Tag Archives: labeling

AP Headline: Keeping 2011-2012 Income Tax Rates the Same Is ‘Big New Tax Law’

Did you know that the “big new tax law” signed by President Obama yesterday “will save taxpayers, on average, about $3,000 next year,” and that it will have “tax breaks for being married, having children, paying for child care, going to college or investing in securities”? Don't spend that extra $3,000 yet, because it mostly won't be there. With the only major exception being the 2-point cut in the Social Security payroll tax, and of course barring new legislation the next Congress may take on, the tax laws for the next two years will essentially be the same as they have been since 2003, when Congress lowered marginal income, capital gain, and dividend income tax rates. This lack of major change didn't stop the Ministry of Propaganda — er, the Associated Press — and reporter Stephen Ohlemacher from calling the new legislation “the most significant new tax law in a decade,” when there's almost nothing “new” about it, or from trumpeting how much certain American families will “save” as a result. Here are a few paragraphs from Ohlemacher's report : read more

Read more from the original source:
AP Headline: Keeping 2011-2012 Income Tax Rates the Same Is ‘Big New Tax Law’

AP’s Crutsinger Issues Incomplete, Sloppy, Misleading Report on November’s Record Deficit, Obama-GOP ‘Tax-Cut Plan’

How can you cover a story about Uncle Sam's November Monthly Treasury Statement and the proposed Obama-GOP compromise on taxes and unemployment benefits without using the words “spending,” “receipts,” any form of “collect,” or “unemployment”? It's a neat trick, but the Associated Press's Martin Crutsinger pulled it off in his Friday afternoon dispatch shortly after the government report's release. Instead of communicating apparently boring facts, Crutsinger concentrated his fire on the “tax-cut agreement” with a supposed “cost (of) $855 billion over two years” worked out by President Obama and Congressional Republicans. In doing so, he “somehow” failed to mention that the proposal includes a 13-month extension of unemployment benefits. Based on a comparison

CNN: Keeping Current Tax Rates is Increasing Government Spending

On Tuesday's Newsroom, CNN tried to spin the proposed compromise between President Obama and congressional Republicans to keep the current tax rates as a ” package that increases spending dramatically .” Correspondents Jessica Yellin and Joe Johns forwarded the liberal talking point that the Republicans were breaking their campaign promise to reduce government spending with this proposal. Yellin appeared with anchor Brooke Baldwin just after the bottom of the 3 pm Eastern hour. After playing a montage of several clips of President Obama promising to “roll back the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans,” Baldwin stated that “it's not just the President, as we saw in the montage, breaking a promise. It's also- correct me if I'm wrong- the Republicans breaking a promise as well .” The liberal CNN correspondent replied with the faulty concept that letting taxpayers keep more of their income is government spending (thus treating all income as if it belonged to the government): read more

See the original post here:
CNN: Keeping Current Tax Rates is Increasing Government Spending

By 6-to-1 Margin, Networks Paint Debate Over “Tax Cuts,” Not Raising Rates

Even with Monday’s deal between President Obama and top Republicans, no American’s income tax rates will actually decline on January 1 (although, if the deal passes, workers will notice a modest reduction in their payroll taxes in 2011). Yet throughout this debate, the broadcast networks have insisted on framing the debate as about “tax cuts” and “tax breaks,” not about forestalling a tax increase that could jeopardize the weak recovery. MRC analysts reviewed all 23 ABC, CBS and NBC evening news stories about the tax debate from the start of the lame-duck session of Congress on November 15 through December 5, just before the GOP and Obama struck their deal. Network reporters used the phrase “tax cut” a total of 71 times to characterize the issue at hand. CBS’s Nancy Cordes, for example, talked about “the battle over the Bush tax cuts” on the November 15 Evening News. Two nights later, NBC’s Chuck Todd related a new poll showing how “49 percent say don’t give the wealthy these tax cuts” — as if the “the wealthy” would be getting some new gift from the government. read more

Go here to read the rest:
By 6-to-1 Margin, Networks Paint Debate Over “Tax Cuts,” Not Raising Rates

NBC’s O’Donnell: Palin ‘Rips the Heart Out of Her Opponents’ in New Book

NBC correspondent Norah O'Donnell hyped Sarah Palin's criticism of her liberal opponents on Tuesday's Today show, stating that the former governor ” rips the heart out of some of her opponents ” in her new book. O'Donnell stated that Palin, ” in very personal terms, also questions the President's [Obama's] patriotism, concluding he has 'a stark lack of faith in the American people.' ” The correspondent covered “America By Heart,” the Republican's second book, for the second straight day. Anchor Matt Lauer introduced her report, which began 40 minutes into the 7 pm Eastern hour, by immediately noting Palin's attacks on Mr. Obama: “Sarah Palin's much-anticipated new book hits stores today. NBC News received an advanced copy last night, and the former Alaska governor is not holding back when it comes to President Obama .” O'Donnell picked up where he left off: “Well, you know, her new book is called 'America By Heart.' It's full of what she calls 'reflections on faith, family and flag.' But with all the attacks on President Obama and others, some say it could be a handbook for her for a 2012 campaign .” read more

Read the original:
NBC’s O’Donnell: Palin ‘Rips the Heart Out of Her Opponents’ in New Book

CNN Misinterprets Pope’s Condom Remarks; NBC Offers Accurate Coverage

On Monday's Newsroom, CNN's Kyra Phillips gave a false impression of Pope Benedict XVI's recent comments about condoms. While the Pope stated that condom use “can be a first step…on the way toward recovering an awareness that not everything is allowed,” Phillips stated that the pontiff ” says condoms are okay sometimes .” Refreshingly, Monday's Today show on NBC accurately covered Benedict's remarks. The anchor previewed CNN correspondent Atika Schubert's report on the pontiff's comments 10 minutes into the 9 am Eastern hour with her inaccurate description: “Well, the Catholic Church and condoms: two things that have never really gone together until now. The Pope, quoted in a new book, says condoms are okay sometimes. Now, that's a talker! ” After a commercial break, Phillips continued with another misleading statement: PHILLIPS: Pope Benedict is bending a bit when it comes to condoms. A new book actually quotes him as saying that they are okay to use in certain circumstances, like to prevent disease, not birth control. It's the first time the Church has ever talked about exceptions to the condom rule. …Here's a part of what the Pope says in the book. See if your eyebrows raise a little bit. It says- quote, ' There could be single cases that can be justified. For instance, when a prostitute uses a condom .' Say what? (laughs) Doesn't it kind of sound like the Pope is justifying prostitution, too? Surely not, but what a bizarre analogy. read more

Continue reading here:
CNN Misinterprets Pope’s Condom Remarks; NBC Offers Accurate Coverage

Bozell, Hannity Tackle Couric-Murkowski Interview, NPR Portraying Bush As Drunkard in Latest ‘Media Mash’

Katie Couric's boosterism of “moderate Republican” Sen. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and NPR's cheap shot at former President George W. Bush's recovery from alcoholism were just two of the “Media Mash” topics NewsBusters publisher Brent Bozell and Fox News host Sean Hannity addressed on the November 20 edition of “Hannity.” “When will you ever hear the word 'liberal' attached to a Republican?” Bozell asked, noting that Murkowski is in fact a liberal Republican. “In eight years, she was on [CBS] one time. In the last week, she's been on there twice,” the Media Research Center president noted after viewing a clip of CBS “Evening News” Katie Couric's November 15 interview with the Alaska senator. [Video of the full “Media Mash” segment is available after the page break] read more

Read the original post:
Bozell, Hannity Tackle Couric-Murkowski Interview, NPR Portraying Bush As Drunkard in Latest ‘Media Mash’

In Coverage of Latest Court Ruling, AP Continues Press Tradition of Stem Cell Obfuscation

It is truly remarkable to observe how press outlets continue to misreport and misinform the public in the area of stem cell research. One of the latest examples came yesterday at the Associated Press. In a report covering a court ruling on government funding of embryonic stem cell research (ESCR), the AP’s Nedra Pickler completely failed to acknowledge that there are any other kinds of stem cells. Every single use by Pickler of the terms “stem cell” or “stem cells” has no modifying adjective, except the very first, whose modifier is “embryonic.” It’s as if there are no other avenues besides ESCR for “scientific progress toward potentially lifesaving medical treatment.” In fact, Pickler’s less-informed readers would have no reason to believe that there is any form of stem cell research besides ESCR. The reality, which will be shown later for the umpteenth time, is that non-embryonic stem cells, often referred to as adult stem cells, have already shown that they can do virtually everything embryonic cells can with far less potential for side effects and, of course, no loss of human life. The word “adult” does not appear in the AP report. Here are several paragraphs from Pickler’s pathetic piece , which also includes a deeply deceptive quote (is there any other kind?) from Obama White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs (bold is mine): Court OKs US-funded stem cell research for now An appeals court ruled Tuesday that government funding of embryonic stem cell research can continue for now. The U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington granted the Obama administration’s request to allow the funding from the National Institutes of Health while it appeals a judge’s order blocking the research. The administration had argued that stopping the research while the case proceeds would irreparably harm scientific progress toward potentially lifesaving medical treatment. U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth had blocked President Barack Obama’s research funding guidelines because he said it’s likely they violate the law against federal funding of embryo destruction. A three-judge panel of the appeals court issued an unusually quick decision, a day after hearing arguments over whether the funding could continue while it considers the case. The court also said it would expedite the case. Researchers hope one day to use stem cells in ways that cure spinal cord injuries, Parkinson’s disease and other ailments. Opponents say the research is a form of abortion because human embryos must be destroyed to obtain the stem cells. … “President Obama made expansion of stem cell research and the pursuit of groundbreaking treatments and cures a top priority when he took office,” White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said in a statement after the ruling. “We’re heartened that the court will allow NIH and their grantees to continue moving forward while the appeal is resolved.” The bolded sentence above is false. Let’s take it one item at a time. Adult stem cells have already been used to treat spinal cord injuries. Here’s one example that was recounted in testimony this month before the U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations: The first example Dr. Peduzzi Nelson gave was that of Silvio, who was quadriplegic after a spinal cord injury at the base of his neck, “AIS Grade A”. Grade A is considered the worst, indicating a “complete” spinal cord injury where no motor or sensory function is preserved in the lower body. Silvio was left with no movement of his legs and minimal movement of his fingers. At 2 years after injury, and after intensive rehabilitation failed to lead to an improvement, he received his own nasal adult stem cells and partial scar removal. Today Silvio can maintain a standing position and wave without help. With a walker and short braces, he can walk over 30 feet without anyone helping him. He can now move his fingers, which he could not do before. Silvio’s improvement is astounding. Usually only 5% of AIS Grade A patients improve in grade if a treatment is given at 1 year or greater after spinal cord injury. But using adult stem cells for treatment, Silvio is not an isolated case. Adult stem cells have successfully treated Parkinson’s disease ( Life News ; February 16, 2009): Scientists have published a paper in a medical journal describing the results of the world’s first clinical trial using autologous neural stem cells for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. A leading bioethics watchdog says the results show more money should be put behind adult stem cells. UCLA researchers published their results in February issue of the Bentham Open Stem Cell Journal which outlines the long term results of the trial. “We have documented the first successful adult neural stem cell transplantation to reverse the effects of Parkinson’s disease and demonstrated the long term safety and therapeutic effects of this approach,” says lead author Dr. Michel Levesque. The paper describes how Levesque’s team was able to isolate patient-derived neural stem cells, multiply them in vitro and ultimately differentiate them to produce mature neurons before they are reintroduced into the brain. The team was able to inject the adult stem cells without the need for immunosuppressants. Unlike embryonic stem cells, adult stem cell injections don’t cause a patient’s immune system to reject the cells. The adult stem cells were highly beneficial for the patient involved in the study. Are the AP and Nedra Pickler going to quibble over whether the two instances cited represent “cures,” when the ESCR cupboard is utterly bare of success stories such as these? As to other ailments, several years ago, Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life wrote that “ASCR has produced treatments for more than 73 medical conditions, including brain cancer, breast cancer, type I diabetes, Parkinson’s disease, spinal cord injury, osteoporosis, and stroke damage.” The number is probably higher now. Advocate Don Margolis’s web site lists well over 50 categories of diseases and conditions that have been improved and/or cured with adult stem cells. At some point, the oh-so-cute obfuscation of the press stops being funny. That’s the point where people who could be gaining knowledge they could use to help themselves or their loved ones get desired treatment for chronic diseases and conditions are kept unaware because of consistently irresponsible journalism. I would suggest that we’re really close to being there, i.e., we’re not far from the point where people will be needlessly suffering and perhaps even dying because they are being kept in the dark by an establishment press that is all about ESCR uber alles while continuing to ignore and/or downplay available adult stem cell progress and treatments. Graphic found at LifeNews.com . Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

The rest is here:
In Coverage of Latest Court Ruling, AP Continues Press Tradition of Stem Cell Obfuscation

CBS: The Rich to Blame For Bad Economy, Need to Pay Higher Taxes

On CBS’s Sunday Morning, correspondent Martha Teichner promoted left-wing class warfare talking points from former Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich: “[He] in a new book points out another ominous parallel between the Great Depression and the ‘Great Recession,’ its cause.” Reich proclaimed: “More and more of the income that was generated by the economy went to people at the top.” [Audio available here ] Teichner worked to bolster Reich’s argument: “In the last century, there were only two years, in 1928 just before the great crash, and then again in 2007, during which the richest 1% were taking home nearly a quarter of the entire income of the nation.” Reich continued his assault on upper income earners: “Last year, when most Americans were suffering, the top 25 hedge fund managers each earned $1 billion. A billion dollars would pay the salaries of something like 20,000 teachers.” Again, Teichner made sure to back up Reich’s assertions: “That wage inequality, Reich argues, is at the heart of our economic woes. And to fix things, we need to pay those teachers and the rest of the middle class more , not less, so they can spend enough to kick-start the economy. And yes, that means higher taxes for the rich.” For a brief moment, the segment featured the opposing side, in the form of Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch Mcconnell warning that increasing taxes on the rich could further harm the economy. However, Teichner quickly dismissed such a notion, in favor of liberal economic dogma: “In the partisan battle over the future of the Bush tax cuts, Reich disagrees.” Reich claimed: “We provided a huge tax cut to the rich and nothing trickled down. After 2001, median wages actually dropped.” Teichner tried to suggest that any tax increases would be modest compared with past tax rates: “The top tax rate now is 35%. If the Bush tax cuts are allowed to expire, nearly 40%. For the record, under President Eisenhower, a Republican, the top rate was 91%. Really. Middle class wages were rising and the rich actually got richer.” As NewsBusters’ Brad Wilmouth earlier reported , giving commentary later in the broadcast, Syfy Channel producer Linda McGibney attacked economist and Sunday Morning contributor Ben Stein for opposing a tax increase on the wealthy. In part, she ranted: “I suppose he thinks he’s beyond sharing his good fortune with the rest of Americans who are suffering financially or he just doesn’t care about them. … I have always understood that the have’s are greedy. This is the first time I’ve heard one of them express it out loud so openly.” Here is a transcript of the September 26 exchange between Teichner and Reich: 9:08AM ET ROBERT REICH: Typically in a business cycle, we get back to the same economic path we were on. People get their old jobs back or nearly their old jobs. But this time around, very much like the Great Depression, we are not going to be able to go back on the same road. MARTHA TEICHNER: Former Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich in a new book points out another ominous parallel between the Great Depression and the ‘Great Recession,’ its cause. REICH: More and more of the income that was generated by the economy went to people at the top. TEICHNER: In the last century, there were only two years, in 1928 just before the great crash, and then again in 2007, during which the richest 1% were taking home nearly a quarter of the entire income of the nation. REICH: The typical CEO is up to 350 times the salary and benefits of the typical worker. Last year, when most Americans were suffering, the top 25 hedge fund managers each earned $1 billion. A billion dollars would pay the salaries of something like 20,000 teachers. TEICHNER: That wage inequality, Reich argues, is at the heart of our economic woes. And to fix things, we need to pay those teachers and the rest of the middle class more, not less, so they can spend enough to kick-start the economy. And yes, that means higher taxes for the rich. REICH: The economy depends – 70% of demand – on consumers and those consumers are essentially the middle class. People who are very rich, they spend a much smaller proportion of their income. MITCH MCCONNELL [SEN. R-KY]: No recovery will take place if we impose new taxes on the people we need to create jobs. TEICHNER: In the partisan battle over the future of the Bush tax cuts, Reich disagrees. REICH: We provided a huge tax cut to the rich and nothing trickled down. After 2001, median wages actually dropped. TEICHNER: The top tax rate now is 35%. If the Bush tax cuts are allowed to expire, nearly 40%. For the record, under President Eisenhower, a Republican, the top rate was 91%. Really. Middle class wages were rising and the rich actually got richer. REICH: Henry Ford understood this. He paid his workers $5 a day at the Highland Park Model-T plant. That was a lot of money. That was about twice as much as the typical worker was earning. He said, you know, I’m going to make a lot of money because my workers are going to earn enough that they can turn around and buy the Model-Ts that they are making. You know something, Henry Ford was right.

Read the original here:
CBS: The Rich to Blame For Bad Economy, Need to Pay Higher Taxes

CNN’s Phillips Endorses Liberal Minister Critical of Blacks’ Attitudes on Homosexuality

CNN’s Kyra Phillips gave a ringing endorsement to a Christian minister and his heterodox views on homosexuality on Monday’s Newsroom. Phillips interviewed televangelist Bishop Carlton Pearson, who, in her words, went ” out on a limb …[to] say gays are accepted in heaven ,” and concluded the segment by stating how she ” respect [s] very much ” what he preached on the highly-debated moral issue. The anchor led the 10 am Eastern hour with the allegations against Bishop Eddie Long, who has been sued by four young men so far who accuse him of coercing them into sexual relationships. Four minutes into the hour, Phillips introduced Pearson as a ” pioneering black televangelist and a close friend of Eddie Long’s…[who] l ost a lot of his flock when he began preaching that everyone has a place in heaven, including gay people .” She first asked the bishop, ” Why did you go out on a limb and say gays are accepted in heaven, something that the black church disagrees with? ” Pearson lauded his “gay friends” as ” some of the most sensitive, loving, creative, ingenious, generous people ” and touted how he ” started preaching the Gospel of inclusion ” and criticized how supposedly ” the devotion to the devil and hell is stronger, or as strong as anybody’s devotion to Jesus in many of the Christian circles .” After spending some time discussing what Pearson knew of Long, Phillips posited what would happen if the accused minister came out as a homosexual: “What if he does come forward, Bishop, and say, I told you I wasn’t a perfect man and I’ve been- I have been struggling with this issue, and he does say that he’s gay. What if this story changes? How will you deal with that? Will you accept him? Will you embrace him? How would you counsel him as his friend?” The CNN anchor’s guest devoted some of his subsequent answer to again criticizing the traditional Christian teaching on homosexuality and sexuality in general: “How do we deal with our sexual side, our sensual side, our spiritual side? They- because they interplay. They interact. So, it’s- it’s wrong for- I’m not for Christian cannibalism, eating our dead or dying, destroying them the way we do so many people .” Phillips and Pearson devoted most of the second half of the segment to discussing and critiquing black cultural attitudes towards homosexuality: PHILLIPS: You’ve talked about this as well, the issue of being a black gay man, especially in the Church, and a man within ministry- gospel music. There have been allegations that have come forward, there have been individuals that have come forward and said, I’m gay and have been completely shut out of the black church because of that. PEARSON: Yes. PHILLIPS: Why is it so unacceptable to be a black man and to be gay and to lead a flock? Why is it so taboo? PEARSON: Well, first of all- PHILLIPS: It’s not just biblical. I mean, there’s a cultural feeling here . PEARSON: Of course. Yes. That’s for white folks. Y’all are supposed to do, when in comes to that. We don’t do that kind of stuff. We [are] real men. That’s- I said that in jest, but that’s the underlying- PHILLIPS: No, but that’s interesting. That’s what’s going on. PEARSON: Yes. That’s we don’t do weird stuff. Now, the other hypocritical aspect of that is our churches, Kyra, are filled with same gender loving people, from the music department to the pulpits- black music, church music- where would it be without our same gender loving or gay musicians and singers? Not all of them are. PHILLIPS: But many have come to you and said, I’m gay, but I can’t come out. PEARSON: Oh, yes. Oh yes. PHILLIPS: And we’re talking very powerful people in the gospel industry. PEARSON: Yes, ma’am. PHILLIPS: I’ve met them. PEARSON: Yes, ma’am. With tears in their eyes, they were afraid. T here are people who’ve come to me and say, I embraced your gospel of inclusion, Bishop, but I can’t- it’s not a theological issue with me. It’s a business decision. I’ll lose my flock. I’ll lose my money. I’ll lose my parishioners. I’ll lose myself. I can’t love everybody. I can’t even love me, he would say. And I want to say to that group- and this is a wake-up call. Until the church, black or otherwise- confronts- not combats- confronts this issue of human sexuality and homosexuality, which is not going away- homosexuals and homosexuality is not going away- if every gay person in our church just left or those who have an orientation or preference or an inclination, or a fantasy, if everyone left, we wouldn’t have a church . The bishop even specifically targeted the Catholic Church in his criticism of traditional Christianity: PEARSON: There are gay doctors, police officers, attorneys, priests. Look at the whole Catholic Church. All this idea of celibacy. It’s not even natural, but it’s out. It’s like the Christian Church is having to confront its issues, its platonic, plastic, superficial portrayals of an angry God, a vicious God, an eternal place where everybody’s going to burn and this God with this terrible anger management problem who’s going to get you and then He’s going to turn you over to the devil, who’s going to accuse you to Him, and it’s fairy tale stuff. But we bought into it, and now we’re having to face the fact that maybe we missed it on many of these issues. Phillips enthusiastically responded to Pearson’s out-of-the-mainstream theology at the end of the interview: ” Well, I respect very much what you’ve preached, so I look forward to talking to you more about this .” This stance isn’t at all surprising, as the CNN anchor endorsed three of her previous guests who hold similarly heterodox views inside Christianity during a March 26, 2010 segment. She even brought back two of them a month later . CNN, as a whole, has latched onto promoting the agenda of homosexual advocacy groups during 2010. On August 4, the day that a federal judge overturned California’s Proposition 8, the network leaned mostly towards those who opposed the voter-approved amendment which bans same-sex “marriage.” A month and a half earlier, senior political analyst Gloria Borger gave a glowing profile of Ted Olson and David Boies , the two main attorneys who worked to overturn Prop 8. CNN also premiered their pro-homosexual parenting documentary, ” Gary and Tony Have a Baby ,” on June 24 and promoted it with a series of pro-homosexual agenda segments during that month.

Read the original here:
CNN’s Phillips Endorses Liberal Minister Critical of Blacks’ Attitudes on Homosexuality