Tag Archives: behaviour

Packers Fan Slams Ex-Boyfriend on Best Sign Ever

Green Bay Packers fans are like no other. The Wisconsin city and its ticket-holders actually own the team, and season tickets are an invaluable commodity there. As you can imagine, that made tickets to the Christmas game with the arch nemesis Bears the hottest (coldest?) ticket in town … and a great vehicle for REVENGE! If her sign is to be believed, this female Packer backer not only dissed one jackass guy in particular, she let a national TV audience know she was smart enough to move on. Wouldn’t it be funny if the guy actually saw this from the couch? “Ho-Ho-Home Field Advantage” isn’t terrible either … Nicely played, Packers fan. Not nicely played, Packers fan’s ex-boyfriend .

Go here to see the original:
Packers Fan Slams Ex-Boyfriend on Best Sign Ever

Sinead O’Connor and Barry Herridge: It’s Already Over!

In sad news today, Sinead O’Connor and Barry Herridge are getting divorced. If it seems like they just got married , it’s because they did. On December 9! It was a great 18-day run for the couple. To put that in perspective, Kim Kardashian ‘s marriage to Kris Humphries lasted four times longer than these two. Why the change of heart, Sinead? The singer explained on her website: “Dear friends, I had for reasons u (sic) will all understand, wished to keep this private but have been told today it is to be leaked in the next few days despite my best efforts … So I must now leak it myself so as the record is straight.” “Within 3 hours of the ceremony being over the marriage was kyboshed by the behaviour of certain people in my husband’s life. And also by a bit of a wild ride I took us on looking for a bit of a smoke of weed for me (sic) wedding night as I don’t drink.” “My husband was enormously wounded and very badly effected (sic) by that experience and also by the attitude of those close to him toward our marriage.” “It became apparent to me that if he were to stay with me he would be losing too much to bear… A woman wants to be a joy to her husband.” “So… U (sic) love someone? Set them free.” Words to live by, people. Words to live by. [Photo: WENN.com]

See the original post here:
Sinead O’Connor and Barry Herridge: It’s Already Over!

Artists Draw Parallels Between the Behaviour of Pigeons and People in Decadent Pigeons (Photos)

Photo credit: Lisa Klappe Throughout history, they have served in the military, sent love letters or have been dished out as dinner. Nowadays, few citizens appreciate them and most call them “rats with wings” while their real name is “Colomba Livia”. Some cities, like Hollywood, put them on birth control and in others they take the metro ! We’re talking about pigeons, an animal with which humans have changed rel… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Read more from the original source:
Artists Draw Parallels Between the Behaviour of Pigeons and People in Decadent Pigeons (Photos)

Study Shows Conflicted Meat-Eaters in Denial That Meat-Animals Suffer

A new study from the University of Kent has provided direct evidence that people who wish to escape the ‘meat paradox’ i.e. simultaneously disliking hurting animals and enjoying eating meat, may do so by denying that the animal they ate had the capacity to suffer. By engaging in denial, those participating in the study also reported a reduced range of animals to which they felt obligated to show moral concern. These ranged from dogs and chimps to snails and fish. The study, the results of which are published in the August issue of Appetite, was conducted by Dr Steve Loughnan, Research Associate at the University’s School of Psychology, and colleagues in Australia. Prior to their study, it was generally assumed that the only solutions to the meat paradox are for people to simply stop eating meat, a decision taken by many vegetarians, or the ongoing failure to recognise that animals are killed to produce meat (although few people live in true ignorance, some meat-eaters may live in a state of tacit denial, failing to equate beef with cow, pork with pig, or even chicken with chicken). Dr Loughnan explained: ‘Some people do choose to stop eating meat when they learn that animals suffer for its production. An overwhelming majority do not. Our research shows that one way people are able to keep eating meat is by dampening their moral consideration of animals when sitting at the dinner table.’ Dr Loughnan also explained that, broadly speaking, their study has shown that when there is a conflict between their preferred way of thinking and their preferred way of acting, it is their thoughts and moral standards that people abandon first – rather than changing their behaviour. ‘Rather than change their beliefs about the animals’ moral rights, people could change their behaviour,’ he said. ‘However, we suspect that most people are unwilling to deny themselves the enjoyment of eating meat, and denying animals moral rights lets them keep eating with a clear conscience’. ‘The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals’ (Stephen Loughnan, University of Kent; Nick Haslam, University of Melbourne; Brock Bastian, University of Queensland) is published in the August issue of Appetite. Dr Loughnan is a member of the University’s Leverhulme Trust-funded Centre for Research on Social Climate. added by: animalia_libero