Tag Archives: observation

Rebecca Martinson Advice Column: How Do You Get a Guy to Text You the Next Day?

Rebbeca Martinson, the University of Maryland student who gained web notoriety after her insane sorority e-mail went viral, now has an advice column. And why shouldn’t she? If there’s anyone who knows how to administer tough love or lay the smack down on BroBible readers when needed, it’s R-Mart. In her first effort, Rebecca Martinson offers some advice to female readers about how to get a guy you meet at the bar to text you the following day. Yes, she deploys the CAPS LOCK. And begins with the observation that “to most drunk guys a wet hole is a wet hole.” Becks always cuts to the chase. Below are excerpts from Martinson’s official bro texting guide … “I don’t think a single weekend has gone by during the semester where at least one of my roommates hasn’t moped her way onto one of our couches and begun whining about how some guy she met at the bar or wherever the night before hasn’t texted her yet.” “‘But guys, he bought me, like, six rails!’ Well duh, he was trying to get into your pants.” “There needs to be a public service announcement on E! in the middle of a Kardashians episode that says, ‘ATTENTION: NO SANE MAN GOES TO THE BAR TO NOT TRY TO STICK IT IN. HE IS NOT THERE TO GET TO KNOW YOU. HE IS NOT THERE TO HEAR YOU TALK ABOUT YOURSELF AND HOW MUCH YOU LOVE YOUR NEW SHADES OF NAIL POLISH. HE IS THERE TO GIVE YOU THE D FOR FREE!'” In which case, this is how you do it … 1. Only half put out . So I know this sounds counterintuitive, but hear me out. Look back at the lovely and informative PSA. Is it mentioned anywhere in there that he’s out trying to find a girl with a lovely personality and who cooks like Paula Deen on a crack binge while simultaneously being Jenna Jameson in the sack? Nope. To most drunk guys a wet hole is a wet hole, and with each cranberry vodka you slurp down you’re both less likely to remember what either of you talked about. You could tell him you won the friggin’ lottery and the morning after he wouldn’t know it. This is why you only partially put out. What comes next? Follow the above link and find out!

Read more here:
Rebecca Martinson Advice Column: How Do You Get a Guy to Text You the Next Day?

Paula Deen Bails on Today Show Amid N-Word Controversy

Days after it was revealed that Paula Deen admitted using racial slurs in the past, the cook canceled a live TV interview with Today at the last minute. She had been scheduled to discuss her recent admission under oath in a deposition for a discrimination lawsuit that she has in fact used racial epithets. But, according to Matt Lauer, Deen’s rep contacted the show moments before she was set to appear live and told producers that she’s not showing. Paula Deen is “exhausted” after flying into New York overnight, her rep said. “We had planned to have an exclusive live interview with Paula Deen this morning,” a disappointed Lauer announced on the air Friday. “We spoke several times with her people yesterday and then I spoke with Paula yesterday afternoon. We arranged an interview this morning.” “We agreed there would be no restrictions to that interview only that it would be an open and candid exchange. Then we started to hear from her people that she is exhausted.” “She has not called us at all,” Lauer continued. “Her publicity person and I spoke a little while ago. Simply said they believe she is in the hotel but she has not confirmed anything other than she is not here.” As for Deen, she has not commented, but a source tells People that she “is beside herself … this is killing her. She’s so beaten down by this.” Although she hasn’t apologized for anything, Paula Deen Enterprises released a statement on Thursday explaining Deen’s use of racial slurs: “During a deposition where she [was under oath], Ms. Deen recounted having used racial epithets in the past, speaking largely about a time in American history which was quite different than today.” “To be clear Ms. Deen does not find acceptable the use of this term under any circumstance by anyone nor condone any form of racism or discrimination.” So basically, she’s old? With that excuse not likely to sit well with a modern audience, all eyes are on Deen to address the issue publicly. Time will tell when she decides to do so.

Link:
Paula Deen Bails on Today Show Amid N-Word Controversy

Helena Bonham Carter Joins Cinderella as Fairy Godmother

We’ve been wondering what kind of tone Kenneth Branagh’s live-action  Cinderella  would take. With the announcement that Helena Bonham Carter has joined the cast, it’s looking like it will be a fantastical epic in the vein of Bonham Carter’s other fairy tale movie,  Alice in Wonderland . Of course Bonham Carter can also play gritty, so I guess we’ll have to wait and see. Bonham Carter will play the Fairy Godmother , alongside Lilly James as Cinderella and Cate Blanchett as the Evil Stepmother. Richard Madden plays Prince Charming, with Holliday Granger and Sophia McShera in talks for the Evil Stepsisters. Cinderella is expected to begin filming this fall.

Go here to see the original:
Helena Bonham Carter Joins Cinderella as Fairy Godmother

Tiger Photobombs Wedding Reception: Real or Fake?

Ah, the joy of celebrating your marriage with your closest friends and family! And a Sumatran tiger! Wait, what? Karma and Andrew Madgwick were posing for wedding photos at Paignton Zoo in Devon, England following their wedding ceremony when they were photobombed by a Sumatran tiger . So, Tigerbombed? Is this a real photobomb? Or just a clever use of Photoshop?  The wedding photographer, Vicki Boulter, says the tiger was in the frame long enough for this single photo to be captured and the bride calls it “one fabulously unique wedding picture.” Karma, a self-described “crazy cat lady,” says she and her husband are going to adopt Banda, the tiger who thought her wedding dress was food and wandered up to the glass barrier between her enclosure and the observation deck hoping for an afternoon snack.  Because that’s what reasonable people do. (Probably “adopt” means “make a donation” but with crazy cat people, one can never be too sure.) I guess the tiger just couldn’t be one-upped by the dog who attacked a bride last month. Or maybe this was some sort of revenge for all the cat bearding photos that have circulated in recent weeks. But still we ask, is this real life? What do you say, THGers? Did the tiger photobomb the wedding or is this just a clever photoshop?   That tiger totally photobombed them! What an awesome capture! No way that’s real! It’s totally photoshopped. View Poll »

Read the original post:
Tiger Photobombs Wedding Reception: Real or Fake?

Observation Tower In Austria Looks As Good As The View

Observation towers create a wonderful opportunity to connect with the environment, permitting a view over the treetops to incredible vistas. Many are utilitarian structures, but some are true works of art on their own. Abitare shows us this new one at a nature reserve on the Austrian River Mur, by Terrain: Loenhart & Mayr. … Read the full story on TreeHugger

See more here:
Observation Tower In Austria Looks As Good As The View

Empathy is What Really Sets Vegetarians Apart (at least Neurologically Speaking)

An article appeared in PLoS one this May which describes brain differences between Vegetarians, Vegans and Omnivores in the way they process pictures of animal suffering. I wasn't going to write about this until later this week, but since the always popular Scientific Fundamentalist has a related post out at the moment, I figure I should “jump on the bandwagon” with this right away. So here we go: The study in question is a neuroimaging study intent on investigating whether “the neural representation of conditions of abuse and suffering might be different among subjects who made different feeding choice due to ethical reasons, and thus result in the engagement of different components of the brain networks associated with empathy and social cognition” The hypothesis behind this study is based on the observation that Vegetarians and Vegans tend to base their decision to avoid animal products on ethical grounds. Assuming that Vegetarians and Vegans – because of their underlying moral philosophies – show greater empathy towards animal suffering, it is very well possible that these differences in empathy extend beyond the animal domain and show up as general differences in the degree of empathy felt towards other humans also; even at a neurological level. The study – in basic terms – investigates this hypothesis by placing subjects into a functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) machine and looking at the “activation” of different brain areas as subjects view a randomized series of pictures. The pictures used for this study included neutral scenes and an even share of scenes depicting various kinds of animal and human suffering. The first main finding of this study is that, compared to Omnivores, Vegans and Vegetarians show higher activation of empathy related brain areas (e.g. Anterior Cingular Cortex and left Inferior Frontal Gyrus) when observing scenes of suffering; whether it be animal or human suffering. Further, pictures of animal suffering (in contrast to pictures human suffering) recruited specific brain regions in Vegans and Vegetarians that were not differentially recruited by Omnivores. These were areas which are thought to be associated with higher-order representations of the self and self values (e.g. medial Prefrontal Cortex). In addition to generally higher activations in the above mentioned areas, a second main finding of this study is that there are certain brain areas which only Vegetarians and Vegans seem to activate when processing pictures of suffering. In particular, when viewing pictures of human suffering, Vegetarians in this study recruited additional brain areas thought to be associated with bodily representations that distinguish self from others. (Notably these areas were particularly active when mutilations were shown). The study has – of course – its own shortcomings, and I am somewhat breaking one of my own rules here by presenting fMRI related research without a thorough discussion of the statistics involved, however I feel vindicated by the fact that the authors themselves remain moderate in their conclusions by stating that “Our results converge with theories that consider empathy as accommodating a shared representation of emotions and sensations between individuals, allowing us to understand others. They also led us to speculate that the neuronal bases of empathy involve several distinct components including mirroring mechanisms, as well as emotion contagion and representations of connectedness with the self. In addition, brain areas similar to those showing different emotional responses between groups in our study have also been found to be modulated by religiosity, further supporting a key role of affect and empathy in moral reasoning and social values.” [italics added]. All things considered, the study suggests that Vegetarians are more empathetic to the suffering of others, but as I contemplate the well-documented health benefits of a Vegetarian diet, as well as the environmental and social hazards of current meat eating habits and production practices, I think it is obvious that reducing your meat consumption will first and foremost be an act of compassion towards yourself. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/evolved-primate/201005/empathy-is-what-reall… Here is the original study: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2877098/ More links at original link, too. added by: animalia_libero

Matthews: ‘Media Will Try To Destroy Her’ But Palin Can Win GOP Nod

An unexpected prediction, and an even more surprising admission from Chris Matthews this morning . . . Appearing on Morning Joe, the Hardball host predicted that Sarah Palin would seek the Republican presidential nomination, and painted a path to victory for her.  In a moment of candor, Matthews admitted that “the media will try to destroy her, of course.” Matthews made his comments in the course of a pre-taped Mojo Midterm Exam segment that aired on today’s Morning Joe. Matthews saw a scenario in which evangelicals would sweep Sarah to victory in the Iowa GOP primary. She would lose New Hampshire, but put in a respectable-enough showing to move on to South Carolina, where her game-changing endorsement of Nikki Haley would pay dividends.  The fight would then move to Michigan, where Matthews says Palin “beats the hell” out of Mitt Romney, whom he curiously described as “not a politician.” Then came Chris’ flight of frankness. CHRIS MATTHEWS: [Palin] maybe gets an early knockout.  That’s how I see her winning. An early knockout’s the way she can win. The media will try to destroy her of course, but if she goes early, wins early, I think she can win it before anyone can stop her. Note Matthews’ blase “of course” appended to his observation that the MSM will try to destroy Palin.  He takes it as a given that everyone knows the liberal media have it out for her. Question: does Matthews envision himself participating in the media effort to “destroy” Palin?

More here:
Matthews: ‘Media Will Try To Destroy Her’ But Palin Can Win GOP Nod

Bret Michaels Suffers a Setback, Doctors Remain Hopeful

Bret Michaels has suffered a setback. As the singer tries to recover from last week’s brain hemorrhage , he received some bad news in the intensive care unit today: Bret was diagnosed with hyponatremia, a side effect that is caused by a sodium deficiency. It can lead to seizures. “Michaels remains under 24-hour observation in the ICU and is in positive spirits. He is responding well to tests and treatments,” his rep said in a statement. “Even though today was a minor setback, doctors remain hopeful for a full recovery.” The rock star is conscious and in critical but stable condition. His father spoke to him this week and said his son sounds “a little slow, but fine.” Meanwhile, Bret’s Celebrity Appreciate cast mates have wished him well , and we encourage THG readers to do the same.

See more here:
Bret Michaels Suffers a Setback, Doctors Remain Hopeful

The Successful Viral Video I Don’t Understand of the Day

There was a time I used to think up all kinds of ideas for viral videos in efforts of hitting the next big internet phenomenon because the shit looked fucking easy, but for some reason I never bothered making the videos and that reason is laziness and talentless and uninspired but I still get annoyed everytime one of these videos comes across and I see that 2,000,000 people have checked a clip out over the course of a few days because it strikes a chord with people or some shit, while my videos would only get 2 views, both me from different computers, while putting a head in bed with your gf who freaks the fuck out that may just be staged will get the creator of this video his own show.

Continued here:
The Successful Viral Video I Don’t Understand of the Day

Scarlett Johansson is the Jolly Green Monster of the Day

I get a lot of hate from people who have little goin on in their lives who get worked up over celebrities enough to get mad when I say that Scarlett Johansson is a fucking pig of a girl.

Here is the original post:
Scarlett Johansson is the Jolly Green Monster of the Day