Tag Archives: stock-market

Doing Numbers: Spotify Valued at Nearly $30 Billion Following Their NYSE Debut

Mohammed Elshamy/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images Spotify’s Value Sky Rockets Following Going Public On Tuesday, the Spotify opened up to the New York Stock Exchange at $165.90 a share, which puts the company’s value at $29.5 billion. According to  TechCrunch , their “estimated” value translated to that of $23.5 billion, so it’s safe to say the biggest streaming platform surpassed expectations. Spotify began trading through “direct public offering,” which allowed current shareholders to sell an existing number shares directly to stock market investors rather than issuing new stock. This allowed Spotify shareholders, including employees, to sell early. Spotify’s founder Daniel Ek explained why they took this approach in a blog post . “Spotify is not raising capital, and our shareholders and employees have been free to buy and sell our stock for years. So while tomorrow puts us on a bigger stage, it doesn’t change who we are, what we are about, or how we operate. This is why we are doing things a little differently,” he wrote in part. “[…] Spotify has never been a normal kind of company. As I mentioned during our Investor Day, our focus isn’t on the initial splash. Instead, we will be working on trying to build, plan, and imagine for the long term. Sometimes we succeed, sometimes we stumble. The constant is that we believe we are still early in our journey and we have room to learn and grow.” Last month, the company said it had 159 million monthly active users, 71 million of which are premium subscribers. According to  MarketWatch , Spotify closed the day at $149.95 per share, which brings the valuation of the company to $27 billion.

Read more here:

Doing Numbers: Spotify Valued at Nearly $30 Billion Following Their NYSE Debut

Dr. Boyce Watkins: Creating Generational Wealth, Entrepreneurship, Financial Literacy

See the original post here:

Dr. Boyce Watkins stopped by Hot 1079 to chop it up with B High about his All Black National Convention taking place in Atlanta. During the conversation Dr. Watkins breaks down how to create generational wealth, the importance of entrepreneurship, how to invest money into the stock market and more.

Dr. Boyce Watkins: Creating Generational Wealth, Entrepreneurship, Financial Literacy

Naked Tribal Wives Wrestling of the Day

This is a video of tribal wives wrestling to see who will be the Queen of the jungle. Some people say that tribal jungle people are primitive. Untouched from the modern conveniences of society, with no internet or designer clothes, or jobs or money or taxes, but after watching this video of them fighting in what looks like a thong, but is actually just a waist band, all pussy exposed in some of the best mud wrestling I’ve seen, I think they’ve got it all figured out. They know what is important in life…and that’s girl on girl wrestling…fuck the stock market, your new iPhone, restaurants…this is what it’s all about…and brings back memories of a simpler time before the internet, when I used to jerk off to National Geographic. It’s not porno, it’s nature!! Sometimes they are just interchangeable, like the time I fucked a tree.

Read more:
Naked Tribal Wives Wrestling of the Day

Learn How to Invest in Oil Real Estate through Self-Directed IRA Webinar Series

http://www.youtube.com/v/4REcsse-xfg

Read more here:

DALLAS, Texas (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) — The financial crisis continues to loom and stock market uncertainty lurks at every turn. Traditional investors are watching their money disappear. That’s why Domestic Development Company is conducting a weekly investment webinar series designed to show investors how to invest in oil with a self-directed real estate IRA. Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Send2Press Newswire Discovery Date : 11/08/2011 11:57 Number of articles : 2

Learn How to Invest in Oil Real Estate through Self-Directed IRA Webinar Series

New York Post Uses Streetwalker To Represent Stocks

View original post here:

“The Fed also yesterday sharply downgraded its own view of the US economy.” The New York Post illustrated this degradation with a racy photo of an ethnic woman on the cover of their issue. In an effort to represent the wildly fluctuating stock market, The New York Post chose to use a photo of a prostitute. Rather than using a crazy roller coaster ride or the mood of a teenager going through life changes to explain the changing stock values, the Post chose a hooker and her panties. The Post used the headline: Crazy stox like a hooker’s drawers.. up, down, up. What do you think of this cover? Do hookers even wear panties?! Click here to read the article that this photo was supposed to represent. What A Downgrade Of U.S. Rating Means In Plain English Beyonce, Rihanna, Mariah Carey & More Come Together To Help Feed East Africa

New York Post Uses Streetwalker To Represent Stocks

The Average Person’s Guide to Investing in 2011 [Money]

The stock market is positively sizzling today, as Wall Street ‘s optimism pushed the Dow to a two-year high . Sounds tempting, eh? Before you wade in with your wallet, consider this short list of “Do’s” and “Don’ts.” Consider it now! More

Time’s Joe Klein Profiles Liberal Vineyard Owner Practically Pining for Days of Higher Taxes

With its dwindling readership, Time magazine is fast becoming a museum piece.  What better way is there to celebrate than for the publication to bring to its few readers’ attention other strange curiosities? Three weeks into his cross-country Election Road Trip , Joe Klein filed a Swampland blog post  shortly after noon Eastern time today from Sebastopol, California, where he found a true rarity, a businessman practically pining for the days of heavier federal taxation (emphasis mine): Barry [Sterling, founding partner of Iron Horse Vineyards] said he was deeply worried about the country. “I was born on the day of the 1929 stock market crash, so I’ve lived from the Great Depression to the Great Recession,” he said, “and I must say I’m amazed by how little progress we’ve made. We stopped regulating. We dropped taxes to unsustainable levels. I spent a good part of my life in the 70% tax bracket. It didn’t discourage me from working,” he said, referring to the supply-side argument that lower tax rates spur enterprise. “It made me work harder. My father lived with 90% rates during World War II. I’m actually mystified by the greed now. I don’t understand families like Koch brothers,” he said referring to the Republican Tea Party bankrollers. “They have so much money. Why do they need more?” No wonder Joe Klein found Barry to be delightful dinner company.

See the original post:
Time’s Joe Klein Profiles Liberal Vineyard Owner Practically Pining for Days of Higher Taxes

Scooped: British Publication Tells Us Uncle Sam Having Problems Unload Citi Shares

You would think someone in the U.S. establishment press would be following Uncle Sam’s progress or lack thereof in getting out from under its investment in Citigroup, especially since the government promised that it would be fully divested from the bank holding company by the end of this year. From all appearances, you would be wrong. It looks like the government may not be able to keep that year-end divestiture promise. For a fair number of news followers to learn that, the UK’s Financial Times had to take an interest (link may require registration), and Drudge had to link to it: US Treasury stumbles selling Citi shares The US government is in danger of missing its deadline of divesting all of its Citigroup shares by the year-end after a fall in stock market trading volumes prompted authorities to slow down sales in July and August. The lull could prompt the US Treasury, which has a stake of about 17 per cent in Citi, to consider a share offering instead of selling the stock in small quantities in the market, according to bankers and analysts. “The sales of Citigroup stock have slowed way down in July and August … The US Treasury will not finish its share sale by … the end of the year,” said Linus Wilson, a professor of finance at the University of Louisiana. “The only option for the Treasury if it wants to exit Citigroup before the year-end seems to be to conduct a large secondary offering of the stake.” The government only seeks to sell shares equivalent to a small percentage of the overall trading volume in Citi to avoid depressing the price. By the end of August, less than half of the government’s 7.7bn shares in Citi had been sold, with the average number of shares sold per day falling sharply, the latest official data show. The Treasury has until Thursday to complete the sale of 1.5bn shares before entering a “blackout period” ahead of Citi’s third-quarter results. … The government’s continued involvement complicates Citi’s efforts to convince investors its troubled past is behind it. The lack of stateside establishment media interest is, as far as I can tell, complete. None of the stories returned in a search on the company’s name at the Associated Press’s main site contained any information citing the government’s stock-selling difficulty. One item in a group of “Business Highlights” at least acknowledges that Citigroup “is still partly owned by taxpayers.” A search on the company’s name at the New York Times also returned nothing relevant. The Washington Post also has nothing relevant , though it does have an item also carried at the AP’s main site on bonuses that are being paid to Citi execs in (of all things) company stock. But there’s no mention of the problems the government is having in unloading its stake. If Uncle Sam is having trouble unloading Citi, imagine the difficulties it might encounter pulling off its planned initial public offering of stock in Government/General Motors, an attempt which has conveniently been put off until after Election Day. It would appear that the establishment press might be interested in keeping a lid on stories indicating that once the state gets in the business ownership door, it’s very hard for it to get out — assuming it even really wants to. Ultimately, that explains why one has to hope that the British and foreign press stay on top of developments such as these — and that Drudge keeps on reviewing their work. Meanwhile, Tim Geithner says that TARP has worked out just fine , almost as if we’re in past-tense mode. Uh-huh. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

View original post here:
Scooped: British Publication Tells Us Uncle Sam Having Problems Unload Citi Shares

Peter Schiff — Purveyor of Libertarian Principles … When Convenient

For the past several years, we’ve heard the doom-and-gloom prognostications coming from perma-bear Peter Schiff: The Federal Reserve is the root of all evil. Inflation will be the United States’ undoing. Invest in gold and overseas because the American stock market is toast. Perhaps that’s a legitimate view, but Schiff argues a more libertarian approach to prevent these supposed calamities. He argues for a different way of handling monetary policy , less spending by the federal government and a rethinking of how regulation is handled . Yet, when a political campaign is waged in the halls of Congress by a partisan member against one of his competitors , he turns a blind-eye to the abuses of government power. “You know, I have my own gold company and it bothers me what they’re going to do,” Schiff said to CNBC’s “The Kudlow Report” fill-in host Michelle Caruso-Cabrera on the Sept. 24 broadcast. “I think that companies like, you know, like Goldline, you know that are basically marking up their gold coins 67 percent or whatever – it’s outrageous. I mean, most companies mark-up 2 or 3 percent, which is what I do. These type of companies give the whole industry a bad name. What I’m afraid of is we’re going to have a lot of regulation.” Caruso-Cabrera asked Schiff in these circumstances if it was a case of buyer beware. However, Schiff suggested it was fraudulent for coin companies to charge these prices for what by any measure of the law would be a legal transaction if a consumer chose to purchase coins from such a company. “If there’s fraud, it’s not buyer beware,” he continued. “But what I’m afraid of is I don’t want government regulating the coin industry so that people like me have to raise our prices to cover all the extra cost of regulation.” But assuming Schiff’s assumption were correct, wouldn’t he has a competitor be able to move in on the market and offer the same product for a lower price? Isn’t that how the free market operates? Schiff conceded that point, but complained he was getting beat because he couldn’t afford the advertising. “I mean, I think the free market should ferret out these companies that are grossly overcharging people who don’t know any better. You know, that’s the problem. People haven’t bought gold in so long and see how well it’s doing and get conned by these commercials that are all over television. But most gold companies like mine, we can’t afford to run commercials because we’re not charging that much.” Schiff makes regular appearances on all the cable news networks, with his firm’s logo Euro Pacific Capital on the backdrop and raised more than $3 million for his failed effort to win the Connecticut Republican U.S. Senate nomination. So is it fair to complain about his firm’s inability to market its products, if indeed they’re at lower prices than the competition’s products.

See the original post here:
Peter Schiff — Purveyor of Libertarian Principles … When Convenient

Question for Paul Krugman: Are Things Better Today Than In January 2007?

A recurring theme from liberal media members as we approach the midterm elections is that Americans have to vote for Democrats in November so the nation doesn’t go back to the way things were when Republicans ran everything. A perfect example is New York Times columnist Paul Krugman who on Friday penned a piece called “Downhill With the G.O.P.”: Never mind the war on terror, the party’s main concern seems to be the war on arithmetic. And this party has a better than even chance of retaking at least one house of Congress this November. Banana republic, here we come. In the midst of all this ” Do you really want to go back to those days ” talk is a staggering ignorance concerning how ” those days ” compare to now: In January 2007 before the Democrats took over Congress, unemployment was 4.6 percent; now it’s 9.6 percent. In January 2007 there were 7.1 million unemployed people in America; now there are 14.9 million. In January 2007 the median home price was $210,600; today it’s $179,300. In January 2007 the Dow Jones Industrial Average was at 12,500; today it’s at 10,840. In January 2007 the gross federal debt was $9 trillion; today it’s $13.5 trillion. The poverty rate in 2006 was 12.3 percent; now it’s 14.3 percent In the final budget created by a GOP-controlled Congress, the deficit was $160 billion; now it’s $1.6 trillion. Add it all up and: there were half as many people out of work then; houses were worth 17 percent more; stocks were 16 percent higher; the federal debt was 33 percent lower; poverty was 14 percent lower, and; the deficit was 90 percent lower!  As such, I ask Mr. Krugman and all liberal media members stumping for Democrats: is America really better off today than it was in January 2007? If so, how ?

Excerpt from:
Question for Paul Krugman: Are Things Better Today Than In January 2007?