Tag Archives: miramax

5 Miramax Films the Weinsteins Can Remake To Get Out of Hock

By now you’ve heard the feel good story of the week — hey, it was a slow week — that Harvey and Bob Weinstein are thisclose to buying back their beloved Miramax from Disney for the not-so-cheap price of $600 million. Disney has denied this , but were the sale to go through it would bring up at least one question: How the hell do the Weinstein Brothers — the same Weinstein Brothers who barely had enough money to release Youth in Revolt into theaters — plan to pay back their fellow investors (lead by billionaire financier Ron Burkle), who presumably footed a lot of this bill? One word: Remakes! Here now are the five films from the Miramax library that the Weinsteins should seriously consider revisiting.

See the article here:
5 Miramax Films the Weinsteins Can Remake To Get Out of Hock

Miramax: Deal or No Deal?

Following preemptive reports that the Weinsteins (i.e. their backers, including Ron Burkle) won back their studio, all hell broke loose overnight in the Miramax sweepstakes. In a nutshell, Disney has reportedly denied that a Weinstein sale is imminent; if anything, the Weinsteins are closer to securing an exclusive negotiating window with Disney than they are to striking an actual deal. Come on , competitors David Bergstein and the Gores brothers! Let the Weinsteins have their baby! There’s a perfectly good gently used studio in MGM that could desperately use suitors like you ; go harass them, for heaven’s sake. [ Deadline ]

Read the original here:
Miramax: Deal or No Deal?

BREAKING: Weinsteins Buying Back Miramax?

Happy days are here again! Disney has reportedly chosen Harvey and Bob Weinstein’s $600 million bid to reclaim Miramax Films, the label they started 31 years ago before breaking away in a rift with… Disney, which acquired the minimajor in 1993. It’s like a giant schadenfreude sandwich on rye, but don’t worry about it. All you need to know is that if the word on the street is in fact accurate, and if the Weinsteins are restored to their place atop the Miramax food chain, and if Harvey’s power and bluster return stronger than ever, and if the Miramax name crests like a phoenix from its ashen repose on some disused back lot in Burbank, then maybe — just maybe — Hoodwinked 2 might eventually be released . Developing… [ THR ]

Go here to read the rest:
BREAKING: Weinsteins Buying Back Miramax?

Quentin Tarantino Sued Over ‘Kill Bill’

Filed under: Celebrity Justice Quentin Tarantino — fresh from his Oscar loss — is now being sued by a man who claims Q.T. ripped-off his concept to create “Kill Bill.” In a lawsuit filed today, Dannez Hunter claims in 1999 he submitted a treatment to Miramax, about a fictional … Permalink

See the original post:
Quentin Tarantino Sued Over ‘Kill Bill’

Miramax Shuts Its Doors

Link: http://gawker.com/5458719/ The modern-day indie studio officially closed today.

Link:
Miramax Shuts Its Doors

Media Still Talking About Partying in 1999

(Edit, to draft, un-top, Slurp)

Copy this whole post to another site

cancel
sending request

Recently Tina Brown eulogized party-planner Robert Isabell, fondly recalling her decadent Talk launch party he organized in 1999, a party she modestly labeled, “the last social celebration of the pre-9/11 celebrity decade.” Now David Carr‘s offering a sad remembrance.

The party, or “The Party” as it has come to be known by some, remains famous for it’s over-the-top flamboyance, and since Talk was partially funded by Miramax money, Harvey and Bob Weinstein served as co-hosts for the event, leading the New York Observer to headline their coverage of the night’s festivities, “Weinstein Brothers Revel in Vulgarity, Glory of Manhattan.”

In her Daily Beast post eulogizing Isabell dated July 12th, Tina Brown reminisced about the illuminated-by-Japanese-lanterns soiree on the electricity-less Liberty Island to bring in the now-defunct magazine. She spoke wistfully about the plethora of stars she shipped in on an ark to genuflect at her altar, The Statue of Liberty, for the evening. Here’s the money quote:

Guests, who included Madonna, George Plimpton, Demi Moore, Tom Brokaw, Kate Moss, Christopher Buckley, Helen Mirren, and Jerry Seinfeld, disgorged one after another from the Liberty Island ferry that Buckley immediately re-christened the “Star Barge.” Like an A-list Noah’s Ark, it motored slowly toward the tiny island where the Talk staff waited to greet the 800 guests in a warm August dusk.

Brown’s piece must have triggered the memory of the New York Times‘ David Carr, as he dedicates his Monday “Media Equation” column to the Talk launch party, only his take on the event isn’t so much a fond remembrance as it is a look back at what he now views as an event marking of the beginning of the end of an era of excess. Noting that the ten years that have passed since “The Party” have seen the death of many established titles as well as a dramatic drop in ad pages, Carr, who says he’s “still ashamed to admit that I wasn’t one of the lucky 1,000 people invited to the party,” writes:

Too bad nobody saw the sharks circling in the harbor. Rather than the culmination of a century of press power, the Talk party was the end of an era, a literal fin de siècle. Flush with cash from the go-go ’90s and engorged by spending from the dot-com era, mainstream media companies seemed poised on the brink of something extraordinary. But that brink ended up being a cliff. partied

Ten years ago, journalists, long the salarymen of the publishing economy, began gorging on big contracts and options from digital start-ups like shrimp at a free buffet. With coveted writers commanding $5 for every typed word into magazines that were stuffed to the brim with advertising, there was a fizziness, some would say recklessness, in the air. The industry was drunk on its own prerogatives, working a party that seemed as if it would never end.

Carr goes on to note that Tina Brown’s Daily Beast launch party in 2008 was held at Pop Burger in the Meatpacking District, where assembled guests munched on miniature burgers and hot dogs until about 8:15 or so, when the food sadly ran out. Indeed, that’s quite a remarkable contrast. But hey, there was an open bar, so it couldn’t have been that bad, right?

Finally, all of this brings to mind the words of a certain eccentric American prophet who, speaking about partying in the year 1999, once said, “Life is just a party and parties weren’t meant to last.” And really, all things considered, is that such a terrible thing?

Read more:
Media Still Talking About Partying in 1999