Tag Archives: lester holt

NBC Finds Most Americans Oppose Repeal of ObamaCare, But CBS Reports ‘Just 30%’ Favor ObamaCare

Sunday’s Today show on NBC and Sunday Morning on CBS presented seemingly contradictory polling results on how much ObamaCare is supported by the American public, although both seemed to be citing the same AP poll. As Meet the Press host David Gregory appeared on Today, anchor Lester Holt suggested that Republicans are going against the majority of Americans in promising to repeal ObamaCare as he vaguely referred to polling data and contended, “But new polling out suggests that most people not only do they not want to, don’t want it repealed, they want more added to it,” and added, “Do Republicans have to refine this message and take a better look at it?” According to the AP poll as reported at msnbc.com , “four in 10 adults think the new law did not go far enough to change the health care system.” By contrast, on Sunday Morning, CBS anchor Charles Osgood briefly recounted numbers from the AP poll which suggested that ObamaCare is unpopular. Osgood: “A poll commissioned by the Associated Press finds just 30 percent of Americans in favor of the new health care law, 30 percent are neutral, and 40 percent oppose it. Four out of 10 respondents say the new law doesn’t do enough to change the health care system.” Returning to NBC, Gregory did not comment directly on whether he believed the poll’s accuracy, as he argued that the Republican message may indeed be successful, and went on to raise the theory from the left that ObamaCare will become more popular as people benefit from it: If the message is government’s out of control, they passed this huge entitlement, it’s going to cost a lot of money and have you felt the effects of it yet, I think that has the shot to be a winning political message. But the more people start to feel health care reform, so the argument goes, it will become more popular. But that has not exactly been the case across the board yet with health care reform, and that’s why the President has to keep hammering away at it. Below is a transcript of the relevant portion of the Sunday, September 26, Sunday Morning on CBS, followed by the same day’s Today show on NBC: #From the September 26 Sunday Morning on CBS: CHARLES OSGOOD: A poll commissioned by the Associated Press finds just 30 percent of Americans in favor of the new health care law, 30 percent are neutral, and 40 percent oppose it. Four out of 10 respondents say the new law doesn’t do enough to change the health care system. #From the September 26 Today show on NBC: LESTER HOLT: The President in his weekly radio address, he talked about the Pledge for America, it’s the Republican pledge that they have released. One of the things they talked about was going after the health care, repealing the health care bill. But new polling out suggests that most people not only do they not want to, don’t want it repealed they want more added to it. Do Republicans have to refine this message and take a better look at it? DAVID GREGORY: Well, I think that, from a political point of view, if the message is government’s out of control, they passed this huge entitlement, it’s going to cost a lot of money and have you felt the effects of it yet, I think that has the shot to be a winning political message. But the more people start to feel health care reform, so the argument goes, it will become more popular. But that has not exactly been the case across the board yet with health care reform, and that’s why the President has to keep hammering away at it. HOLT: This Pledge for America, of course, many compare it to the contract from 1994. How does it differ? GREGORY: Well, I mean, it is, it’s very similar. It lacks some specifics that the ’94 contract had. But one thing that’s similar is that what’s more important than the Pledge to America, what’s more important than the Contract with America is the political climate in which they’re operating. The truth is it’s the unpopularity of President Obama and his policies right now that’s hurting democrats more than faith in the Republicans which, by the way, is an argument that the Presidents trying to exploit and say, look, the alternative is not the way to go here.

Read more here:
NBC Finds Most Americans Oppose Repeal of ObamaCare, But CBS Reports ‘Just 30%’ Favor ObamaCare

Harwood On Congressional Colbert: ‘One Of Dumbest Stunts I’ve Ever Seen’

John Harwood was not amused . . .   Harwood, chief Washington correspondent for CNBC and political writer for the New York Times, offered a surprisingly harsh assessment of Stephen Colbert’s testimony, in Colbert Show character, before Congress yesterday. Harwood ripped the episode in response to Lester Holt’s observation, on this morning’s Today show, that he didn’t know whether to cringe or laugh. Harwood had no doubts, saying “it was all cringing for me,” and went on to lambaste it from there . . . LESTER HOLT: We showed a moment ago, Stephen Colbert testifying on immigration before a congressional hearing yesterday.  I didn’t know whether to cringe or to laugh.  I think members of Congress kind of felt the same. Give me your take on what happened yesterday. JOHN HARWOOD: Well it was all cringing for me.  I thought that was one of the dumbest stunts that I’ve ever seen in the Congress, making a mockery of a congressional hearing.  I understand the reason why, which is that they thought Stephen Colbert, as he said, has some star power that can bring some attention to an issue that isn’t getting a lot of attention. But if you think that the attention from that hearing was on immigration, that proved out to be a terrible miscalculation, because it was more about the theater, the comedy, and as Savannah [Guthrie] indicated in her piece, it deepened that sense among many Americans I suspect that Congress is a joke.  And you look at Congress’ approval ratings, they’re 15, 20, 25% and I don’t think that’s what they needed.

Go here to read the rest:
Harwood On Congressional Colbert: ‘One Of Dumbest Stunts I’ve Ever Seen’

CBS to Black Beck Rally Attendees: ‘I’m Noticing that There Aren’t a Lot of Minorities Here Today’

CBS and the rest of the MSM have decided the Tea Party movement is racist and hostile to non-whites, and it’s a mantra they’re going to illustrate whenever they see an opportunity. Reporter Nancy Cordes saw a “nearly all-white crowd” at Glenn Beck’s “Restoring Honor” rally in Washington, DC, as she (at least an off-camera female voice) demanded of two black women who weren’t afraid to attend: “I’m noticing that there aren’t a lot of minorities here today. Why do you think that is?” One of the women shot back: “They’re probably over there with Al Sharpton.” In her story for Saturday’s CBS Evening News, Cordes had a very specific attendee number: “According to a tally commissioned by CBS News, roughly 87,000 people gathered here at this event today, thronging both sides of the reflecting pool, stretching all the way to the World War II memorial. That’s the largest gathering here on the mall since President Obama was inaugurated.” NBC anchor Lester Holt was more generous with his crowd guesstimate (“tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands”) before he described the Beck rally as “steeped in patriotism, rooted in the nation’s cultural divide and greeted by suspicion.” Holt opened the August 28 NBC Nightly News: Good evening. Tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands, of people from all over the country gathered at the foot of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington today for a rally steeped in patriotism, rooted in the nation’s cultural divide and greeted by suspicion. It was organized by provocative conservative talk show host Glenn Beck who was joined on stage by Sarah Palin. And if that wasn’t enough to trigger reaction from activists on the left, the timing and place of the rally certainly was – the anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr’s “I Have a Dream” speech delivered from those same steps 47 years ago today. Flashback to April: “ White NBC Reporter Confronts Black Man at Tea Party Rally: ‘Have You Ever Felt Uncomfortable? ‘” Back to the CBS Evening News and Cordes, a little of what led into the exchange quoted above: NANCY CORDES: Beck, who is a converted Mormon, likes to call himself a clown, but today he played the role of ring-master, preaching racial tolerance to the nearly all-white crowd. A change in tone from the Fox News host who notoriously called President Obama [Beck: “a racist.”] CORDES (or at least a female voice) TO TWO BLACK WOMEN: I’m noticing that there aren’t a lot of minorities here today. Why do you think that is? WOMAN: They’re probably over there with Al Sharpton. (There was no World News on ABC on Saturday night, at least in the EDT and CDT zones, because of the Little League World Series Texas v Hawaii playoff game. Hawaii won.)

More here:
CBS to Black Beck Rally Attendees: ‘I’m Noticing that There Aren’t a Lot of Minorities Here Today’

Kagan’s Confirmation Makes ABC and NBC as Giddy as Liberal Democrats

“The number that really excited Democrats is three: Think Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan,” NBC’s Kelly O’Donnell excitedly announced Thursday night while leading into a clip of Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy, who exclaimed as he bounced on his heels on the Senate floor: “Three women will serve together on the United States Supreme Court for the first time in our nation’s history!” The news equally excited the TV network journalists. “History was made in this country today when the Senate confirmed Elena Kagan to the U.S. Supreme Court,” declared fill-in NBC Nightly News anchor Lester Holt as viewers were treated to a “Making History” on-screen graphic. “Tonight on World News, a day of high court history. Elena Kagan confirmed. For the first time ever, three women will be part of deciding the law of the land,” spouted a giddy Diane Sawyer in matching NBC by making Kagan her lead story. Sawyer could hardly contain her excitement: We are here in Washington on the day a new voice joins the Supreme Court. Elena Kagan, the third woman currently on the court, a woman with a reputation for holding her own in any room. And our Jonathan Karl is right here to tell us about the big vote right over there on Capitol Hill. And I want to know what happens when a new justice dons the robe for the first time, Jon? Karl confirmed: “Well, it’s a big day here. I mean, in all of American history, the Senate has confirmed only 112 justices, and, even if you include retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, only four of them have been women.” One sour note for Karl, a certain Republican who voted no: “There was one surprise. Scott Brown, I mean, this is the liberal, or moderate Republican from Massachusetts, introduced her at the confirmation hearings, defended her leadership of Harvard Law School. But in the end, he voted no.” (Back on January 31, 2006, when the Senate confirmed President George W. Bush’s second Supreme Court nominee, Samuel Alito, ABC’s World News held itself to a short item read by anchor Elizabeth Vargas.) On NBC Thursday night, Holt fretted that “today’s confirmation vote fell largely along party lines, seen by many as another symbol of Washington’s ever-deepening partisan divide.” But that “ever-deepening” is actually slightly less so than with Alito. Five Republicans voted to confirm Kagan, one more than the four Democrats who backed Alito. On the January 31, 2006 NBC Nightly News, Pete Williams noted: “The vote, 58-to-42, was one of the most deeply partisan ever for a Supreme Court nominee, with just four Democrats voting to confirm.” The MRC’s Brad Wilmouth corrected the closed-captioning against the video to provide these transcripts of the Thursday, August 6 stories: ABC’s World News: DIANE SAWYER, IN OPENING TEASER: Tonight on World News, a day of high court history. Elena Kagan confirmed. For the first time ever, three women will be part of deciding the law of the land. … SAWYER: We are here in Washington on the day a new voice joins the Supreme Court. Elena Kagan, the third woman currently on the court, a woman with a reputation for holding her own in any room. And our Jonathan Karl is right here to tell us about the big vote right over there on Capitol Hill. And I want to know what happens when a new justice dons the robe for the first time, Jon? JONATHAN KARL: Well, it’s a big day here. I mean, in all of American history, the Senate has confirmed only 112 justices, and, even if you include retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, only four of them have been women. SENATOR AL FRANKEN (D-MN): The tally is 63-37. KARL: Elena Kagan was easily confirmed in a vote the President hailed as historic. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: For nearly two centuries, there wasn’t a single woman on our nation’s highest court. KARL: Kagan faced last-minute attacks from Republicans who branded her a liberal activist with absolutely no judicial experience. SENATOR PAT ROBERTS (R-KS): Her lack of judicial experience, striking. MITCH MCCONNELL, SENATE MAJORITY LEADER: -is not suited- SENATOR JEFF SESSIONS (R-AL): -does not have the gifts- SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN (R-AZ): She is unlikely to exercise judicial restraint. KARL: It was highly partisan. All but five Republicans voted no. All but one Democrat voted yes. With Kagan, the court will now have, for the first time, three women serving at once, one third of the justices. It’s a huge sea change for an institution that has been dominated by men. As recently as last year, there was just one woman on the court. JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG, U.S. SUPREME COURT: Now there I am all alone, and it doesn’t look right. It’s lonely for me. There’s life experience that a woman has simply because she’s grown up inside a woman’s body. KARL: Ronald Reagan nominated Sandra Day O’Connor as the first woman in 1981, but it wasn’t until 12 years later that the court installed a woman’s restroom near the room where they deliberate. JOAN BISKUPIC, SUPREME COURT HISTORIAN: For years, they would just have a men’s bathroom back there. It just goes to show what a male-dominated place the Supreme Court had been for many years. KARL: Kagan will, of course, be the most junior justice, and the others will make sure she knows it. By tradition, the junior justice must take notes when the nine of them deliberate. And, Diane, if somebody knocks on the door, it is her, the most junior justice, that has to go up to answer the door to bring in papers, a message, or even coffee. SAWYER: Pretty mild form of hazing, though. Tell me about the vote itself. Any surprises who voted for and against? KARL: There was one surprise. Scott Brown, I mean, this is the liberal, or moderate Republican from Massachusetts, introduced her at the confirmation hearings, defended her leadership of Harvard Law School. But in the end, he voted no. SAWYER: So he voted with the Republicans? KARL: He voted with the rest of the Republicans, all but five of them, against her nomination. SAWYER: Okay, thanks, Jon. Good to be here with you tonight. NBC Nightly News: LESTER HOLT: Good evening. Brian is on assignment tonight. I’m Lester Holt. History was made in this country today when the Senate confirmed Elena Kagan to the U.S. Supreme Court. Once she’s sworn in this weekend, she’ll become the current court’s third woman member and the fourth ever named. Tonight President Obama calls Kagan’s confirmation “an affirmation of her character and her temperament.” Still, today’s confirmation vote fell largely along party lines, seen by many as another symbol of Washington’s ever-deepening partisan divide. NBC’s Kelly O’Donnell is on Capitol Hill with more. Kelly, good evening. KELLY O’DONNELL: Good evening, Lester. When you look at today’s vote, you can see history. Justice Kagan will give women a greater voice – making up one-third of the court – and you can see politics. Five Republicans crossed over to support Kagan while one Democrat was among the no votes. SENATOR AL FRANKEN (D-MN): The tally is 63-37. The nomination is confirmed. O’DONNELL: Elena Kagan did get five fewer votes than Sonia Sotomayor last summer, but the number that really excited Democrats is three: Think Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan. SENATOR PATRICK LEAHY (D-VT): Three women will serve together on the United States Supreme Court for the first time in our nation’s history! O’DONNELL: At 50, Kagan becomes the youngest justice, succeeding the oldest, 90-year-old John Paul Stevens. Congratulations from President Obama late today. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: She knows that the Supreme Court’s decisions shape not just the character of our democracy, but the circumstances of our daily lives. O’DONNELL: Kagan’s unexpected sense of humor charmed Senators of both parties at her confirmation hearings. JUSTICE ELENA KAGAN, U.S. SUPREME COURT: It means I’d have to get my hair done more often, Senator Specter. O’DONNELL: New York born, first woman dean of Harvard Law. Her policy to limit military recruiters access there gave Republicans their strongest criticism. SENATOR JOHN CORNYN (R-TX): Dean Kagan, I believe, showed a willingness to bend the law and facts to advance her own political goals of protesting the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy. O’DONNELL: Kagan worked for Presidents Obama and Clinton. She will be the only justice on the current court who has never been a judge. LEAHY: She earned her place at the top of the legal profession. No one gave it to her. She earned it. O’DONNELL: And it’s been 40 years since the newest member of the Supreme Court has had no previous experience as a judge. And the plan for Elena Kagan is that she will be sworn in this Saturday afternoon by her new colleague, Chief Justice John Roberts.

See more here:
Kagan’s Confirmation Makes ABC and NBC as Giddy as Liberal Democrats