Tag Archives: journalismism

How ABC News’ Brian Ross Staged His Toyota Death Ride [Fakery]

Brian Ross , America’s Wrongest Reporter , has been credited with owning the Toyota recall story , including one memorable report with Ross behind the wheel of an out-of-control car . He did it by splicing in staged footage to make it look scarier. Last month, Ross paid a visit to David Gilbert, a professor of automotive technology at Southern Illinois University who claims to have diagnosed a Toyota design flaw and found a way to reliably recreate uncommanded acceleration in its cars. To prove it, he let Ross drive around a car he’d rigged to suffer from the defect, and sure enough, it took off without warning! Scary. Here’s the video: One of the things that makes it look scary is that when the acceleration occurs, Ross’ piece cuts to a close-up shot of the Toyota’s tachometer spiking up to 6,000 RPMs in the course of a second—the whole car is outfitted with cameras, and it looks like they planted one right on top of the dashboard to record the RPMs. Wow! That’s fast. But, as some commenters at various message boards have discovered , the tachometer footage is faked. Take a look at these screenshots of the shot of the RPMs surging, one taken at the beginning of the acceleration and one at the end, just before Ross’ piece cut back to a shot of him at the wheel: As you can clearly see, the dashboard lights indicate that the car’s doors are open and its parking brake is on. The first shot shows the tachometer beginning at below 1,000 RPMs—or idling speed, as opposed to the 20 mph that Ross said he was driving when the acceleration began. On the right of the images, the speedometer appears to show a reading of zero miles per hour. And to top it all off, the transmission indicator shows that the car is in park. In other words, Ross took footage of a parked Toyota’s RPMs taking off and falsely portrayed the shot as having taken place while he was driving the car. ABC News spokesman Jeffrey Schneider confirmed to Gawker that the tachometer shot was indeed taken from the parked car and spliced into Ross’ death ride. But he says the shot wasn’t just taken while someone stepped on the gas pedal—it was filmed while Gilbert performed the same test that caused the acceleration while Ross was driving. “We isolated the tachometer during tests while the car was parked, in neutral, and driving,” Schneider says. “The shot of the car while driving was very shaky, so a choice was made in the editing suite to use the shot of the parked tachometer.” Schneider says ABC News is re-editing the online version of Ross’ piece to sub in the shot of the tachometer while Ross was driving, which he says shows the car’s RPMs going from “2,000 to 6,000 or 7,000,” and will post the following editor’s note explaining the decision: We have changed a two second insert shot in this video report, showing the tachometer meter during Professor Gilbert’s demonstration.The original insert shot was taped when Professor Gilbert demonstrated how an induced short circuit could cause the acceleration as the car was in park. As you will see, the insert shot of the tachometer taped as the car is rolling is extremely shaky, which is why it was not originally used. The readings of the induced surge are comparable. A question about the original shot (which clearly shows it was taped while the car was parked with the doors open) was brought to our attention by a writer at the Gawker.com website, John Cook. We got credit and everything! Schneider claims that the editing trick didn’t undermine the point of Ross’ piece, which was to show that Gilbert was able to recreate the flaw, prove that Toyota’s failsafe brake override system didn’t work, and that the glitch didn’t generate an error code that mehcanics could use to diagnose the problem. “The tachometer shot of the car driving as an even more accurate portrayal,” he says. “But they’re both accurate.” If it’s true that the swapped shot actually took place while Gilbert was performing the same test he performed while Ross was driving, then we could conceivably be inclined to believe that this was a careless error rather than a deliberate attempt to deceive viewers by using the most damaging shot of the tachometer Ross had. And maybe if he didn’t have a lengthy and documented history of shamelessly hyping cooked stories—from the Iraqi connection to the 2001 anthrax attacks to former CIA agent John Kiriakou’s lie that the agency only waterboarded one person one time to Nidal Hasan’s attempt to “reach out to Al Qaeda” to the Yemeni terrorist who plotted the Christmas bombing attack from Saudi custody and so on—we would believe that.

Go here to read the rest:
How ABC News’ Brian Ross Staged His Toyota Death Ride [Fakery]

National Enquirer Editor Corrupts Impressionable Columbia J-School Students [Barbarians At The Gate]

If you’re a journalism Brahmin who’s simply appalled at the prospect of the National Enquirer winning a Pulitzer Prize for its coverage of John Edwards’ atrocious moral life, look out—they’re going after your young now! The high priests of pedigreed journalism-with-a-capital-j gasped at the news earlier this year that the Enquirer was throwing its hat in the ring for a 2009 Pulitzer Prize for its ownership of the John Edwards scandal. Well, it’s too late—the foul tabloid barbarians have already penetrated the barricades of Columbia University ‘s journalism school, the keepers of the hallowed prize. National Enquirer executive editor Barry Levine gave a lecture to journalism graduate students there last week. “Yes, I was in the belly of the beast,” Levine told Gawker. “I had never been there before. I was happy to be greeted by a giant statue of [tabloid progenitor] Joseph Pulitzer, which I thought was appropriate.” UPDATE: A couple of commenters have pointed out, and these directions to the Columbia journalism school seem to confirm , that the giant statue that Levine saw was in fact of Thomas Jefferson. Whoops! Levine had been invited by Columbia professor John Martin to tell the story of his paper’s relentless, three-year pursuit of Edwards and Rielle Hunter, a story that he had virtually to himself for much of that time because “respectable” newspapers didn’t deign to get down in the mud with trivial stories about politicians who cheat on their dying wives and have illegitimate children and attract federal grand jury investigations for paying hush money out of campaign funds. We learned of the visit from Gawker contributor Hunter Walker, a Columbia journalism school student, who spotted a leftover stack of Levine’s business cards and some print-outs of a New York Post story about the Enquirer in one of the school’s classrooms this morning. Like any upstanding member of Columbia’s journalism community, Walker immediately reported the intrusion to a responsible adult grabbed a card for future employment prospects and contacted Gawker. The lesson, apparently, is that Columbia is happy to let the rude, ink-stained wretches of the Enquirer teach its charges the hard-won lessons of how reporting is done, but when it comes to actually honoring that reporting—surely you jest! After initially trying to preemptively blackball the Enquirer based on the preposterous notion that it’s really a magazine, and not a newspaper, the Pulitzer Committee has reportedly relented and will consider its application in earnest . Maybe they’re doing so right now! Jurors are meeting as we speak in the school’s “World Room.” We hope they grabbed one of Levine’s cards on the way to the meeting, because you never know in this economy.

Read the original post:
National Enquirer Editor Corrupts Impressionable Columbia J-School Students [Barbarians At The Gate]

For Washington Post Star, Lure of the Red Carpet Trumps the Thrill of Combat [Commitment]

When the Washington Post ‘s Rajiv Chandrasekaran requested an evacuation from his war-zone embed with the Marines in Afghanistan last week for “personal reasons,” military officials thought it sounded serious. But he just needed to go hang out with Matt Damon . Chandrasekaran, an associate editor and star reporter at the Post for his coverage of Iraq and Afghanistan, spent most of February in close quarters with Marines in Marja, Afghanistan, where NATO forces have been mounting a major combat offensive against the Taliban. The action in Marja is a hot story, and embeds with military units in Afghanistan are hard to come by right now—the waiting list currently stands at 56 reporters. But Chandrasekaran asked the Marines to evacuate him from the combat zone last week, citing unspecified “personal reasons.” He was free to leave, of course. But when the military public affairs officers who oversee embeds pointed out that, as per Department of Defense policy, the Post would have to lose its embed slot and Chandrasekaran’s place would go to the next reporter on the waiting list, he raised a stink and demanded that his fellow Post reporter Joshua Partlow be allowed to take his place, a military source in Afghanistan tells Gawker. After some back and forth, the DOD relented and allowed Chandrasekaran to leave without giving up the Post ‘s position. So why all the tsuris ? The “personal reason” that Chandrasekaran needed out of Marja, it turns out, was so he could attend the New York premiere of The Green Zone , the new Matt Damon film based on Chandrasekaran’s 2006 book Life in the Emerald City . Chandrasekaran’s last byline from Marja appeared on February 23 , and here he is at the premiere on February 25. “I had a number of reasons for needing to come back,” Chandrasekaran told Gawker. “Certainly attending the premiere of a movie based on a book that I wrote was among them. Unfortunately, there was a scheduling conflict and I had to leave Afghanistan when I did.” But Chandrasekaran never told the military officials who bent the rules for him and his paper why he needed the special treatment, and at least one of them was under the impression that it was some sort of family emergency. “I didn’t go into my reasons for needing to leave,” he said, “but I didn’t keep anything from them, and I certainly did not at any point say that there was a family emergency. They evaluated our request and they made their decision. They have their usual procedures, but I believe the public affairs staff recognizes that they’d like to have certain large news organizations covering significant military operations. That includes the Washington Post and others.” (Someone should tell Chandrasekaran that his boss thinks the ” Washington Post is not a national news organization of record serving a large general audience .”) Other reporters who’ve had to leave the combat zone in Marja—presumably for less lofty reasons than attending a movie premiere—haven’t gotten the same indulgence from military officials. National Public Radio’s Soraya Sarhaddi Nelson unexpectedly had to leave the front lines last month, and wasn’t able to immediately sub in her replacement Corey Flintoff, who is currently cooling his heels at a Marine base in Helmand province awaiting a slot and doesn’t expect to see combat until next week. Partlow, on the other hand, is in the thick of it and filing dispatches . [Photo by Andres Otero / WENN.com .]

Read more:
For Washington Post Star, Lure of the Red Carpet Trumps the Thrill of Combat [Commitment]

National Enquirer Editor Corrupts Impressionable Columbia J-School Students With Stories About Reporting [Barbarians At The Gate]

If you’re a journalism Brahmin who’s simply appalled at the prospect of the National Enquirer winning a Pulitzer Prize for its coverage of John Edwards’ atrocious moral life, look out—they’re going after your young now! The high priests of pedigreed journalism-with-a-capital-j gasped at the news earlier this year that the Enquirer was throwing its hat in the ring for a 2009 Pulitzer Prize for its ownership of the John Edwards scandal. Well, it’s too late—the foul tabloid barbarians have already penetrated the barricades of Columbia University ‘s journalism school, the keepers of the hallowed prize. National Enquirer executive editor Barry Levine gave a lecture to journalism graduate students there last week. “Yes, I was in the belly of the beast,” Levine told Gawker. “I had never been there before. I was happy to be greeted by a giant statue of [tabloid progenitor] Joseph Pulitzer, which I thought was appropriate.” Levine had been invited by Columbia professor John Martin to tell the story of his paper’s relentless, three-year pursuit of Edwards and Rielle Hunter, a story that he had virtually to himself for much of that time because “respectable” newspapers didn’t deign to get down in the mud with trivial stories about politicians who cheat on their dying wives and have illegitimate children and attract federal grand jury investigations for paying hush money out of campaign funds. We learned of the visit from Gawker contributor Hunter Walker, a Columbia journalism school student, who spotted a leftover stack of Levine’s business cards and some print-outs of a New York Post story about the Enquirer in one of the school’s classrooms this morning. Like any upstanding member of Columbia’s journalism community, Walker immediately reported the intrusion to a responsible adult grabbed a card for future employment prospects and contacted Gawker. The lesson, apparently, is that Columbia is happy to let the rude, ink-stained wretches of the Enquirer teach its charges the hard-won lessons of how reporting is done, but when it comes to actually honoring that reporting—surely you jest! After initially trying to preemptively blackball the Enquirer based on the preposterous notion that it’s really a magazine, and not a newspaper, the Pulitzer Committee has reportedly relented and will consider its application in earnest . Maybe they’re doing so right now! Jurors are meeting as we speak in the school’s “World Room.” We hope they grabbed one of Levine’s cards on the way to the meeting, because you never know in this economy.

Read this article:
National Enquirer Editor Corrupts Impressionable Columbia J-School Students With Stories About Reporting [Barbarians At The Gate]

Culture of Fear Inflames Financial News Wires

Bloomberg News staffers no longer have the market on fear and loathing cornered: Informants tell us that high-stakes monitoring of reporters’ performance has poisoned the atmosphere at Reuters and the Associated Press business desk, too. On Wednesday we reported on how Bloomberg’s neo-Soviet method of tracking scoop production, “Breaking News Points,” led to perverse outcomes like the obvious misrepresentation of some stories as exclusives and waning enthusiasm for enterprise journalism. On top of all that, we were told the system exacerbated a newsroom culture of paranoia and fear. Almost immediately, we began hearing from business journalists about similar problems at Reuters and AP Business. Our AP source says a majority of the staff — 90 percent, this person claims — are about to send a jointly-signed letter to Business Editor Hal Ritter accusing him of “installing a culture of fear.” Chief among their complaints: An annual review process “in which the entire staff is slammed.” Why would the news cooperative’s management want to demoralize staff like that? One theory is that the negative reviews would allow the newswire to cut more staff loose without having to pay severance. Then there’s Reuters, and its “Beats and Exclusives” scoop-tracking system — “the bastard twin to the one at Bloomberg,” as one source described it, in which the act of breaking news first is recorded via written “notes.” The “Beats and Exclusives” system wasn’t a very big deal until this year, when for the first time it will be used as the basis for pay, says our source, following an impasse in negotiations between Reuters and a union to which its journalists belong. Now “reporters who don’t file the requisite number of beats and exclusives will take it in the paycheck, so to speak.” It’s not clear how widely within the global Reuters newsgathering organization this change will spread, but our source indicated the new connection between pay and “Beats and Exclusives” notes is the reason New York Equities Editor Martin Howell this week implored staff to file fewer such records of scoops. You can read his internal memo here ; it was first printed by Talking Business News. Dig the part where he says Reuters reporters should write more about Reuters clients. The abuse we’re told is rampant under the Reuters “Beats and Exclusives” system should only get worse now that money is involved. Our source: The people who actually file [“Beats and Exclusives” notes] tend to shamelessly game the system by trying to get credit for non-news that no other outlet had or cared about or for “exclusive” executive interviews that broke zero ground. I can’t imagine what’s going to happen now, when jobs and pay are on the line. Of course, the fact that so much is on the line is, from a management standpoint, the precise reason for the system, as well as for the fearsome annual review at AP Business and for the Breaking News Points system at Bloomberg. The financial wires are being battered by several disasters at once: The implosion of financial services; the meltdown in the traditional news media; and a broad economic recession. This is the maelstrom that has AP lashing out at Google , that has seen Reuters spike a perfectly good investigation into one its investors and that led Bloomberg to kill a coverage expansion that was the pet project of its editor-in-chief. Executives are scared, and when executives get scared editors get scared. Said editors are now so frightened that they are positively racing, it would seem, to ape Bloomberg’s longstanding culture of near-psychotic paranoia — racing everywhere but at at Bloomberg, where they are scrambling to become even more Stalinist than they already were. The trouble with panic is that it actually makes a person (or, ahem, organization) less able to tackle challenging situations. Which helps explain why these scoop-measuring systems are now significantly inhibiting the very thing they’re supposed to be monitoring, by sapping time and energy from working journalists. Hence Howell’s memo to chill out with the scoop “notes,” and hence the plan we’ve been told Bloomberg has to tweak its Breaking News Points system again in 2010. Here’s a better idea for finance wire managers: Take the money earmarked for performance monitoring overhauls and rewarding Breaking Exclusive Scoop Beat Things and plow it into several dozen rounds of beers, and maybe some hot cocoa and rice krispy treats or whatever, spread out over the course of the year. Then when the time comes to let people go, as it probably will, do the sort of agonizing you knew deep down you’d have to do at layoff time even after you started pretending you could judge everyone using statistics. You’ll probably still feel terrible, but your (more) relaxed and brave reporters will have created an atmosphere where it’s much easier to hire people back when the rebound comes, and where it’s more likely you’ll still have lots of readers — err, clients — still paying for your content. Or just keep doing what you’re doing and hope (in vain) your staff doesn’t blow off steam by sending their horror stories and rants to tips@gawker.com . It’s cool either way, as far as we’re concerned. (Top pic by artemuestra on Flickr ; second pic by Max Sang )

Read the rest here:
Culture of Fear Inflames Financial News Wires

Luke Russert Disproving Those Nepotism Charges One Story at a Time

In your blizzardy Wednesday media column: Luke Russert does it the Luke Russert way, the NYT has no iPad comment, a new journalism moneymaking scheme, and David Remnick acts so haughty you’d think he runs America’s best magazine or something. Professional journalist Luke Russert says about the above Twitpic: “It’s not that bad, in fact being a correspondent in this weather is a day at the beach!” Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Whew. Even though the New York Times managed to make some money last year, they didn’t say a dadgum thing about the iPad during their earnings call ! The iPad is all that humans care about now NYT, get with the “program,” okay? The latest thing that a journalist is doing to try to make money and thereby not starve : a former religion reporter and a former con man are forming a business reporting venture in which they do investigative reporting on companies, then short the stock. Clearly, the money here will be made when they sell the odd-couple screwball comedy screenplay. David Remnick on whether the National Enquirer should win a Pulitzer: “I’m not a ridiculous prude about it, but: is that a great achievement of journalism?” Hello, pretentious. Who the fuck are you, Seymour Hersh’s editor?

Go here to read the rest:
Luke Russert Disproving Those Nepotism Charges One Story at a Time

How to Destroy a Perfectly Good Fake Trend Story

We all know that New York Times fake trend stories are annoying because they are 1) fake, and 2) trend stories. But do not neglect their third worst quality: many are terribly written. Allow us to show you. The underlying cause of the poorest-written portions of most fake trend stories is the insistence by NYT editors that every fake trend story have some sort of “stats” graf—a graf that attempts to force a clearly made-up premise into an empirically justifiable form. Since fake trend stories are, by definition, pure bullshit, this requirement often results in the most tortured or transparently ridiculous part of what could have been a perfectly decent story, had it been upfront about its total lack of journalistic merit. Examples: The Run-On Nightmare: The NYT’s in-house grammar scold highlights this (14 verb forms in one sentence!), from last month’s “H ipsters are living in cold apartments ” piece: As Americans across the country wrestle with spouses and their thermostats over how low to go – as they join contests like Freeze Yer Buns, now in its third year, a challenge posed by Deanna Duke, a Seattle-based environmental blogger who calls herself the Crunchy Chicken, to lower the thermostat to around 55 degrees, or follow the lead of the Maine couple trying to live comfortably in a furnace-free house and blogging about it in their Cold House Journal – there are those who are living nearly without heat by choice, and doing just fine, thank you very much. The Unsupported Anecdote-to-Wide Angle Pivot: From September’s ” Everybody is jogging with their babies now ” fitness piece : Mrs. Keith is an extreme example of an increasingly common breed of runner: parents who hit the road with their offspring in jogging strollers, typically single or double versions with two 16-inch inflatable tires in back and a single tire in front. But, experts say, there is a learning curve to running with a stroller. The Futile Attempt to Disprove Its Own Acknowledgment of Preposterousness: From Guy Trebay’s lively expos

What the VICE/CNN Partnership Means for Media, Hipsters, and News

It was announced last week that the well-reputed paint-huffing punks of VICE was partnering up to share their VBS.TV content with CNN—the 30 year-old broadcast news network, America’s first all-news channel—on their website. Does it mean anything?

View original post here:
What the VICE/CNN Partnership Means for Media, Hipsters, and News

Life After Gosselin: Kate Major Answers Your Questions

As promised , Kate Major —the former Star celebrity reporter who left journalism behind to pursue love with Jon Gosselin (which didn’t quite work )—has answered five questions for you, the bloodthirsty internet hordes. Below: regrets, journalism, heroes, and celebulove.

See the original post here:
Life After Gosselin: Kate Major Answers Your Questions

CNN’s Post-Heroic Phase

Two days ago, CNN’s Haiti coverage reached a strange climax, as Sanjay Gupta and Anderson Cooper morphed into a heroic team of life-saving reporters. Tonight—eight days after the earthquake hit—Gupta and Cooper seemed beaten down, almost resigned. Their reports focused mainly on the lack of supplies—medical and otherwise—that threaten to make the earthquake’s aftermath as deadly as the disaster itself.

Follow this link:
CNN’s Post-Heroic Phase