Tag Archives: print is dead

The Dark Side of Steve Jobs [Media Wars]

Steve Jobs seduced New York’s media moguls all too easily, convincing them his iPad would magically keep them in business — and in chauffeured limos. But nothing easy comes free, and the publishers’ digital debt is now due. More

Will Condé Nast Feed the iPad At the Expense of the Web? [Apple]

The iPad looks futuristic, but in some ways it keeps old media rooted the past. Condé Nast, for example, will offer some magazine content on the Apple tablet before its release on the open Web. We hear the luxe magazine group plans to release articles first on the iPad, at titles with an iPad edition, and then at least several days later on the Web. While Condé Nast magazines already delay the publication of some articles on the Web, and withhold others altogether, the iPad could exacerbate the situation by adding an additional tier of access and putting the Web further downstream, or, most ominously for Web readers, leading Condé Nast to an “iPad first” policy. Wired editor Chris Anderson told us his Condé title is trying to experiment in a nuanced manner: We’ve always sequenced magazine content so that it comes out at different times in print and on the web, with web delays that have typically ranged from days to weeks. I can’t speak for the rest of CN or any other title, but at Wired we intend to do the same thing with tablets. I can’t yet say what the range of delays will be for various parts of the magazine, but we’ll experiment with different options, ranging from short delays to long ones. The iPad Wired is the most interactive tablet edition within Condé Nast and, last we heard, isn’t expected to launch until ” midsummer .” A simpler iPad port of GQ had been submitted to Apple, and iPad editions of Vanity Fair , Glamour and the New Yorker are also planned. None are expected to be as ambitious as Wired , and will thus be more dependent on exclusive content for promotion. We’re still waiting for an official response from Condé on whether just some content, or all, will be released on iPad before the Web — we were led to believe the latter is the case — and whether the practice is planned for one issue or as a regular thing. But any Web delay is unfortunate, because iPad content should be compelling enough on its own to draw readers, without the need for artificial scarcity. After all, this is supposed to be a technologically wondrous device, almost magical for users. We’d download Wired’s app, for example, on the strength of the sexy demo alone . And Condé should be trying to make its websites more lively and timely, not less so; even with the iPad, the magazine group will need to greatly improve its Web business as lucrative print operations deteriorate. Condé Nast’s web operations have suffered enough abuse without being further bled at the altar of the iPad.

Original post:
Will Condé Nast Feed the iPad At the Expense of the Web? [Apple]

Turf War at the New York Times: Who Will Control the iPad?

There’s a heated turf war going on inside the New York Times over the iPad, pitting print die-hards against people focused on the Times ‘ digital future. The outcome will determine pricing for some marquee content on Apple’s tablet. The internal fight might also determine how relevant — and profitable — the nation’s most prominent newspaper can remain in the digital future. Which is probably why there’s reportedly so much sniping over who gets to control the iPad edition internally. On one side, a Times source explains, you have print circulation, which thinks it should control the iPad since it’s just another way to distribute the paper. They’d like to charge $20 to $30 per month for the Times ‘ forthcoming iPad app, basically the product already demonstrated on stage with Steve Jobs , the source said. Why so much? Because they’re said to be afraid people will cancel the print paper if they can get the same thing on their iPad. Nevermind that iPad distribution comes with none of the paper or delivery costs associated with print, or that there’s already a free electronic edition available to subscribers who cancel. On the other side, you have the Times ‘ digital operation, which is pushing to charge $10 per month for the iPad edition and is said to be up in arms over print circulation’s pricing. The digital side will provide interactive content for the iPad no matter what happens, but does not want print circulation to have control of pricing, marketing and other facets of the product. It’s something of an uphill battle since print circ has had control of other e-editions, for example for the Kindle, which are also seen on the digital side as overpriced. The dispute has apparently escalated all the way to the top of the Times Building, and top executives — presumably the same ones who secretly dined with Apple CEO Steve Jobs — are now debating which way to go. Among those supporting the $20-30 per month print circulation side is, we’re told, New York Times Media Group president Scott Heekin-Canedy . Even by the standards of the old-fashioned Times , it would be shockingly retrograde to charge such a huge sum for internet content to protect the fading print edition. It would also be self defeating, exploding the paper’s best chance yet to charge readers for its digital product. (Even at $10 per month, the iPad Times will have to compete with the free-through-2011 Web edition.) But it’s almost as shocking that the Times Company is having a discussion over this question at all. Really? You’re going to ruin this little gift from Steve Jobs? You’re still not sure if you’re ready to commit to this internet thing? Sigh. If you know more about this debate, or similar debates at other publishers, we’d love to hear from you .

See more here:
Turf War at the New York Times: Who Will Control the iPad?

Print Media’s Big Tablet Letdown

No doubt, Steve Jobs showed off a compelling tablet computer today, one that should excite people who make videogames, TV shows — even books. But today’s Apple iPad debut was a big letdown for magazine and newspaper people. Look, expectations were fairly insane

Read more:
Print Media’s Big Tablet Letdown

Arianna Huffington’s Journalism Charity Helps Nobody but Herself

When the Huffington Post Investigative Fund was announced last March, Arianna Huffington modestly described its mission as ” to save investigative journalism .” Ten months later, it’s safe to say the fund’s chief accomplishment is providing free scoops to the Huffington Post. (And burnishing Huffington’s reputation and monstrous ego, but that goes without saying.) The fund is supposed act as a sort of disembodied newspaper i-team, with experienced reporters and editors bankrolled by tax-exempt donations from the Atlantic Philanthropies and the Schumann Center for Media and Democracy doing the time-consuming and expensive investigative work that strapped newspapers are increasingly abandoning. It is axiomatic that investigative reporting is the most precious casualty of the demise of print journalism, and the fund has been heralded as one of many “new models” of funding real journalism in an increasingly blog-eat-blog world

See more here:
Arianna Huffington’s Journalism Charity Helps Nobody but Herself

Update: Men’s Health Stopped Writing New Cover Lines Years Ago

Yesterday, Men’s Health editor David Zincenko got caught cutting and pasting old cover lines onto the new issue of his magazine . Today, he explained that it was a deliberate “overall branding strategy.” Boy, was he right. It goes far beyond the similarities between the December 2007 and December 2009 covers that was discovered yesterday

The rest is here:
Update: Men’s Health Stopped Writing New Cover Lines Years Ago

Get Your White House Pool Reports Right Here

The White House Correspondents’ Association has started letting lowly blogs participate in the White House pool, and now the real journalists are all upset about it. As we mentioned earlier this week , the WHCA has invited Salon, Politico the Huffington Post and Talking Points Memo into the White House pool rotation—the system whereby the White House press corps joins together and appoints one outlet to follow the president during his waking hours and file reports that everyone can use

More:
Get Your White House Pool Reports Right Here

Canadian Editors: Freaking the F—k Out, Just Like Their American Counterparts

Funny Canadians. Our editors get into knockdown-dragout brawls where they kick the shit out of each other just for bad writing.

Visit link:
Canadian Editors: Freaking the F—k Out, Just Like Their American Counterparts

Layoffs at Forbes?

A source close to Forbes tells us another layoff round is imminent, the third this year. Ouch.

More:
Layoffs at Forbes?

Everything Annoying in the Universe in One iPhone App

Dave Eggers , lord of twee literature, has declared he will personally save print media . But not until the author and McSweeney’s publisher starts selling this lamentable little iPhone app. What is catastrophic about this app?

Read more:
Everything Annoying in the Universe in One iPhone App