Tag Archives: new yorker

Chris Rock Isn’t A Fan Of Jennifer Lawrence’s Comments On Gender Inequality, But Here’s Why

More here:

Chris Rock brought up a pretty good point when responding to J. Law.

Chris Rock Isn’t A Fan Of Jennifer Lawrence’s Comments On Gender Inequality, But Here’s Why

Chris Rock Isn’t A Fan Of Jennifer Lawrence’s Comments On Gender Inequality, But Here’s Why

More here:

Chris Rock brought up a pretty good point when responding to J. Law.

Chris Rock Isn’t A Fan Of Jennifer Lawrence’s Comments On Gender Inequality, But Here’s Why

David Fincher’s Dragon Tattoogate Embargo Solution: No Early Screenings for Critics

Film bloggers and pundits and awards season watchers have pecked this David Denby-Scott Rudin exchange to death with no clear consensus or solution, but one player in the Girl with the Dragon Tattoo kerfuffle has a solution. “If it were up to me, I wouldn’t show movies to anybody before they were released,” director David Fincher told the Miami Herald. “…If I had my way, the New York Film Critics Circle would not have seen this movie and then we would not be in this situation.” More wishful thinking from Fincher after the jump!

Go here to read the rest:
David Fincher’s Dragon Tattoogate Embargo Solution: No Early Screenings for Critics

New Yorker Publishes Hit Piece Demonizing Koch Brothers for Thought Crime of Supporting Conservative Causes

The Tea Parties are driving the liberals crazy. They charged that Tea Partiers were racists but that pretty much backfired on them when they were unable to collect on the $100,000 Breitbart prize offered for any video evidence of racial epithets that were supposedly hurled at congressmen on March 20 at the Capitol. Now it seems that they have gone back to the Nancy Pelosi charge of accusing the grassroots Tea Party of being an “astroturf” organization. And who is suposedly financing them? According to a New Yorker hit piece article written by Jane Mayer , much of the money is coming from businessmen brothers, Charles and David Koch. Of course, any article complaining about businessmen contributing to conservative causes will have a big elephant in the room in the form of George Soros who pours hundreds of millions into the far left movement. And that elephant is so large that even Mayer can’t ignore it. So what to do? Why, portray Soros as saintly. So start plucking your harps as you read the hilarious money quote Mayer employs to explain away this hypocritical matter by presenting the “benevolent” Soros floating upon his heavenly cloud: Of course, Democrats give money, too. Their most prominent donor, the financier George Soros, runs a foundation, the Open Society Institute, that has spent as much as a hundred million dollars a year in America. Soros has also made generous private contributions to various Democratic campaigns, including Obama’s. But Michael Vachon, his spokesman, argued that Soros’s giving is transparent, and that “none of his contributions are in the service of his own economic interests.” A big tell as to where Mayer is coming from is presented at the get go in a photo caption that states: “David H. Koch in 1996. He and his brother Charles are lifelong libertarians and have quietly given more than a hundred million dollars to right-wing causes .” Much of the information for Mayer’s article comes from the “non-partisan” group, Center for Public Integrity. And how do we know it is non-partisan? Because Jane Mayer says so. Unfortunately for Mayers’ assertion, even a most basic Web search reveals Center for Public Integrity to be a left-wing group which is funded by the aforementioned George Soros. What is most laughable about the charge by Mayer about the Tea Party movement being funded by the Koch brothers is that there is really nothing much to fund. It takes almost no money to hold Tea Party rallies. How much has to be spent to post on Facebook that there will be a Tea Party rally taking place in, say, Sunrise, Florida at the northeast corner of University and Oakland Park Blvd. on a certain date? Pretty much the only costs consists of minor gas fare to get there and small expenditures on signs and flags paid by the participants themselves. No big league funding necessary but that hasn’t stopped Mayer from making the ridiculous charge of big money being poured into the Tea Party movement.  Other charges made by the transparently devious Mayer are that the Koch brothers don’t (EEK!) blindly buy into the Global Warming mythology. Bottom line is that all the Koch Brothers are really “guilty” of is that they support conservative (along with vast charitable) causes. In an alternative universe where those brothers were supporting liberal causes there would be no Jane Mayer hit piece on them. 

More:
New Yorker Publishes Hit Piece Demonizing Koch Brothers for Thought Crime of Supporting Conservative Causes

Whole Foods To Make Personal Care Products Companies Prove Their Organic Claims

Whole Foods founder John Mackey, photo via new yorker Whole Foods has taken its knocks , but no one can doubt that the company has been a leader in pushing forward progressive policies that are good for the earth. The Austin-based grocer’s latest move is to require third-party certification by June 1, 2011 for personal care products and cosmetics that make an “organic” claim…. Read the full story on TreeHugger

View post:
Whole Foods To Make Personal Care Products Companies Prove Their Organic Claims

We Still Don’t Know Whether Inglourious Basterds is Going to Suck or Not

We’re Tarantino fans for sure, but a WWII movie about Nazi-killing Jews? We’re a little skeptical, and the critics aren’t helping our confusion. The reviews are starting to come in and evidence is contradictory.

Visit link:
We Still Don’t Know Whether Inglourious Basterds is Going to Suck or Not

Thoughts on the Nomination Process of Judge Sonia Sotomayor

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina has acknowledged that nothing short of a meltdown can