Tag Archives: gloria borger

O.K. Paul-Bots, Explain This Or Shut the Hell Up!!!

http://www.youtube.com/v/fhgGKWmw8HI

More:

Yesterday Congressman Ron Paul, fearless Emperor of the Planet Ronulin and Candidate for the GOP Nomination for President of the United States, cut short an interview with Gloria Borger, of CNN because she pressed him on the publishing of his newsletters. Before he walked away, he offered, “I never read that stuff. I was probably aware of it ten years after it was written. ” That would be somewhere… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : YID With LID Discovery Date : 22/12/2011 09:00 Number of articles : 2

O.K. Paul-Bots, Explain This Or Shut the Hell Up!!!

CNN’s Bash: Was Editing Tina Fey Mocking Conservative Women First Time PBS Favored Republicans?

CNN's Dana Bash asked a great question on Tuesday: were Tina Fey's disgusting remarks about conservative women at the Mark Twain Awards “the first time that PBS has been accused of editing to favor Republicans?” Almost as telling, CNN's Gloria Borger appearing with Bash on “John King USA” answered, “They edited out something Paul McCartney said that was offensive at one point to Republicans, so probably not” (video follows with transcript and commentary): read more

Continued here:
CNN’s Bash: Was Editing Tina Fey Mocking Conservative Women First Time PBS Favored Republicans?

Santelli’s Simple Answer to Deficit: ‘Stop Spending, Stop Spending, Stop Spending!’

If it were only that simple – that is the way CNBC’s Rick Santelli would have it. On CNBC’s June 28 “Squawk Box,” CNBC’s senior economics reporter Steve Liesman vigorously defended the need for higher tax rates as a measure to cut federal deficits. Others argued that government revenues would increase if tax rates were lower because it would stimulate growth. (h/t Real Clear Politics Video ) “Let me get this straight – all you guys want to cut taxes en route to bringing down the deficit?” Liesman asked. But according to Santelli, it has nothing to do with taxes, but the role of government in the economy. “No, I didn’t say anything about taxes, Steve,” Santelli shouted. “I want the government to stop spending! Stop spending, stop spending, stop spending, stop spending! That’s what we want, stop spending!” Liesman continued his defense of higher taxes, arguing they wouldn’t “pay for themselves,” but Santelli followed up with a suggestion for Liesman. “I just keep saying what the data show,” Liesman said. “The data show tax cuts don’t pay for themselves.” “You wouldn’t know data if it bit you on the nose,” Santelli, the CME Group reporter, said. “Go read some Austrian economists instead of the funny pages.” And Santelli suggested Liesman try a change of venue to get a better understanding of economics. “Go back to Russia where you understand the state and the citizen,” Santelli said. However, “Squawk Box” co-host Becky Quick said the government is occasionally needed to step and she alluded to the near financial collapse and ultimate passage of TARP in 2008. “I’m on Steve’s side on this,” Quick said. “There are times when the government has to step in. I think probably what happened two years ago was the time.” But that has caused a political backlash, demonstrated by European nations and their lack of willingness to employ government-spending policies. “Yes they did and a couple of trillion of dollars later they’re [the federal government] done because the taxpayers are the people voting and they’re done, Steve,” Santelli said. “Talk all you want, they’re done. Merkel’s done. Europe’s done because the voting electorate has said their done.” Liesman stuck to his line of reasoning argued the deficit was directly correlated to the economy and not as much as the amount government spending. “I don’t even care, Steve. Our deficit is too big and we need to knuckle under and we need to live too prudently, prudently,” Santelli fired back.

Read the original post:
Santelli’s Simple Answer to Deficit: ‘Stop Spending, Stop Spending, Stop Spending!’

Newspaper Editor Questions Whether Pro-Aborts Are to Blame for Misspelled Pro-Abortion Graffiti

Somewhere between 7 p.m. on June 14 and 7 p.m. on June 15, vandals spray painted graffiti, as seen on the top right photo, on the home of Dubuque, Iowa pro-lifer Allen Troupe. They were most likely incited by a sign in one of the windows of Troupe’s home, as seen on the bottom right photo. Click both photos to enlarge. Troupe filed a police report and anticipated the same level of fair and balanced media coverage one would expect were pro-life graffiti to appear on the home of an abortion proponent – i.e., lots. But not only did the local paper, the finally posted a story about the vandalism on June 23, but catch the headline: Troupe “believes” the graffiti on his home was tied to his abortion opposition, but that may not be true? The story’s 1st sentence reiterated the point: Police are investigating a vandalism case involving a man who believes his house was targeted due to his opposition to Planned Parenthood and abortion. So Troupe could have been in actuality drawing wild conclusions or hallucinating? These journalists are either utterly biased or totally void of common sense and simple intelligence.

Go here to see the original:
Newspaper Editor Questions Whether Pro-Aborts Are to Blame for Misspelled Pro-Abortion Graffiti

Five Out of Five Lib Journalists Agree: Obama’s Big Government Push Helps Dems in ’10!

On the syndicated Chris Matthews show over the weekend, Chris Matthews praised Barack Obama’s “legislative success” in getting all sorts of overbearing, big government laws passed and asked his panel to rate if those wins in Congress will lead to victory for the Democratic Party in the fall. Just before closing his show Matthews posed the following big question to HDNet’s Dan Rather, the BBC’s Katty Kay, CNN’s Gloria Borger and the Politico’s John Harris: “Will the President’s legislative success with the stimulus, with health care, with Wall Street reform and maybe even an energy bill be a net positive or negative for his party this fall?” The following are their individual responses as aired on the June 27 Chris Matthews Show: CHRIS MATTHEWS: Welcome back. This week another big feather in Barack Obama’s cap – Wall Street reform. Which brings us to our big question. Will the President’s legislative success with the stimulus, with health care, with Wall Street reform and maybe even an energy bill be a net positive or negative for his party this fall? Dan Rather? DAN RATHER, HDNET: Slight positive. MATTHEWS: Katty? KATTY KAY, BBC: Net positive. MATTHEWS: Gloria? GLORIA BORGER, CNN: I’m with Dan, slight positive. JOHN HARRIS, POLITICO: Positive. Takes away the Jimmy Carter ineffectual argument. MATTHEWS: Wow! Slight positive. Maybe just solid positive.

More here:
Five Out of Five Lib Journalists Agree: Obama’s Big Government Push Helps Dems in ’10!