Tag Archives: Street

Leonardo DiCaprio May Reteam With Ridley Scott On Wall Street Movie

Long in the works ‘Wolf of Wall Street’ adaptation would be produced by Martin Scorsese. By Eric Ditzian Leonardo DiCaprio Photo: Jim Spellman/ WireImage Leonardo DiCaprio and Martin Scorsese had been trying to bring an adaptation of Jordan Belfort’s tell-all memoir, “The Wolf of Wall Street,” to the big screen since early in 2007. Scorsese was set to direct, and Leo would play Belfort, a New York stockbroker who landed in prison for refusing to cooperate in a 1990s securities fraud case. “Sopranos” scribe Terence Winter came onboard to pen the screenplay. But the project stalled, and DiCaprio and Scorsese went off to make “Shutter Island.” Now the film is getting another shot, Deadline New York reports, and director Ridley Scott is in early discussions to helm “Wolf.” DiCaprio, who worked with Scott on 2008’s “Body of Lies,” would remain in the starring role and Scorsese would shift into the role of a producer. The film would reportedly be similar to DiCaprio’s “Catch Me If You Can” in terms of storytelling, as “Wolf” would focus on Belfort’s relationship with an FBI agent who tries to convert him into an informant. According to Deadline, all involved still love Winter’s script. “It is funny, dramatic and fast paced, and manages to make something of a sympathetic character out of a stockbroker who supervises a cadre of brokers who squeezed clients to buy stocks that paid off — for the brokers, who used the funds to live extravagantly until they were brought down by the feds,” Deadline’s Mike Fleming wrote. The only thing standing in the way of production is scheduling. Scott is plowing ahead on his 3-D “Alien” prequel and DiCaprio’s next role is “Hoover,” the biopic directed by Clint Eastwood. Which director do you think works best with Leonardo DiCaprio? Talk about it in the comments. For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com . Related Photos The Evolution Of: Leonardo DiCaprio

Visit link:
Leonardo DiCaprio May Reteam With Ridley Scott On Wall Street Movie

Wall St. Journal Reporter Cites Smerconish as a Gaffe Expert: Mrs. Obama Good, Coulter Bad

Jeffrey Zaslow of The Wall Street Journal  reported on political gaffes on Wednesday, and as an expert he brought on Obama-loving former Republican Michael Smerconish. Unsurprisingly, Smerconish bashed Ann Coulter and forgave Michelle Obama as he discussed his “Muzzle Meter” and the severity of scandalous words:   We’ve become a culture that is unforgiving when it comes to poor word choice, says syndicated radio host Michael Smerconish. “We’re far too thin-skinned, starting federal investigations every time someone says something stupid.” He blames political partisanship and a 24/7 media looking for “gotcha” moments. Web sites such as TMZ.com, Politico.com, Gawker.com and TheSuperficial.com traffic in verbal gaffes. Mr. Smerconish, a lifelong Republican who this year announced he is now an independent, has developed a “Muzzle Meter,” asking listeners to help him measure, on a scale of 1 to 10, whether poor word choices are innocent mistakes (a 1 or a 2) or were said with malice (a 9 or a 10). Unlike many of his listeners, he gave Michelle Obama a pass for saying at a 2008 campaign rally: “For the first time in my adult lifetime, I am really proud of my country.” “I believe she meant she had never been as proud of her country,” says Mr. Smerconish. However, he gave pundit Ann Coulter a 9 for belittling the activism of certain wives of Sept. 11 victims. “I’ve never seen people enjoying their husbands’ deaths so much,” Ms. Coulter said.

Follow this link:
Wall St. Journal Reporter Cites Smerconish as a Gaffe Expert: Mrs. Obama Good, Coulter Bad

First-Ever ‘Oaklavia’: 2 Miles of Oakland Streets Closed to Cars (Video)

Big Street Party in Oakland (Cars Not Welcome) The Ciclovia concept is most closely associated with Bogotá, Colombia. The general idea is to temporarily close down some streets to cars and allow people to take over with various a… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Continue reading here:
First-Ever ‘Oaklavia’: 2 Miles of Oakland Streets Closed to Cars (Video)

The Bachelorette Recap: Chris Lambton Melts Our Hearts, Ali Fedotowsky Plays Ty-Breaker

Only four men remain on The Bachelorette now. Maybe you noticed. Last night’s episode of the reality TV saga was dominated by a Jake and Vienna interview for the ages, making everything else seem boring and irrelevant. Follow the above link for an entire recap devoted to that nonsense. Below, we give Ali Fedotowsky and crew their due as her quest for love hits Portugal. Here’s THG’s patented plus-minus rundown of the episode … Ali and Roberto Martinez take pictures of each other, hear music on the street and start dancing right there. SO romantic and NOT AT ALL staged. Minus 4 . They make nice conversation about Roberto’s family, the hunk says really nice things to Ali, they kiss and we think he’s the favorite, hands down. Plus 8 . Who will The Bachelorette star choose? Ty and Frank go on the awkward two-on-one date ever. Minus 5 , ’cause they just bitch about the format the whole time. You’re on The Bachelorette , guys. Frank lives with his parents. Minus 4, but Ty does him one better by saying he’s “tickled” Ali has a plan and a career of her own. Sexist much? Minus 20 . Kirk’s date takes place in a big castle, at which he talks about his illness and how it made him reexamine his life. Again with the mold poisoning. Plus 9 . Minus 12 , or approximately one point for each use of the word “hometown.” Like saying “wrong reasons” ad nauseam, guess they stick to the script. Fortunately, Chris Lambton not only refers to his town’s name (Dennis, Mass.), he knocks it out of the park on his date. Moped skills aside. Plus 13 . Chris and Roberto can do no wrong. The narrative of Chris’ mom’s death is a wee bit overblown, but he seems so genuinely sweet about it, how can you not give the guy another Plus 11 ? Minus 7 for blurring out Chris’ Boston Red Sox shirt. If you’re up on The Bachelorette spoilers , you knew that Ty or Kirk was going home at the rose ceremony, and it was Ty in a bit of a surprise. Plus 5 . Again, see the link above for the full rundown, but for all her flaws, sad Vienna Girardi came off 100 times better than pompous Jake Pavelka. Wash . How funny was next week’s preview, considering how much Frank whines about not getting time with Ali, the alleged girl of his dreams?! Minus 15 . TOTAL: -9. SEASON: +130 . Roses : Chris, Roberto, Frank and Kirk. Out : Ty.

Read more:
The Bachelorette Recap: Chris Lambton Melts Our Hearts, Ali Fedotowsky Plays Ty-Breaker

Oh, No! On Independence Day, CBS Frets Congress Becoming ‘Paralyzed’ Over ‘Fear of the Deficit’

West coast viewers got to see a July 4 CBS Evening News on Sunday, and those who tuned in saw CBS’s interim “report card” on Congress’s performance so far. Under the headline of “unfinished business,” correspondent Wyatt Andrews and his sole expert, Politico’s Jonathan Allen, both fretted how Congress is now “paralyzed” due to a “growing fear of the deficit.” Many Americans are probably wishing Congress had become “paralyzed” a few trillion dollars ago. Andrews rued that supposedly job-creating “stimulus spending” may be sacrificed if enough congressmen feel deficit spending is now “political Kryptonite.” Many members of Congress especially those in tough re-election campaigns are home right now, trying to figure out the spending issue: Will voters support more stimulus spending if it directly leads to jobs, or has deficit spending itself become political Kryptonite? CBS’s main example of congressional indecision, however, was an urgently-needed Afghanistan war funding bill that the Senate has nearly doubled with additional spending, pushing it from $33 to $60 billion, and that has ballooned in the House to $80 billion. That doesn’t sound like a Congress that is becoming cowed by the need to throttle back spending. Here’s the transcript of the piece from the July 4 Evening News; you can watch video at CBSNews.com: ANCHOR RUSS MITCHELL: Congress has had some notable successes this year in health care and education reform along others. But members have a lot of catching up to do when they return from their holiday recess in a week and a half. Wyatt Andrews has more. CORRESPONDENT WYATT ANDREWS: As members of Congress streamed from the Capitol Thursday night, they were leaving for a ten-day break, but escaping a long list of unfinished business. Despite repeated demands for final action- REPRESENTATIVE JOHN LEWIS: Do not be afraid to vote with your heart, and your conscience. ANDREWS: -action was hard to find. The extension of unemployment benefits, funding for the war in Afghanistan, funding for 100,000 teachers, Wall Street reform, and campaign finance reform were all either stuck, or stalled, or rejected and presumed dead. [to Jonathan Allen] How much of that did they get done? The POLITICO’s JONATHAN ALLEN: They got absolutely none of it done before the July 4th break. ANDREWS: Zero? ALLEN: Zero. WYATT ANDREWS: Jonathan Allen of Politico, who’s covered the Hill for eleven years, calls Congress unusually paralyzed this time because of a growing fear of the deficit. ALLEN: You see that paralysis in Congress where there are these sort of conflicting impulses of, ‘We’ve got to do something to help,’ but ‘We can`t do that because it cost too much money.’ ANDREWS: The latest example is funding for Afghanistan. The administration asked for $33 billion, but the Senate bill totaled $60 billion by tacking on spending for veterans — and the House bill, by adding extra money for teachers, totaled $80 billion. Because the two bills are different and bitterly contested, money the Defense Department said it needed to fight the war now is on hold. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ROBERT GATES: We begin to have to do stupid things if the supplemental isn’t passed by the Fourth of July recess. WYATT ANDREWS: Many members of Congress especially those in tough re-election campaigns are home right now, trying to figure out the spending issue: Will voters support more stimulus spending if it directly leads to jobs, or has deficit spending itself become political kryptonite? Wyatt Andrews, CBS News, Capitol Hill.

Read more here:
Oh, No! On Independence Day, CBS Frets Congress Becoming ‘Paralyzed’ Over ‘Fear of the Deficit’

Calls to ‘Rein in the Federal Government’ Are ‘Not Very Rational,’ Al Hunt Declares on ABC

“The side that talks about the need to rein in the federal government” is “not very rational,” yet “is winning” the debate over whether to pass another “stimulus” bill, Al Hunt regretted on Sunday’s This Week on ABC. The former Washington Bureau Chief for the Wall Street Journal, who’s Washington Editor for Bloomberg where he hosts Bloomberg TV’s Political Capital show, fretted over how “right now, that argument – that we have to rein in because the stimulus didn’t work — well, I think most economists would say the stimulus did work in the sense it would have been a lot worse if there hadn’t been one.” Hunt’s assessment came in reaction to an outnumbered Dan Senor, the lone voice on the panel against additional government spending to spur the economy and who warned of a Greece in our future. New York Times columnist Paul Krugman charged the 2009 stimulus bill wasn’t big enough and proposed that in the face of a likely $20 trillion debt in ten years, “whether we borrow another $500 billion now” is “really trivial,” Cynthia Tucker of the Atlanta Constitution yearned for a new “robust stimulus” and Jorge Ramos of Univision declared: “We need more government intervention.” Hunt ( columns ), however, took aim at the rationality of anyone opposed to massive additional government spending, as he expounded on the July 4 This Week: AL HUNT: I think the fundamental problem here, Jake [Tapper], and Dan [Senor] I think what you’re talking about is five, seven, ten years out, not right now. We can’t walk and chew gum at the same time. We ought to be dealing with long-term deficits in the long-term, and short-term stimulus, which this incredibly sluggish economy needs right now. The politics just are lousy, though Jake. I don’t know if it’s Republicans, if it’s conservative Democrats, but the side that talks about the need to rein in the federal government – this is not very rational, has really, is winning that debate. And when you talk to people about the stimulus, Paul [Krugman] may be right there should have been a bigger stimulus. Barack Obama thinks there should have been a bigger stimulus. The reason there wasn’t is you couldn’t get it through even a year ago. I mean, meet Ben Nelson, but- JAKE TAPPER: Or Susan Collins or Olympia Snowe or Arlen Specter. HUNT: But right now, that argument – that we have to rein in because the stimulus didn’t work — well, I think most economists would say the stimulus did work in the sense it would have been a lot worse if there hadn’t been one. But when people talk about the stimulus, they associate it with bank bailouts and auto bailouts which had nothing to do with this. From April: “ Bloomberg Editor Al Hunt Attacks Tea Partiers: ‘That’s Not America ‘”

Visit link:
Calls to ‘Rein in the Federal Government’ Are ‘Not Very Rational,’ Al Hunt Declares on ABC

Runaway Horses Kills 1, injures 23 at 4th of July Parade

Two runaway horses pulling a wagon trampled spectators at a small-town Fourth of July parade, killing a 60-year-old woman and injuring at least 23 other people, four critically. The horses bolted after one rubbed its head against the other, removing that horse's bridle, police said. They galloped for several blocks with the wagon in tow, trampling parade-goers. The wagon flipped and ejected its two passengers, police said. Among those injured were children who had stooped in the street to pick up candy that had been tossed to them. Sandie Crilly, 46, of Willow Springs, Ill., said she was collecting Tootsie Rolls from the street with her 8-year-old son, 12-year-old niece and 2-year-old granddaughter when the horses ran toward them about halfway through the parade. Someone yelled to get out of the way, she said. “I could see it was two horses,” Crilly said. “I could see they were running at full speed and they were harnessed together and I knew we were going to most certainly get hit, and as soon as it happened, everybody was crying and screaming.” Police declined to identify the woman who died, but said she passed away at the University of Iowa Hospital in Iowa City. Four people were hospitalized in critical condition, five others were seriously hurt and 14 others sustained minor injuries, police said. added by: Stoneyroad

Long Island man blows arm off with fireworks

Doctors will attempt to reattach the arm of a man from Long Island, N.Y. who was hit in the shoulder with a firework, severing his arm, police say. In a release Saturday evening, Suffolk Police said Eric Smith, 36, was using a three foot long metal tube to shoot “mortars” from the street across from his home in Islip Terrace on Long Island around 5:45 p.m. Saturday. As one of the explosives shot out of the launcher, it hit Smith “in the left arm, completely severing it from his shoulder.” Smith was rushed to hospital where he was listed in serious condition. Police said friends attempted to save the arm by wrapping it in ice and taking it to the hospital. “It is believed that doctors will try to reattach it,” police said. http://www.torontosun.com/news/world/2010/07/03/14600706.html Happy 4th of July! added by: unimatrix0

Underreported: The Irony of BP’s ‘Beyond Petroleum’ PR Crusade

One narrative the liberal media has strenuously failed to develop is the incredible irony of BP presenting itself as the greenest oil company, the “Beyond Petroleum” folks who recognized they were boiling the planet with oil. In Friday’s Wall Street Journal , Mark Mills reviewed a new book, Oil, by Tom Bower:   But the most interesting figure in Mr. Bower’s narrative is not Mr. Putin but BP’s Lord Browne, who understood cultural politics better than his peers. In the 1990s, BP launched what was arguably the oil industry’s most successful public-relations campaign, for all the good it is doing the company now. The campaign transformed BP into a shining example of a progressive company—one supposedly “Beyond Petroleum.” It is clear from Mr. Bower’s account that, while BP remained first and foremost an oil company, Lord Browne drank his own Kool-Aid, basking in encomia from the media and green mavens. He gave lectures at Stanford, appeared on “Charlie Rose,” cozied up to Greenpeace and promised to spend $1 billion on solar technology. The Beyond Petroleum campaign, conceived by PR masters Ogilvy & Mather, was originally intended as an internal strategy, aimed at making the company appear more green-sensitive. But it so excited Lord Browne that he delivered a May 1997 speech proclaiming BP the first “green” oil major. The company produced a 200-page “Reputation Manual” with facts about BP’s greenness, formed a political-style “war room” in Houston, and launched a multiyear media blitz. Mr. Bower claims that the rebranding cost BP $200 million. The cost is now measurable in irony, as the Gulf of Mexico grows ever more slick and BP ever more hated. But the campaign was hokum from the start. At this point in history it is almost impossible to find a place “beyond” petroleum. It’s not just the scale of the task but its nature. Energy-dense liquids are valuable, and oil is uniquely valuable in its combination of density, ease of storage and transport, and, believe it or not, safety. Every alternative is worse on all metrics, including cost, even at twice today’s oil price. If liquid hydrocarbons didn’t exist, we would have to invent them

See the original post:
Underreported: The Irony of BP’s ‘Beyond Petroleum’ PR Crusade

Glenn Beck Uses Military Charity To Fund His Book Launch – Tax Free

By now, unless you've been living under a rock, or below the surface of the Gulf of Mexico, you know that Glenn Beck is about the lowest common denominator when it comes to corporate teevee and radio. Despite his ratings dive and a lack of sponsors, he still considers himself to be a winner. Well, he's really stepping in it this time. He's asking his fans to make donations to a military charity to fund a rally in Washington D.C. – the only problem is that the rally is nothing more than a release party for his new book and well…I'll let GottaLaff tell the rest of the story, keying off this audio report from Bill Press: http://crooksandliars.com/logan-murphy/glenn-beck-uses-military-charity-fun Yes, you heard right. Beck doesn’t even have a permit for The Big Rally yet. They’ve applied, but they’re still in negotiations. Yet, they’re selling merchandise as if it’s a done deal. He’s selling stuff for an event that may never take place. It’s also not being held at the Lincoln Memorial, but at the reflecting pool, across the street. Glenn Beck is lying about the location of the rally. And finally, he’s exploiting a charity by soliciting contributions to the Special Operations Warrior Foundation. But see, the fine print says all contributions will first be applied to the rally, the one with Sarah Palin. All contributions in excess of the costs will go to the troops. Let’s recap: –He’s desecrating the memory of Martin Luther King and Abraham Lincoln; –He’s lying to the (gullible) American people who still choose to give him an ounce of credibility, and –He’s using a charity set up to raise money for members of the military, and then stealing the money he raises to pay for his little get together. I am flabbergasted that Glenn Beck would try to freeload like that! /snark WTF is wrong with pukes like Beck and Hannity, who claim to be sooo patriotic, yet use military charities to enrich themselves? Oh wait…they're Republicans…. added by: Stoneyroad