Tag Archives: foreign-policy

Dr. Conrad Murray Cries During Old Lady’s Testimony About His Father And Good Deeds [Video]

Continued here:
Dr. Conrad Murray Cries During Old Lady’s Testimony About His Father And Good Deeds [Video]

Black On Black Bolitics: Herman Cain Says He Doesn’t Need To Know Foreign Policy Details To Know That Obama Has Failed

Herman Cain is running his mouth again and this time it’s regarding the foreign policy: Former businessman turned presidential frontrunner Herman Cain continued his attempts to calm voters concerns over his lack of foreign policy experience during a campaign stop here Wednesday night. “Relative to foreign policy, I don’t need to know the details of every one of the issues we face. “We’ve got plenty of experts who can fill in the details,” Cain said at dinner held by the Nueces County Republican Women. The former Godfather’s Pizza CEO told the 900 supporters in attendance that the key to dealing with issues abroad is to develop a clear foreign-policy philosophy, a line he often has repeated on the trail. That philosophy: clarify who the United States’- friends and enemies are – something Cain says President Obama has failed to do. During his two-day swing through the Lone Star State, Cain began both campaign speeches critiquing the president’s decision to withdraw all troops from Iraq by the end of the year. “When he withdraws all of the troops out of Iraq, it’s going to leave a huge power vacuum for Iran to go in and disrupt everything and undue everything that we’ve been trying to help them do on the last several years,” Cain said while speaking at the Clear Lake Tea Party in La Marque, TX on Tuesday. Broadening Cain’s policy platform comes at a time when the candidate is fighting speculation that he is the latest flash in the pan in the Republican field. A national CBS/New York Times poll released Tuesday shows Cain atop the field of Republican presidential hopefuls, garnering 25% of support, with the second closest Mitt Romney at 21%. Source

View original post here:
Black On Black Bolitics: Herman Cain Says He Doesn’t Need To Know Foreign Policy Details To Know That Obama Has Failed

Thomas L. Friedman Warns: ‘Young People Need To Be Paying Attention’

Pulitzer Prize-winning writer discusses with MTV News ‘That Used to Be Us,’ his and Michael Mandelbaum’s just-released book about the U.S. By Tami Katzoff, with reporting by Sway Calloway Thomas L. Friedman Photo: Nancy Ostertag/ Getty Images Pulitzer Prize-winning writer Thomas L. Friedman has been talking about foreign policy with his friend Michael Mandelbaum for two decades. Over the past couple of years, though, they started to notice something different about their conversations. “Every time we started off talking about the world, we’d end up talking about America,” Friedman recalled when he spoke with MTV News recently. “And we realized basically that America — its fate, future, vigor, vitality — was really the biggest foreign-policy issue in the world.” The two friends recognized the enormity of the role the U.S. plays in the world — for good or bad. “We’re kind of the tent pole that holds up a lot of the global economy,” Friedman said. “That tent pole buckles or frays, your kids won’t just grow up in a different America; they’ll grow up in a very different world. So there’s a lot at stake.” Friedman and Mandelbaum were inspired to write their new book, “That Used to Be Us: How America Fell Behind in the World It Invented and How We Can Come Back.” In it, they identify four major challenges this country is currently failing to meet: our chronic deficit, our pattern of energy consumption, globalization and the revolution in information technology. Friedman acknowledged that by failing to tackle these issues, his generation has made things very difficult for its descendants. “Young people need to be paying attention right now, because we’re messing with your future.” He cited the nation’s deepening deficit as an example and listed ways in which it will affect young people years from now if it’s not reversed. “One, the currency you hold will buy less. It will just be worth less,” he said. “Second, it won’t be so easy to get a job. The number of companies that will want to start up here, the number of employers that will say, ‘Hmm, I could hire a machine or I could hire a person, or I could hire cheap labor over in another country — I think I’ll go for the machine or the cheap labor.’ And third, you may be counting on your Social Security and your Medicare for when you get old like your parents are now — it may not be there.” Fortunately, these problems also hold countless opportunities, like for those who can find innovative ways to address our nation’s excessive energy consumption. “Whoever invents these systems and technologies is going to have a huge global market in order to thrive in,” Friedman said. Meeting all these challenges, Friedman explained, will spur economic growth. “And if we’re growing, then there’s money for a lot of things, and there’s a pie for everyone to get a slice. If we’re not growing, then we’re fighting over the slices, and we’re collecting all the crumbs.” Related Videos Thomas L. Friedman Says The Next Generation Will Have To Invent Their Job

See the original post here:
Thomas L. Friedman Warns: ‘Young People Need To Be Paying Attention’

Allen West critical of Ron Paul’s foreign policy

http://www.youtube.com/v/4g2nn_TqeSE

Excerpt from:

Maybe some of the tin hat bunch can explain the reason behind Paul saying he’d allow Iran to posses nuclear weapons. Allen West, kudos to you sir for calling out this nut. Source: Allen West critical of Ron Paul’s foreign policy Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Hayride Discovery Date : 15/08/2011 01:52 Number of articles : 2

Allen West critical of Ron Paul’s foreign policy

Lying is Not Patriotic

Ron Paul Texas Straight Talk December 14, 2010 WikiLeaks’ release of classified information has generated a lot of attention world-wide in the past few weeks. The hysterical reaction makes one wonder if this is not an example of killing the messenger for the bad news. Any information that challenges the official propaganda for the war in the Middle East is unwelcome by the administration and supporters of these unnecessary wars. Few are interested in understanding the relationship of our foreign policy and our presence in the Middle East to the threat of terrorism. Revealing the real nature and goal for our presence in so many Muslim countries is a threat to our empire and any revelation of this truth is highly resented by those in charge. Questions to consider: 1. Do the American people deserve to know the truth regarding the ongoing war in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen? 2. Could a larger question be: how can an Army Private gain access to so much secret material? 3. Why is the hostility mostly directed at Assange, the publisher, and not our government’s failure to protect classified information? 4. Are we getting our money’s worth from the $80 billion per year we spend on our intelligence agencies? 5. Which has resulted in the greatest number of deaths; lying us into war, or WikiLeaks’ revelations or the release of the Pentagon Papers? 6. If Assange can be convicted of a crime for publishing information, that he did not steal, what does this say about the future of the First Amendment and the independence of the internet? 7. Could it be that the real reason for the near universal attacks on WikiLeaks is more about secretly maintaining a seriously flawed foreign policy of empire than it is about national security? 8. Is there not a huge difference between releasing secret information to help the enemy in the time of a declared war—which is treason—and the releasing of information to expose our government lies that promote secret wars, death, and corruption? 9. Was it not once considered patriotic to stand up to our government when it’s wrong? more at link… added by: rodstradamus

Anonymous DDoS Campaign Fizzles – On To Faxing

With maintaining the DDoS attacks proving to be too much for the group, they are now focusing their efforts on mass faxing. The new strategy could cost corporations hundreds of dollars in toner and paper, and put some companies at risk of financial failure if it continues for several decades or more… https://www.infosecisland.com/blogview/10255-Anonymous-DDoS-Campaign-Fizzles-On-… added by: Paisano1

Anonymous DDoS Campaign Fizzles – On To Faxing

With maintaining the DDoS attacks proving to be too much for the group, they are now focusing their efforts on mass faxing. The new strategy could cost corporations hundreds of dollars in toner and paper, and put some companies at risk of financial failure if it continues for several decades or more… https://www.infosecisland.com/blogview/10255-Anonymous-DDoS-Campaign-Fizzles-On-… added by: Paisano1

Holbrooke’s Last Words: "You’ve Got to Stop this War in Afghanistan"

In his final words before emergency heart surgery, Richard Holbrooke, the influential U.S. diplomat who died on Monday following complications from the surgery, urged an end to America's nine-year old Afghanistan conflict. “You've got to stop this war in Afghanistan,” Holbrooke told his Pakistani surgeon before entering into surgery according to family members, the Washington Post reports. Holbrooke, a 69-year-old foreign policy veteran who worked in Vietnam as a foreign service member during the war and advised four Democratic presidents, had been serving until his death as special envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan in the Obama administration. Though Holbrooke is believed to have seen the war in Afghanistan as winnable, he allegedly struggled in his dealings with the Afghan government – particularly when it came to the country's widespread corruption and lack of functional public services. In a statement, President Obama called Holbrooke, who was nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize seven times (including for his work brokering the war-ending Dayton peace accords in former Yugoslavia), a “true giant of American foreign policy who has made America stronger, safer, and more respected.” The president also praised Holbrooke's work in Afghanistan and Pakistan. “The progress that we have made in Afghanistan and Pakistan is due in no small measure to Richard's relentless focus on America's national interest, and pursuit of peace and security,” Mr. Obama's statement read. “He understood, in his life and his work, that our interests encompassed the values that we hold so dear.” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton also lauded his work for the administration, and emphasized that while he was a “fierce negotiator,” she considered him “a fiercer friend and a beloved mentor.” “When I came to the State Department, I was delighted to be able to bring Richard in and give him one of the most difficult challenges that any diplomat can face,” Clinton said on Monday in remarks at a holiday reception for the chiefs of diplomatic missions to the United States. “He immediately put together an absolutely world class staff. It represents what we believe should be the organizational model for the future – people not only from throughout our own government, but even representatives from other governments all working together.” “Tonight America has lost one of its fiercest champions and most dedicated public servants,” Clinton added in a separate statement. As special envoy for Pakistan and Afghanistan, Holbrooke advised the White House on strategies for brokering peace as well as how to revamp civilian assistance efforts there through diplomatic negotiations, development, and reconstruction initiatives. Though Holbrooke and Afghan President Hamid Karzai were known to have a contentious relationship, the Post reports that Karzai released a statement saying Holbrooke “served greatly the government and the people of the United States.” Senator John Kerry, a Vietnam veteran, also offered his condolences on Monday, calling the end of his career “almost a bittersweet bookend that a career of public diplomacy that began trying to save a war gone wrong, now ends with a valiant effort to keep another war from going wrong.” “Our public careers were intertwined in so many ways, from Vietnam to my presidential campaign to the conflict in Afghanistan, and every step of the way he provided wise advice and intelligent guidance to presidents and statespeople alike,” Kerry said, in a Monday night statement. “He died giving everything he had to one last difficult mission for the country he loved,” Kerry said. The White House plans to release a strategic review of the war in Afghanistan this month, and it is not expected to call for a change in strategy. Though Mr. Obama set July 2011 as the date to begin brining troops home when he announced a troop “surge” one year ago, the administration is now pointing to 2014 as its target date for a significant drawdown of U.S. forces. added by: TimALoftis

Holbrooke’s Last Words: "You’ve Got to Stop this War in Afghanistan"

In his final words before emergency heart surgery, Richard Holbrooke, the influential U.S. diplomat who died on Monday following complications from the surgery, urged an end to America's nine-year old Afghanistan conflict. “You've got to stop this war in Afghanistan,” Holbrooke told his Pakistani surgeon before entering into surgery according to family members, the Washington Post reports. Holbrooke, a 69-year-old foreign policy veteran who worked in Vietnam as a foreign service member during the war and advised four Democratic presidents, had been serving until his death as special envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan in the Obama administration. Though Holbrooke is believed to have seen the war in Afghanistan as winnable, he allegedly struggled in his dealings with the Afghan government – particularly when it came to the country's widespread corruption and lack of functional public services. In a statement, President Obama called Holbrooke, who was nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize seven times (including for his work brokering the war-ending Dayton peace accords in former Yugoslavia), a “true giant of American foreign policy who has made America stronger, safer, and more respected.” The president also praised Holbrooke's work in Afghanistan and Pakistan. “The progress that we have made in Afghanistan and Pakistan is due in no small measure to Richard's relentless focus on America's national interest, and pursuit of peace and security,” Mr. Obama's statement read. “He understood, in his life and his work, that our interests encompassed the values that we hold so dear.” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton also lauded his work for the administration, and emphasized that while he was a “fierce negotiator,” she considered him “a fiercer friend and a beloved mentor.” “When I came to the State Department, I was delighted to be able to bring Richard in and give him one of the most difficult challenges that any diplomat can face,” Clinton said on Monday in remarks at a holiday reception for the chiefs of diplomatic missions to the United States. “He immediately put together an absolutely world class staff. It represents what we believe should be the organizational model for the future – people not only from throughout our own government, but even representatives from other governments all working together.” “Tonight America has lost one of its fiercest champions and most dedicated public servants,” Clinton added in a separate statement. As special envoy for Pakistan and Afghanistan, Holbrooke advised the White House on strategies for brokering peace as well as how to revamp civilian assistance efforts there through diplomatic negotiations, development, and reconstruction initiatives. Though Holbrooke and Afghan President Hamid Karzai were known to have a contentious relationship, the Post reports that Karzai released a statement saying Holbrooke “served greatly the government and the people of the United States.” Senator John Kerry, a Vietnam veteran, also offered his condolences on Monday, calling the end of his career “almost a bittersweet bookend that a career of public diplomacy that began trying to save a war gone wrong, now ends with a valiant effort to keep another war from going wrong.” “Our public careers were intertwined in so many ways, from Vietnam to my presidential campaign to the conflict in Afghanistan, and every step of the way he provided wise advice and intelligent guidance to presidents and statespeople alike,” Kerry said, in a Monday night statement. “He died giving everything he had to one last difficult mission for the country he loved,” Kerry said. The White House plans to release a strategic review of the war in Afghanistan this month, and it is not expected to call for a change in strategy. Though Mr. Obama set July 2011 as the date to begin brining troops home when he announced a troop “surge” one year ago, the administration is now pointing to 2014 as its target date for a significant drawdown of U.S. forces. added by: TimALoftis

The Nation: Ron Paul’s Fight For Transparency

The Obama administration condemns WikiLeaks in the most extreme terms, with White House spokesman Robert Gibbs referring to the people involved in the leaking and distribution of diplomatic cables as “criminals,” and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton describing the latest WikiLeaks revelations as an ” attack on America's foreign policy interests.” Attorney General Eric Holder talks of using the Espionage Act and other tools to go after WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. Democrats in Congress echo the criticisms — with Senate Foreign Relations Committee chair John Kerry ripping Assange for having done “real damage” to U.S. interests — or simply remain silent. Some are openly working with neoconservative Republicans to come up with new laws to restrict the flow of information about U.S. foreign policy, Is anyone in official Washington standing up for transparency? Is anyone saying that we should be more concerned about the revelations of wrongdoing than killing the messenger? Yes, if you count Texas Congressman Ron Paul as a resident of official Washington. The Texas Republican who has long been the sternest critic in Congress of the imperial ambitions of presidents of both parties, rejects the notion that WikiLeaks is the problem. “Rather than worry about the disclosure of embarrassing secrets we should focus on our delusional foreign policy,” argues Paul, who has run for the presidency as both the Libetarian nominee and a Republican primary candidate. “We are kidding ourselves when we believe spying, intrigue and outright military intervention can maintain our international status as a superpower while our domestic economy crumbles in an orgy of debt and monetary debasement.” Continued at: http://www.npr.org/2010/12/13/132021734/the-nation-ron-paul-s-stand-for-transpar… added by: Dagum