Tag Archives: exploitation

And the Grammy for Best Nude Artist Goes to….

2010 was a banner year for cleavage at the Grammys, as the ladies of the music biz charitably showed off their chest clefts. Performers included XXXtina Aguilera , busting out of a slinky black gown, and Katy Perry , whose gigantic 32DD milk jugs deserve their own Grammy for Best Male Tent-Pitching Performance. Lady Gaga , freakishly sexy as always, walked away with the award for Best Female Pop Vocal. Despite her penchant for perturbing her audience with her fashion choices (remember the literal meat curtains she sported at last year’s MTV Video Music Awards?), Gaga rarely exposes her hoo-ha. Fans are left searching for unguarded moments of nip slip, like in her Alejandro video. But luckily, the Grammy for Best Nude Artist has some stiff competition…

Read the rest here:
And the Grammy for Best Nude Artist Goes to….

R.I.P. David F. Friedman

The skinema world lost a true pioneer of poon today with the death of sexploitation producer David F. Friedman . Friedman produced a number of b-movie classics, from the pioneering gorefest Blood Feast to the Nazisploitation shocker Ilsa: She Wolf of the SS . Friedman started his career producing underground “sex hygiene” films in Chicago, before beginning a fruitful partnership with director Herschell Gordon Lewis. Together Lewis and Friedman produced dozens of films that preached the unholy gospel of sex & violence, from “Nudie Cutie” pics like Goldilocks and the Three Bares to “roughies” like the Defilers . With the liberalizing of the Production Code in the late 1960’s the film market become flooded with hardcore pornography. Friedman showed little interest in producing XXX films, claiming he was in the business of “selling the sizzle, not the steak.” Still, he continued to produce exploitation films throughout the 1970s and 1980s, coming out of retirement to produce Blood Feast 2: All You Can Eat in 2002. David F. Friedman, the Mighty Monarch of Exploitation, baron of boobs and blood, has left the building. He will be missed.

Link:
R.I.P. David F. Friedman

R.I.P. David F. Friedman

The skinema world lost a true pioneer of poon today with the death of sexploitation producer David F. Friedman . Friedman produced a number of b-movie classics, from the pioneering gorefest Blood Feast to the Nazisploitation shocker Ilsa: She Wolf of the SS . Friedman started his career producing underground “sex hygiene” films in Chicago, before beginning a fruitful partnership with director Herschell Gordon Lewis. Together Lewis and Friedman produced dozens of films that preached the unholy gospel of sex & violence, from “Nudie Cutie” pics like Goldilocks and the Three Bares to “roughies” like the Defilers . With the liberalizing of the Production Code in the late 1960’s the film market become flooded with hardcore pornography. Friedman showed little interest in producing XXX films, claiming he was in the business of “selling the sizzle, not the steak.” Still, he continued to produce exploitation films throughout the 1970s and 1980s, coming out of retirement to produce Blood Feast 2: All You Can Eat in 2002. David F. Friedman, the Mighty Monarch of Exploitation, baron of boobs and blood, has left the building. He will be missed.

Link:
R.I.P. David F. Friedman

Don’t Put Your Secret Second Marriage Photos on Facebook [Pro Tip]

Fellas, how many times do we have to go over this: when you leave your wife and family in Ohio and go secretly marry a much younger woman in Florida, do not let her put the wedding photos on Facebook. More

How an Army of Junkies and Kids Enriches Tech Titans [The Way We Live Now]

The company behind Farmville is sealing a deal with Google and has been embraced by Apple and Facebook. That such companies would associate themselves with the exploitation of children and financially depleted addicts is alarming, even in hyper-aggressive Silicon Valley. More

Who’s being Fooled by Dairy Front Groups?

Click original link for post with external links to thing and it will make more sense. ____________________ I'd like to thank gmail's targeted ad system for, again, enlightening me to the presence of another pro animal-exploitation front group. (Always click on these ads when you get them. These places often pay per click in order to keep their ad up.) Front groups, for those of you who don't know, are groups designed to protect industries that are failing due to various reasons- exposure for cruelty to animals, health reasons, environmental reasons, worker exploitation, oil spills (BP has one), etc. The Center for Consumer Freedom is one of the most famous of these groups and has attacked everyone from doctors studying obesity to anti-smoking proponents. Today's front group is the Real California Milk campaign, who espouses on their sight that “99% of California dairy farms are family owned”. Well, since 95-99% of these farms are the dreaded “factory farms” then we know now that most factory farms are “family farms”. So if you read into the site, it is telling you the truth about the industry- when people say “family farm” it often still means “factory farm”. My favorite part is the Happy Cows section, trying to convince us that every drop of milk is “made with 100% pure happiness!” A video on the page shows green pastures with cows tagged for milking and slaughter, factory farming pens and milking parlor machines in nice, soft lighting, and baby cows just birthed fromn their mothers shortly before being torn away from them to be made into future dairy cows or veal. This footage is juxtaposed with interviews with the farmers who exploit, beat, confine, forcefully impregnate, kidnap, and kill discussing how much they love their animals. I guess business owners have to do what they have to do when so many undercover videos come out showing horrible abuse on dairy farms. One of the biggest messages of the video is that the cows “need” these farmers to exploit them in order to live (before they are killed of course), and thus, the relationship involves mutual respect and help. Talk about ridiculous. It doesn't take an animal rightsist to realize that when you force an animal to breed and force the babies into these farming conditions, that they are not voluntarilly doing anything. It's also quite true that farm animals survive quite well outside of dairy farms. Take the rescued veal calves living out their lives at Woodstock Farm Animal Sanctuary as an example. Another apparently touching section of a video is a farmer patting himself on the back because, after his cows are dragged to the milking parlor (in which machines are attached to them to extract the milk that should have gone to their calves- who are sent to slaughter for veal and beef), he offers them a soft bed of hay in the pen they are dragged back to, with clean water to boot! What kind of industry is this where hay to lay on top of in a prison and clean water are extreme luxuries? It's funny watching these farmers trying to hide their desire for capital behind “caring” for the cows- of which every measure is based on how much they can get her to produce. There is a constant insistence that if a cow is fed correctly, that's how she produces. That is the main concern here- not the actual well being and desires of the cows, just how much milk they make. What happens when she stops? Oh more rape and kidnapping and if she still doesn't produce enough- slaughter. At the end they claim animal liberationists have something to gain from calling for the abolition of the exploitation of animals. Really? What's that exactly? The same person says he'd invite anyone to see his farm. That's all well and good for the ad online, but in reality he'd call the cops and prosecute people for trespassing or for taking pictures of the animals- something punishable by “terrorism” laws in many areas. Even so, most farm tours never include the slaughter process or veal crates. That way, they can send people away, still able to deny that those things happen. So, bravo, “Real California Milk”! You've actually taught me more about why I oppose the dairy industry- including the “family” farms. Keep up the good work and misinformation. You might be able to combat the fact that a new undercover video comes out every month that most people can not make it through due to the cruelty involved in the dairy industry. added by: animalia_libero

Read more:
Who’s being Fooled by Dairy Front Groups?

Who’s being Fooled by Dairy Front Groups?

Click original link for post with external links to thing and it will make more sense. ____________________ I'd like to thank gmail's targeted ad system for, again, enlightening me to the presence of another pro animal-exploitation front group. (Always click on these ads when you get them. These places often pay per click in order to keep their ad up.) Front groups, for those of you who don't know, are groups designed to protect industries that are failing due to various reasons- exposure for cruelty to animals, health reasons, environmental reasons, worker exploitation, oil spills (BP has one), etc. The Center for Consumer Freedom is one of the most famous of these groups and has attacked everyone from doctors studying obesity to anti-smoking proponents. Today's front group is the Real California Milk campaign, who espouses on their sight that “99% of California dairy farms are family owned”. Well, since 95-99% of these farms are the dreaded “factory farms” then we know now that most factory farms are “family farms”. So if you read into the site, it is telling you the truth about the industry- when people say “family farm” it often still means “factory farm”. My favorite part is the Happy Cows section, trying to convince us that every drop of milk is “made with 100% pure happiness!” A video on the page shows green pastures with cows tagged for milking and slaughter, factory farming pens and milking parlor machines in nice, soft lighting, and baby cows just birthed fromn their mothers shortly before being torn away from them to be made into future dairy cows or veal. This footage is juxtaposed with interviews with the farmers who exploit, beat, confine, forcefully impregnate, kidnap, and kill discussing how much they love their animals. I guess business owners have to do what they have to do when so many undercover videos come out showing horrible abuse on dairy farms. One of the biggest messages of the video is that the cows “need” these farmers to exploit them in order to live (before they are killed of course), and thus, the relationship involves mutual respect and help. Talk about ridiculous. It doesn't take an animal rightsist to realize that when you force an animal to breed and force the babies into these farming conditions, that they are not voluntarilly doing anything. It's also quite true that farm animals survive quite well outside of dairy farms. Take the rescued veal calves living out their lives at Woodstock Farm Animal Sanctuary as an example. Another apparently touching section of a video is a farmer patting himself on the back because, after his cows are dragged to the milking parlor (in which machines are attached to them to extract the milk that should have gone to their calves- who are sent to slaughter for veal and beef), he offers them a soft bed of hay in the pen they are dragged back to, with clean water to boot! What kind of industry is this where hay to lay on top of in a prison and clean water are extreme luxuries? It's funny watching these farmers trying to hide their desire for capital behind “caring” for the cows- of which every measure is based on how much they can get her to produce. There is a constant insistence that if a cow is fed correctly, that's how she produces. That is the main concern here- not the actual well being and desires of the cows, just how much milk they make. What happens when she stops? Oh more rape and kidnapping and if she still doesn't produce enough- slaughter. At the end they claim animal liberationists have something to gain from calling for the abolition of the exploitation of animals. Really? What's that exactly? The same person says he'd invite anyone to see his farm. That's all well and good for the ad online, but in reality he'd call the cops and prosecute people for trespassing or for taking pictures of the animals- something punishable by “terrorism” laws in many areas. Even so, most farm tours never include the slaughter process or veal crates. That way, they can send people away, still able to deny that those things happen. So, bravo, “Real California Milk”! You've actually taught me more about why I oppose the dairy industry- including the “family” farms. Keep up the good work and misinformation. You might be able to combat the fact that a new undercover video comes out every month that most people can not make it through due to the cruelty involved in the dairy industry. added by: animalia_libero

Cap and Trade no more? ConocoPhillips, BP and Caterpillar pull out of lobby group

Before we explore any deep thoughts about why ConocoPhillips, BP and Caterpillar the U.S. Climate Action Partnership (USCAP) (a coalition of environmental organizations and leading corporations pushing for a cap-and-trade bill to curb emissions of carbon dioxide) we might as well drill down to the basics and remind ourselves about what is Cap and Trade. Amy Goodman explains it as the issue that splits the environmental movement in half. While some say it is a way to tax polluters, generate accountability, and raise money for new technologies, other argue that it gives free permits to big polluters, fake offsets and distraction from what’s really required to tackle the climate crisis. If you want Annie Leonard's explainer video on Cap and Trade, look no further. So here is the break down: The Washington Post reports the reason as: The oil giants also want to do more to promote natural gas, which has become more abundant because of recent developments in the exploitation of shale gas and emits half as much greenhouse gas as coal does. The legislation adopted by the House included benefits for coal producers and coal-fired power plants in an effort to secure the votes of key lawmakers. Many natural gas producers think that more should be done for them. In other words, these companies are turning towards an industry that is under regulated and somehow perceived as “natural” or “environmentally friendly”. However, ask the residents who live near this form of mining natural resources about the state of cancer rates, houses blowing up, and lighting their water on fire, and you will be initiated into the world of Fracking. BP's statement alludes to that they are pulling out in part because of their deep care for the well being of their customers: BP spokesman Ronnie Chappell said, “We think the organization has accomplished what it was intended to do. It has established a broad, principle-based framework for climate-change legislation. With the completion of that blueprint, that work was done.” “We don't think legislation pending in the House or Senate conforms with the blueprint,” he added. “A disproportionate share of the cost burden falls on the transportation sector and consumers. As a result, we're going to miss out on the most cost-effective measures, and misallocation of resources could occur.” ConocaPhilips provided the following insight in their press release: “House climate legislation and Senate proposals to date have disadvantaged the transportation sector and its consumers, left domestic refineries unfairly penalized versus international competition, and ignored the critical role that natural gas can play in reducing GHG emissions,” [CEO Jim] Mulva continued. “We believe greater attention and resources need to be dedicated to reversing these missed opportunities, and our actions today are part of that effort. Addressing these issues will save thousands of American jobs, as well as create new ones.” Kate Kenny, a Caterpillar spokeswoman, said the company wants to focus on carbon capture and storage projects, such as FutureGen, an Illinois plant that is partly financed by the federal government. “We have decided to direct our resources toward the commercialization of technologies that will promote and provide sustainable development and reduce carbon emissions,” she said in an e-mail. After reading several articles on BP's website, major news sources, and conservative energy blogs, I've come to the conclusion that if you aren't on the inside track of this issue you are out of luck if you actually want to understand this manuver. So I asked one of my favorite bloggers on energy, David Roberts of Grist, to put this into context and explain what it isn't being said in the press releases.

Cap and Trade no more? ConocoPhillips, BP and Caterpillar pull out of Cap and Trade lobby group

Before we explore any deep thoughts about why ConocoPhillips, BP and Caterpillar the U.S. Climate Action Partnership (USCAP) (a coalition of environmental organizations and leading corporations pushing for a cap-and-trade bill to curb emissions of carbon dioxide) we might as well drill down to the basics and remind ourselves about what is Cap and Trade. Amy Goodman explains it as the issue that splits the environmental movement in half. While some say it is a way to tax polluters, generate accountability, and raise money for new technologies, other argue that it gives free permits to big polluters, fake offsets and distraction from what’s really required to tackle the climate crisis. If you want Annie Leonard's explainer video on Cap and Trade, look no further. So here is the break down: The Washington Post reports the reason as: The oil giants also want to do more to promote natural gas, which has become more abundant because of recent developments in the exploitation of shale gas and emits half as much greenhouse gas as coal does. The legislation adopted by the House included benefits for coal producers and coal-fired power plants in an effort to secure the votes of key lawmakers. Many natural gas producers think that more should be done for them. In other words, these companies are turning towards an industry that is under regulated and somehow perceived as “natural” or “environmentally friendly”. However, ask the residents who live near this form of mining natural resources about the state of cancer rates, houses blowing up, and lighting their water on fire, and you will be initiated into the world of Fracking. BP's statement alludes to that they are pulling out in part because of their deep care for the well being of their customers: BP spokesman Ronnie Chappell said, “We think the organization has accomplished what it was intended to do. It has established a broad, principle-based framework for climate-change legislation. With the completion of that blueprint, that work was done.” “We don't think legislation pending in the House or Senate conforms with the blueprint,” he added. “A disproportionate share of the cost burden falls on the transportation sector and consumers. As a result, we're going to miss out on the most cost-effective measures, and misallocation of resources could occur.” ConocaPhilips provided the following insight in their press release: “House climate legislation and Senate proposals to date have disadvantaged the transportation sector and its consumers, left domestic refineries unfairly penalized versus international competition, and ignored the critical role that natural gas can play in reducing GHG emissions,” [CEO Jim] Mulva continued. “We believe greater attention and resources need to be dedicated to reversing these missed opportunities, and our actions today are part of that effort. Addressing these issues will save thousands of American jobs, as well as create new ones.” Kate Kenny, a Caterpillar spokeswoman, said the company wants to focus on carbon capture and storage projects, such as FutureGen, an Illinois plant that is partly financed by the federal government. “We have decided to direct our resources toward the commercialization of technologies that will promote and provide sustainable development and reduce carbon emissions,” she said in an e-mail. After reading several articles on BP's website, major news sources, and conservative energy blogs, I've come to the conclusion that if you aren't on the inside track of this issue you are out of luck if you actually want to understand this manuver. We have calls out to several experts who we hope can translate this action, until then, we hope that you leave your insight in the comment section below. added by: leahl

Paula Abdul Courted by ABC, For Dancing with the Stars

All of a sudden, crazy is in crazy demand. Paula Abdul is reportedly fielding a major offer from ABC

Originally posted here:
Paula Abdul Courted by ABC, For Dancing with the Stars