I am a big fan Emma Roberts…I think she’s hot, skinny, stylish and a good time… I like that she is crazy or passionate when getting arrested for beating her boyfriend in Montreal… I like that she’s got daddy issues, because there is no way anyone raised by Eric Roberts from A-List to F-List cokehead doesn’t have daddy issues, not that he even raised her but you know what I mean….that she is a survivor from a broken home…a broken rich person home with an Aunt who was Julia Roberts…but a broken home nevertheless…. Plus, she could have easily turned to party girl crackhead instagram whore…instead she got work, even if it was easy to get work, it’s easier to bee a n instagram whore who does nothing all day – when you’ve got ROBERTS as a last name…. So…here she is working out. JOIN THE NEWSLETTER YOU ASSHOLES! The post Emma Roberts Fitness Tits of the Day appeared first on DrunkenStepFather.com .
The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills reunion special aired Tuesday night, and while there was a fair amount of drama on set, the real fireworks were going off on Twitter. You see, Brandi Glanville was clearly watching the show live, and the former RHOBH cast member had a lot to say about the proceedings: As you may recall, Glanville was fired from the show back in 2015, but either her ex-castmates still get under her skin, or she’s angling to get her old job back, because Brandi was throwing some major shade online during Tuesday night’s broadcast. Most of her ire was directed at Camille Grammer, who argued that Brandi was the reason Lisa Vanderpump decided not to attend this year’s reunion : “She’s pissed about Brandi,” Camille said at one point. “[She’s pissed Brandi] showed up on the show, absolutely. She’s her archenemy! She feels so betrayed.” From there, Brandi turned her attention to Denise Richards and accused of her conspiring with Brandi against Lisa: “I’m just assuming — and I could be absolutely wrong — but she felt throughout this season that you’ve had her back, Denise, but you talking to Brandi,” said an outraged Camille. “Brandi’s her archenemy.” While the Glanville-Vanderpump feud is the stuff of legend, Camille is likely overstating her case, as Lisa had lots of reasons to skip the reunion. On the show, Denise argued that she and Brandi “didn’t meet to talk about Vanderpump.” And on Twitter, Brandi positively unloaded on Camille: “I am NOT LVP’s arch enemy!! That is absolute insanity. Trust and believe that is UNTRUE!!!” Glanville tweeted. “I adore [Denise] after meeting her at a dinner party for our mutual agent! [Not to mention] 95% of our conversation was not about LVP at all!” From there, Brandi revealed that she was quick to reach out when Lisa’s brother died last year. Then she continued to go off on Grammer: “Nope [Camille] I don’t buy it!” Brandi continued. “She knows for a fact that I’m a proper f–king person and that I do the RIGHT thing when I’m suppose to. We may not be friends but I’m not LVP’s #1enemy.” When a fan agreed with Brandi’s sentiments, Glanville replied by dismissing Camille as a “wishy-washy c-nt.” And believe it or not, the tirade didn’t end there: “Let me be clear, LVP and I have a past that we will not recover from but I refuse to let [Denise] be called out for provoking anything!” Brandi tweeted. “I was on ONE episode of an entire season where the women had their own separate issues with her. That’s f–king it.” She added: “It’s clear to me that if certain people feel that they are going down they have the need to take everyone down with them. If I had done that the ENTIRE housewives world would be ‘shook.’ “I’m not that person and that’s not how I’m raising my boys. Oh and half of the men in Hollywood.” Sadly, Andy Cohen has yet to respond to Brandi’s tweets with a job offer. Get on it, bro! RHOBH is gonna need all the help it can get post-Vanderpump! View Slideshow: 19 Reasons We Miss (and Love!) Brandi Glanville
Hard to believe, but it’s been two months since Meghan Markle gave birth to baby Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor. (His name is also a bit difficult to fathom, but we’ll leave that conversation for another time.) From the start of their relationship, of course, Meghan and Prince Harry have made it clear that they intend to break with royal tradition in a number of small but significant ways. So it’s no surprise that Meghan has been accused of breaching royal protocol with her etiquette, her attire, her tendency to breathe in and out without muttering “God save the Queen” with each exhalation, etc. And it’s also not shocking that the British media is wagging its collective finger at Harry and Meg for allegedly acting more like a Hollywood couple than a duke and duchess with regard to little Archie. First, they took flak for making Archie’s christening a private affair, with just a few select members of the press on hand. Harry “is acting like an A-lister over Archie’s christening, not a royal,” claims royal biographer Peggy Junor, adding: “I think they have made a big mistake that could backfire on them.” Now, a new non-existent crisis has captured the attention of the tabloid press, as reporters were shocked — shocked! — to learn that Archie had zero interaction with Prince William and Kate Middleton’s kids for the first two months of his life. Yes, this tidbit was revealed to The Daily Mail, when royal correspondent Emily Andrews revealed that Archie met his cousins for the first time at a recent polo match: “It was interesting actually, that polo match, because it was the first time that Charlotte and George had actually met Archie,” Andrews told the Mail. “They hadn’t actually met him for two months, so that polo match was lovely.” But before you go getting your knickers in a twist about Meghan keeping Archie from her in-laws (aka, the narrative that Piers Morgan will probably be flapping his jowls about on Good Morning Britain tomorrow), you should note that it’s only the kids who went that long without seeing Archie: “Yes Kate and Will had been there to see Archie at Frogmore Cottage, but they hadn’t taken their children with them,” Andrews said. “So that was the moment at the polo match where all three of the Cambridge kids got to meet Archie.” So there you have it. The jury’s still out with regard to whether or not Meghan and Harry moved to Frogmore Cottage to get away from Will and Kate, but at least we know they’re not keeping their kid from his royal cousins. So save your weak-ass “think of the children!” takes for next time, Piers! View Slideshow: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Share Never-Before-Seen Wedding Pics on 1-Year Anniversary
According to various sources, Mike Johnson is the front-runner to be ABC’s next Bachelor. And, yes, we know why: He’s very handsome. He’s very down to Earth. He’s kind and humble and we typically trust Demi Lovato’s taste in men . But do viewers want handsome? Do they want down to Earth? Do they want someone who is generous and nice and free from scandal? Or do viewers want controversy? Do they want sexism? Do they want someone who thinks he is holier than pretty much anyone else on the planet? In other words: Do they want Luke Parker? We know, we know; Parker sucks. He proved himself to be a misogynistic narcissist throughout his run on Hannah Brown’s ongoing season of The Bachelorette. But let’s also face it: scandal sells. Controversy sells. Vanilla does not draw ratings. This is why we’ve posed the following question to our staff members: SHOULD LUKE PARKER BE THE NEXT BACHELOR? Before you scoff at the notion, ask yourself whether you’d tune in to see what a season with Parker at the helm would be like. Because that’s the only issue ABC executives are debating right now. Will folks actually watch? We can’t say for certain, but we can say the following about the possibility: Why Not by Tyler Johnson Look, I agree with everyone else that Mike Johnson deserves to be the next Bachelor, and he would probably be the most charismatic selection in the show’s history. And I also agree that Luke Parker is a sociopath, a pathological liar, a manipulator, and a narcissist. He’s frighteningly quick to anger, and some of his behavior toward Hannah this season arguably constituted psychological abuse. But at the same time, I don’t think any figure on either side of the rose stand has ever kept me glued to my screen quite as effectively as Luke P. I’m not proud of it, either — but the show’s grown more than a little stagnant over the course of 15 seasons, and apparently, it needed a dash of evil to liven up the proceedings. Of course, a little goes a long way when you’re talking about Luke, which is probably why God made him 5’4” in lifts. Could Parker really anchor his own season of The Bachelor? More importantly, could the casting department really round up 30 women who are willing to fight for this jackass’ affection? The answer might be in a spinoff: The A-Hole Bachelorette, in which women who have proven themselves to be less than upstanding citizens (perhaps they’ve done time for a violent crime, or they have a Nickelback tattoo they don’t even regret) are offered someone like Luke as a consolation prize. It may sound crazy, but given the recent allegations against series creator Mike Fleiss, truth in advertising laws might force the show to change its title to The A-Hole Bachelorette, anyway. Might as well make it a whole theme and cast Luke. Nope by Simon Delott Obviously, you don’t want every Bachelor to be the same. Mixing it up makes a lot of sense. To wit: Arie was the one that nobody liked. Colton was a virgin himbo. Luke Parker is polarizing, handsome… and fascinating enough that he overstayed his welcome for way too many episodes on Hannah’s season. But he’s also a creep. Bonding with Hannah over their shared faith was great. He later tried to twist that around and control her. Not great. In fact, you have to wonder if any dude who seems to have trouble making friends or getting along with fellow human beings should be considered for leading man. And the Winner is? No Way! Click Here To Vote for NO! Heck yes! Click Here To Vote for YES! Luke Parker may be a sexist pig, but would he make an entertaining Bachelor? Vote now! View Poll » Luke’s behavior resonated in a bad way with a lot of viewers. This is a fact. Scores of women took to social media to reflect upon how his red flags matched up with those of their exes. The Bachelor is supposed to be about finding love, not your fight-or-flight response going off out of worry for the women on screen. ABC has the resources to find another guy who’s topical and has a nice jawline who isn’t going to behave like a Lifetime movie villain. We all enjoy drama and big personalities, but casting Luke as the leading man just seems indecent. No by Hilton Hater I would have been in favor of this idea up until Luke’s very last episode . As my esteemed colleagues above have pointed out, Parker acted like a sexist pig nearly every week — but the truth is that sexist pigs exist in the world. It would actually have been fascinating to see how one reacted to life as The Bachelor. Could we actually have witnessed some kind of transformation while he was surrounded by beautiful, intelligent women? Could this have been an opportunity for Luke to evolve and realize the errors of his awful ways? Could The Bachelor have opened up the eyes of The Bachelor himself and, most importantly, could Luke really have remained celibate until marriage when presented with the keys to the Fantasy Suite? We’ll never know because ABC will never select Luke as The Bachelor. And this is now clearly the right decision. I cringed when Luke cast actual blame and guilt on Hannah for sleeping with two other suitors. I rolled my eyes he said that he saw something in Hannah the moment he noticed her on Colton’s season of this ABC franchise. I wanted to straight up punch him he later wrote that he tried to bring glory to God by appearing as one of her contestants. In this final moments and these new social media messages, Luke went from being an A-Hole who would make for entertaining television… to simply being an abusive crazy person. Placing him front and center on The Bachelor would be unethical and a total slap to the face of women everywhere. It would also be a misguided notion by Chris Harrison and his fellow producers. Luke was tailor made this season to be the side player that fans love to hate. But you know what happens when you try to turn a side player into a star attraction, don’t you? You get the sitcom Joey .
Source: Sarah Morris / Getty Wendy Williams’ post marriage glow up continues. She has confirmed a movie based on her life in the works. Bossip is reporting that the self proclaimed Queen of Media is powering through her separation from her husband as best as possible . During a recent appearance on The Karen Hunter Show , the New Jersey native got a little broken up when asked about possibly mending her broken nuptials with Kelvin Hunter. “Girl, no. Don’t ask,” she exclaimed. “I know what you’re saying, but my family is good, and we’ll always be family.” In an effort to secure the freshest brew of tea Karen asked if she is dropping the Hunter from her government name. The gossip maven had to hold back tears when answering the question. “No, my name is Wendy Hunter. That’s my son’s name and you can’t take away 20 [years]. Don’t make me cry” she explained. It seems she using this tough time as a springboard for a new project though. Rumor has it she is working with Will Packer of Girl’s Trip fame on her biopic. The movie is slotted to air on Lifetime in 2020. You can see a clip from the interview below. . @WendyWilliams gets emotional when asked by @karenhunter about her estranged husband, Kevin Hunter. pic.twitter.com/JZecBMkZOA — SiriusXM (@SIRIUSXM) July 23, 2019 Photo: Sarah Morris/Getty Images
Source: Gilbert Carrasquillo / Getty Meek Mill’s Drug And Gun Conviction Thrown Out By Appeal Court It’s been one helluva day for Meek Mill . Earlier this morning we reported that the Philly rapper inked a joint venture with Jay-Z and Roc Nation for his very own DreamChasers record label. Now, the AP is reporting that the drug and gun conviction that has plagued Meek for over a decade has FINALLY been thrown out! Three judges unanimously agreed that the new evidence in Meek’s case warranted his conviction be tossed a new trial be granted. This is HUGE life-changing news for Meek because it means that if he is found not guilty, he will no longer be under the cynical eye of the probation system and will no longer have to fear going back to prison for something as silly as popping a wheelie on a motor bike. To that end, the court tossed out the “parole violations” handed down by janky judge Genece Brinkley, and in a rare move, removed her from his case entirely. God is good.
