Tag Archives: willie-geist

Cookout Food Smells Good: Dave Chappelle Apologizes For Saying “Give Trump A Chance” On SNL

Dave Chappelle Apologizes For Trump Comments On SNL Dave Chappelle’s appearance on SNL was hilarious. No doubt. But he rubbed a LOT of people the wrong way when he started talking that “give Trump a chance” bulls#it. “I’m gonna wish Donald Trump luck, and I’m going to give him a chance, and we the historically disenfranchised demand that he give us one too,” Yesterday, according to MSNBC’s Willie Geist, Chappelle walked his comments back. Dave Chappelle tonight in NY on his November SNL monologue: “I was the first guy on TV to say 'Give Trump a chance.' I f***ed up. Sorry.” — Willie Geist (@WillieGeist) May 16, 2017 Y’all welcoming Dave back? Offering him a burger and some chicken? Image via Getty

Here is the original post:
Cookout Food Smells Good: Dave Chappelle Apologizes For Saying “Give Trump A Chance” On SNL

Meredith Vieira Curses on Today Show: Oh, $hit!

Well, this is one way for The Today Show to bolster ratings. In preparation for an interview with Al Roker this morning, Meredith Vieira dropped her note cards coming back from commercial and expressed her irritation the way many of us might: by dropping the S bomb. The only problem? She was on live television. HA! Watch the mishap for yourself: Meredith Vieira Curses on Today Show In other Today news, rumors are starting to circulate: Might Willie Geist replace Matt Lauer as co-anchor? If that goes down, we have a feeling the long-time reporter may be borrowing a word or two from Vieira’s vocabulary.

Here is the original post:
Meredith Vieira Curses on Today Show: Oh, $hit!

Report: Matt Lauer WILL Be Fired If Today Show Continues to Suck

Matt Lauer Fired ! According to a new report, the odds of seeing that headline are increasing by the day. Sources tell Radar Online that new Today Show producer Alexandra Wallace has made it very clear: Lauer will be a goner if program ratings do not improve. “ The Today Show has always been considered a cash cow for the network,” says this insider. “It dominated the morning news ratings for years and brought in millions of dollars in ad revenue. “But if viewers continue preferring Good Morning America over The Today Show that revenue will decrease and cuts will have to be made.” And if this major move is made? “The replacement is likely to be Willie Geist,” adds the source. “He has been wildly popular with viewers and the crew since he was named co-host of the third hour of the show.” Last Wednesday, Today lost to GMA by 1.3 million viewers, the largest gap in 10 years. NBC News President Steve Capus has defended Lauer against blame for the ratings decline, making it interesting to see what happens if it really does continue. What do you think? Should Lauer be fired?   Yes No Maybe View Poll »

More:
Report: Matt Lauer WILL Be Fired If Today Show Continues to Suck

MSNBC Airs Fake News Story That Says Staring At Breasts Is Good For Men

http://www.youtube.com/v/R0NXXN05rwI

Visit link:

Does anyone over at MSNBC check the facts on stories before they are allowed on-air? An internet scam from 1999 resurfaced over the weekend. It said that men can get healthier just by staring at women’s breasts for a few minutes a day. On Tuesday MSNBC’s Willie Geist completely debunked it. One day later, in the middle of news programming on the network, Contessa Brewer reported the story as legitimate…. Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Business Insider Discovery Date : 09/03/2011 21:12 Number of articles : 2

MSNBC Airs Fake News Story That Says Staring At Breasts Is Good For Men

David Letterman Again Bashes Obama’s Vacations

David Letterman for at least the second time in eight days mocked Barack Obama for spending so much time on R&R During his “Late Show” opening monologue, the host quipped, “The President’s been busy, he redecorated the Oval Office and then he took another two week vacation.”  Moments later, Letterman talked about Obama’s address to the nation the previous day before presenting a video of the speech.  As you’ll see from this doctored clip, the President wasn’t wearing attire at all suitable for the occasion (video follows with commentary): Readers are reminded that Letterman joked about Obama’s vacations just last Tuesday. Remember shortly after his inauguration Hollywood comedians and writers felt Obama was off-limits. Not anymore!

Visit link:
David Letterman Again Bashes Obama’s Vacations

Aspiring Talk Show Host Martha Stewart Wants Interview With ‘Phenomenal,’ ‘Beautiful’ Nancy Pelosi

What two words come to mind when you think of Speaker Nancy Pelosi? If you said “phenomenal” and “beautiful,” you will probably be a fan of Martha Stewart’s new talk show. That’s how Stewart described the speaker, who she told reporters she’d like to have as her first guest. The comments indicate that Stewart’s new show will be yet another addition to daytime TV’s liberal talk lineup. “She’s a phenomenal woman – look at what she’s done,” Stewart said on a conference call, referring to Pelosi. “And she’s absolutely beautiful.” Stewart went on to state, “I’m an American. I’m involved as much as anyone in the political fabric of the country.” That may be true, but her Pelosi statement suggests she doesn’t share the general sentiments of the nation (hardly surprising, given she’s worth almost a billion dollars ) – only 11 percent of the nation has a favorable view of the Speaker. And though she aspires to replace retiring talkers Barbara Walters and Larry King as the nation’s premiere political and cultural interview, Stewart doesn’t exactly emote political proficiency. She referred to President Barack Obama’s Tuesday Oval Office address as “his State of the Union Speech.” As for the “beautiful” claim…well, it’s in the eye of the beholder I suppose. Stewart also expressed her desire to interview Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. But she did not heap the praise on Clinton that she did on Pelosi. She obviously has a deep affinity with the Speaker. Which, again, raises the question of how in tune with the political attitudes of the nation she really is. All signs point to her show being yet another politically liberal addition to daytime television.

Follow this link:
Aspiring Talk Show Host Martha Stewart Wants Interview With ‘Phenomenal,’ ‘Beautiful’ Nancy Pelosi

MSNBC’s ‘Morning Joe’ Skips Any Talk to Guests About James Lee; Al Gore Mentioned at 6 AM

MSNBC’s Morning Joe seemed to be trying very hard to avoid the Discovery Channel hostage incident on Thursday morning — even though NBC had the exclusive of speaking with hostage-taker James Jay Lee before he was shot. With Willie Geist and Chris Jansing guest-hosting the show, they talked a lot about Middle East peace negotiations, and Hurricane Earl, and sinking Democratic midterm prospects, and even anonymously sourced hit jobs against alleged serial liar Sarah Palin in Vanity Fair . In the whole three hours, they never blabbed with guests about James Lee’s inspirational figures or his ultra-left website weirdness. The subject only came up about six minutes into the 6 am hour, before a Tom Costello news report. Jansing relayed: “Disturbing details are emerging about that gunman who was shot and killed yesterday after holding three people hostage at the Discovery Channel’s headquarters in Maryland. Court records show the 43-year-old, identified as James Jay Lee, was a radical environmentalist who said he experienced quote, ‘an awakening’ when he watched former Vice President Al Gore’s documentary An Inconvenient Truth. In a manifesto Lee wrote, he also railed against shows like Kate Plus Eight for encouraging the birth rate [of] quote, “parasitic human infants.” At 7:30, after another airing of the Costello report, Geist and Jansing talked to NBC News producer Rob Rivas, but even as Rivas vaguely mentioned the Lee manifesto, the hosts stepped right around any loose talk about Lee’s eco-inspirations: GEIST: First of all, how did you get the guy on the horn? RIVAS: Well, we had initial reports of some kind of situation at the Discovery Channel but nothing confirmed so as part of our standard operating procedure, we started calling authorities and one of the places we happened to call was the discovery channel and in the course of making that conversation, he answered the phone. GEIST: He answered the phone. CHRIS JANSING: I mean, what goes through your mind? You’re calling to get a confirmation presumably from somebody who works in public relations for discovery and next thing you know, you have a potentially volatile situation on your hands. RIVAS: Well, absolutely, and you know, as soon as we found out that to the best of our knowledge this was, in fact, the gentleman who was making threats against the building, we contacted the police immediately, and we just — I did my best just to keep him on the line. I figured if he was talking to me, he wasn’t doing anything else in the building, hopefully. MIKE BARNICLE: When did you realize that you were talking to the suspect? RIVAS: Well, he sounded like an individual when we called the facility that didn’t belong there. He seemed a little bit anxious and he identified himself right away as the gentleman who was, in fact, you know, wearing a device. BARNICLE: There was a very good line of inquiry, just in the clips that we played. How did you get there with the questions? It was very good. RIVAS: Well, you know, you never want to be part of the story. I just wanted to get as much information that was pertinent to hopefully report it in the future, but also you want to keep him talking. He was very actively promoting his website, which was sort of a manifesto, if you will, of several bullet points. So at the same time we were asking him questions, we were reading the website where we could go next with the questioning, primarily just to keep him on the line. That was the obvious place to shift to the politics, but MSNBC wasn’t going there. GEIST: How long did you keep him on the phone? How long was the call? RIVAS: Probably about 10, 15 minutes max. JANSING: Did he hang upon you ? RIVAS: He did. He got another phone call or a phone rang in the background and he dropped off of our line. GEIST: And at what stage of the crisis was this? Was this early on? Was this right before he was shot, or where was this? RIVAS: This was several hours before he was shot. I believe the police or someone was trying to get in contact with him because it probably continued another three hours before it ended. Mike Barnicle strangely thought of the human connection between reporter and eco-terrorist, but Rivas admirably shifted the sympathy back to the innocent folks: BARNICLE: How’d you feel? You know, you talked to him at 2:00 and at 5:30, the guy you talked to on the phone had been shot to death. RIVAS: It’s surreal, and I’m just glad nobody in the building, none of the innocent folks were hurt. GEIST: Rob, you did a great job on the phone, keeping him on the line. Good questions. Thanks for coming in to tell us about it. Rivas might not have been the first choice for windy analysis of the Big Picture. But it’s fascinating that MSNBC can do entire one-hour Chris Matthews specials about the frightening, impending dangers of right-wing rhetoric, and then go all silent when the threats and violence emerge from the other side of the ideological fence.

Continued here:
MSNBC’s ‘Morning Joe’ Skips Any Talk to Guests About James Lee; Al Gore Mentioned at 6 AM

Vanity Fair’s Palin Antagonist: ‘I Have a Lot in Common with this Woman’

The author of a  10,600-word Vanity Fair hit piec e on Sarah Palin is defending his work, claiming he set out to defend the former Alaska governor and vice presidential candidate, but that the resulting article “was forced on me by the facts.” Michael Gross appeared on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” Sept. 2 to discuss his article in the October issue of Vanity Fair. The piece depicts Palin as a volatile, vengeful, mean-spirited figure, although Gross  only managed to find one person  willing to speak critically of Palin on the record. “The worst stuff isn’t even in there,” Gross said on “Morning Joe” when asked about the extreme picture he paints of Palin. “You know, I couldn’t believe these stories either when I first heard them and I started the story with the prejudice in her favor. I have a lot in common with this woman. I’m a small town person, I’m a Christian. I think that a lot of her criticisms of the media actually have something to them and I figured she’d gotten a bum ride but everybody close to her tells the same story.” Yet for someone so supposedly enamored with Palin, Gross sure turned quickly. He said Palin is “a person for whom there is no topic too small to lie about,” citing a speech in Wichita in which Palin contradicted other statements she’d made about finding out her son, Trig, would have special needs. “She lies about everything,” Gross continued, without offering other examples. “She lies about her personal life. She lies about, she lies about …” At one point, Gross said that “if we start returning to the standard that … a politician has to tell the truth, then she is out of here because she can’t stand up to that.” When host Willie Geist pressed Gross on criticism that his piece is a hatchet job, the author maintained that “it’s exactly the opposite. As I said before, I started this with every good intention toward her. I was just shocked and appalled at every step at what I found and I wrote this story, you know, sort of against my will. It wasn’t what I wanted to write, it wasn’t what I wanted to find. It was forced on me by the facts.”  Like this article? Sign up for “Culture Links,” CMI’s weekly e-mail newsletter, by  clicking   here.

Go here to read the rest:
Vanity Fair’s Palin Antagonist: ‘I Have a Lot in Common with this Woman’

Geist: Showing Plane Flying Into WTC ‘Always In Bad Taste’

More in sorrow than in anger, I’m about to record a personal blogging first: airing a gripe about Willie Geist.  When writing of the Morning Joe sidekick, my habit is to append adjectives such as “affable.”   Willie is indeed a likable guy, patently comfortable in his own skin.  And while I don’t suspect him of being a closet conservative, neither is he anything of a raging liberal, typically striking a regular-guy’s middle ground on most issues. All of which makes his comment of today that much more surprising—and regrettable.  Geist was commenting on an ad by an anti-Ground Zero mosque group to be displayed on NYC buses, which shows a plane flying into one of the WTC towers.  Although defending the anti-mosque group’s rights, Willie opined that it’s “always in bad taste to show the plane flying into the building.” Really? The ad was illuminating for another, chilling, reason . . . Have a look at the screencap below showing the mosque’s proposed design [note that the anti-mosque group wasn’t misrepresenting the design.  See mosque architect’s rendering here ].  Sure looks a lot like the WTC towers themselves, doesn’t it?  Hard to imagine that’s a coincidence. A certain implicit triumphalism involved? Note: Introducing the segment, Chris Jansing [subbing for Mika] said that “New York’s transportation agency has approved a controversial advertisement protesting a planned mosque near Ground Zero.”  True. But what Chris [who generally seems to be playing things straight] didn’t say is that the MTA only approved the ad after the group sued the agency, which had demanded various changes to the ad, including the removal of the plane.

See original here:
Geist: Showing Plane Flying Into WTC ‘Always In Bad Taste’

9-11 Ring A Bell? Donny Doesn’t Remember Why We Went Into Afghanistan

How clueless can a guy who lives in Manhattan possibly be?   Discussing the Afghanistan war on Morning Joe, Donny Deutsch claimed “people weren’t clear why we were there in the first place.” Uh, Donny . . . Fortunately, the ever-affable Willie Geist was there to diplomatically offer Deutsch a brief history lesson. WILLIE GEIST: Well, it was clear in the first months after 9-11. Remember, Donny?  That little piece of the Manhattan skyline puzzle that’s missing?  The Taliban regime in Afghanistan that harbored al Qaeda members who plotted it?  Hello?

Link:
9-11 Ring A Bell? Donny Doesn’t Remember Why We Went Into Afghanistan