Tag Archives: nuclear-weapons

Jenelle Evans: Is She Jealous of Chelsea Houska’s Baby?!

So this is a pitiful little story. But it’s a story about Jenelle Evans … was there really any chance that it wouldn’t be a pitiful story? To recap, Jenelle had a baby , little Ensley Jolie Eason, on Tuesday. Sweet, right? Good for her. But then Chelsea Houska, the best, most likable, most stable Teen Mom of them all, gave birth to her son , Watson Cole DeBoer, on Wednesday. Do you see where this is going yet? Poor Jenelle didn’t even get one full day where all the attention was on her, which must have really hurt. It must have hurt worse once you consider that having a baby is one of the only things that would inspire people to say anything nice about this girl — not many would rip her apart right at that moment. And fans were quick to point out this unfortunate turn of events. One of her followers pointed out to Jenelle that “She stole your thunder” — and it’s true. Chelsea stole that thunder, and she stole it hard . Another stated that “Chelsea is family goals & Jenelle is the family you want to forever avoid being.” Cold. But accurate. One person told Jenelle early yesterday that “Hahaha both pictures you posted don’t have as many likes as ONE of Chelsea’s pics. You’re probably so pissed.” So is it true? Is Jenelle actually upset that Chelsea had her baby so soon after she had hers? Would she really be so petty as to be upset over some dumb social media nonsense during such a special time in her life? According to Jenelle, she’s totally cool with Chelsea. “I really don’t understand why everyone would think we would be so mad at each other for having our babies born so close,” she tweeted last night. She added an “lmao,” so you know she’s real chill about it. She also said “I’m actually happy for her and glad she got the little boy she always wanted.” How nice! And how unexpected, too, considering that Jenelle has never really gotten along with Chelsea precisely because of jealousy. The two Teen Mom stars announced their pregnancy around the same time, and while everyone was so happy for Chelsea, people were concerned that Jenelle was having a third baby with a third man . Ol’ Bitter Bessie here tweeted “Funny someone else comes out with news they are pregnant and the world is overjoyed,” then deleted her Twitter account altogether . And then, a few months before that, Jenelle got upset because Chelsea dared to start her own website. Jenelle had created hers months before, see, and it was a very original idea that Chelsea obviously stole . “Monkey see monkey do…unreal,” she tweeted at the time. “So over this show.” It’s all pretty embarrassing, but we’re glad to see that this new baby may have knocked some delusions out of Jenelle’s head. View Slideshow: 12 Most Fiery Feuds in Teen Mom History

See the original post here:
Jenelle Evans: Is She Jealous of Chelsea Houska’s Baby?!

Doomsday Clock Reset as Atomic Scientists Warn of Apocalypse

Been a rough year so far, right? You could probably go for a bit of good news amidst all the talk of border walls, Muslim bans, and Mary Tyler Moore getting cast in that big sitcom in the sky? Well, we hate to break it you (although you really should’ve figured it out from the headline), but you’ve come to the wrong place! Doomsday Clock Moves Closer to Midnight In case you’re not familiar with the Doomsday Clock, rest assured that it’s every bit as terrifying as it sounds. Started in 1947 by  The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists’ Science and Security Board (If that’s too much to remember, just think, “really smart people.”), the clock is meant to serve as a indicator of how close we are to the end of the world. Today, it inched forward 30 seconds, bringing it to 11:57:30, the closest it’s been to midnight since 1953, when both the U.S. and Soviet Union tested hydrogen bombs. (In case symbolism isn’t your strong suit, midnight on the Doomsday Clock equals ka-blooey.) Today’s move has been described as “unprecedented,” and not surprisingly, it has more than a little to do with the election of Donald Trump . “Make no mistake, this has been a difficult year,” Rachel Bronson, executive director and publisher of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists In its official statement about how colossally f–ked we all are, the board had this to say: ” Over the course of 2016, the global security landscape darkened as the international community failed to come effectively to grips with humanity’s most pressing existential threats, nuclear weapons and climate change … “This already-threatening world situation was the backdrop for a rise in strident nationalism worldwide in 2016, including in a U.S. presidential campaign during which the eventual victor, Donald Trump, made disturbing comments about the use and proliferation of nuclear weapons and expressed disbelief in the overwhelming scientific consensus on climate change .” So there you have it folks.  We’re a little bit closer to the end of the world, and darn it, if those pesky Russians aren’t involved again. It’s been all down with them since Yakov Smirnoff blew up, but electing their brutal dictator’s BFF as our president probably didn’t help matters. But hey, at least those of you live along our southern border will have a big, dumb $14 billion monument to racism to look as it as your face melts off! View Slideshow: 12 Donald Trump Tweets That Outline His Plans as President

Read the original here:
Doomsday Clock Reset as Atomic Scientists Warn of Apocalypse

Top 10 Reasons Why You Shouldn’t Try To Survive An Apocalypse

It is human instinct to try and survive anything, from nuclear holocausts and planet-killing asteroids, to killer viruses and zombies. However, if we try to brush all our fears aside for a minutes and analyze what’s in store for us in the aftermath of the apocalypse, we’d probably be holding an end of the world party right where Ground Zero would be, and get vaporized in an instant and in the process be spared from the following: 1. The Smell Unless the disaster that will end our world is a huge solar flare that will give new meaning to the phrase “scorched earth”, there will be hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions of survivors all over the world. On the other side of the coin will be BILLIONS of dead and rotting bodies, both animal and human. And if zombies are walking the planet, the smell would be exponentially worse. Not even industrial strength Lysol would suffice to wipe the stink away for eons to come. 2. Food and Water Shortages Comets, asteroids, nuclear weapons, an alien invasion, the shifting of the Earth’s crust or a deluge worthy of Noah are all cataclysms that involve massive destruction of property, infrastructure, and food and water supplies. No sense surviving the initial impact only to die, extremely painfully at that, of starvation and dehydration a short time later. A zombie apocalypse, on the other hand, tends to keep malls and grocery shops intact even as billions of people become the walking dead or end up as food for the walking dead. That means lots of canned goods and other processed foods for survivors who are lucky or smart enough to hole up in a shopping mall or a supermarket. That, however, leads directly to… 3. Dying of a heart attack or stroke from eating canned goods regularly Canned goods are a good source of sodium, but sodium, when taken in excess, increases blood pressure and puts anyone at risk for a heart attack or a stroke. And eating canned goods three times daily for their typical two-year duration surely qualifies as taking in excessive sodium, don’t you think? 4. Being made a sex slave by marauding gangs We all know the cliché about bad situations bringing out the worst in people. The problem is, this is one cliché that has proven to be true throughout history. And an apocalypse will be worse, as all bets would be off then. Forget law and order; it’s human decency that would be flushed down the toilet should the apocalypse come. Murder and rape would become a part of everyday life, because, let’s face it, there really are people in this world who get off on that sort of thing. Imagine those people coming together to form a gang and roaming around hunting for survivors. No one would want to end up like those women in Stephen King’s The Stand where the bad guys run a length of barbed wire across their vajayjays just for kicks. 5. No Electricity No more TV, computers, video games, A/C, movies and ice cold beer. Again, power plants would probably still be operational after a zombie or virus apocalypse, but who will be left to run them? We’ll have a meltdown faster than you can say “tsunami”. 6. No More Sports The NFL, MLB, NHl and the NBA will be gone, and so will be the cheerleaders who, for a lot of people, are the only reason they watch games live in the first place. No more LeBron James to hate , and no more Maria Sharapova upskirts. Taking its place will be death matches where food or other supplies are offered up as prizes. Now that would be a neat idea, if only it would have TV coverage, but electricity would be a thing of the past by then, so no dice. 7. No More Porn ‘Nuff said. 8. No Internet Facebook, Google+, YouTube and gossip blogs will all be but a memory. If anyone out there’s actually having an end-of-the world bash at any predicted Ground Zero sites, count me in for front row tickets. 9. Not Knowing Who “The Mother” is In How I Met Your Mother If the apocalypse pushes through on December 21, 2012 as that ancient calendar and millions of other doomsayers predicted, then How I Met Your Mother will have just started its projected eighth and final season by then, and the identity of the mother will not have been revealed just yet, before the world as we know it ends. Unless Neil Patrick Harris survives and you bump into him leading one of those marauding gangs mentioned above or something. 10. No More Justin Bieber, Rebecca Black… …On second thought, THIS might be a good enough reason to try to survive an apocalypse after all! Related Posts: 10 Zombie Jesus Tattoos 8 Things I Like About Transformers: Dark of the Moon Top 10 Former ’90s Child Stars Gone Naked 10 Celebrity Virgins – Or So They Claim To Be 20 of the Prettiest Women in Porn Today

The rest is here:
Top 10 Reasons Why You Shouldn’t Try To Survive An Apocalypse

Stuxnet Virus is an Example of Cyber Warfare

Stuxnet is the first in-the-wild evidence of what the future of cyber offensives may look like. So instead of the Israeli air force bombing facilities, we have covert malware infesting critical systems to slow Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions. This is cyber warfare… https://www.infosecisland.com/blogview/9861-Stuxnet-Virus-is-an-Example-of-Cyber… added by: Paisano1

Adam Savage boards plane with 12 inch razor blades

Adam Savage, of MythBusters, appears at a function in Seattle and explains how the TSA missed two 12 inch razor blades he had in his coat pocket. WTF? Go to 1:05 to skip all the clapping . . . http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3yaqq9Jjb4 added by: pjacobs51

Korean War Crisis Brought to You by Uncle Sam

Despite the fact that South Korea admits it fired the first shots that prompted the North to retaliate, the vast majority of the establishment press are feverishly blaming North Korea for a new escalation in the crisis, while failing completely to acknowledge the fact that the whole fiasco was generated as a direct result of Uncle Sam’s policy through two separate administrations to ensure hereditary dictator Kim Jong-Il and his successors acquired the atom bomb. As we have exhaustively documented, North Korea’s nuclear belligerency was almost exclusively a creation of the U.S. government in that they armed the Stalinist state both directly and indirectly through global arms dealers under their control, namely Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan. While labeling North Korea as part of the “axis of evil,” the U.S. government was enthusiastically funding its nuclear weapons program at every stage. Both the Clinton and Bush administrations played a key role in helping Kim Jong-Il develop North Korea’s nuclear prowess from the mid 1990’s onwards. Just as with Saddam Hussein’s chemical and biological weapons program, it was Donald Rumsfeld who played a key role in arming Kim-Jong-Il. If the tensions between the Koreas were to escalate into all out war, don’t expect the castrated American corporate media to mention how Kim Jong-Il and his successors grew to be such a threat in the first place – with the aid of nuclear weapons enthusiastically supplied by the U.S. government and its surrogates. more at link… Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com November 23, 2010 Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show. Watson has been interviewed by many publications and radio shows, including Vanity Fair and Coast to Coast AM, America’s most listened to late night talk show. added by: rodstradamus

Declassified: Massive Israeli manipulation of US media exposed

Between 1962-1963 the Senate Foreign Relations Committee subpoenaed internal reports of the American Zionist Council during its investigation into the activities of registered agents of foreign principals.

Time’s Klein Attacks John McCain for Challenging Obama’s Lack of Leadership on Iran

On the eve of the one year anniversary of the most recent Iranian presidential election, the Web site for The New Republic gave space to Sen. John McCain (R-Arizona) to lament the Obama administration’s feckless response to the corrupt Iranian regime’s crackdown on protesters and its continued quest for nuclear weapons and terrorist sponsorship under Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. In response two days later, Time’s Joe Klein resorted to his typical petulant bluster to berate the generally liberal magazine and divert attention from the real issue of Obama’s leadership: The New Republic perplexes me. It has some of the best and smartest writing around. And then it allows John McCain, whose lack of knowledge about Iran is encyclopedic, to hold forth in its pages. Klein’s June 13 Swampland blog post at Time.com focused on one brief excerpt of McCain’s item, launching into how he felt McCain was not nuanced enough and hence lacks credibility to address the issue: [McCain’s] lack of knowledge–his tendency to bloviate without thinking–can be staggering, as in this case: Is it any wonder that this is the same regime that spends its people’s precious resources not on roads, or schools, or hospitals, or jobs that benefit all Iranians—but on funding violent groups of foreign extremists who murder the innocent? Yes, the regime spends money funding noxious terrorist outfits like Hizballah. But it also spends vastly on its people. The road, school and medical systems far surpass those of neighboring countries–they approach the level achieved in that other regional petro-giant, Saudi Arabia  (the Iranian school system, though riddled with propaganda when it comes to the teaching of history, is excellent when it comes to math and science–and it is fully coeducational; Iran’s women are, without question, the best educated in the region). More important, under Ahmadinejad, a phenomenal amount of money and attention has gone directly to the poor, especially the widows and children of the 1 million Iraq war casualties, raising them into the middle class. You get the picture, Ahmadinejad is a bad guy, but he’s done some good things. Ol’ John McCain just can’t see that because he’s so blinded by his ideology, Klein insists. At the close of his post, Klein smarmily huffed: I’d have hoped that the New Republic would have published something more insightful than this onanistic rant. Leaving aside the fact that it’s rich seeing Klein, of all people, to carp about “onanistic rant[s],” I would argue Klein’s real issue with McCain is that he dares to challenge the Obama administration as feckless when it comes to handling foreign policy in general and Iran in particular.   Here’s McCain’s chief complaint, which Klein failed to rebut: We—the government and the people of the United States—need to stand up for the Iranian people. We need to make their goals our goals, their interests our interests, their work our work. We need a grand national undertaking to broadcast information freely into Iran, and to help Iranians access the tools to evade their government’s censorship of the Internet. We need to let the political prisoners in Iran’s gruesome prisons know that they are not alone, that their names and their cases are known to us, and that we will hold their torturers and tormentors accountable for their crimes. We need to publicize the names of Iran’s human rights abusers, and we need to make them famous. Then we need to impose crippling sanctions on them for their human rights abuses—to go after their assets, their ability to travel, and their access to the international financial system, which is exactly the goal of legislation that I and others have proposed. It is one thing for members of Congress to lead this effort; but it would be quite another thing to have that leadership unequivocally from the President himself. The United States has never had a president whose personal story resonates as strongly overseas as President Obama’s does. His ability to inspire, to move people, to mobilize them on behalf of democratic change is one of the greatest untapped sources of strength now available to Iran’s human rights activists. If President Obama were to unleash America’s full moral power to support the Iranian people—if he were to make their quest for democracy into the civil rights struggle of our time—it could bolster their will to endure in their struggle, and the result could be genuinely historic.  If there were ever any doubt about the possibility that Iran will have a democratic future, the birth of the Green Movement over the past year should lay that doubt to rest. That democratic future may be delayed for awhile, but it will not be denied. And now is the time for the United States to position ourselves squarely on the right side of Iranian history—on the side of courageous Iranian reformers such as Shiva Nazar Ahari. Shiva was first arrested on September 11, 2001, at the age of 17, for the heinous act of participating in a candlelight vigil for the victims of that day of terror. After her release, she continued her human rights activism, until she was detained again in the wake of last year’s election. Shiva now faces the baseless charge of supporting terrorism—a charge that carries the penalty of death. June 10 is Shiva’s birthday. She is only 26. She spent this birthday, like so many before it, unjustly detained in Iran’s most notorious prison—locked in a cage so small that, last we heard, she cannot fully move her arms and legs. Shiva Nazar Ahari represents the future of Iran, and all that could be best about it—its decency, its peacefulness, its commitment to dignity and justice for all. Shiva, and all of Iran’s prisoners of conscience, must know that they are not alone in their struggle for democracy, and their desire to change their government. America stands with them, as we do with all who seek a better future for Iran. The Green Movement lives on. Eventually—maybe not tomorrow or next year or even the year after that, but eventually—Iranians will achieve the democratic changes they seek for their country. The Iranian regime may appear intimidating now, but it is rotting inside. It has only brute force and fear to sustain it, and Iranians won’t be afraid forever.

Here is the original post:
Time’s Klein Attacks John McCain for Challenging Obama’s Lack of Leadership on Iran

Surprise! The BP Gulf Spill is as Big as these Nations and States …

Introducing the Best Way Yet to Visualize the Gulf Oil Spill All those vague references from newscasters about how the BP Gulf spill is as big as this US state or that US state got you yearning for a better way to visualize the spill? If It Was My Home has it. Using Google Maps and data from NASA satellites, the clever interactive map lets you build a frame of reference for the spill’s vastness … Read the full story on TreeHugger

See more here:
Surprise! The BP Gulf Spill is as Big as these Nations and States …

Phew! US Has No Plans to Use Nuclear Weapons to Stop the Gulf Gusher

photo: Andy Zeigert via flickr You’ve probably heard the lunatic proposition floating around the web that the last resort option in stopping the oil gushing out of the the sunken Deepwater Horizon is to deploy some variety of nuclear weapon to blast the leak out of existence. Thankfully, according to a New York Times report, the US government has no plans to act on what one senior official described as a “crazy” plan:… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Read more:
Phew! US Has No Plans to Use Nuclear Weapons to Stop the Gulf Gusher