Tag Archives: harry smith

CBS ‘Early Show’: Nearly Five Minutes on Gay Marriage Ruling, One Sentence to Critics

In a report on Friday’s CBS Early Show, correspondent John Blackstone described the fallout of a decision by California Judge Vaughn Walker to lift his stay on gay marriages after overturning Proposition 8: “Inside San Francisco City Hall dozens of same-sex couples lined up for marriage licenses, anticipating their wedding day.” A headline on screen declared: “Save the Date.”   Blackstone explained how gay couples were still upset that the stay would not be lifted until August 18: “Despite a celebration here, these advocates know this may be just a temporary opening. And it turned out it wasn’t opened yet….Among the disappointed couples was one of those who filed the lawsuit challenging California’s ban on same-sex marriage.” Finally taking note of critics of the initial Proposition 8 ruling and the lifting of the stay, Blackstone remarked: “The delay gives opponents time to appeal and a political issue.” The only sound bite of a critic was that of Maggie Gallagher from the National Organization for Marriage: “The extreme nature of this decision is, in fact, going to impact the elections in 2010.” Blackstone then concluded his report this way: “Polls show a majority of Americans oppose same-sex marriage, but in California, where there were 18,000 such marriages two years ago, plenty of wedding plans are now being made for next week.” He made no mention of the majority of Californians also being opposed. Following Blackstone’s report, co-host Harry Smith spoke with liberal George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley about the issue. While Turley described the judge’s decision as “very controversial,” he also made sure to tell viewers where he stood: “I actually support same-sex marriage.” Smith was puzzled by the delay in allowing gay marriage: “Why would the judge leave – well, open the window and then say, ‘okay, we’re going to close the window until next Wednesday’?” Turley replied: “Well, he’s actually doing a very standard and responsible thing….This is a controversial decision. And for the people on the other side of this debate, they should be entitled to make their argument to the court of appeals.” Later, Turley assured his fellow gay marriage supporters that allowing Judge Walker’s decision to be appealed would “add legitimacy to his opinion.”                              Here is a full transcript of the August 13 segment: 7:00AM TEASE ERICA HILL: Save the date. A California judge says same-sex couples will have to wait one more week to get married, allowing for an appeal to move forward. We’ll tell you why this could end up going all the way to the Supreme Court.         7:01AM SEGMENT HARRY SMITH: We begin with the court room battle over California’s same-sex marriage ban, the federal judge that threw that ban out now says that same-sex weddings can be held next week, unless higher courts get involved. CBS News correspondent John Blackstone has the story. [ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Save the Date; Judge Delays Same-Sex Weddings to Allow Appeal] JOHN BLACKSTONE: Inside San Francisco City Hall dozens of same-sex couples lined up for marriage licenses, anticipating their wedding day. Outside, a crowd gathered. The judge, who last week ruled that California’s ban on same-sex marriage as unconstitutional, said he is lifting the stay he placed on that decision. Same-sex marriage in California has been on a roller coaster, sometimes legal, sometimes not. Despite a celebration here, these advocates know this may be just a temporary opening. And it turned out it wasn’t opened yet. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: The good news is the stay is lifted. The bad news is the judge has said it’s lifted next Wednesday. CROWD: Aww. BLACKSTONE: Among the disappointed couples was one of those who filed the lawsuit challenging California’s ban on same-sex marriage. JEFF ZARRILLO: We’re hopeful that we will be able to get married and we’ll be able to announce wedding plans as soon as possible. BLACKSTONE: The delay gives opponents time to appeal and a political issue. MAGGIE GALLAGHER [NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE]: The extreme nature of this decision is, in fact, going to impact the elections in 2010. BLACKSTONE: Polls show a majority of Americans oppose same-sex marriage, but in California, where there were 18,000 such marriages two years ago, plenty of wedding plans are now being made for next week. John Blackstone, CBS News, San Francisco. SMITH: And joining us now from Washington is George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley. Good morning, sir. JONATHAN TURLEY: Hi, Harry. SMITH: Why would the judge leave – well, open the window and then say, ‘okay, we’re going to close the window until next Wednesday’? TURLEY: Well, he’s actually doing a very standard and responsible thing. What he’s doing is he’s giving the court of appeals a short period of time to review his decision and decide whether they want to impose a stay. Most federal judges will do that. In fact, if he didn’t do that, it’d be viewed as a little bit odd, if not aggressive towards the court of appeals. What he’s saying is, ‘look, I’m one judge. This is a controversial decision. And for the people on the other side of this debate, they should be entitled to make their argument to the court of appeals.’ SMITH: So what is the likelihood, then, a court of appeals would get involved in this by Wednesday? TURLEY: Well, they’re going to have to. I mean, they’re going to have to take a look at whether they want to impose a stay. And’s it’s going to be tempting for some of those judges. You know, this did overturn a majority of people who voted on the proposition. It’s a very controversial decision. Some judges might be inclined to say, ‘You know what? Let’s go ahead and stay this until other judges have looked at it.’ But what Judge Walker said in this opinion was I don’t see the irreparable harm being done to people by allowing people to get married. SMITH: Right. TURLEY: And he gave a very strong opinion saying, I don’t think this should be stayed by the Ninth Circuit. SMITH: If you are a proponent of same-sex marriage, how should you interpret this? TURLEY: I would encourage my friends on that side – and I actually support same-sex marriage – but I would encourage people on the side of same-sex marriage to understand that they benefit, in some regards, with – from Judge Walker’s move. He’s going to add legitimacy to his opinion. It’s not going to be just one judge. It’s important for this to be reviewed, to satisfy all parties that it’s not just one judge making his own decision, but that it’s going to be other judges making independent decisions of their own. SMITH: Right. Since this thing came down people have said this is likely to end up in the Supreme Court. Do you agree? TURLEY: Well, you know, as you know, you’ve been around a long time, it’s dangerous to predict when the court will accept something. They have actually avoided the same-sex marriage issue in the past, but if any case has a chance, it would be this one. By my count, there seems to be four justices on both sides of this issue, if you’re going to make an early prediction. And as usual, Justice Kennedy’s right in the middle. But Kennedy has been very sympathetic towards gay rights in the past. So, it would be a very interesting issue to go before this court at this time. SMITH: Jonathan Turley, we sure do appreciate your expertise this morning. Thank you very much. TURLEY: Thanks, Harry. SMITH: Alright, you bet.

More:
CBS ‘Early Show’: Nearly Five Minutes on Gay Marriage Ruling, One Sentence to Critics

CBS ‘Early Show’ Promotes Levi Johnston Pitch for Reality Show

Teasing an upcoming story in the 7:30AM ET half hour on Tuesday’s CBS Early Show, co-host Harry Smith cheerfully promoted Levi Johnston’s pitch for a reality show in Alaska: “He’s going to star in a new reality show and it’s all about him running for mayor of Wasilla. That’s right, he’s gunning for his would-have-been mother-in-law’s old job.” Later, Smith further teased: “Johnston’s quest to follow in Sarah Palin’s foot steps and hold political office.” Introducing the report, fill-in co-host Erica Hill remarked how Johnston would “be chasing Sarah Palin’s legacy.” Correspondent Priya David-Clemens discussed the show as if it was about to go on the air: “He’s inked a reality show deal that will be all Levi and no Bristol. The new show, called ‘Loving Levi: The Road to the Mayor’s Office,’ will follow the young father as he campaigns for the top job in his hometown of Wasilla, Alaska.” In fact, as the New York Times reported , the show is simply an idea being pitched by Johnston and producers but has not been picked up any network yet. David-Clemens touted a description of the proposed show: “In a statement to ‘Us Weekly,’ the show’s executive producer said, quote, ‘he’ll give us a real inside look into who he is as a father, a skilled hunter, an avid dirt biker, and, of course, his journey down the road of small town politics, right after he gets his high school diploma.'” Following the story, Hill noted: “And he [Johnston] was asked at one point what his ideas for Wasilla are. The answer, ‘you’ll have to wait for the show.'” Smith remarked: “I wonder where his – where his politics are? Left, center, Right?” Hill responded: ” I am absolutely intrigued.” In contrast to the Early Show, ABC’s Good Morning America only offered a 15-second news brief to the topic in the 8:00AM ET hour, instead of a three-minute segment. GMA news reader JuJu Chang reported: “And finally, looking to extend his moment in the spotlight, Palin family nemesis Levi Johnston is jumping into politics. Johnston’s manager says he’s planning to run for city council or mayor in his hometown of Wasilla. All that for a new reality show.” NBC’s Today skipped the story. Here is a full transcript of the August 10 Early Show segment: 7:30AM TEASE HARRY SMITH: And on a much lighter note, Levi Johnston isn’t letting his second breakup with – in case anybody’s keeping score – with Bristol Palin slow him down. He’s going to star in a new reality show and it’s all about him running for mayor of Wasilla. That’s right, he’s gunning for his would-have-been mother-in-law’s old job. Did I get that right? ERICA HILL: Which came first, the show or the campaign? SMITH: Oh, I wonder? 7:41AM TEASE SMITH: Coming up next, Levi Johnston’s quest to follow in Sarah Palin’s foot steps and hold political office. 7:45AM SEGMENT ERICA HILL: Just one week after Bristol Palin dumped Levi Johnston because, as she said, he was obsessed with the limelight, it turns out, well, he’s got his own reality show. Only this one has a Wasilla twist. He’ll be chasing Sarah Palin’s legacy. Correspondent Priya David-Clemens has more. [ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: “Loving Levi;” Johnston Runs for Mayor, Gets Reality Show] PRIYA DAVID-CLEMENS: When Bristol Palin and Levi Johnston announced their engagement- BRISTOL PALIN: He got down on one knee and asked me to marry him. DAVID-CLEMENS: -rumors of a reality show quickly followed suit. BONNIE FULLER [EDITOR-IN-CHIEF, HOLLWOODLIFE.COM]: Bristol Palin and Levi Johnston are a perfect example of new reality stars. They already have a little fame as a result of being related to Sarah Palin. DAVID-CLEMENS: The two recently went their separate ways. Bristol says Levi’s hunger for the spotlight was partly to blame. Now he’s inked a reality show deal that will be all Levi and no Bristol. The new show, called ‘Loving Levi: The Road to the Mayor’s Office,’ will follow the young father as he campaigns for the top job in his hometown of Wasilla, Alaska. In a statement to ‘Us Weekly,’ the show’s executive producer said, quote, ‘he’ll give us a real inside look into who he is as a father, a skilled hunter, an avid dirt biker, and, of course, his journey down the road of small town politics, right after he gets his high school diploma.’ He’s part of the latest reality in reality TV. People trying to cash in and create industries based solely on their stints on these shows. The most successful example, Kim Kardashian. She’s built a brand that earns more than $5 million a year. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Like what is the point of this? KIM KARDASHIAN: What do you mean what is the point of this? You want to know what your boyfriend’s up to. DAVID-CLEMENS: But if Levi hopes to replicate Kardashian, he’ll have to make small town politics into big time TV. FULLER: The new reality stars are like ‘come on in, come take my picture, come in my house. See what I look like without my clothes on.’ DAVID-CLEMENS: Given his track record of photo shoots, that’s something Levi may not have a problem with. Priya David-Clemens, CBS News, Los Angeles. HILL: There’s a lot going on in this story. Two of my favorite tidbits. HARRY SMITH: Yes? HILL: They approached him with the idea. So at first he said ‘I don’t really know about this’ and then he thought ‘maybe I’ve got something here.’ SMITH: Okay, right. HILL: And he was asked at one point what his ideas for Wasilla are. The answer, ‘you’ll have to wait for the show.’ SMITH: I wonder where his – where his politics are? HILL: I am absolutely intrigued. SMITH: Left, center, Right? HILL: Well, he calls himself half Hollywood, half redneck, so I don’t know what of marriage that gets you. SMITH: And avid dirt biking. HILL: Avid, not just a dirt biker. SMITH: That’s right, that was what jumped out at me. Because if you’re putting in a political resume, if it just said dirt biking, I mean, why would you vote for a guy like that? HILL: But if it’s avid- SMITH: I think that’s- JEFF GLOR: When you’re avid about it- HILL: I think there is more to Levi Johnston than meets the eye. We’ve seen just about all we can. [LAUGHTER] SMITH: No mas.

More here:
CBS ‘Early Show’ Promotes Levi Johnston Pitch for Reality Show

‘The Other Guys’: Will Ferrell Lecturing On Economics…Really?

The last thing I was worrying about was that The Other Guys would be too preachy. Sure, Will Ferrell has a long history of deep, thought-provoking critiques of society and culture, so that should have been my big concern. Also subtitles. And having the last shot of the film be the word “Fin” superimposed over the freeze-framed image of a crying child alone on a beach symbolizing death or something. You know, sometimes you just want to go, have a drink or two, or three, or ten, and then sit in a movie theater and tune out the seemingly endless parades of nimrods, pinkos and sanctimonious deadbeats who make up so much of our society today. You just want some guys to come on the screen and to do and say some funny stuff. Maybe you want an explosion or two, perhaps a gratuitous shower scene – strike that, as shower scenes are never gratuitous. Unless it’s a dude. Or Kathy Bates. The point is the last thing you want after a Dos XX prep and handing over $11.75 each for yourself and your life partner/designated driver is for a bunch of Hollywood half-wits to stop the fun to give you a PowerPoint briefing on their insights into modern politics – without even the PowerPoint. And it appears that this is exactly what The Other Guys intends to do . Look. Will Ferrell is an intermittently amusing guy with a bizarre sense of humor and an ability to be oddly compelling in his usual role as an utterly unself-aware buffoon. However, I’d put my level of eagerness to drop $23.50 for the privilege of hearing out his political views at somewhere between passing a kidney stone made of broken glass and helping Ernest Borgnine with his bi-monthly Brazilian wax. Someone out there might be interested in seeing Ferrell’s phallocentric George Bush play – they pimped the stupid thing on HBO enough – but I’m not one of them. I have plenty of geniuses providing me the full benefit of their lefty echo-chamber reinforced clichés on Twitter every day. I don’t need to pay for them – there are countless dumbasses out there who give it away for free. The problem isn’t that Will Ferrell wants to talk about politics on stage or on the screen. It’s that I don’t want to see it in The Other Guys. Let’s leave out the fact that the message itself appears to be a confused mishmash of pseudo-populist ire and hazily understood recent history. I just don’t want to deal with it in a Will Ferrell comedy. Hell, I’m not being unreasonable here. I’m willing to tolerate having that Marky Mark guy in the movie – that’s a major concession for a straight man. So, now I and I’m guessing a significant number of other conservative folks are going to have to sit this one out. Will the filmakers even notice? Perhaps, perhaps not. But the consequences of alienating at least half your audience with some free-form pinko propagandizing will only grow more consequential over time. Now, not so many years ago – before sites like Big Hollywood, as here , let the cat out of the bag on lefty sucker-punchery – our number would have been small. No one would think to warn us, mostly because to the extent that most mainstream critics would notice these politics they would probably find them not nearly leftist enough. Even now, the Rolling Stone review – yeah, Rolling Stone is still a thing, if you can believe it – does not even mention The Other Guys’ politics. Hacky puff- pieces whitewash it. But then, “Hollywood journalism” is a contradiction in terms – like the phrases “Democratic fiscal responsibility” and “Lady Gaga’s talent.” If it weren’t for the alternative media, we’d have walked into the theaters, sat down, quietly popped the tops on our beers – everyone does that, right? – and stared wide-eyed and smiling until … WHAM! The liberal sucker punch would have landed. And we never saw it coming. Well, we see it coming now, and there are quite a few of us who are a bit reluctant to walk right into a left cross. The point is not that Hollywood should not make left-wing movies – though it shouldn’t, considering leftism’s unbroken track record of total failure and human misery. The point is that it should not cater to the delusions of the pampered stars and producers who think that years of toiling in detergent commercials and taking roles as “Second Delivery Man” before hitting it big have provided them with unique, valuable insights that simply must be shared with their unwilling, unsuspecting audience. You want to make a left-wing film? Make it, but be honest about it. Let people know. Spread the word. Sit there during one of those insipid Access Hollywood pseudo-interviews, tent your fingers, lean your enormous movie star head into the camera and say, “In this movie, I don’t hold back my poorly articulated thoughts about how the ownership of the means of production should reside in the hands of the proletariat. Plus, I do some really hilarious bits involving farting nuns.” If I want preaching, I’ll go to church. When I go to a Will Ferrell movie, I want to laugh. I want to drink my beer, not feel like I need to huck it at the screen. And, while you’re at it, no subtitles or “Fin” freeze-frames either. Crossposted at Big Hollywood .

Read the original:
‘The Other Guys’: Will Ferrell Lecturing On Economics…Really?

‘Media Mash’: Networks Celebrate Obama’s Birthday, CBS’s Smith Lobs Softball in Interview

After watching a highlight reel of network news reporters lamenting how President Obama was spending his 49th birthday alone and that the office is discernibly graying his hair, NewsBusters publisher Brent Bozell told Fox News viewers last night that the same media outlets ignored how, the day before Obama’s birthday, “The voters of Missouri absolutely crushed, clobbered, masaquered his ObamaCare program by 71 to 29 percent.” Bozell appeared on the August 5 edition of Sean Hannity’s program for the latest installment of “Media Mash,” a look at the media’s most egregious bias of the past week. The second topic in last night’s segment was this doozy from CBS’s Harry Smith: HARRY SMITH to President Obama:  Do you feel sometimes that your administration is not given the credit it deserves? President OBAMA: Yes. “You know, this wah-wah whining has got to stop. What they’re saying is that the media aren’t pro-Obama enough,” Bozell observed, adding: Look, the Obama people have got the political defibrillators out. He’s at 41 percent [approval] in the polls. George Bush didn’t get this low until the second term after Katrina…. They’re in an absolute free-fall. So what do they doing?  First they go to “The View,” and then they go to Harry Smith. It’s a likely progression.  For the full segment, click here for MP3 audio . To watch the video, click the play button on the embed above or click here to download the WMV video file . 

The rest is here:
‘Media Mash’: Networks Celebrate Obama’s Birthday, CBS’s Smith Lobs Softball in Interview

Sean Penn Blames Media for Failures in Haiti Recovery

Appearing on Monday’s CBS Early Show, actor Sean Penn described ongoing relief efforts in Haiti following January’s earthquake and condemned the media for its lack of coverage of the disaster beyond the initial weeks: “I think that the media has played an enormous part in the failures that are still going on today and the recovery here and the relief operations.” Those comments from Penn were prompted by co-host Harry Smith wondering: “People would be curious why you went in the first place. And then, why you stayed. What’s the best answer for that?” Penn replied: “…if they’re wondering that, then that would be an indictment of the American and the international press that came here in the immediate aftermath of this devastating earthquake.” Penn explained: “The United States sent its military, that did an extraordinary job in immediate relief….And then when they went on with other deployments, when the amputations en masse stopped, the media left.” Smith gave absolutely no reaction to Penn’s scathing criticism, but simply went on to tout praise for the left-wing actor’s work on the island nation: “I was reading the comments of a lieutenant general from the U.S. Southern Command who you came in contact with. And he said, ‘you know, maybe I don’t agree with Sean Penn’s politics but I can tell you this, he’s a doer, not a talker….I applaud the leadership he has shown. He doesn’t have to do this.'” While teasing the exclusive interview earlier in the show, Smith gushed over Penn: “Sean Penn went to Haiti right after January’s devastating earthquake….He has made a serious life commitment to these folks….one person who has been there much of the last six months, very much under the radar, doing really the Lord’s work there, quite frankly, is Sean Penn.” This is not the first time Smith has fawned over Penn’s work. On the February 23, 2009 broadcast, Smith described how he “wept openly” at Penn’s portrayal of gay activist Harvey Milk in the movie ‘Milk.’ On March, 7, 2010, CBS foreign correspondent Lara Logan did a profile piece on Penn’s work in Haiti for the network’s Sunday Morning program. At one point, Logan asked: “Does it make you angry when people talk about, you know, ‘Sean Penn, the Hollywood star, the movie star, coming in and trying to do something,’ and they’re kind of cynical about it?” Penn replied: “I haven’t had an awful lot of time to pay attention to them. You know, do I hope that those people die screaming of rectal cancer? Yeah, you know, but I’m not going to spend a lot of energy on it.” Here is a full transcript of Smith’s July 12 interview with Penn: 7:30AM TEASE HARRY SMITH: Also ahead this morning, a big Hollywood name takes on a big job. Sean Penn went to Haiti right after January’s devastating earthquake. His organization is now taking care of some 50,000 refugees. He has made a serious life commitment to these folks. He’s going to tell us exclusively about the challenges Haiti faces six months after the quake in just a little bit. 7:45AM TEASE SMITH: Still ahead, we’re going to go to Haiti and talk exclusively to actor and activist Sean Penn. He has been there almost nonstop since January’s deadly earthquake. He’s got quite a story to tell. We’ll get it from him in a couple of minutes. 8:00AM TEASE SMITH: Six months to the day since the earthquake in Haiti, and one person who has been there much of the last six months, very much under the radar, doing really the Lord’s work there, quite frankly, is Sean Penn. He joins us exclusively in just a couple of minutes to talk about the work that needs to be done there and the gaping reality gap between what needs to be done and what is actually getting accomplished. So, we’ll talk to him in just a couple of minutes. ERICA HILL: Beyond sobering, unfortunately. 8:08AM SEGMENT SMITH: Six months after Haiti’s earthquake, the numbers are still staggering. Between 220 and 300,000 died. Another 300,000 were injured. And about 1.5 million people still are homeless. That is as we head into hurricane season. Before the quake, actor Sean Penn had never been to Haiti. He has been there almost full time since January, building a relief organization that is helping tens of thousands of survivors. And Sean Penn joins us exclusively from Port-au-Prince this morning. Sean, good morning. SEAN PENN [CEO, J/P HAITIAN RELIEF ORGANIZATION]: Good morning. [ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Six Months Later; Sean Penn on Haiti Relief Efforts] SMITH: In the six months that you have spent, most of the last six months that you have spent there in Haiti, what is the most important thing you have learned there? PENN: Well, I think there’s a – there’s a tremendous coordination issue between the international agencies, the government of Haiti. And so, what happens, is that floods and floods of money come in when people are seeing immediate trauma and the drama that goes along with that. And then there are agencies, big agencies, that have a lot of time sorting out the ways to best spend the money and that have the detailed capacity to do it. And so, what happens is that you get six months down the line and those things that would be preventative have not been put in place to – in any legitimate measure. And so, I think that there’s a big learning curve here and something that we’re going to have to take away with us for disasters to follow and the disasters that are likely to continue happening in Haiti. SMITH: People would be curious why you went in the first place. And then, why you stayed. What’s the best answer for that? PENN: Harry, I’ll tell you, the very best answer for that is, frankly, that if they’re wondering that, then that would be an indictment of the American and the international press that came here in the immediate aftermath of this devastating earthquake. The United States sent so much money. The United States sent its military, that did an extraordinary job in immediate relief, the most decisive action of any organization so far to date in this country. And then when they went on with other deployments, when the amputations en masse stopped, the media left. And so many of the questions and criticisms could have been answered. People could understand what’s going on here, they could understand the heart and the courage of the Haitian people and the necessity for the coordination efforts that still are not happening, in anything close to an effective way. I think that the media has played an enormous part in the failures that are still going on today and the recovery here and the relief operations. SMITH: You know, it’s interesting. I was reading the comments of a lieutenant general from the U.S. Southern Command who you came in contact with. And he said, ‘you know, maybe I don’t agree with Sean Penn’s politics but I can tell you this, he’s a doer, not a talker.’ And he said, ‘Sean knew how to work, both with the U.N., break its bureaucracy down.’ He said, ‘I applaud the leadership he has shown. He doesn’t have to do this.’ Why do you do it? PENN: You know, I came here – I’d never been to Haiti before, but I came here with a group of people who would all have their own answers for that and we found ourselves surrounded by thousands of others who would, again, have their own response to that. But I guess generically is the best way to answer it, is that you come to Haiti, in our case we came down with the idea of spending about two weeks and trying to help out. And there’s something that takes over and it’s really an obligation because you see the strength of the people who have never experienced comfort and the gifts that that can give to people like myself and to our country and culture. You see the enormous gaps. And you see that at least in your own small way, it’s each of us, every agency in its own small way, that chips into what is such an immeasurable problem here and one that Sanjay Gupta early on had said – had called ‘awful, indelible, fixable.’ And it is fixable. And it’ll be – you know, it remains to be seen whether or not the American people, the world community, are going to join together and maintain the kind of commitment that the United States military showed here and to do this completely rather than to do a cosmetic emergency response and then let a country that’s been suffering for so long suffer that much longer. SMITH: Sean Penn, we thank you very much for doing what you’re doing down there and also for taking a few minutes to clue us into just what it’s like there in Haiti six months later. Thank you so much. PENN: Thanks for bringing attention to it. SMITH: Alright, you bet.

See the article here:
Sean Penn Blames Media for Failures in Haiti Recovery

CBS ‘Early Show’ Follows ABC’s Lead, Touts Kagan’s SNL-Worthy Humor

During the ‘Early Wrap’ segment on Friday’s CBS Early Show, co-host Harry Smith discussed the confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan with a panel of media pundits: “The almost unknown, practically under the radar, the Supreme Court nominee, Elena Kagan, before committees this week being funny. She was downright funny.” GQ Magazine’s Washington correspondent Ana Marie Cox agreed with Smith and added: “…a Saturday Night Live skit made live , in part because she looks exactly like Rachel Dratch. And it’s perfect because Al Franken is on the committee. And I kept on watching like waiting for someone to burst into song or Unfrozen Caveman Senator.” Radio host Jane Pratt chimed in: “Her joke was good, the Chinese food joke was good.” Smith remarked: “Very funny. Sunday night, and Christmas.”          On Wednesday’s Good Morning America on ABC, news reader Juju Chang noted Kagan’s “lively sense of humor” and later asked co-hosts George Stephanopoulos and Elizabeth Vargas “who is going to play her in the SNL skit?” Vargas replied: “I don’t think they could be as funny as Elena Kagan was!” While the Early Show touted Kagan’s comedic performance, neither Good Morning America nor NBC’s Today made any mention of the confirmation hearings on Friday. In addition, none of the evening newscast on Thursday made any mention of Kagan’s final day of testimony. Here is a full transcript of the July 2 Early Show exchange provided by NewsBusters’ Scott Whitlock: 8:20AM HARRY SMITH: The almost unknown, practically under the radar, the Supreme Court nominee, Elena Kagan, before committees this week being funny. She was downright funny.  MO ROCCA: Last Justice Standing. [All laugh] ANA MARIE COX: American justice. It’s funny. I actually thought she was funny, too.  SMITH: Right.  COX: I have to say, watching it immediately, I don’t know if I’m allowed to say SNL, but Saturday Night Live, a Saturday Night Live skit made live, in part because she looks exactly like Rachel Dratch. And it’s perfect because Al Franken is on the committee. And I kept on watching like waiting for someone to burst into song or Unfrozen Caveman Senator. I mean- JANE PRATT: Yeah. Right. I haven’t been able to watch it just because I feel like- like, I see Al Franken looking like he’s kind of falling asleep and I’m like, it makes me feel like I’m going to fall asleep and then I wanted to crack a joke. Her joke was good, the Chinese food joke was good. SMITH: Very funny. Sunday night, and Christmas. COX: She took the fifth on Team Edward vs. Team Jacob, which all women do. [They move on to other topics.]

See the rest here:
CBS ‘Early Show’ Follows ABC’s Lead, Touts Kagan’s SNL-Worthy Humor

ABC Focuses Oil Spill Blame on BP and Coast Guard, Not Obama; CBS Gives President ‘C’ for Response

On Thursday’s Good Morning America on ABC, co-host George Stephanopoulos laid blame on BP and Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen for mishandling the Gulf oil spill response but depicted the Obama administration as having done everything it could. In contrast, on the CBS Early Show, guests from both sides of the aisle gave the President a ‘C’ grade for his response.   At the top of Good Morning America, Stephanopoulos described how BP CEO Tony Hayward would be facing a “public execution” in Thursday’s congressional hearings and how Michigan Democratic Congressman Bart Stupak promised to “slice and dice” Hayward. In a report that followed, correspondent Jonathan Karl furthered the theme of courageous Democrats standing up to the big oil villain: “Tony Hayward may be the most hated man in America. And he’s heading right into a buzz saw of congressional outrage. In his prepared testimony, Hayward declares, ‘I am deeply sorry.’ But the chairman of the committee says that’s not enough.” A clip of Democratic committee chairman Henry Waxman was played. Minutes later, Stephanopoulos interviewed Louisiana Plaquemines Parish President Billy Nungesser and wondered: “…with everything the President and BP announced this week, do you think this is on the right track now?” After Nungesser expressed doubt about local fisherman being reimbursed for financial losses and a lack of organization in the response, Stephanopoulos deflected any criticism away from President Obama and suggested another target: “The White House has approved the building of berms, they’ve sent the boom down there, Admiral Allen is on the scene every day. Are you saying he is not giving you the help you need? And do you think he should keep his job?” Nungesser replied: “I don’t know if it’s Admiral Allen. I don’t know if the chain of command. Something’s not working.” Stephanopoulos pressed further: “So how does it get done? Is Admiral Allen the right man for the job right now?” The headline on-screen during the segment read: “Desperation On the Gulf; Residents Want More Action.” Meanwhile, on the Early Show, co-host Harry Smith invited Republican strategist Dan Bartlett and Democratic strategist Rob Zimmerman to grade President Obama’s handling of the disaster. Bartlett replied: “Well I think, Harry, anything above maybe a C-minus would be difficult to score.” Smith joked: ” ‘Gentleman’s C,’ we’ve heard that before.” Zimmerman actually graded on the same curve: “Harry, I’d have to agree with Dan. I’d give him a C on this, a C at this point.” Unlike the more generic ABC headline, the on-screen headline on CBS read: “Disaster in the Gulf: Day 59; What’s Next Step for Obama Administration?” Barlett later questioned the wisdom of the White House using the crisis to push controversial cap-and-trade energy legislation. Smith agreed with that concern, asking Zimmerman: “…you have to confess….At the end of the speech he says, ‘Well now it’s time for us to think about energy policy and this is a perfect, perfect jumping-off point,’ was that, as you watched, were you thinking, ‘Boy that’s a good idea,’ or were you thinking, ‘Not now, not now!'”   Zimmerman argued: “But unless we, in fact, put in place an aggressive energy policy, we run the risk of this tragedy happening all over again.” Smith agreed: “That goes without saying.” However, he reiterated: “But from a political standpoint, it’s not as if he’s saying, ‘Okay, I’ve solved all the problems, I have got the bully pulpit, I’ve got the momentum. Now’s the time to jump on this.'” On Tuesday, while the Early Show and NBC’s Today challenged White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs on the administration’s response, former Democratic strategist Stephanopoulos lobbed softballs to the Obama staff member. 

Read more from the original source:
ABC Focuses Oil Spill Blame on BP and Coast Guard, Not Obama; CBS Gives President ‘C’ for Response