Tag Archives: olbermann

Olbermann Rips ‘Racist’ Nugent for Speaking at Beck Rally He’s NOT Going To

Keith Olbermann on Friday evening once again stuck his foot in his mouth on national television when he bashed Ted Nugent for appearing at Glenn Beck’s “Restoring Honor” rally next Saturday. Problem is Nugent is booked at the Boise Knitting Factory Concert House that night, and won’t be attending the Beck event. But this actually wasn’t the only fact Olbermann got wrong on MSNBC’s “Countdown,” for he also accused Nugent of making racist remarks while giving a concert in Dubuque, Iowa, a few weeks ago. Turns out that was 100 percent false as well (video follows with transcript and commentary): KEITH OLBERMANN, HOST: But our winner, Ted Nugent, former musician. He doesn`t have a call in phony advice show and he was never on anything as big as “Seinfeld,” so it has taken nearly two weeks for this to get out. At the Mississippi Moon Bar in Dubuque, Iowa, August 5th, Mr. Nugent looked out over his audience and, according to the “Dubuque Telegraph Herald” said, quote, “there is a lot of white people in this crowd. I like that. This is a white town.” Witnesses say he then pointed to at least one member of the audience and questioned that man`s race. Why would overt racism from a prominent right wing nut job and gun freak take two weeks to get national attention? Because Ted Nugent hasn`t been famous since about 1977. But here`s the punch line: one of the speakers at the Beck-apocalypse August 28th, the anniversary of Martin Luther King`s “I Have a Dream Speech” near the Lincoln Memorial? Ted Nugent. I know. I know. You thought he was dead, today`s worst person in the world. Well, Keith, according to the schedule at the Knitting Factory website, Nugent is performing there on August 28: Nice job of research there, Keith! Of course, as Tommy Christopher pointed out shortly after Olbermann’s faux pas, it appears the “Countdown” host once again blindly relied on the shills at Media Matters who wrongly wrote about this issue early Friday afternoon. Making matters worse, a photographer that was in the crowd at the Mississippi Moon Bar in Dubuque on the evening in question has flatly contradicted what Olbermann, Media Matters, and the Telegraph Herald claimed: Although the Telegraph Herald seemed to be reporting that Ted Nugent put on a racially biased show last night, what I head [sic] him say in his opening monologue was this: “Hey there sure are a lot of white people in this crowd. You need to do something about that.” He later said, heavy on the sarcasm, “Dubuque is a white town.” If anything, Nugent showed how much he honored and respected black performers of the past such as Wilson Pickett, Ray Charles, Chuck Berry and James Brown among others. He said at one point that all American soul came from these black performers who gave their blood, sweat and tears to the music. He even launched into an American Soul retrospective with songs such as Soul Man and Hey Baby. So, it appears Olbermann and the shills he foolishly allows to do his research for him got this issue totally wrong. General Electric and NBC must be so proud of their employees involved with this prime time MSNBC program!  That said, I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for Olbermann to retract this nonsense next week for that requires character.

Go here to see the original:
Olbermann Rips ‘Racist’ Nugent for Speaking at Beck Rally He’s NOT Going To

CNN’s Rick Sanchez: Obsessed With Fox News, Beck, and Limbaugh

CNN anchor Rick Sanchez revisited his vendetta against Fox News, Glenn Beck, and Rush Limbaugh on Thursday’s Rick’s List. Sanchez brought on outgoing Representative Bob Inglis, who lost a primary challenge to a Tea Party-backed Republican candidate, and when he harped about “flamethrowers” on TV and radio, the anchor pressed him on whether he meant the two radio hosts and his network’s competitor . Sanchez interviewed Rep. Inglis just before the top of the 4 pm Eastern hour. He introduced the politician by emphasizing the South Carolina Republican’s overall conservative record and his recent defeat in the primary: ” My next guest is a conservative firebrand . He is a veteran conservative congressman. In fact, he’s maintained a 93 percent conservative voting record….Pro-choice liberals have called him a ‘zero.’… He was a Ronald Reagan Republican, if there ever one was, and suddenly, he wakes up one day, and he simply is not conservative enough, not for South Carolina Republicans . He lost the recent primary. No- he got killed in the recent primary, 29-71 [percent].” However, what the CNN anchor left out is how Inglis was one of the few House Republicans who voted for a 2007 Democratic-sponsored resolution opposing the troop surge in Iraq , and has criticized skeptics of man-made global warming, as well as opposed offshore drilling . Most prominently, he voted for the 2008 bailout of the financial system . The Republican’s primary opponent used these votes and stances to defeat him. Sanchez first asked the outgoing congressman about an excerpt from his recent interview with the left-wing magazine Mother Jones, where he highlighted a constituent’s conspiracy theory about President Obama: SANCHEZ: [reading from the constituent’s letter] ‘Bob, what don’t you get? Barack Obama is a socialist, communist, Marxist, who wants to destroy the American economy so that he can take over as dictator. Health care is part of that, and he wants to open up the Mexican border and turn the U.S. into a Muslim nation .’…When I read that, I was just struck by the language. You vouch for that, right? That- who was telling you that? Later in the interview, Rep. Inglis criticized “this scapegoating that’s keeping us from the solutions” to issues like Social Security and Medicare. The anchor asked him to explain what he meant and borrowed from a recent argument by CNN contributor John Avlon , that the Tea Party would reject former President Reagan: “What do you mean, ‘scapegoating’? Where is this coming from? Because I said this or asked this of one of my guests yesterday- you know, if Ronald Reagan were running today, he would likely be in the same boat you’re in .” Sanchez pounced when the South Carolina congressman placed the blame on conservative media and grassroots activists, specifically ” Beck, Limbaugh, and the Tea Party wing ,” and took the opportunity to ask about his other favorite target, Fox News: INGLIS: I think that’s true, really. I mean, Reagan would have had a hard time on Tuesday, the 22nd of June, in the Fourth District of South Carolina, because he’s too optimistic. You know, he’s always- morning in America, the best days are still ahead. Way too many of these hot microphones on TV and radio are telling us that- no, our- the best days are behind us. It’s all going to pot. We’re done for, and way too many people are believing that stuff. I mean, the people that sell that are making millions off their books . SANCHEZ: Well, that’s interesting…. Here’s another quote. This is you on outside influences in the Republican Party. It’s what you were just getting at. You say, ‘It’s hard for Republicans in Congress to summon the courage to say no to Beck, Limbaugh, and the Tea Party wing.’ Amplify that thought process, if you would, for us, sir. INGLIS: Well, it’s very important that we basically say to these hot microphones, put down those flame-throwers. Stop running people- forcing people to this cliff that you want us to go over like lemmings. What we need to do to is say to them, stop- America’s best days are not behind us. They are in front of us, if we realize that we’re in this together, and we can solve these challenges of Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security. That’s where the big dollars are. That’s the crisis we’re facing. But, if we come together, we can actually solve that. It won’t be a 100 percent Republican solution. It won’t be a 100 percent Democrat solution, but it’s got to be an American solution that gets us to balance. So, but what we’re wasting time with is scapegoats. SANCHEZ: It almost you sounds like you’re saying that honorable people in the Republican Party are allowing themselves to be led, rather than leading. INGLIS: Well, I think there’s a big fear of these people with the hot microphones, because they have got powerful flamethrowers, and they throw that flame at you, and they say, get moving, and they get the crowd moving, and, meanwhile, you stop- SANCHEZ: You’re talking about Beck and Limbaugh and people like that? INGLIS: The people that make millions by selling soap and by selling books- SANCHEZ: Fox News? INGLIS: And by selling fear. SANCHEZ: Fox News? INGLIS: Well, they’re the competitor for you. But the idea here is to- SANCHEZ: Well, no. Look, I don’t care . I- I’m asking. I mean, you’re- I don’t know what it’s like to be a Republican congressman getting so much heat from what I believed was my side of the aisle, that it makes me start to wonder if people are pushing me in a direction I don’t want to go to. You’re in a unique position to tell his story to Americans, so I- you know, I’m not putting words in your mouth. I just know who are the people who drive that message out there, and I know that it’s Beck, and I know that it’s Limbaugh, and I know, that in many ways, you could argue it’s Fox News. Is it- do you feel it’s that way? INGLIS: Well, I think that there are a lot of people that are making a lot of money off of selling fear at this point. And there are networks that do that. There are individual talk show hosts that do that, and the sad thing is that an awful lot of Americans are running in fear in front of those folks, and especially, politicians are running in fear in front of those folks. But, really, if you’re going to lead, you need to face those hot microphones, and you need to say, put down the flame-throwers. We’re going to talk facts. The fact is, the President was born in America. The fact is, he is not a socialist. Now, let’s get rid of those non-sensical kind of commentaries and get to the real issues, which are, how do you cope with Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid? How do you put those on solid footing? On August 2, the CNN anchor hinted that Fox News wasn’t a legitimate news organization after the outlet received a front-row seat at White House press briefings. He did the same on the September 21, 2009 edition of his program.  Earlier that year, on April 8, Sanchez blamed Fox News and “right-wing radio” for the murder of three police officers in Pittsburgh. The anchor has also specifically targeted Beck and Limbaugh on a few occasions. Three weeks earlier, on July 14, Sanchez and CNN contributor Roland Martin slammed the two and their listeners : ” Well, unfortunately, there’s a lot of people in this country that look at legitimate news organizations like The Washington Post and scoff, and actually think that Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh are legitimate news organizations .” Five days before that, the CNN personality belittled conservative talks show hosts as he made a plausible reference to Limbaugh and Sean Hannity: ” The people who are really leading the charge in this country are the guys on the radio and- many of which don’t even have a college degree .” Most egregiously, he had to apologize in October 2009 after reading a dubious quote attributed to Limbaugh.

Read more:
CNN’s Rick Sanchez: Obsessed With Fox News, Beck, and Limbaugh

Keith Olbermann Out At Sunday Night Football

How many Americans refused to watch Sunday Night Football in recent years as a result of Keith Olbermann’s involvement? That’s certainly a question the folks at NBC likely have asked themselves since inviting the highly partisan and divisive “Countdown” host to be a part of the festivities associated with NFL football on Sunday evenings. With this in mind, a highly respected sports website announced Thursday that Olbermann will no longer be involved in NBC’s “Football Night in America.”  As reported by SportsByBrooks.com (h/t Hot Air headlines ): I’m told that NBC News officials requested the move, citing Olbermann’s weekday commitment to MSNBC’s Countdown with Keith Olbermann. During the 2009 NFL season, Olbermann periodically did not appear on Friday editions of Countdown. Network television sources confirmed to me that Olbermann’s departure from FNIA was not due to any conflict with cast or production crew members. I was also given no indication that Olbermann’s politics had anything to do with the move. Exit questions:  Do you believe that Olbermann’s departure from this program had nothing to do with his politics?  Are you more likely to watch Sunday night football now that Olbermann is no longer involved? Yes, those were both rhetorical questions, but I couldn’t resist. 

Go here to read the rest:
Keith Olbermann Out At Sunday Night Football

Daily Caller Gets KeithOlbermann.com, But Will Olbermann Sue?

Tucker Carlson is now the proud owner of a slightly used Keith Olbermann. With a large-print headline announcing “We own you” and a picture of ol’ Keith looking bemused whilst he adjusts he glasses, The Daily Caller promoted their newest acquisition: http://keitholbermann.com/ . It’s just the latest shot across the bow in the escalating feud between Olbermann and Carlson, which will one day be featured on a Cracked.com list of the top eight inconsequential personal feuds the media chose to cover instead of events that were actually newsworthy. The Daily Caller criticizes Olbermann at least once a week, with reporter Ruth Graham regularly writing sarcastic critiques of his shows, a feature called “We watch because we’re paid to.” According to Don Irvine of Accuracy in Media, the spat betwixt Carlson and Olbermann began over the David Weigel scandal. Olbermann and The Daily Caller exchanged pithy insults on Twitter, each claiming that the other did not know what they were talking about with Olbermann additionally saying that Tucker Carlson’s “bowtie contained [his] brain.” The must have been the straw that broke the camels back. There is only one hope for the future of the nation and that is for President Obama to personally step in and mediate between the two media personalities by throwing a wild kegger at Joe Biden’s place . Alas, they will probably go to court, as Michael Calderone writes : In a similar case, The World Intellectual Property Organization ruled in favor of actor Hill Harper when he sought to take back hillharper.com. The WIPO [World Intellectual Property Organization] noted in the ruling that that a complainant—say, Keith Olbermann—could qualify to block the transfer of a domain name to the respondent—in this case, The Daily Caller—if the petitioner can prove that the name ‘is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights,’ that the respondent ‘has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name’ and if the name ‘has been registered and is being used in bad faith.’   *Update According to the US Copyright Office : “Copyright law does not protect domain names.”

Read the original here:
Daily Caller Gets KeithOlbermann.com, But Will Olbermann Sue?

Keith Olbermann Thinks NAACP Resolution Against Tea Party ‘Was Kind of Mild’

Keith Olbermann on Wednesday said the recently adopted resolution by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People condemning alleged racism within the Tea Party “was kind of mild.” Speaking with NAACP President Ben Jealous on MSNBC’s “Countdown,” Olbermann asked, “Do you think that what you passed was actually kind of moderate?” With a straight face, Olbermann continued, “Because it struck me that, that one of the points that you emphasized was that the Tea Party is, is not a racist movement, but is merely tolerating racism and bigotry by its, by its members.” Still with a straight face, “I thought that was kind of mild” (video follows with commentary): KEITH OLBERMANN: Do you, do you think that what you passed was actually kind of moderate? Because it struck me that, that one of the points that you emphasized was that the Tea Party is, is not a racist movement, but is merely tolerating racism and bigotry by its, by its members. I thought that was kind of mild.  Kind of mild? Well, although the NAACP isn’t actually going to release a full text of the resolution until October, this is the press release from the organization: NAACP DELEGATES UNANIMOUSLY PASS TEA PARTY AMENDMENT NATION’S OLDEST AND LARGEST CIVIL RIGHTS GROUPS ASK TEA PARTY TO REPUDIATE RACIST FACTIONS (KANSAS CITY, MO) – Over 2,000 NAACP delegates today unanimously passed a resolution-as amended-called “The Tea Party Movement,” asking for the repudiation of racist Tea Party leaders. The resolution condemns the bigoted elements within the Tea Party and asks for them to be repudiated. The NAACP delegates presented this resolution for debate and passage after a year of vitriolic Tea Party demonstrations during which participants used racial slurs and images. In March, members of the Congressional Black Caucus were accosted by Tea Party demonstrators and called racial epithets. Civil rights icon John Lewis was spit on, while Congressman Emanuel Cleaver was called the “N” word and openly gay Congressman Barney Frank was called an ugly anti-gay slur. “We take no issue with the Tea Party movement. We believe in freedom of assembly and people raising their voices in a democracy. What we take issue with is the Tea Party’s continued tolerance for bigotry and bigoted statements. The time has come for them to accept the responsibility that comes with influence and make clear there is no place for racism & anti-Semitism, homophobia and other forms of bigotry in their movement,” stated NAACP President and CEO Benjamin Todd Jealous. “Last night after my speech, I was approached by an African American member of the NAACP and the Tea Party. He thanked me for speaking out because he has begun to feel uncomfortable in the Tea Party and wants to ensure there will always be space for him in both organizations. I assured him there will always be a place for him in the NAACP. Dick Armey and the leadership of the Tea Party need to do the same.” The resolution was amended during the debate to specifically ask the Tea Party itself to repudiate the racist elements and activities of the Tea Party. It comes on the heels of NAACP President and CEO Benjamin Todd Jealous’ announcement of the “One Nation, Working Together” Movement culminating with a national march on Washington on 10-2-10. The resolution will now go to the NAACP National Board of Directors for a full vote when they meet in October 2010 in Baltimore, MD. A formal copy of the resolution will be released at that time. Founded in 1909, the NAACP is the nation’s oldest and largest civil rights organization. Its members throughout the United States and the world are the premier advocates for civil rights in their communities, conducting voter mobilization and monitoring equal opportunity in the public and private sectors. For the record, that’s what a shill like Olbermann believes is mild. Any questions? 

Visit link:
Keith Olbermann Thinks NAACP Resolution Against Tea Party ‘Was Kind of Mild’

PolitiFact Catches Keith Olbermann In Another Significant Error

Keith Olbermann had a terrible day on Tuesday. In baseball terminology, he went 0 for 3.  After NewsBusters reported two segments from his low-rated “Countdown” program that either included selectively edited transcripts to mislead viewers or material misrepresentations contradicted by numerous sources, the fact-checking website PolitiFact determined another statement made by MSNBC’s hottest property as “False”. So egregious were Olbermann’s comments that Politifact almost gave them their lowest rating, “Pants on Fire,” which readers should recall from their youth always came after “Liar, liar.” Before we get to PolitiFact’s analysis, let’s witness Olbermann at his worst (video follows with transcript and LOTS of commentary, h/t Lachlan Markay): KEITH OLBERMANN, HOST: BP and its co-conspirators are also gaining from previously unreported tax benefits. It‘s allowed to write-off the rent it paid for Transocean, the company that owned the Deepwater Horizon, in order to lease the oil rig. That saves BP hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Transocean, meanwhile, having fled first to the Cayman Islands and then to Switzerland to lower its corporate tax bill by almost 15 percent. The Center for American Progress counting nine different subsidies that the U.S. government gives to an industry that makes more money that any other industry, including refunds for drilling costs and refunds to cover the cost of searching for oil. Subsidies for oil and gas companies make up 88 percent of all federal subsidies. Just cutting the oil and gas subsidies out would save the U.S. government $45 billion every year.   Uhhhh, no! Frankly, not even close as PolitiFact reported Friday: We tracked down the Center for American Progress paper the statistic was drawn from — “Pumping Tax Dollars to Big Oil: Getting Government Priorities Right on Tax Subsidies for Oil Companies,” published on April 14, 2010, by Sima J. Gandhi, a senior economic policy analyst with the center. In the paper, Gandhi wrote, “Tax expenditures are government spending through the tax code. They are distributed through deductions, exclusions, credits, exemptions, preferential tax rates, and deferrals. What makes them look different from grants or checks is that they are delivered through the tax code as part of tax expenditure spending programs. These tax expenditures can amount to a significant portion of federal subsidies for oil and gas. The cost of tax expenditure programs for oil and gas companies made up about 88 percent of total federal subsidies in 2006.” When we read that, it sounded to us like Gandhi was saying that 88 percent of all oil and gas subsidies were accomplished through the tax code — not that 88 percent of all federal subsidies went to the oil and gas industry. To check that, we contacted Gandhi. She confirmed our suspicion and pointed us to her original source — a 2006 paper published by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, a state office. The paper includes a detailed table and says that “various taxes represented approximately 87.4 percent of federal government subsidies for oil and gas in 2006.” So it’s clear to us that Olbermann misstated that statistic. As for the government saving $45 billion a year if all oil and gas subsidies were cut: This one proved even easier to check. We located a different Center for American Progress paper by Gandhi, “Eliminating Tax Subsidies for Oil Companies,” published on May 13, 2010. In it, she outlines nine different types of subsidies (Olbermann was right about that number) and concludes that “the total government savings from eliminating these subsidies is projected to be $45 billion over 10 years.” That’s $45 billion over 10 years, not one year, as Olbermann had said. We aren’t qualified to judge the accuracy of the Center for American Progress’ statistics, which may well draw criticism from conservatives. But Olbermann clearly muffed it twice when he repeated them incorrectly to viewers — and by a substantial margin — giving viewers the impression that oil and gas subsidies are 10 times more expensive than they actually are. Because of this, we considered rating his comment Pants on Fire, but his errors seemed to us to be sloppy rather than devious. So we’ll give him a rating of False. PolitiFact may see this as “sloppy rather than devious,” but when a man gets three things wrong in one show, one certainly has to wonder. As NewsBusters previously reported , Olbermann on the same evening selectively edited and cherry picked from a Rush Limbaugh radio transcript to make the conservative talker appear racist. The “Countdown” host also on Tuesday claimed Abraham Lincoln only lost one election in his political career, an errant proclamation employed to discredit Nevada senatorial candidate Sharron Angle. PolitiFact just identified strike three. The question is how much more of this is MSNBC going to put up with. Right now, despite only getting about one million viewers an evening, Olbermann is this cable channel’s hottest property. But can a news network tolerate this level of incompetence while maintaining any sense of credibility, or is that beside the point for an organization that turns a blind eye to its newscasters admitting that they get tingles up their leg when a presidential candidate speaks? 

Read more here:
PolitiFact Catches Keith Olbermann In Another Significant Error

Keith Olbermann Against the World

Tonight Keith Olbermann returned from vacation and used his “Worst Persons” segment to emphatically rebuff the Times report stating that he and Bill O’Reilly ‘s feud has been muzzled by corporate chieftains. He also addressed the Richard Wolffe situation online. Olbermann kicked off his “Worst Persons” segment by lashing out at Brian Stelter , the Times media reporter who broke the story that on June 1st Olbermann and Bill O’Reilly were told to stop taking each other to the woodshed on the air because their bloody feud had become detrimental to the corporate interests of the parent corporations running MSNBC and Fox News

Read this article:
Keith Olbermann Against the World