One of the common instagram poses…the Mirror Selfie….was properly executed by Kendall Jenner recently… There are only so many ways to whore out on the internet, the human species has limited capacity to find clever and original ways to whore out on the internet…and really why bother. If you have a system that works, that people understand, stick to it. I assume this is Kendall trying to distract a shoot that her legal team made me remove…featuring her topless and riding a horse in a thong that they photoshopped out…badly….to make her look like she’s got a bald pussy…when really she was just wearing nude panties…or what I’d call skin color panties…which in and of itself makes for RACIST panties… Or maybe it’s just Kendall being Kendall…She’s a Kardashian/Jenner and it’s all tactical to make more money. The post Kendall Jenner Mirror Selfie of the Day appeared first on DrunkenStepFather.com .
We live in a world where headlines include “Kylie Jenner Tries Cereal with Milk for the First Time”…. So seeing the media celebrate 71 year old Susan Lucci in a bathing suit is not that surprising, because the easiest people to manipulate with the media are the people who read the tabloids and who watch the soap operas because they are on disability and don’t have actual jobs… I don’t see how saying “look at this hot plastic old as fuck lady in a bathing suit being empowered and a boss after 50 years of soap opera acting” is ok… I thought people were supposed to hate skinny women and yell at them for giving into the patriarchy, and giving unrealistic body norms for the youth.. Where are the other 71 year old women throwing shade and side eye and hating on this bitch slutting out in her one piece at the aquafitness class. Why is there this inconsistency on what is ok to say “look at that bod”…and what is “rape”…or bad for the fat people who are jealous… Is it ok cuz she’s old? Clearly plastic surgeried like she always has been…but celebrated…. This is for Harper’s Bazaar. They need to figure out there stance and stick to it….an article strictly based on celebrating an old ladies physical looks…crazy in this era of inclusion…but the people are into it…confusing me even more. The post Susan Lucci in a Bathing Suit of the Day appeared first on DrunkenStepFather.com .
I think these pictures are some of Ellie Goulding’s best work… Here’s an interview I had with myself about it: Who’s Ellie Goulding? A UK Pop singer… Why do you care? You Don’t… Why did I post this? Her ass is bending over for the paparazzi while grinding up to her dude… Why is this important? It’s not…I just like watching people fuck, I’m a creepy pervert and I guess in world, this is as close to seeing her inner slut, until she leaks nudes or a sex tape when her celebrity starts fading… Is there anything I’d like to add? Yes, I am pretty depressed that like a teenage girl, I have a blog and talk about this nonsense, that I’ve never cared about, maybe that’s why I’m not successful….but still would have preferred this to have more anal. Do I think being successful is important? Not as important as finger fucking a UK popstar on the beach in public to try to find excitement in life… That interview sucked. TO SEE THE REST OF THE PICS CLICK HERE The post Ellie Goulding Bikini Picture of the Day appeared first on DrunkenStepfather .
Alexandra Marzella is up on the femoinist hustle… You know shaving her pussy into a perfectly porno landing strip, while growing out her armpit hair, to prove some kind of point I am unsure of…but know all these girls are all about it, and I don’t find that it looks cute, not that I care if a bitch is hairy, I’ve loved bush forever, I just find it irritating her armpit has more bush than her fucking bush does, which is what I am actually into…but I guess bush doesn’t really get much exposure to prove a point when in public… I just think these young feminists are right to want women’s rights or to fight people like the Kardashians for objectifying women in the media, it’s like fuck that trash, but the reality is, when they get naked and “empowered” they are essentially doing the same thing as Kim Kardashian…and more importantly, they are fighting a fight they’ve already won…but any excuse to get girls naked, works for me, that’s why I am a feminist, cuz I like empowering women through nudity…and I like nudity…and I fucking hate the Kardashians…but I still don’t like to fuck with Armpit hair…it just isn’t sexy to me, unless girl is on her period and her menstrual cup is stinky, and her armpit is the only thing I can fuck..it’s very Euro.. The post Feminist Armpit Hair and Trimmed Pussy Inconsistency for Purple Magazine of the Day appeared first on DrunkenStepfather .
Jerry Sandusky refuses to go away. The disgraced ex-Penn State coordinator, who was convicted in June on over 40 counts of sexual abuse and sentenced to in October to at least 30 years in prison , has released a bizarre new letter. Dated December 18, the note (addressed to The Citizen Voice , a Central Pennsylvania newspaper) decrees that “justice and fairness were not a focus” in his trial. Sandusky goes on to say: “Right now, our focus is on appeal. Time is much to learn, issues and information not presented. Nobody, who covered the case and reported it had the time or took the time to study the allegations, the accusers, the inconsistency, and the methods.” Sandusky has alleged a major conspiracy is responsible for his conviction, one that involves the media, investigators, civil attorneys and, of course, his accusers. He ends the latest example of his despicable ways by writing out an acronym for ENDURE: E — Embrace each day as a gift N — Never surrender except to God D — Don’t let your situation get the best of you U — Understand God’s purpose and presence. R — Remain as positive as possible E — Exercise your mind, body, and spirit.
SMH: Senators would have to push their own elevator buttons. House members would go without their free gym. Food on Capitol Hill would be sparse. And the lawmakers’ restrooms? Perhaps not as fresh. Congress would feel the pinch of a government shutdown, but nowhere near the pain that would be inflicted on the massive federal work force it is supposed to govern. Unlike the roughly 800,000 federal workers who would be affected, lawmakers get wide latitude deciding who is essential and who’s not in the fiefdoms of their own offices and committees. They also get to choose whether to give up their own pay during a shutdown — an option not afforded the furloughed. “How does that make any sense?” said Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., who added that he will forgo a paycheck for the length of a budget impasse. More than two dozen senators of both parties took the same pledge as the clocked Friday toward the midnight shutdown deadline. House Speaker John Boehner on Friday told other lawmakers that he planned to return the pay he would be entitled to during a shutdown, In a message to House members, he noted that the Constitution forbids lawmakers from changing their compensation or the president’s in mid-term, but there is no prohibition on lawmakers refusing their pay when a shutdown occurs. Rank-and-file House members and senators make $174,000 a year, with the leaders of each party making more. Boehner receives $223,500. President Barack Obama’s annual salary is $400,000. Many members of Congress already donate all or some of their pay to charity, but those swept into office last year by the populist, tea party-tinged wave of the midterm elections are especially sensitive to the inconsistency of getting paid — more than most Americans — for a job not done. “I’ll find a way to give it back,” said Colorado Rep. Cory Gardner, a member of the Republican class of freshman that handed control of the House to the GOP. Gardner said he gave up his pay in the state Legislature under similar circumstances. “We aren’t different than anybody else.” The Capitol Hill workforce is the size of a small city, tens of thousands of people who protect, feed, shuttle, schedule, advise, clean up after and otherwise support the 535 members of Congress. During a shutdown, deciding who and what services are essential generally falls to the lawmakers, with advice from Congress’ experts on the subject. The House Administration Committee, for example, recommended that lawmakers use three criteria when deciding staffing. Employees whose jobs “are associated with constitutional responsibilities, the protection of human life or the protection of property” should be considered essential, the committee said. Three-fourths of the Architect of the Capitol’s 2,600-person workforce would stay home, severely curtailing the many services it provides, according to spokeswoman Eva Malecki. That includes limited food service and even restroom cleaning — both the public facilities and those in the lawmakers’ offices. It also means limited response to emergency service calls for help on plumbing, electrical, elevator or other problems, she said. Expect a police force big enough to keep the campus secure but severely scaled back, said Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Terrance Gainer. That means one door open per building both for lawmakers, their staffs and the tourists Congress is obligated to admit when the legislature is in session. But since the Capitol Visitor Center would be closed, tour guidance would be mostly up to the lawmakers themselves. And if they feel like escaping to the comfort of, say, the members-only balcony just off the House floor? Lawmakers might have to find an officer with a key to unlock the door, according to knowledgeable officials who demanded anonymity to be candid. Members would have to line up for everything from elevators to news conferences, since there would only be one act of televised grandstanding allowed at a time, Gainer said. And food? Sparse enough to constitute “a mandatory diet,” he quipped. Source
Well, here's one more argument for an overhaul of the jury system in America. According to a Cornell University study, a physically unattractive defendant is likely to receive a harsher sentence than a more attractive defendant – a prison sentence up to 22 months longer, on average, for a similar crime. The study looks at two kinds of jurors – those who process information rationally and without regard for the appearance of the defendant, and jurors who process information emotionally, giving harsher verdicts and sentencing based upon their perception of the physical attributes of the defendant. Author Justin Gunnell '05, J.D. '08, who began working on the study as a policy analysis and management major with co-author Stephen Ceci, and Cornell's Helen L. Carr Professor of Developmental Psychology were determined to find out why there have been reports of such disparities for decades. Using 169 Cornell undergraduates, the scientists determined those individuals who processed information rationally, using facts, analysis and reason, and those who based their decisions on emotion which factored in irrelevant factors such as race, gender and class, and who reported that a “less attractive” person would be “more likely” the kind of person who would commit a crime. The study concluded with the participants looking at an actual case file and photograph, jury instructions and closing arguments and rendering his or her verdict and sentencing accordingly. (In fairness, this inconsistency was reported in those cases with ambiguous evidence or lesser charged offenses; in other words, not in cases where there was harder evidence more determinative of guilt). Since in the American justice system, attorneys have an opportunity to screen jurors for specific reasons, and for a limited number of non-specific reasons, this study might be useful, in designing questions or challenges that get to the heart of a prospective juror's mindset, but can we ever ensure a jury system without predisposition, whether for race, gender, class or attractiveness? Should we even be surprised by this study, with what we, as laymen, know of human nature? This tosses another ball into the court of proponents for professional jurors – with its own set of drawbacks, but arguably a more plausible solution to justice in the courtroom. http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/6015099-unattractive-defendants-receiv… added by: Stoneyroad
