Golden Globes Like when Ricky Gervais confronted Mel Gibson about that whole “sugar tits” thing. Or when Leonardo DiCaprio possibly threw some shade at Lady Gaga . Or, heck, pretty much any time Gervais opened his mouth during his opening monlogue. At one point during the ceremony, meanwhile, MTV Australia decided to get in on the scandalous act. It all started when Eva Longoria and America Ferrera came out to present the award for Best TV Actor in a Drama. The actresses engaged in a very well-received bit about Latina stereotypes, an exchange likely inspired by the Golden Globes’ own mistake when the show’s Twitter account referred to Ferrera as “Gina Rodriguez” when she announced the nominations back in November. View Slideshow: Golden Globe Awards 2016: The Best Moments in GIFs! After viewing the presentation, MTV Tweeted in an attempt at humor: “Where are the English subtitles? We have no idea what @AmericaFerrera and @EvaLongoria are saying #GoldenGlobes.” The backlash came quickly and strongly, with MTV deleting the message and then offering up the following apology: “Our Tweet was in reference to @EvaLongoria & @AmericaFerrera’s #GoldenGlobes joke. We sincerely apologise for causing offence. “We get it was a bad call. We’ll leave the humour to @rickygervais.” It’s like they always say: you can joke about almost anything. But the most controversial the territory, the funnier the joke better be, Check out Longoria and Ferrera’s humorous interaction above and then drool over all the impressive red carpet fashion below: View Slideshow: 2016 Golden Globes Red Carpet: A Feast For The Eyes
There was plenty of controversy to be stirred by the 2016 Golden Globe Awards on Sunday night. Eva Longoria and America Ferrera Present at the Golden Globes Like when Ricky Gervais confronted Mel Gibson about that whole “sugar tits” thing. Or when Leonardo DiCaprio possibly threw some shade at Lady Gaga . Or, heck, pretty much any time Gervais opened his mouth during his opening monlogue. At one point during the ceremony, meanwhile, MTV Australia decided to get in on the scandalous act. It all started when Eva Longoria and America Ferrera came out to present the award for Best TV Actor in a Drama. The actresses engaged in a very well-received bit about Latina stereotypes, an exchange likely inspired by the Golden Globes’ own mistake when the show’s Twitter account referred to Ferrera as “Gina Rodriguez” when she announced the nominations back in November. View Slideshow: Golden Globe Awards 2016: The Best Moments in GIFs! After viewing the presentation, MTV Tweeted in an attempt at humor: “Where are the English subtitles? We have no idea what @AmericaFerrera and @EvaLongoria are saying #GoldenGlobes.” The backlash came quickly and strongly, with MTV deleting the message and then offering up the following apology: “Our Tweet was in reference to @EvaLongoria & @AmericaFerrera’s #GoldenGlobes joke. We sincerely apologise for causing offence. “We get it was a bad call. We’ll leave the humour to @rickygervais.” It’s like they always say: you can joke about almost anything. But the most controversial the territory, the funnier the joke better be, Check out Longoria and Ferrera’s humorous interaction above and then drool over all the impressive red carpet fashion below: View Slideshow: 2016 Golden Globes Red Carpet: A Feast For The Eyes
Straight Outta Compton is the biggest movie in the country, but no everyone is totally thrilled with the presentation from “The World’s Most Dangerous Group.” Eazy-E’s daughter, singer EB Wright, obviously has a dog in the fight, but she still made valid points on some of the glaring omissions the movie left out. Continue
“Katy tells us that it’s okay to stand out,” one of pneumatic pop star Katy Perry’s disciples intones at the beginning of Katy Perry: Part of Me 3D , a shiny, brightly colored piece of fan candy that follows the performer as she embarks on her 2011 world tour. Also the Word of Katy: “How could you ever be too cartoon-y?” The latter, exclaimed as Perry’s being fitted into one of her Jetsons concession girl costumes, is a baldly rhetorical question. Somewhere in between those two lines of pop scripture lies the explanation for the only female artist to eke five number-one hits from a single album, her 2010 record Teenage Dream . Do we still talk in terms of albums? The record-keepers do, anyway, still bound by the standards of the past. And Perry, the daughter of born-again evangelists (her father’s aging rock god outfit makes more sense upon learning that he used to cook up LSD; no trace of her mother’s romantic history with Jimi Hendrix remains), likes to play with a retro look. But she is an unmistakably modern creation, as the brand-conscious Part of Me confirms, beginning with the webcam testimonials from fans about the realness and relatability of their heroine that segue to an 18-year-old Katy earnestly confiding into her own laptop. Except the teenage Katy, as though guided by shivering foreknowledge of this exact moment, expresses her desire to be a leader, and her doubts about taking on “all those responsibilities.” Madonna was 25 when Dick Clark got her to blurt out her plan “to rule the world.” Perry has cited pop music’s great survivor as an influence, but I couldn’t watch Part of Me without thinking of how thinly it compares to Madonna: Truth or Dare , a backstage concert film that documents the singer at the peak of world domination. Madonna the road-mother, Madonna the hardass, Madonna the cut-up, Madonna the boyfriend emasculator, Madonna the “even when I feel like shit they love me” fan mocker, Madonna the incandescent performer who terrifies her followers as often as she transfixes them. I became a Madonna fan as a little girl; I could still dance the entire Blonde Ambition tour if I had to, like, save the world. Not that I’ve envisioned such a scenario. But then as now I would have chewed through my own wrist to avoid an encounter with the star, and the idea of relating to Madonna in some sisterly or otherwise pals-y way feels universe-invertingly wrong. Part of Me works hard to establish that Katy Perry is just like you and me. At the same time, her coterie (including an assistant as well as costume and make-up teams) assure us that Perry deserves her fame. She’s a good person from Santa Barbara who charmed even the Cobra Snake (a louche nightlife photographer) when she lit out for Los Angeles with a few bikinis, zero bibles, and a dream. Small doubts are seeded through the introductory interviews – can she handle a tour this big? – and even her manager expresses surprise at her success. There’s a glaze to the talking head segments familiar from any number of MTV or VH-1 artist infomercials. The concert footage (from shows staged around the world) is meant to showcase the 3-D presentation; there are dancers bouncing around and some fleet camerawork, but the laser light effects make the best use of it. Reality TV figureheads and first-time directors Dan Cutforth and Jane Lipsitz produced last year’s wildly successful Justin Bieber: Never Say Never . The same formula of gifting a fan-made star back to the people is followed, but Cutforth and Lipsitz never ascend to a moment of kitsch ecstasy on par with Bieber’s slow-mo signature lid shimmy. Perry is no dancer and not much of a mover; she’s a more mannequin-ish presence, but an energizer mannequin, expressive and ever connecting. Her cabaret rendition of “I Kissed a Girl” has unprocessed flair, and a witty quick-change number sparks an absolute shitfit in the stands. Her solid and unsurprising voice sounds solid and unsurprising, but with any production as slick as this one – where personality is prized over performance – it’s hard to know what you’re getting. Unlike Bieber, Perry had several close encounters with the big time. We learn of her various blighted record deals and studio makeovers (Perry tried everything from gospel to country to angry-girl rock) and get a small sense of her musicianship. Then, in a preposterous sequence, the story of her professional bottom (involving a botched partnership with pop gurus The Matrix) is crosscut with a bondage number in which Katy wails about being held hostage. After that, we are told, Perry decided to just be herself, and the rest is chart and bullet-bra-busting history. And who is that? What can you say about someone whose real self resembles a marzipan anime character? Well, she’s a goofball and a charmer, to start. She’s sweet with fans and an everygirl champ with her crew. She’s in every way devoted to the job of being Katy Perry, and the state of her marriage to comedian Russell Brand soon replaces the “can she hack it?” storyline. Or maybe it’s another stem of the same storyline. “A baby can’t have a baby,” she pronounces after Brand texts her possible names for their kids. “And I’m still a baby.” Background drama builds to a meltdown in Brazil, the show goes dramatically on, and the split is reframed as a feminist conundrum: The baby wants to work. Despite this careful (and successful) depiction of a warm and decent person, Perry the pop star remains stubbornly two-dimensional. She’s a sexless sex symbol, too girlish to be a girl, and her crack about being a cartoon feels critical to her anodyne appeal. Perry might sing about seeing your peacock and cover the front rows in whipped cream shot out of a two-foot canister, but it couldn’t be more congenial or less erotic. Only an extreme fetishist could actually get off on her shtick; for the rest of us, especially her adoring tween army of fans, she’s a human Pez dispenser barking out candy-covered platitudes. Even her much-feted boobs seem friendly. Beckoning from behind them is the strangely modern conception of pop stardom, one that derives its powerful hold on (largely young, female) fans from the promise that if you can’t live the cupcake dream, Katy Perry will gladly live it for you. Follow Michelle Orange on Twitter . Follow Movieline on Twitter .
The first image of the mysterious Elysium has made its way onto the Internet and a smooth skulled Matt Damon sporting a severe weapon and futuristic bric-a-brac are revealed. Director Neill Blomkamp received an Oscar nomination for Best Screenplay for District 9 in 2010, which made over $115 million in the U.S. alone. Not bad for a feature directorial debut and no doubt a pass to move onto bigger and brighter things. The image, which came via The Playlist is reminiscent of District 9 weaponry. Sony said the sci-fi pic will be part of their presentation at Comic-Con. But, is it just me or does this image of Matt Damon make him look eerily similar to a notorious Dutch man currently sitting in a Peruvian prison? Joran van der Sloot looks like he could be a double for Damon in this pic if one just gave him some weapons (or maybe not a good idea), a tan shirt and some robotic attachments… Pardon the digress. Elysium also stars Jodie Foster, Sharlto Copley, William Fichtner, Alice Braga, Diego Luna and Wagner Moura and is slated to open next March. Set in 2159, a wealthy elite live on a man-made space station, while everyone else lives on a ruined Earth. It is one man’s mission (Damon) to bring back equality to the divergent worlds. [Source: Screenrant via The Playlist ]
