Tag Archives: Iran

Time’s Klein Attacks John McCain for Challenging Obama’s Lack of Leadership on Iran

On the eve of the one year anniversary of the most recent Iranian presidential election, the Web site for The New Republic gave space to Sen. John McCain (R-Arizona) to lament the Obama administration’s feckless response to the corrupt Iranian regime’s crackdown on protesters and its continued quest for nuclear weapons and terrorist sponsorship under Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. In response two days later, Time’s Joe Klein resorted to his typical petulant bluster to berate the generally liberal magazine and divert attention from the real issue of Obama’s leadership: The New Republic perplexes me. It has some of the best and smartest writing around. And then it allows John McCain, whose lack of knowledge about Iran is encyclopedic, to hold forth in its pages. Klein’s June 13 Swampland blog post at Time.com focused on one brief excerpt of McCain’s item, launching into how he felt McCain was not nuanced enough and hence lacks credibility to address the issue: [McCain’s] lack of knowledge–his tendency to bloviate without thinking–can be staggering, as in this case: Is it any wonder that this is the same regime that spends its people’s precious resources not on roads, or schools, or hospitals, or jobs that benefit all Iranians—but on funding violent groups of foreign extremists who murder the innocent? Yes, the regime spends money funding noxious terrorist outfits like Hizballah. But it also spends vastly on its people. The road, school and medical systems far surpass those of neighboring countries–they approach the level achieved in that other regional petro-giant, Saudi Arabia  (the Iranian school system, though riddled with propaganda when it comes to the teaching of history, is excellent when it comes to math and science–and it is fully coeducational; Iran’s women are, without question, the best educated in the region). More important, under Ahmadinejad, a phenomenal amount of money and attention has gone directly to the poor, especially the widows and children of the 1 million Iraq war casualties, raising them into the middle class. You get the picture, Ahmadinejad is a bad guy, but he’s done some good things. Ol’ John McCain just can’t see that because he’s so blinded by his ideology, Klein insists. At the close of his post, Klein smarmily huffed: I’d have hoped that the New Republic would have published something more insightful than this onanistic rant. Leaving aside the fact that it’s rich seeing Klein, of all people, to carp about “onanistic rant[s],” I would argue Klein’s real issue with McCain is that he dares to challenge the Obama administration as feckless when it comes to handling foreign policy in general and Iran in particular.   Here’s McCain’s chief complaint, which Klein failed to rebut: We—the government and the people of the United States—need to stand up for the Iranian people. We need to make their goals our goals, their interests our interests, their work our work. We need a grand national undertaking to broadcast information freely into Iran, and to help Iranians access the tools to evade their government’s censorship of the Internet. We need to let the political prisoners in Iran’s gruesome prisons know that they are not alone, that their names and their cases are known to us, and that we will hold their torturers and tormentors accountable for their crimes. We need to publicize the names of Iran’s human rights abusers, and we need to make them famous. Then we need to impose crippling sanctions on them for their human rights abuses—to go after their assets, their ability to travel, and their access to the international financial system, which is exactly the goal of legislation that I and others have proposed. It is one thing for members of Congress to lead this effort; but it would be quite another thing to have that leadership unequivocally from the President himself. The United States has never had a president whose personal story resonates as strongly overseas as President Obama’s does. His ability to inspire, to move people, to mobilize them on behalf of democratic change is one of the greatest untapped sources of strength now available to Iran’s human rights activists. If President Obama were to unleash America’s full moral power to support the Iranian people—if he were to make their quest for democracy into the civil rights struggle of our time—it could bolster their will to endure in their struggle, and the result could be genuinely historic.  If there were ever any doubt about the possibility that Iran will have a democratic future, the birth of the Green Movement over the past year should lay that doubt to rest. That democratic future may be delayed for awhile, but it will not be denied. And now is the time for the United States to position ourselves squarely on the right side of Iranian history—on the side of courageous Iranian reformers such as Shiva Nazar Ahari. Shiva was first arrested on September 11, 2001, at the age of 17, for the heinous act of participating in a candlelight vigil for the victims of that day of terror. After her release, she continued her human rights activism, until she was detained again in the wake of last year’s election. Shiva now faces the baseless charge of supporting terrorism—a charge that carries the penalty of death. June 10 is Shiva’s birthday. She is only 26. She spent this birthday, like so many before it, unjustly detained in Iran’s most notorious prison—locked in a cage so small that, last we heard, she cannot fully move her arms and legs. Shiva Nazar Ahari represents the future of Iran, and all that could be best about it—its decency, its peacefulness, its commitment to dignity and justice for all. Shiva, and all of Iran’s prisoners of conscience, must know that they are not alone in their struggle for democracy, and their desire to change their government. America stands with them, as we do with all who seek a better future for Iran. The Green Movement lives on. Eventually—maybe not tomorrow or next year or even the year after that, but eventually—Iranians will achieve the democratic changes they seek for their country. The Iranian regime may appear intimidating now, but it is rotting inside. It has only brute force and fear to sustain it, and Iranians won’t be afraid forever.

Here is the original post:
Time’s Klein Attacks John McCain for Challenging Obama’s Lack of Leadership on Iran

Scott Ritter in Conversation with Robert Scheer Part IV

Author: truthdig Added: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:43:05 -0800 Duration: 533 Scott Ritter speaks with Robert Scheer about American ignorance, the lies that led us to war, Iran’s nuclear program and more. Part IV: Nuclear weapons and the war on terror.

http://flash.revver.com/player/1.0/player.swf?mediaId=208804

Read more from the original source:
Scott Ritter in Conversation with Robert Scheer Part IV

Scott Ritter in Conversation with Robert Scheer Part III

Author: truthdig Added: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:43:05 -0800 Duration: 720 Scott Ritter speaks with Robert Scheer about American ignorance, the lies that led us to war, Iran’s nuclear program and more. Part III: Korea, Iran and why there aren’t more Scott Ritters.

http://flash.revver.com/player/1.0/player.swf?mediaId=208796

Follow this link:
Scott Ritter in Conversation with Robert Scheer Part III

First Look at Frank Miller’s Xerxes Probably Won’t Thrill Iran

Three years ago, the screen adaptation of Frank Miller’s brutal graphic novel 300 became a global smash. Or it was a smash everywhere but Iran, which somehow objected to the depiction of an androgynous, bedazzled Persian king Xerxes laying cruel waste to the scrappy, ab-happy Spartans. The ethnic implications seemed the least of moviegoers’ concerns — not to mention Miller’s own, which have now returned to the mega-pierced monarch for the prequel Xerxes . The author still has a ways to go on the project, but I think we all know a movie adaptation is inevitable. As such, a first look at Xerxes — who makes Mr. T look like the Dalai Lama — clues us in to what will be pissing Iran off in the next two to three years.

Read the original:
First Look at Frank Miller’s Xerxes Probably Won’t Thrill Iran

Turkey Willing To Act As Iran Intermediary

Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu agrees that diplomacy is the best way to fix the problem over Iran’s atomic program. Turkey is willing and ready to mediate Tehran and world powers. Together with his Iranian counterpart Manouchehr Mottaki, Davutoglu addressed a joint media conference. According to Mottaki, Iran is ready for the deal and also plans to hold talks with all 15 members of the UN Security Council that includes Turkey in order to break the deadlock over the deal. Ankara believed that the solution for Iran’s nuclear program is through negotiations and diplomatic process. Turkey Willing To Act As Iran Intermediary is a post from: Daily World Buzz Continue reading

Brazil And Turkey Turned Down Iran Sanctions

The leaders of Brazil and Turkey have notified the US President Barack Obama that they are still against to imposing sanctions on Iran. On Tuesday, in a meeting held with the US president regarding the 47-nation Nuclear Security Summit in Washington DC, President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva of Brazil and Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey disagreed with the US calls for sanctions to be executed on Iran. The two leaders recommended the US president to search for a “negotiable solution” to the argument over Iran’s nuclear program so as to prevent imposing new UN sanctions on the country. President Lula also asked President Obama for further negotiations and to give Iran a chance. In spite of this, both leaders failed to attain a firm response from the US president. However, President Obama’s reaction was not definite, putting into consideration that the US leader is not all negative about attempting a negotiated solution. Brazil And Turkey Turned Down Iran Sanctions is a post from: Daily World Buzz Continue reading

Castle Season 2 Episode 21: Den of Thieves [Online Video]

Castle Season 2 Episode 21 is entitled “Den of Thieves”. The 21st installment of this series was aired at 10PM on ABC. Watching an episode online pales in comparison to watching it on a big screen tv. But what can you do when you are on the run? Or in the office during lunch break? Yes, you do not have any choice but to watch online. Fortunately for you, we have taken the liberty to provide you with a link (above and below) where you can watch the episode mentioned. Additionally, you can also find video links to former episodes of this series by doing a search at the top right corner of this website. If you have any encounter any problems doing so, simply contact us via the contact link above and we will do our best to help you out. Now without further ado, please check out the show and episode summary below. Meet Richard Castle: he’s a successful murder-mystery writer who has just killed off his main character. However, it seems one of his fans liked his books just a bit too much when a copycat murderer starts running around killing people as described in Castle’s books. Here is the summary of the episode: Castle Season 2 Episode 21 – Den of Thieves Investigating the murder of a thief, Castle and Beckett are surprised to learn that Esposito has a personal connection to the suspected killer. Another surprise is in line for Castle when Beckett hits it off with the handsome Robbery detective assigned to the case, Tom Demming. Now this romantic triangle must work together to solve the case Watch Castle Season 2 Episode 21 . If you found this post useful or you simply liked what you read, please subscribe via the subscription field below for free! The DWB team does its best to provide you with the latest information possible found in the internet. Whether be it sports, world or simply just the latest news buzz, we will provide it to you. However, sites that we link to are not our own so please use your discretion when visiting those sites. Nevertheless, we have checked them firsthand to make sure they are working fine. Castle Season 2 Episode 21: Den of Thieves [Online Video] is a post from: Daily World Buzz Continue reading

The Spy Who Wronged Me: The New York Times’ Messy Entanglement With an Ex-CIA Operative [Spooks]

The New York Times reported this morning that an off-the-books intelligence operation may be assassinating people in Pakistan with the help of a sketchy former spook—the same guy that the Times hired to save reporter David Rohde ‘s life. Dexter Filkins and Mark Mazzetti’s Page One story on a secret contractor-run intelligence program in Afghanistan and Pakistan offers a weird view into the intersection of the media business and the world of spycraft, not to mention the hazards of a newspaper like the Times hiring a private army led by an arguably crazy ex-spy. The story recounts the development of a “network of private contractors in Afghanistan and Pakistan to help track and kill suspected militants” that operated under the cover of “a benign government information-gathering program,” and Mazzetti and Filkins refer darkly to the involvement a legendary former CIA operative named Duane “Dewey” Clarridge as evidence that something was fishy about the whole thing. They describe Clarridge as “a former top C.I.A. official who has been linked to a generation of C.I.A. adventures, including the Iran-Contra scandal,” which is a nicer way of saying Clarridge was involved in the illegal mining of Nicaraguan harbors and indicted in 1991 for lying to Congress about arms shipments to Iran (he was pardoned by President George H.W. Bush in 1992 ). Clarridge is a legendary old spook in intelligence circles, and the Times says the Defense Department official who ran the program “would occasionally brag to his superiors about having Mr. Clarridge’s services at his disposal.” As the story discloses, the Times once also had Clarridge’s services at its disposal. He was hired, through his employer American International Security Corporation, in 2008 to secure the release of kidnapped Times reporter David Rohde from his Taliban captors in Pakistan. When Rohde was first kidnapped, the Times and its insurer AIG sought out a security firm called Clayton Consultants to handle the case. Clayton’s strategy, and expertise from prior cases it had worked on, was to negotiate a ransom. But after negotiations stalled, Rohde’s family became anxious and insisted that the Times pursue a dual-track approach: Clayton would continue the ransom route, but the Times also hired AISC and Clarridge to prepare a paramilitary snatch-and-grab operation. A team assembled by Clarridge was at one point suited up and ready to assault a location where they believed Rohde was being held, according to New York magazine , but the operation was called off at the last minute. Rohde and his translator Tahir Ludin eventually escaped on their own in June of last year. But Clarridge soon began causing headaches for the Times . He freely talked to reporters off the record—ABC News’ Brian Ross is said to be in regular contact with him—and began spreading rumors that the story of Rohde’s escape was a sham. Ross and New York both reported that contractors hired by the Times had paid bribes to Rohde’s guards , contradicting the Times ‘ claims that it had paid no ransom and suggesting that Rohde’s escape was a planned operation. According to one contractor who worked on Rohde’s case, Clarridge was inflating his role in facilitating Rohde’s escape in an effort to justify AISC’s enormous fees. The contractor says Clarridge routinely supplied inaccurate intelligence about Rohde’s whereabouts—on the day Rohde escaped from a safehouse in Miram Shah, Waziristan, the source said, Clarridge was claiming that he was being held in an entirely different location. The rumor campaign against the Times culminated in a series of Twitter posts by independent warblogger Michael Yon, who caused a stir in November by writing that “ex-CIA officers helped pay off release for Rohde” to the tune of “millions” of dollars. Yon’s claims attracted a flurry of attention, and Rohde responded that he would “never have written a five-part series [detailing his captivity and escape] based on a lie.” In December, in response to inquiries from Gawker, Rohde wrote that “money was paid to individuals who claimed to know our whereabouts, but I do not believe that the guards who lived with us were bribed. As I have repeatedly said, our guards did not help us during our escape. In addition, no one has been able to name the guards who lived with us.” According to one Times insider, the paper suspected Clarridge was behind the rumors and confronted him, but took him at his word when he denied it. “There’s no ill will toward Clarridge,” the insider says. “Getting accurate information out of the tribal areas is extraordinarily difficult.” But another source familiar with Clarridge’s involvement in the Rohde episode says the Times was furious, and threatened in December to withhold payment from AISC, claiming that the leaks and rumors constituted a violation of the contract. AISC, the source says, was considering legal action against the paper. The tension seems to have defused, however. Reached at his home in California, Clarridge told Gawker that the Times and AISC “came to some sort of a negotiated settlement,” before declining to answer further questions for the record. A Times spokesman says “We have no billing dispute with AISC, and AISC has no billing dispute with us.” And the Times insider insists that the dispute was “about money and hours,” not any involvement Clarridge may have had with the bribery rumors. Clarridge, who is in his late 70s, is a strange man, and has a reputation among reporters who have spoken to him of making outrageous and contradictory statements. In September 2009, he sent a political screed via e-mail to a wide contact list under the subject heading “Senator McCarthy Was Right.” In it, he complained of the influence of “far left vermin (FLV) as they are known in the bug business” and hailed the imminent right-wing insurrection: “We won the Cold War; now we will win The War of the Authoritarians, which will be a civil war in the USA and such catastrophes are always exquisitely nasty.” The prospect of the Department of Defense hiring an indicted perjurer who advocates “civil war in the USA” to run an off-the-books intelligence operation is strange enough without adding in his prior ugly entanglement with the New York Times . The fact that it was the Times itself who blew the lid off his involvement makes the whole thing unbelievably incestuous. (The Times insider, for what it’s worth, says the story was not motivated by a vendetta against Clarridge: “He came up very late in the reporting, and once he did, we had to put him in there with a disclosure of his previous involvement with the Times.”) The program started with an idea from, of all people, former CNN executive and Sharon Stone-dater Eason Jordan . He proposed a DOD-funded web site, similar to his post-CNN project Iraq Slogger, that would cover Afghanistan and Pakistan. The DOD loved the idea and funded it to the tune of $22 million, but the money was diverted, the Times says, to the secret intelligence network by Michael Furlong, a DOD official and former Air Force officer with “extensive experience in psychological operations.” Jordan’s web site, Afpax, did get off the ground, but he says he only received two slight payments from the DOD funding the work. The rest of the money allocated for the project went somewhere else—presumably to the secret network. It wasn’t Jordan’s first run-in with psy-ops. While he was in charge of newsgathering for CNN, he invited active duty psy-ops operatives with the Army to intern in CNN’s Atlanta headquarters . “Psyops personnel, soldiers, and officers, have been working in CNN’s headquarters in Atlanta through our program ‘Training With Industry,'” an Army spokesperson admitted in 2000. The program was immediately discontinued once people figured out that it’s not such a good idea to invite professional liars to help deliver cable news and study how to better lie to news organizations. So he probably should have known better.

Read the rest here:
The Spy Who Wronged Me: The New York Times’ Messy Entanglement With an Ex-CIA Operative [Spooks]

What Is Going On in Iran, Then?

You were maybe too busy opening presents or seeing It’s Complicated and eating Chinese food to read Andrew Sullivan this weekend, but you have probably heard that something is up in Iran. Andrew Sullivan’s Daily Dish covered the events in real time , and today’s New York Times has a very good piece on what went down on Sunday.

Visit link:
What Is Going On in Iran, Then?

WTF Iran? Twitter hacked and oil well seized

Either Iran just got real aggressive in the last 24 hours or someone is out to make the Islamic Republic look bad. Real bad. First, last night, Twitter goes down

View post:
WTF Iran? Twitter hacked and oil well seized