Tag Archives: viewer

Margaret, Melancholia and More: Alison’s Top 10 Movies of 2011

I found 2011 to be a great, overstuffed year in film, though the sweeping trend of nostalgia that peaked during this awards season left me a little cold. Hugo , War Horse , The Artist , The Adventures of Tintin , The Help , even the self-aware looking back of Midnight in Paris — when it’s been such a turbulent 12 months beyond the movies, the comfort of evoking the past, especially the cinephilic past, is understandable, particularly with attendance down once again. But the features I really loved tended to be more prickly, vital affairs, about tragedy and life messily, stubbornly going on in its aftermath — ones that reminded us that film can not only be a great escape, but can also engage and reflect the outside world. 10. Shame Steve McQueen’s sophomore effort took flack from some who found it moralizing in its portrayal of sex addiction, but it’s not a film about a condition, it’s a film about damage. Michael Fassbender plays a man who’s left a traumatic childhood behind and has shored himself up in the city that never sleeps with an immaculate condo and a high-powered job that almost hide his underlying desperation and his inability to connect or open up to anyone on anything other than a physical level. It’s one of the loneliest portraits of urban living I’ve ever seen. 9. Warrior The neglected blockbuster of our Occupy Wall Street era, Warrior drapes Rocky trappings over characters and settings more immediate than you’d ever expect at a multiplex. Its two brothers, in what should have been star-making turns from Tom Hardy and Joel Edgerton, head to the cage after taking beatings elsewhere — one’s left the Marines on less than ideal terms after the death of colleague, the other’s upside down on his mortgage and unable to support his family on a teacher’s salary. Add to that the fact that the tournament in which they both compete was started by a former Wall Street type putting up the money to see “who the toughest man on the planet is,” and you have a rousing, violent fight film with a seriously bittersweet edge. 8. The Arbor Andrea Dunbar grew up in run-down Bradford council estates, drank heavily, had three kids by different fathers, wrote a trio of acclaimed plays about the life she knew and died at age 29. Clio Barnard’s documentary about the playwright brilliantly stages its interviews as their own performance, lip-synched by actors in the settings in which Dunbar and her children grew up and lived, and offering a piercing glimpse of how tragedy is taken up — her second work Rita, Sue and Bob Too was made into a film directed by Alan Clarke — and passed down, to her heroin-addicted eldest Lorraine. 7. Certified Copy It’s never clear which part of Juliette Binoche’s antiques dealer and William Shimell’s writer’s relationship is the pretense — are they strangers who play at being married, or a married couple playing at meeting as strangers? The thesis of Shimell’s book may or may not line up with that of Abbas Kiarostami’s film — the relationship between art and reproduction, original and copy — but the figuring out, and the slippery nature of the connection the pair on screen, is delicious. 6. The Tree of Life It’s a film about a family that stretches from the beginning of the universe to a possible vision of the afterlife — if it may not be wholly lovable, its ambition alone should earn respect. But it’s the evocative immersion on childhood that lingered with me after Terrence Malick’s more grandiose imagery had faded, the tactile sense of that Texas street, the house, the endless possibility, uncertainty and wonder of being young and new to the world, the flashes of memory — the offering of a drink to a prisoner, the caress of a baby’s foot, the goading of a younger sibling to touch a light socket — that break up the more iconic moments with startling specificity. 5. Margaret Messy, vivid and wonderful, Kenneth Lonergan’s difficult production has become a critics’ cause, in part because of how tough it’s been to actually see. It’s worth the trouble, and in some ways better because of the long wait in reaching the few theaters it did — it now looks less like a movie about post-9/11 New York and more one about the city in all of its anonymous, chaotic glory, about a teenage girl’s first horrific brush with mortality and about the strange places that life leads us. 4. Take Shelter Few films have attempted to capture our age of anxiety like Jeff Nichols’s drama, about catastrophic dreams that may be caused by mental illness, but seem just as much to spring from the sense of uncertainty with which we’ve all been infected. Anchored by a stunning performance from Michael Shannon, Take Shelter presents a look at quiet breakdown spurred on by a desire to protect one’s loved ones, and pairs it with frightening scenes of monstrous storms and shadowy attackers that rival any of this year’s horror movies. 3. Into the Abyss Trust Werner Herzog to find stories so strange and moving in a terrible small-town triple murder over an automobile. The Texas of this film is recognizable, but it’s also near-mythic — a place of universally broken families, sudden violence, prison reunions and hard-earned redemption. Taken alone, the interviews with Melyssa Burkett or Jared Tolbert would be enough to make the film. As part of a kaleidoscope of suffering and hope, they’re highlights in something dark, funny and expressly moving about the persistence of human nature in the face of loss. 2. A Separation A marriage falls apart over the decision of whether or not to leave Iran in Asghar Farhadi’s magnificent drama, and encompasses in its disintegration a snapshot of the fractured nation that’s so nuanced, empathetic and complex it quickens the heart. Certainly the smartest film of the year, both as a self-contained work and in the respect it offers the audience, A Separation is unadorned by a score or flashy camera tricks — it doesn’t need them. 1. Melancholia The opposite of love isn’t hate, it’s indifference, and in Lars von Trier’s film it’s the awesome force of Kirsten Dunst’s depression-fueled disinterest that exudes a gravitational drag on everyone around here even before the arrival of the destructive planet of the title. Before the breathtaking apocalyptic imagery appears — the object looming closer in the sky, the static sparking from fingertips — Melancholia is already a devastating look at an illness that leaves you unable to connect to what life has to offer, even on an extravagant wedding day that seems to compress half a lifetime into a night. But it’s that the film turns to offer a sympathetic eye to Charlotte Gainsbourg’s anxious sibling in the second half that makes it great, and that gives it a soul. As she struggles to hold everything together in the face of approaching disaster, even Dunst’s depressive is moved to offer her a conciliatory gesture as the world ends. Follow Alison Willmore on Twitter . Follow Movieline on Twitter .

Original post:
Margaret, Melancholia and More: Alison’s Top 10 Movies of 2011

The Ides of March, The Artist and Other Moviegoing Let-Downs of 2011

The key to a list of moviegoing disappointments is the element of expectation: I am prepared to say I watched more suicidally bad films in 2011 than in any other year in my life; to be merely disappointed suggests a certain relativity. For example, I found The Ides of March to be a tremendous let down, I think partly because my hopes were inflated. George Clooney’s high political tragedy is perfectly cast, and that early, loaded exchange of glances between rival campaign managers Phillip Seymour Hoffman and Paul Giamatti goes off like a starter pistol. But The Ides of March is like that — it keeps threatening to start something interesting, right up to the point that it just… ends. I had the same issue with Good Night and Good Luck , another major disappointment and another film that played as if it were perpetually about to begin . The pleasures of Ryan Gosling’s performance as the fledgling spinmeister feel stingy — why tell us that he’s known to rock the microphone when we paid for the show? And Clooney’s Teflon governor is an empty, well-cut overcoat — perhaps the most glaring evidence of both the character and the director’s failure is that his one big scene with his golden boy star is the least exciting one in the movie. Given the improbable, stadium-rolling wave of appreciation that greeted The Artist , I expected much more than the mannered silent that Michel Hazanavicius and co. delivered. A mediocre movie with a couple of bright moments, The Artist also had too little to say about its chosen themes. Given the challenge of holding our attention across a silent film landscape, the music felt either too sparse or too sentimentally obvious, and the droopy patches felt twice as long as they needed to. The story of a silent film star left behind by the transition to sound was unconvincing when it needed to be clear and dolorous when it might have been lyrical. Similarly cranky friends have fixated on the issue of George Valentin’s (Jean Dujardin) refusal to speak on film—was it the accent? A principled stance? The fact that they were at all unsure points out a massive gap in the center of The Artist , one its title sews up too neatly. Any close follower of Werner Herzog’s career should know better than to bring expectations brewed from his last film into the next. Along with an auteurist consistency of preoccupations, Herzog shares with Woody Allen a prodigious output of wildly variable quality. The titles of this year’s Herzogian harvest — the sublime Cave of Forgotten Dreams and the slapdash Into the Abyss — seem interchangeable, but the latter felt to me like Achilles Herzog, a hot check of a documentary passed off as the real thing. Researched and assembled under extreme time constraints, Into the Abyss is an inquiry into the death penalty that gets by on artful narrative juxtapositions and moments of profound, almost invasive intimacy with its interview subjects. The reach for effect often feels more craven than considered, and the crime at the heart of the film is eventually clouded over for convenience. When a topic and a director — and a title! — of this magnitude collide, the viewer wants the Earth to shimmy; instead we had to settle for the Richter equivalent of a quick freehand sketch. I’ve watched Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy twice now and I still couldn’t give you a basic plot summary. Having felt like a failure after the first viewing, after the second I’m prepared to push the better part of the blame onto director Tomas Alfredson and his Let the Right One In editor Dino Jonsäter. It’s a film that seems designed for le Carré obsessives, which means the rest of us may have to sit through all 57 hours of the 1979 BBC production just to get the facts straight. It’s a shame, because the performances and the production design knocked me out, but of all the ways to sex up a retro-procedural, I’d put mincing it into incomprehensibility second to casting Young Jeezy as George Smiley. With The Iron Lady Meryl Streep re-stamps her all-access passport to human history, and proves once again that the only thing she can’t seem to defy are superlative clichés. There are no words left to describe the kind of work Streep does — even those who dismiss her as a mere impressionist have to admit that her Margaret Thatcher is uncanny in its near-total self-effacement. But the film built around that performance is in some sense designed to disappoint: The biopic is an inefficient delivery system for dramatic tension or even, paradoxically, the human arc of a lifetime. It’s the movie equivalent of a greatest hits package, and while I’m not crazy about the appropriation of the still-living Thatcher’s dementia as a dramatic device, for me the more broadly director Phyllida Lloyd played her hand — ruining every successful visual cue by repeating it three times, leaping from one familiar milestone to the next — the farther we move away from the potential of Streep’s performance and the uneven richness of Thatcher’s story, into the straight flush of political iconography. Follow Michelle Orange on Twitter . Follow Movieline on Twitter .

Visit link:
The Ides of March, The Artist and Other Moviegoing Let-Downs of 2011

The Ides of March, The Artist and Other Moviegoing Let-Downs of 2011

The key to a list of moviegoing disappointments is the element of expectation: I am prepared to say I watched more suicidally bad films in 2011 than in any other year in my life; to be merely disappointed suggests a certain relativity. For example, I found The Ides of March to be a tremendous let down, I think partly because my hopes were inflated. George Clooney’s high political tragedy is perfectly cast, and that early, loaded exchange of glances between rival campaign managers Phillip Seymour Hoffman and Paul Giamatti goes off like a starter pistol. But The Ides of March is like that — it keeps threatening to start something interesting, right up to the point that it just… ends. I had the same issue with Good Night and Good Luck , another major disappointment and another film that played as if it were perpetually about to begin . The pleasures of Ryan Gosling’s performance as the fledgling spinmeister feel stingy — why tell us that he’s known to rock the microphone when we paid for the show? And Clooney’s Teflon governor is an empty, well-cut overcoat — perhaps the most glaring evidence of both the character and the director’s failure is that his one big scene with his golden boy star is the least exciting one in the movie. Given the improbable, stadium-rolling wave of appreciation that greeted The Artist , I expected much more than the mannered silent that Michel Hazanavicius and co. delivered. A mediocre movie with a couple of bright moments, The Artist also had too little to say about its chosen themes. Given the challenge of holding our attention across a silent film landscape, the music felt either too sparse or too sentimentally obvious, and the droopy patches felt twice as long as they needed to. The story of a silent film star left behind by the transition to sound was unconvincing when it needed to be clear and dolorous when it might have been lyrical. Similarly cranky friends have fixated on the issue of George Valentin’s (Jean Dujardin) refusal to speak on film—was it the accent? A principled stance? The fact that they were at all unsure points out a massive gap in the center of The Artist , one its title sews up too neatly. Any close follower of Werner Herzog’s career should know better than to bring expectations brewed from his last film into the next. Along with an auteurist consistency of preoccupations, Herzog shares with Woody Allen a prodigious output of wildly variable quality. The titles of this year’s Herzogian harvest — the sublime Cave of Forgotten Dreams and the slapdash Into the Abyss — seem interchangeable, but the latter felt to me like Achilles Herzog, a hot check of a documentary passed off as the real thing. Researched and assembled under extreme time constraints, Into the Abyss is an inquiry into the death penalty that gets by on artful narrative juxtapositions and moments of profound, almost invasive intimacy with its interview subjects. The reach for effect often feels more craven than considered, and the crime at the heart of the film is eventually clouded over for convenience. When a topic and a director — and a title! — of this magnitude collide, the viewer wants the Earth to shimmy; instead we had to settle for the Richter equivalent of a quick freehand sketch. I’ve watched Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy twice now and I still couldn’t give you a basic plot summary. Having felt like a failure after the first viewing, after the second I’m prepared to push the better part of the blame onto director Tomas Alfredson and his Let the Right One In editor Dino Jonsäter. It’s a film that seems designed for le Carré obsessives, which means the rest of us may have to sit through all 57 hours of the 1979 BBC production just to get the facts straight. It’s a shame, because the performances and the production design knocked me out, but of all the ways to sex up a retro-procedural, I’d put mincing it into incomprehensibility second to casting Young Jeezy as George Smiley. With The Iron Lady Meryl Streep re-stamps her all-access passport to human history, and proves once again that the only thing she can’t seem to defy are superlative clichés. There are no words left to describe the kind of work Streep does — even those who dismiss her as a mere impressionist have to admit that her Margaret Thatcher is uncanny in its near-total self-effacement. But the film built around that performance is in some sense designed to disappoint: The biopic is an inefficient delivery system for dramatic tension or even, paradoxically, the human arc of a lifetime. It’s the movie equivalent of a greatest hits package, and while I’m not crazy about the appropriation of the still-living Thatcher’s dementia as a dramatic device, for me the more broadly director Phyllida Lloyd played her hand — ruining every successful visual cue by repeating it three times, leaping from one familiar milestone to the next — the farther we move away from the potential of Streep’s performance and the uneven richness of Thatcher’s story, into the straight flush of political iconography. Follow Michelle Orange on Twitter . Follow Movieline on Twitter .

Continued here:
The Ides of March, The Artist and Other Moviegoing Let-Downs of 2011

Cindy Crawford Does the Beach of the Day

The good thing about Google is that when you see pictures of Cindy Crawford in a 3 piece bikini you’d expect her to be in, you know one of those middle aged fat chick bikinis that is built like a fucking bed sheet when the paparazzi is looking as to not humiliate herself because she isn’t the model she once was, you, the viewer can use it to find the pictures of her half naked making millions for her amazing body…I’ve seen her in person and even pushing 50, she’s spectacular…but her bikini pictures are a fucking serious fail….these could have been way more mom pussy on all fours with a sloppy belly hanging over her bottoms if only she knew what the public and the girls from her high school who hate her want…

Read more from the original source:
Cindy Crawford Does the Beach of the Day

Courtney Trouble: The Mr. Skin Skinterview [PICS]

Courtney Trouble has a lot to celebrate these days. This fearless fox pretty much invented the genre of “queer porn” when she launched No Fauxxx in 2002, and now she’s being nominated for a 2012 AVN award for Best Alternative Website . Courtney’s expansive vision of pants-tightening hotness skincludes everything from girly pics of rocker chicks to an entire Kinsey scale of gay, straight and transgendered performers having free, uninhibited sex. Courtney is a performer as well as a director, and on No Fauxxx and her new site Queerporn.tv she doesn’t require her stars to perform specific scenarios or sex acts, just do what they feel, resulting in a more spontaneous and “real” experience for the viewer. Since 2002 Courtney has also directed 12 XXX DVDs, the success of which led to establishing her own smut empire, Troublefilms, just a few short weeks ago. Her newest DVD [ Available now at Courtney’s store ] is Live Sex Show , a voyeur’s wet dream of exhibitionist lesbian sex featuring Nina Hartley , April Flores , Jolene Parton , Kimberlee Cline and even Courtney herself in a 5-on-1 gangbang filmed in front of a LIVE AUDIENCE in San Francisco! Tomorrow night at 7:30 pm Courtney and friends are bringing the Live Sex Show (s)experience to the Center for Sex and Culture in San Francisco , where they’ll premiere the film on the big screen, sign autographs, answer questions, and “watch you watch them”. Kinky! We were lucky enough to sit down with this up-and-coming titan of titillation, who chatted with us about Deep Throat , Angelina Jolie , and how The Smurfs turned her on to gang bangs. More after the jump!

More:
Courtney Trouble: The Mr. Skin Skinterview [PICS]

‘X Factor’ Lawsuit Latest Battle In Simon Vs. Simon

Simons Cowell and Fuller have been in the legal trenches for years over ‘Idol’ and ‘Factor.’ By Gil Kaufman Simon Fuller of “American Idol” and Simon Cowell of “X Factor” Photo: Slaven Vlasic and Dimitrios Kambouris/ Getty Image In one of life’s bizarre coincidences, the two men most instantly associated with the global phenomenon that is “American Idol” are both named Simon. Unfortunately, that’s where their similarities end, as, once again, “Idol” creator Simon Fuller and breakout star Simon Cowell find themselves locked into a legal battle for control, credit and what is likely a massive pile of cash. “It’s this horrible fate for both of them that they’re both incredibly ambitious people who very much like to and need to be the powers of their world, but their fate has been inextricably bound since they rose together on the strength of what was Simon Fuller’s creation, ‘American Idol,’ ” Richard Rushfield, author of “American Idol: The Untold Story,” told MTV News. And though Fuller was the brains behind launching “Idol” in England in 2001 (where it was called “Pop Idol”), the show quickly rose to immense popularity, thanks to the breakout stardom of then-little-known music executive Simon Cowell. “This fight has gone through several permutations, but because both have had a hand in the creation of [‘Idol’], they have been locked in this combat over it.” That latest twist comes courtesy of a recent lawsuit Fuller filed in Los Angeles Superior Court in which he claimed that he had negotiated an executive-producer fee and producer credit on “X Factor” as part of a settlement in the 2004 copyright-infringement suit against Cowell when “X Factor” launched in the U.K. Eager to have his own talent show, Cowell launched “X Factor” in the U.K. through his own production company, Syco, putting a twist on the singing-competition genre by adding a rotating cast of celebrity mentors. Cowell saw it as an eventual successor to “Pop Idol,” which went on indefinite hiatus after its second season because of Cowell’s eagerness to launch “Factor.” Fuller filed suit against Cowell, Syco and the producer of both shows, FremantleMedia, and a lengthy trial was avoided after the two sides came to an out-of-court settlement in 2005 that granted Fuller a “minority interest” in the show and kept Cowell on “American Idol” for five more years, as well as giving him a bigger stake in “Idol.” The deal also required Cowell to not launch “Factor” in the U.S. until 2011, at which point Fuller agreed to pull “Pop Idol” off the air in England. According to The Hollywood Reporter, Fuller is now claiming that Fox and producer Fremantle North America — which produces both “Idol” and “Factor” — are refusing to honor that deal as they plan to unleash the heavily hyped “Factor” on American audiences in September. “Fox and Fremantle made hundreds of millions of dollars thanks to the creative efforts of Fuller,” the suit claims. “Now, when it is time to finally perform on these unequivocal promises, Fox and Fremantle refuse to provide Fuller his executive producer credit for Defendants’ new television show, ‘The X Factor,’ and refuse to pay Fuller an executive producer fee ‘commensurate with his duties and stature in the entertainment industry.’ Defendants refusal to honor their promises made to Fuller is particularly malicious given that but for Fuller’s agreement, the ‘X Factor’ show would not be able to broadcast in the United States at all.” The timing of the suit is curious, according to Shirley Halperin, music editor at The Reporter and founder of its Idol Worship blog . “I think that promo Cowell made where he was making fun of ‘Idol’ really stung and it propelled this action,” she speculated. “It was obnoxious and it made Fox compulsory, since it had to approve the ad. The lawsuit came seven days after that.” She also noted that the suit does not name Cowell as a defendant, but does take aim at Fox and Fremantle. “They came up together and have had this symbiotic relationship for a long time, but over the years, their interests have diverged,” she said, with Fuller taking on more management and TV production duties, while Cowell has mostly stayed the course as a TV presenter with the occasional foray into TV producer. “That’s divided them over time.” But, curiously, Halperin said when she was compiling her book on the show, “American Idol: Celebrating 10 Years,” she looked at the photo archive of every image taken of the two over the years, and even as recently as 2009, the pair looked “incredibly” friendly, even chummy, in the photos. “The relationship is a lot more complex than we know, and it’s easy to say it’s a love/hate thing, but I think there’s a deep friendship and mutual respect, but at the same time they are very competitive and have become adversaries at times.” Rushfield said the battle comes down to “two tremendous personalities” who are used to controlling things at a very high level. ” ‘Idol’ is probably the most valuable entertainment franchise in the world now that ‘Harry Potter’ is gone,” he said. “The stakes are in the billions of dollars … and [based on] a relationship that came together very quickly and that they’re locked into. If they could do it over, I’m sure they would all give themselves a bigger piece.” Fox and Fremantle responded to the suit with a comment to The Reporter, in which they said, “Mr. Fuller has not been hired, nor performed any duties, on the U.S. version of ‘The X Factor.’ His suit seeks payment and credit as an executive producer despite his neither having been approved by the required parties, nor hired, as such. We believe this lawsuit is without merit, and we expect to prevail.” Fuller’s attorneys threw water on that claim, saying Fox was “contractually obligated” to approve Fuller as an executive producer on the show and that it has breached that obligation. “They both want the honor and the credit,” Halperin said. “Fuller has always had the credit and no one is taking that away, but Cowell wants more than just to be the guy that judges. He wants people to look at him as a real force.” Get your “Idol” fix on MTV News’ “American Idol” page , where you’ll find all the latest news, interviews and opinions.

Here is the original post:
‘X Factor’ Lawsuit Latest Battle In Simon Vs. Simon

‘Amazing Spider-Man’ Trailer: What We Know So Far

From Peter Parker’s ‘daddy issues’ to his new leading lady, Spidey clip hints at what’s to come in 2012. By Josh Wigler Andrew Garfield in “The Amazing Spider-Man” Photo: Columbia Pictures This weekend’s “Captain America: The First Avenger” continues the charge of superhero supremacy at the box office this summer, and the grand tradition of Marvel heroes is sure to continue a year from now when “The Amazing Spider-Man” swings into action. The first “Spider-Man” trailer hit the Web earlier this week (through both official and leaked channels), gifting comic book fans with the great power and great responsibility of delivering their snap judgments on Sony’s developing reboot — well ahead of its summer 2012 release. Of course, we’re not immune to having our own reactions here at MTV News. To that end, we took a closer look at the new Spidey trailer and found quite a bit to pick apart. Even The Best Web-Heads Have Daddy Issues Most “Spider-Man” fans are familiar with Peter’s relationship with Uncle Ben and Aunt May Parker, but the newest film’s first trailer puts a heavy emphasis on our hero’s birth parents. Although this territory has been covered before in the comics, it’s a story far less frequently told than Peter’s struggles with Uncle Ben’s death. But director Marc Webb has said before that “Amazing Spider-Man” will deal heavily with Peter’s daddy issues, and judging by the trailer, he wasn’t kidding. The Dark Spider If there’s one thing to take away from the “Spider-Man” trailer, it’s that this isn’t Sam Raimi and Tobey Maguire’s web-slinger. In the hands of Webb and leading man Andrew Garfield, we’re seeing a Spider-Man story that takes itself much more seriously than the whimsical nature of the Raimi and Maguire era. Whether you approve of the tonal change will vary based on personal taste, but there’s certainly no arguing that this “Spider-Man” movie feels different than the last three, if nothing else. When Andrew Met Emma Another big change from the “Spider-Man” films of yesteryear is the removal of longtime love interest Mary-Jane Watson in favor of Gwen Stacy, played here by Emma Stone. Much of the trailer’s focus is on the budding relationship between Andrew and Emma’s characters, and already it feels as though they share more common ground with each other than Peter and MJ enjoyed in the first film’s opening chapters. Back To Start One thing that isn’t different from the previous Spider-flicks is that “Amazing” appears to be an origin story, just like the first Raimi-directed picture. It’s a curious choice: The original “Spider-Man” movie swung into theaters in 2002, and only 10 years later we’re seeing yet another re-telling of how Peter Parker got his radioactive spider-powers. There’s already debate about whether another origin story was worth the narrative cost, but we’ll reserve some judgment until we see the finished product — or, at least, another trailer. First-Person Heroics Speaking of other trailers, here’s hoping that the second “Spider-Man” spot puts a heavier emphasis on action than this first one. We don’t see Garfield in action albeit for a few shots two thirds of the way into the trailer, and even then, he’s without mask or costume. The final portion of the trailer, clocking in at almost a minute, focuses entirely on Spidey swinging from rooftop to rooftop … but all from the character’s own perspective. Again, it’s a curious choice to show the web-slinging action from Spidey’s point of view rather than allowing the viewer to gaze upon the hero in all of his glory. It’s bound to be a breathtaking sequence when the full movie hits theaters; as the capper for a first trailer, however, the “Spidey-cam” will likely turn some fans off. What do you think of the first “Amazing Spider-Man” trailer? Tell us in the comments! Check out everything we’ve got on “The Amazing Spider-Man.” For breaking news and previews of the latest comic book movies — updated around the clock — visit SplashPage.MTV.com .

Originally posted here:
‘Amazing Spider-Man’ Trailer: What We Know So Far

Awkward Alert: Drake Accepts BET Award Meant For Chris Brown on Rihanna’s Behalf

Last night at the BET Awards, some lucky fans were chosen to present the viewer’s choice award. Some serious awkwardness transpired. Not only did the wrong person get it, the celebrities involved happened to be Chris Brown and Rihanna, with Drake thrown in no less. Brown owned the BET Awards , taking home four big honors, one of which being the viewer’s choice award. But it wasn’t given to him initially … Chris Brown-Rihanna BET Awards Mix-Up The lucky fan read the winner as “Chris Brown,” only to recant it and say, “I’m sorry, the winner is Rihanna.” The audience grumbled. THEN, despite the fact that Rihanna’s name appeared on screen one of the presenters chimed in again to award the honor to … Drake . Drake then appeared on stage to collect his trophy, giving a short speech and describing the whole thing as awkward. To say the least. Presumably, at some point later, Brown was credited with the actual award … but not before the entire process was thoroughly discredited.

Read more:
Awkward Alert: Drake Accepts BET Award Meant For Chris Brown on Rihanna’s Behalf

Muse, MGMT, Big Boi And Sia To Play Outside Lands Fest

http://www.youtube.com/v/41jtJs721eQ

View original post here:

After turning Coachella on its head last year and preparing to rock the stage at Reading and Leeds, Muse have yet to tire of headlining music festivals. The Brit rock trio is set to perform at the 2011 Outside Lands fest, taking place August 12-14 at San Francisco’s Golden Gate Park. Joining Muse on the … More » Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Idolator Discovery Date : 11/04/2011 18:07 Number of articles : 2

Muse, MGMT, Big Boi And Sia To Play Outside Lands Fest

The camera on the iPad 2 makes 3D possible

http://www.youtube.com/v/bBQQEcfkHoE

Read this article:

By being able to follow the viewer with the front side camera, developers can build apps that know which direction the viewer is looking at the screen. When the viewer moves, so does the perspective. Head-Coupled Perspective on Mobile Devices. We track the head of the user with the front facing camera in order to Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : 9 to 5 Mac Discovery Date : 11/04/2011 21:25 Number of articles : 2

The camera on the iPad 2 makes 3D possible