Tag Archives: requirement

Bogus Bolitics: Democratic Senator Supports NRA Provision That Would Allow People Declared Mentally Ill To Purchase Guns

Democratic Senator Supports Provision Allowing Mentally Ill To Purchase Guns The gun control debate is still a hot topic across the nation , and the recent decision of a Democratic Senator Mark Pryor to speak out in support of a seemingly controversial NRA gun provision has added fuel to the fire. via Think Progress Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR) hinted on Tuesday that he would oppose a Democratic initiative to expand background checks to all gun purchases, but reiterated his support for an NRA-backed measure that would permit individuals deemed mentally ill or incompetent to purchase firearms more freely. Pryor emphasized removing records from the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, rather than broadening the requirement: “I do support improving the background check. I want to make sure that when we put data in the background check that we have the right kind of mental health data. We need integrity in that data to be in there and we also need a process where people can get their names out of there when the time is right. Either they got their name wrongly in the first place or they’ve gone through some issue or whatever and that’s behind them and they need to get their name out of the database. So I support a bipartisan bill on that, in fact I think it’s endorsed by the NRA, so I’m not like totally opposed to every single thing. I try to be reasonable on this.” Do you agree with what the Senator is saying?

Link:
Bogus Bolitics: Democratic Senator Supports NRA Provision That Would Allow People Declared Mentally Ill To Purchase Guns

Meek Mill Nabs Spot On MTV Jams’ Fab 5

Maybach Music Group MC joins Big Sean and Future on list of 2011’s hottest new hip-hop upstarts. By Rob Markman Meek Mill Photo: Jerritt Clark/FilmMagic Meek Mill is just trying to live up to his name. After the receiving the rap moniker “Meek Millionaire” from a deceased friend as a teen, the Philadelphia MC decided to tweak his handle — at least until his dreams become reality. “I was using that rap name when I was like 14, 15. But then, as I got older, 18, I started being in the streets. I ain’t calling myself no millionaire running around the streets and I’m hurting, so I just ended up cutting it short to ‘Meek Mill,’ and I left it at that,” he told MTV News. Now, Meek is part of Rick Ross’ Maybach Music Group and MTV Jams’ 2011 Fab 5 lineup, and well on his way to the money. Conceived on MTV Jams in 2005, the Fab 5 is a collection of the year’s most outstanding new hip-hop artists who have made a visual impact on the road to releasing their debut albums. Fab 5 alumni include Juelz Santana, Tony Yayo, Paul Wall, Young Jeezy, Kid Cudi, Drake and 2011 inductees Big Sean and Future . This year, MTV Jams, MTV News and Sucker Free will bring you 2011’s hottest new hip-hop upstarts, and Meek Mill is at the top of the list. Locally, Mill made a name for himself in Philly thanks to his fiery freestyles and street mixtapes, particularly his Flamerz series. His early efforts caught the attention of T.I. and Rick Ross, who collaborated with Meek on his “Ros

Shark Week Begins With Andy Samberg’s ‘In Your Face’ Shark Officer

‘Saturday Night Live’ funnyman serves as Chief Shark Officer for Discovery Channel’s annual shark fest. By Eric Ditzian Andy Samberg Photo: MTV News It’s Shark Week , people! It’s that time of year when it’s too damn hot to go outside and we’re all too willing to embrace a shameless and brilliant marketing ploy in which Discovery Channel devotes much of its schedule to the sharp-toothed fishies and we stay glued to the TV because the whole thing honestly is freaking badass. To wit, get ready this week for documentaries called “Shark Feeding Frenzy,” “Sharkman,” “Air Jaws: Sharks of South Africa” and “Top Five Eaten Alive.” Yes, the narration will be heavy on machismo, the soundtracks will veer between horror-movie strings and staccato, annoy-your-neighbors bass lines, and the whole thing will be overseen by Andy Samberg . We’re not exactly sure why, and we’re certainly not complaining, but the “Saturday Night Live” funnyman has been appointed Discovery’s first-ever Chief Shark Officer. Tops among his awesome responsibilities, we found out during a chat with Samberg and his Lonely Islands pals this spring, is the requirement that the CSO taunt all non-CSOs. “Chief Shark Officer! In your face, other dudes!” he cracked. “We’re kind of the Chief Shark brain trust on this,” Jorma Taccone offered. “No, you guys haven’t helped me at all on this,” Samberg shot back with killer instinct. So it’s Samberg and Samberg alone guiding us through the hazards and happiness of Shark Week. Can he handle the pressure? After debuting in 1987, the weeklong block of programming was watched by almost 31 million people last year — the highest-rated shark-themed week in Discovery’s history. Samberg ain’t scared. “I’ve already been in the water with sharks,” he said of a trip to the Bahamas to shoot promotional material for the week. “Did you get to slap five with a shark?” Taccone wanted to know. “Yes, me and a shark slapped five!” Samberg replied. Are you looking forward to the Samberg-helmed Shark Week? Let us know in the comments!

Read this article:
Shark Week Begins With Andy Samberg’s ‘In Your Face’ Shark Officer

Sebelius to Health Insurers: Shut Up Or Else About ObamaCare Increasing Premiums; To AP, It’s Mere ‘War of Words’

Adopting language and tactics more typical of tyrants, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius yesterday sent a public letter to the head of a health insurance industry group demanding that carriers stop “falsely blaming premium increases for 2011 on the patient protections in the Affordable Care Act,” and that “that there will be zero tolerance for this type of misinformation and unjustified rate increases.” She reinforced her short-term threat with a longer-term one: We will also keep track of insurers with a record of unjustified rate increases: those plans may be excluded from health insurance Exchanges in 2014. Simply stated, we will not stand idly by as insurers blame their premium hikes and increased profits on the requirement that they provide consumers with basic protections. Keep in mind that three months ago (noted at NewsBusters ; at BizzyBlog ), leaked government documents estimated that, depending on the assumption sets used, anywhere from 49 of small employer health plans and 34 of large employer plans would be forced financially or otherwise to “relinquish” their “grandfathered” status by 2013. This necessarily means that the market for private plans will decrease, while the market for those who would be forced to buy coverage through the “Exchanges” (what’s with the uppercase?) will necessarily expand. Thus, when Sebelius threatens exclusion from the “Exchanges,” she is really saying: “Shut up and eat your costs, or you’ll be out of business in a few years.” If you didn’t expect that the Associated Press’s coverage of Sebelius’s threats by Ricardo Alonso-Zalivar wouldn’t make this linkage, you’re right. In fact, the AP writer characterized them as “warnings” and part of a “war of words”  in his coverage (HT Hot Air ): HHS to insurers: Don’t blame us for your rates President Barack Obama’s top health official on Thursday warned the insurance industry that the administration won’t tolerate blaming premium hikes on the new health overhaul law. “There will be zero tolerance for this type of misinformation and unjustified rate increases,” Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in a letter to the insurance lobby. “Simply stated, we will not stand idly by as insurers blame their premium hikes and increased profits on the requirement that they provide consumers with basic protections,” Sebelius said. She warned that bad actors may be excluded from new health insurance markets that will open in 2014 under the law. They’d lose out on a big pool of customers, as many as 30 million people nationwide. The letter to America’s Health Insurance Plans was the latest volley in a war of words over who gets the blame for rising premiums. Polls show that many people expect their costs to go up as a result of the law, but there’s also widespread mistrust of the insurance industry. Note how helpful the AP writer is to Sebelius’s cause with his reference to “bad actors,” as if a company passing on otherwise legitimate cost increases is presumptively so. It’s also a complete whitewash to describe what’s going on as a “war of words,” when the government is browbeating carriers into reducing otherwise presumably justifiable increases, while brazenly brandishing denial of access to the “Exchanges” and other sanctions as weapons. Though I can’t be sure, it appears that Alonso-Zaldivar got his 30 million figure from estimates of “the uninsured” — really those who don’t have insurance for a brief period during a given year — who would become covered under ObamaCare. If that’s the case, he has totally ignored Treasury’s preliminary estimates of those who would have to flee to the “Exchanges” as a result of employer plan terminations. Even at the low end of Treasury’s estimates (a blended 39% of small and larger employers, assuming that terminated plans have similar average numbers as those which remain), as many as 48 million Americans (39% x roughly 190 million Americans under age 65 x roughly 65% who currently have private plan coverage) would be herded into the exchanges by the end of 2013. Now there’s a threat, namely that the “Exchanges” will be so overwhelmed by new applicants that they will fail to function properly and disrupt the entire system of medical care delivery. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

Link:
Sebelius to Health Insurers: Shut Up Or Else About ObamaCare Increasing Premiums; To AP, It’s Mere ‘War of Words’

The Trillion Dollar Lie: The Insurance Mandate Actually Is A Tax

Pres. Obama swore up and down that the insurance mandate was not a tax. He had to swear as much, having campaigned on a promise of no new taxes for the middle class. “But in court, the Obama administration and its allies now defend the requirement as an exercise of the government’s 'power to lay and collect taxes,'” reports the New York Times, meaning that Obama has pulled yet another Joe Wilson. “Administration officials say the tax argument is a linchpin of their legal case in defense of the health care overhaul and its individual mandate, now being challenged in court by more than 20 states and several private organizations.” In case you've forgotten exactly what the fibber-in-chief said when he was peddling the mandate, here's an exact quote: “For us to say that you’ve got to take a responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax increase.” http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/18/health/policy/18health.html http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2009/09/obama-mandate-is-not-a-tax.html added by: 2hellnwait

How to Destroy a Perfectly Good Fake Trend Story

We all know that New York Times fake trend stories are annoying because they are 1) fake, and 2) trend stories. But do not neglect their third worst quality: many are terribly written. Allow us to show you. The underlying cause of the poorest-written portions of most fake trend stories is the insistence by NYT editors that every fake trend story have some sort of “stats” graf—a graf that attempts to force a clearly made-up premise into an empirically justifiable form. Since fake trend stories are, by definition, pure bullshit, this requirement often results in the most tortured or transparently ridiculous part of what could have been a perfectly decent story, had it been upfront about its total lack of journalistic merit. Examples: The Run-On Nightmare: The NYT’s in-house grammar scold highlights this (14 verb forms in one sentence!), from last month’s “H ipsters are living in cold apartments ” piece: As Americans across the country wrestle with spouses and their thermostats over how low to go – as they join contests like Freeze Yer Buns, now in its third year, a challenge posed by Deanna Duke, a Seattle-based environmental blogger who calls herself the Crunchy Chicken, to lower the thermostat to around 55 degrees, or follow the lead of the Maine couple trying to live comfortably in a furnace-free house and blogging about it in their Cold House Journal – there are those who are living nearly without heat by choice, and doing just fine, thank you very much. The Unsupported Anecdote-to-Wide Angle Pivot: From September’s ” Everybody is jogging with their babies now ” fitness piece : Mrs. Keith is an extreme example of an increasingly common breed of runner: parents who hit the road with their offspring in jogging strollers, typically single or double versions with two 16-inch inflatable tires in back and a single tire in front. But, experts say, there is a learning curve to running with a stroller. The Futile Attempt to Disprove Its Own Acknowledgment of Preposterousness: From Guy Trebay’s lively expos