Tag Archives: mma

At Google, You’re Old and Gray At 40 [Cubicle Culture]

Google faces an imminent California Supreme Court decision on whether it engaged in age discrimination. But that hasn’t kept the internet company from patting itself on the back for how it supports old “Greyglers” — that’s any Googler over 40 . More

Rolling Stone’s McChrystal Profile Helps No One [Profiles]

Rolling Stone has published its big Stanley McChrystal “insubordination” piece online now, and he just trashes Barack Obama throughout the whole thing! Well, not really. There’s a bigger thing getting trashed here called “the War in Afghanistan.” More

Aarif Lee photo

Hong Kong actor Aarif Lee poses during a promotional event in Hong Kong Monday, June 21, 2010. Filmmakers have cast the rising star from Hong Kong to play Bruce Lee in an upcoming biopic that focuses on the late kung fu icon#39;s youth. Aarif Lee, 23, who rose to fame in Hong Kong as the star of the hit movie Echoes of the Rainbow, will play Bruce Lee in an upcoming biopic that focuses on the late kung fu icon#39;s youth. Bruce Lee: My Brother#39;s Story is funded by a consortium of studios fr

Read the original here:
Aarif Lee photo

England aiming to sign off for summer with rare victory in Australia | Robert Kitson

• ‘Some won’t get a chance to play in a Test in Australia again’ • Defining moment for Martin Johnson’s World Cup planning One game should not define a season, but England know there are exceptions. A big defeat in the second and final Test will confirm the worst fears of those who suspect the coaches are flogging a dead horse. Victory, on the other hand, would allow the management to insist their World Cup plans are gathering momentum. There is hardly any middle ground still available for rent. Even a gallant loss would underline what the rugby world has come to believe: that England talk a better game than they play in terms of beating the southern hemisphere’s finest. Australia are a good side but their current scrum issues make them more vulnerable than they might be. If Martin Johnson’s squad wish to enjoy their holidays, it is important they erase the memory of their diffident display in Perth. Precisely that message will be repeated before kick-off by coaches and senior players alike. “We’ve got a chance to put the record straight,” said Nick Easter, the England No8 who, by his own admission, fell below the required standard last week. “You want to have a summer when you can look back and be pleased with your last performance, otherwise you’ll be stewing. We’ve got to go out and show a lot more than we did last Saturday.” Johnson has also reminded everyone that places in England’s 32-man elite squad to be named next month remain unbooked, well aware that Wednesday’s game against New Zealand Maoris in Napier is unlikely to supply much solace. A potential tour record of one scratchy win from five games will not rank as a great leap forward. “Some of the guys won’t get a chance to play in a Testmatch in Australia again,” he said. Barring a marked upturn, several are unlikely to be tackling the Wallabies at Twickenham this November either. At least the cheery mood during training at North Sydney Oval was encouraging. Maybe the sunshine helped, but the squad contains enough talent and enthusiasm to hint at better days ahead if the players can escape their current underachieving rut. Ben Youngs has the ability to match his contemporary Will Genia as a backline catalyst and his first Test start will be instructive. If the Leicester scrum-half shines, it might even persuade Johnson to start thinking like an Australian and blood the likes of Alex Goode on the enlightened basis that class is permanent and immaturity is temporary. It would also help if the French referee Romain Poite, as he surely will, takes a sadistic interest in the scrum engagements. At times last week England’s tight-head Dan Cole unquestionably used illegal tactics to destabilise his opponent Ben Daley, but he is good enough to make life difficult without resorting to the dark arts. Tim Payne, even so, has cautioned against assuming the Wallabies scrum will be minced again. “Without a shadow of a doubt, they’ll be better,” the loose-head said. “I’m sure they’ll have hit the scrum machine many times this week.” Either way, England crave a collective performance that is not entirely down to their scrummagers or the slowly fading veterans of the 2003 World Cup final triumph in the same arena. Australia remains mystified at Jonny Wilkinson’s non-selection, with the former Wallabies centre Tim Horan declaring it “a decision Martin Johnson is likely to regret”. The hosts should clinch a 2-0 win but the ghost in the white No10 jersey has yet to be exorcised Down Under. If Jonny rises off the bench and slots another winning drop-goal the groans will be audible from Canberra to Cape Tribulation. Sky Sports 1: kick-off 11am England rugby union team Australia rugby union team Martin Johnson Robert Kitson guardian.co.uk

Continue reading here:
England aiming to sign off for summer with rare victory in Australia | Robert Kitson

NBA Finals Game 7 Live Blog: Celtics Cling To Four-Point Lead In Ugly Game

-Kobe Bryant is totally in his “I don’t trust anyone” mode. I don’t blame him: other than Ron Artest, his team hasn’t shown up. Still, if you yourself are 3-16, it might be time to think about creating good shots for your teammates. -Mark Jackson just compared Kobe Bryant’s game to John Starks’ Game 7 in the 1994 Finals. Hand down, man down! That was harsh. -Not only is Kobe playing bad offense, but he’s also forgetting to box out Rajon Rondo. That’s the crazy thing about Kobe’s performance: he’s been awful on offense, but he’s also allowed his man, Rajon Rondo, to have a field day. Sure, a lot of Rondo’s production comes in transition, but it’s also on Kobe to corral him there. -Paul Pierce just went to the bench with a shoulder injury. Hopefully he’s okay. I know it’ll be tough for him to recover because there are no wheelchairs available. -The crowd is shouting “defense” right now. In this game, is that even necessary? -It’s about time for Pau Gasol to make one of his customary lefty hook shots. Just be yourself, Pau. Don’t be someone else. -“Yourself” should not include letting Kevin Garnett go baseline for a layup. -Lamar Odom just tipped in a Ron Artest miss in transition and acted like he just won the NBA championship. Or, more accurately, he acted like he just received a Golden Ticket to get inside Willy Wonka’s Chocolate Factory. -Ray Allen continues to struggle from the field. He’s tired from guarding Kobe Bryant. -Kobe Bryant’s last possession: “Dribble, dribble, dribble, dribble, drive into two defenders, turnover.” -Kobe Bryant’s last possession: “Stand around, shoot a shot with a man in his face, miss.” -Does Rasheed Wallace ever do anything other than shoot bank shots in the post?

Excerpt from:
NBA Finals Game 7 Live Blog: Celtics Cling To Four-Point Lead In Ugly Game

R.A. Dickey Stays Strong As Mets Brush Aside Indians For Seventh Straight Win

Jared Wickerham – Getty Images about 1 hour ago: CLEVELAND – JUNE 17: Jose Reyes #7 of the New York Mets is congratulated by a teammate after scoring against the Cleveland Indians during the game on June 17, 2010 at Progressive Field in Cleveland, Ohio. Reyes had earlier injured his hand but stayed in the game. (Photo by Jared Wickerham/Getty Images) View full size photo

The rest is here:
R.A. Dickey Stays Strong As Mets Brush Aside Indians For Seventh Straight Win

Don’t Feed The Troll

Trolls do zilch for me these days. This is because I'm jaded. Allow me to explain. I moderate a rather high-profile message board. This has been a pastime of mine for a few years now. Over the years, I have seen my share of trolls, and I've learned that the best way to deal with trolls is not to react to them. You see, the troll is an enigmatic creature. They could be just about anyone you imagine…your teacher, your mail carrier, your sibling, even one of your parents or grandparents. They could be fine, upstanding citizens, who simply like to say inflammatory things on the Internet just to get a rise out of people…(continued) added by: DoctorLulzington

Emma Roberts Attacked by Rabid RPattz Fans

Hell hath no fury like Robert Pattinson fans scorned. After Emma Roberts harmlessly proclaimed herself to be Team Jacob on The Tonight Show , she was deluged with so many angry Twitter attacks (despite her own backpedaling tweet: “Rob Pattinson is so nice! I was slightly disappointed his skin wasn’t glittering & the song ‘Wild Thing’ didn’t start when he shook my hand”) that she was forced to cancel her own account. Where was this massive grassroots action on Pattinson’s behalf when Remember Me came out? [ E! ]

Read this article:
Emma Roberts Attacked by Rabid RPattz Fans

Rudy Giuliani, MSNBC’s Dylan Ratigan Eviscerate Joe Scarborough for Blaming Bush for Oil Spill

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R) and MSNBC anchor Dylan Ratigan on June 17 joined forces to lambaste “Morning Joe” co-host Joe Scarborough for continuing to defend President Barack Obama’s handling of the BP oil spill. Scarborough presented a litany of arguments in Obama’s defense, but Giuliani and Ratigan countered with specific examples of the president’s failed leadership. Regurgitating liberal talking points, Scarborough blamed the crisis on George W. Bush and Dick Cheney. “We hear that we had the technology to stop this,” Scarborough claimed. “In 2002, though, Dick Cheney and his energy task force said, ‘No, we’re not going to take an extra step.'” Giuliani responded with an eviscerating counter punch: “It’s important to know as part of the history of this but the reality is, he’s been president now for 18 months. It’s about time we stopped blaming Bush.” Scarborough thought that the former New York City Mayor would credit Obama for securing from BP a $20 billion victim compensation fund, but instead Giuliani criticized the president. “I say it was a good deal for BP,” retorted Giuliani. “If I can put even a tentative limit on the liabilities, I’ve helped save my company.” “Democrats only wanted $10 billion,” claimed Scarborough. “You can’t say something nice about the president?” “The president has so mishandled this that it will be impossible for me to even describe how horribly handled this was,” argued Giuliani. “BP would be more than willing to give $20 billion to get themselves somewhat off the hook.” When pressed by Scarborough, Giuliani gave a detailed explanation for how he would have handled the crisis differently: First of all, the first thing I would have done is to bring in experts from the industry who are independent source of advice for me…If your father or mother were sick, you would go get a second opinion from an expert doctor. Not from an academician which is what he did. Go ask the question. Has anyone done remediation before? Has anyone done it better than BP? Bring them in. Make them your eyes and ears. Have them watching everything. Maybe they could have gotten the estimate right of the amount of oil that was coming out. It was horrendous. This is a horrible case of malpractice, negligence, gross negligence. They were off by 60 times. That had to infect every wrong judgment you make. Instead of crediting Giuliani for articulating a coherent plan, Scarborough attempted to deflect and politicize the issue, wondering whether the “malpractice” was “shared by both political parties and the entire Washington establishment over 15 years that has allowed oil companies to drill in areas where they have no backup plan if something goes wrong?” Ratigan rushed to Giuliani’s defense, railing against Obama for failing to consult independent industry experts at the beginning of the crisis: I actually completely agree with the mayor which is we can talk all day about the problems but until you actually address the matter of the fact that oil continues to go into the Gulf of Mexico, and there are other ways to deal with it that have not been brought in, or have been brought in too late–that is shameful. When Giuliani took aim at Obama for addressing the oil spill as a political problem, Scarborough jumped to the president’s defense. “It is a political problem,” exclaimed Scarborough. “It’s a substantive problem, but it’s a political problem!” “He’s just dealing with it as a political problem,” countered Giuliani. “That’s why he went down there only a couple of times at the very beginning. Didn’t take charge. We had Gibbs saying for three weeks that BP was in charge. The speech last night, Obama said the federal government’s been in charge from the beginning. Well, nobody ever told anybody that for the first four weeks. Maybe they were in charge in secret.” Scarborough then claimed that Obama took charge early on, making the oil spill the “top priority for this government,” but Ratigan disagreed, proclaiming, “My biggest criticism of this administration which is why I agree with the mayor when it comes to the response is the incredibly incompetent appearance of the containment strategy.” The transcript of the segment can be found below: MSNBC Morning Joe 6/17/10 8:04 a.m. JOE SCARBOROUGH: $20 billion. MIKA BRZEZINSKI: That’s pretty good. RUDY GIULIANI, former New York City mayor: Even nowadays that’s real money. That’s real money. SCARBOROUGH: Let’s give the president– DYLAN RATIGAN: Unless you get it from the Federal Reserve, in which case it’s not real money. SCARBOROUGH: Mr. Mayor, let’s make headlines, let’s give the president credit right now for being able to get $20 billion from BP without a single lawsuit being filed. What do you say? BRZEZINSKI: Come on. SCARBOROUGH: That’s pretty good. GIULIANI: I say it was a good deal for BP. BRZEZINSKI: Why? GIULIANI: Divide it by four or five years. What do they make per year? Jim would know this. JIM CRAMER, CNBC anchor: They make $6 billion per quarter. GIULIANI: If I can put even a tentative limit on the liabilities, I’ve helped save my company. SCARBOROUGH: But they haven’t done that yet. They did not waive liability. GIULIANI: But that’s a pretty good indication of it’s going to be hard to get above that $20 billion. It gets them– SCARBOROUGH: Democrats only wanted $10 billion. You can’t say something nice about the president? BRZEZINSKI: There’s nothing nice here? SCARBOROUGH: You can’t say, “Mr. President, good job of getting $20 billion?” GIULIANI: The president has so mishandled this that it will be impossible for me to even describe how horribly handled this was. SCARBOROUGH: He got $20 billion from people in my backyard. That’s pretty good, isn’t it? GIULIANI: He would have gotten with the same leverage in a second. BP would be more than willing to give $20 billion to get themselves somewhat off the hook. Unfortunately, they stepped all over it with a comment that the CEO made. SCARBOROUGH: What would you have done differently as far as substance goes? GIULIANI: Every single thing from day one. First of all, the first thing I would have done is to bring in experts from the industry who are independent source of advice for me. I met with some of the– SCARBOROUGH: The president didn’t do that? GIULIANI: Two days ago I had dinner in Houston, with several people who were top people in the industry. Never reached out. Never, never asked, gee, has Shell done this before? Has Exxon done this before? If your father or mother were sick, you would go get a second opinion from an expert doctor. Not from an academician which is what he did. Go ask the question. Has anyone done remediation before? Has anyone done it better than BP? Bring them in. Make them your eyes and ears. Have them watching everything. Maybe they could have gotten the estimate right of the amount of oil that was coming out. It was horrendous. This is a horrible case of malpractice, negligence, gross negligence. They were off by 60 times. That had to infect every wrong judgment you make. SCARBOROUGH: Isn’t that malpractice, though, shared by both political parties and entire Washington establishment over 15 years that has allowed oil companies to drill in areas where they have no backup plan if something goes wrong? DYLAN RATIGAN, MSNBC anchor: I’ll do you one better. The American people consume four gallons of gasoline for every gallon of gasoline that exists on the Earth. We have the biggest subsidized cost of energy. We have a false price for energy in our country to this day. The cost of the wars is not in the cost of energy. The environmental liability is not in the cost of the energy. None of the liability associated with our lifestyle is actually priced in. For capitalism to work, you actually have to be paying the actual price that represents the actual cost. So if we were actually paying the real cost of energy, we would be incentivized, believe me, to come up with something else. But because of the government and the culture of political expedience subsidies of energy costs everybody’s happy to take it so we hire BP to the tune of $6 billion a quarter to figure out–which is not easy, by the way–the technology to drop 18,000 feet beneath the ocean surface to suck oil out so we can continue to enjoy our lifestyle. If you ask me whether it’s the obvious failure in the government–MMS is obviously conflicted. Whether it’s the obvious fact that we built a sports car that could basically do anything. They had the technology to go to the bottom of the sea but they didn’t have a braking system, no way to turn it off which is incredibly reckless. And you put it all together. You find yourself in a situation where everybody’s pointing fingers but no one is containing the spill. So I actually completely agree with the mayor which is we can talk all day about the problems but until you actually address the matter of the fact that oil continues to go into the Gulf of Mexico, and there are other ways to deal with it that have not been brought in, or have been brought in too late–that is shameful. SCARBOROUGH: Do you agree that there are because we have been are defending this White House saying on substance for the most part they’ve gotten it right, do you agree with the mayor that actually they haven’t gotten it right? CRAMER: I think the mayor is dead on when he says that if they had known that the spill could be 60,000 barrels, which was available if you talk to the former heads of Exxon or if you talk to Boone Pickens, which you asked me to do. (Inaudible) GIULIANI: And the people in the industry believe that he hasn’t talked to the industry because they’re bad guys. (Inaudible) GILUIANI: A bunch of bad guys. CRAMER: They’re all bad actors. GIULIANI: And from the point of view of crisis management, this is an F. You couldn’t have done it worse. Some day Harvard will do a study on if you have a crisis like this, these are the things that Obama did wrong. Here are the things to do right. I could go on and on; that was the first mistake that he made. The second mistake that he made was to kind of treat this as a political problem. Which he was doing right up until the speech the other night. Treat it as a political problem. SCARBOROUGH: It is a political problem. It’s a substantive problem, but it’s a political problem! GIULIANI: He’s just dealing with it as a political problem. That’s why he went down there only a couple of times at the very beginning. Didn’t take charge. We had Gibbs saying for three weeks that BP was in charge. The speech last night, Obama said the federal government’s been in charge from the beginning. Well, nobody ever told anybody that for the first four weeks. Maybe they were in charge in secret. SCARBOROUGH: Well, the president said himself though on April 22nd. BRZEZINSKI: Yes. I just pulled up that. SCARBOROUGH: On April 22nd he called all the agency heads in and he said, “Okay, listen. This is going to be very bad.” It’s before–it’s before the thing blew out of the water and said this is the top priority for this government. We have to focus on it. This is job number one. RATIGAN: Where is the containment strategy? GIULIANI: That’s worse because if this was job number one look at the horrible–if this is job number one which I don’t think it was because the president was off on vacation twice during all of this, if this were job number one– SCARBOROUGH: Did you go on vacation Mr. Mayor? GIULIANI: Did I go on vacation as mayor? No. SCARBOROUGH: Isn’t that a cheap shot? You never went on vacation? GIULIANI: Not in the middle of a crisis. SCARBOROUGH:  Ronald Reagan went on vacation. George W. Bush went on vacation. GIULIANI: Not in the middle of a crisis. This is the second time the president has done that, and I resent it. On Christmas day when we had Christmas bombing, he was on vacation. Remained on vacation for 11 days. SCARBOROUGH: It was Christmas! GIULIANI: He is the President of the United States of America. SCARBOROUGH: They got microphones in Chicago. GIULIANI: On Christmas evening, the first year that I was the mayor, I left my house and went to the hospital and I spent five hours there because I was the mayor of New York City and I should be on the spot taking charge of something from the very beginning. This has been a gross failure in crisis management. Could not have done it worse. SCARBOROUGH: Okay. I’m sorry. Didn’t mean to–   GIULIANI: : And you shouldn’t be on vacation when a crisis is affecting the country. RATIGAN: There are two problems here. One is the capping of the well which I think is BP’s problem. BP obviously was negligent in the construction of dealing the well. There’s a totally unrelated problem, which is the containment problem. And in order to deal with the containment problem, that is the government’s problem and you have to know what the flow rate is accurately and early in order to have a containment strategy. So my biggest criticism of this administration which is why I agree with the mayor when comes to the response is incredibly incompetent appearance of the containment strategy. SCARBOROUGH: That’s not monday morning quarterbacking? I mean, who knew? RATIGAN: The oil is still coming out, Joe. They could still bring–Matt Simmons knew. T. Boone Pickens knew. Booms, put booms around it. Drop a curtain. Put super tankers in the middle and start sucking the oil out. (Inaudible) RATIGAN: Booms, curtain, super tanker. Super suck technology. Next question. GIULIANI: And actually, Joe, it is worse if you’re right and they were in charge from the beginning because if they were in charge at the beginning they really didn’t know what they were doing. I actually don’t think they were in charge. I think their real failure was they trusted BP. And they shouldn’t have trusted BP but they trusted BP. SCARBOROUGH: And let’s just say that has been our one critique on substance that perhaps they–two things. One, they trusted BP too much from the beginning. Two, they made a political calculation that if “we go down there, we own the story. It’s not BP’s story. It’s our story.” That is a critique I think we’ll hear for some time. And can we go right now? Because this is a fascinating conversation. You’re actually the first person that’s come on this show and when I’ve challenged them give me substance. Actually you three guys, you’re talking specifics about what the president should have done. Let’s go to the barni-cam right now. Mike Barnicle. Is he wearing the white sox right now? Are you listening to this? MIKE BARNICLE, MSNBC contributor: Yeah I am. SCARBOROUGH: We’ve got three guys here that are loaded for bear. And they’ve got some specifics. What do you think?                          BRZEZINSKI: Taking shots. BARNICLE: Let’s place all of our faith in BP because they’ve done such a great job. They’re still using the same instruments on oil spills that they were using in California in 1969. If British Petroleum, which they used to call themselves, or any of these oil companies were in charge of technological advancements in our society we would still be using a rotary phone and looking at a 12-inch Bendix TV set. (Inaudible) SCARBOROUGH: Do we have the cameraman from “24” now? Mike Barnicle brings up a point but let me ask you again in the role of devil’s advocate. We hear that we had the technology to stop this. In 2002, though, Dick Cheney and his energy task force said, “No, we’re not going to take an extra step.” GIULIANI: I have no idea what Dick Cheney did, you know, five or six years ago. SCARBOROUGH: Isn’t that important to know? It’s part of the story. GIULIANI: It’s important to know as part of the history of this but the reality is, he’s been president now for 18 months. It’s about time we stopped blaming Bush. RATIGAN: Hang on, Mr. Mayor. I don’t mean to interrupt you but the North Sea has a totally different set of safety standards–totally different governmental standards. These standards have to be taken into consideration. –Alex Fitzsimmons is a News Analysis intern at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.

Read the rest here:
Rudy Giuliani, MSNBC’s Dylan Ratigan Eviscerate Joe Scarborough for Blaming Bush for Oil Spill

AP: June Private-Sector Employment May Contract

It seems that when they saw today’s today’s disappointing unemployment claims report from Uncle Sam, the Associated Press’s Alan Zibel, perhaps with the help of contributors Jeannine Aversa, Martin Crutsinger, and Tali Arbel, decided to start playing the expectations game with June’s Employment Situation Report, which isn’t due to arrive from the Bureau of Labor Statistics until July 2. If so, from a propagandist’s perspective, it’s a pretty slick strategy, given that the BLS’s report will probably be the last significant piece of economic news before the July 4 weekend, making it a larger than usual topic of conversation among the American people in the days that follow. Private sector job growth shrank to a seasonally adjusted 20,000 in May. Maybe if the AP and others make us think that June will go negative and the actual result comes in barely positive, it won’t seem so bad. The worse possibility is that they’re aware of more information than the rest of us have, and that things really are heading south in this “Rebound? What Rebound?” recovery . Here are key paragraphs of Zibel’s report (link is probably dynamic and subject to revision; bolds are mine): The number of people filing new claims for jobless benefits jumped last week after three straight declines, another sign that the pace of layoffs has not slowed. Initial claims for jobless benefits rose by 12,000 to a seasonally adjusted 472,000, the Labor Department said Thursday. It was the highest level in a month and overshadowed a report that showed consumer prices remain essentially flat. The rise in jobless claims highlighted concerns about the economic rebound — especially after a report earlier this week said home construction plunged in May after government tax credits expired. If layoffs persist, there’s a concern that the June employment numbers may show a decline in private-sector jobs after five straight months of gains , said Jennifer Lee, an economist with BMO Capital Markets. “We’ve definitely seen the economic recovery hit a wall,” Lee said. … Kevin Logan, an economist with HSBC Securities, said many economists have been expecting claims to fall below 450,000 for several weeks now. “The wait is getting longer and longer,” said Logan. “As each week goes by, doubts about the underlying strength of the economic expansion grow.” It seems suspiciously early for the press to be putting out a jobs-will-be-lost vibe fifteen days out from the actual news. If things really are getting as potentially rough as indicated, the administration’s plan to celebrate a summer of recovery, as detailed today by Politico’s Mike Allen , could turn in to an object of abject ridicule: Vice President Biden today will kick off “Recovery Summer,” a six-week-long push designed to highlight the jobs accompanying a surge in stimulus-funded projects to improve highways, parks, drinking water and other public works. Biden will present President Obama with a report laying out a spike in stimulus activity this summer, and how it will contribute to a steady climb to a total of 3.5 million Recovery Act jobs by the end of the year. Biden, Obama and other administration officials will travel to more than two dozen Recovery Act project sites in coming weeks. Tomorrow, the president will travel to Columbus, Ohio, to mark the groundbreaking of the 10,000th Recovery Act road project, around Nationwide Children’s Hospital. On Monday, Biden will travel to Midland, Mich., for the groundbreaking of the new Dow Kokam advanced battery manufacturing facility. –David Axelrod said: “This summer will be the most active Recovery Act season yet, with thousands of highly-visible road, bridge, water and other infrastructure projects breaking ground across the country, giving the American people a first-hand look at the Recovery Act in their own backyards and making it crystal clear what the cost would have been of doing nothing. … In the face of the greatest economic crisis since the Great Depression, Republicans in Congress chose to play politics with economic recovery and declared the Recovery Act a failure before it even began. They made a cynical bet that if the President fails, they win. Democrats chose to act by tackling the crisis head-on. Just over a year later, the Recovery Act is putting millions of Americans to work and helping the economy grow again. But our work is far from over.” In her perceptive column last week (“The Alien in the White House”), the Wall Street Journal’s Dorothy Rabinowitz wrote the following about Barack Obama and his apparatchiks: The president’s appointees, transmitters of policy, go forth with singular passion week after week, delivering the latest inversion of reality. Their work is not easy … The drivel Politico’s Allen relays proves that Rabinowitz was clearly not exaggerating. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

See original here:
AP: June Private-Sector Employment May Contract