Tag Archives: treasury

Coupled Up: Mariah Carey Posts Up In Steamy Photo With Back Up Dancer Bae

Mariah Carey And Bryan Tanaka Share Steamy Smooch Mariah is feeling bad & boujie with her back up dancer bae , Bryan Tanaka. Mimi has found love and doesn’t care who sees. She posted earlier this week in a hot and steamy french kissing pose with Bryan. ” “No one knows what it means, but it’s provocative … it gets the people going!” Last month, Bryan was seen supporting Mimi at a single release party [g6y, were she greeted people woth kisses and enjoyed lobster mac n cheese.

See the original post here:
Coupled Up: Mariah Carey Posts Up In Steamy Photo With Back Up Dancer Bae

Doing God’s Work: Backpacker Arrested After Scaling White House, “I’m Here To See The President”

Man Arrested For Trespassing On White House Property Late Last Night He just wanted to see the President . What’s the big deal? CNN is reporting that a man wearing a backpack was arrested late last night after he scaled a White House fence en route to pay a visit to Donald. The tangerine chief was on the property at the time. When asked about he purpose for trespassing on White House property, the man told Secret Service: “No, I am a friend of the President. I have an appointment,” the suspect said when approached by an officer, according to a report released Saturday by the Washington, D.C., Metropolitan Police Department. Asked how he got there, the suspect told officers: “I jumped the fence.” Here’s how well the Secret Service does their job, this guy reportedly jumped the Treasury Building fence, but was not detected until he was seen by an agent who happened to be on the grounds. Now, here’s an ironic joke: The White House was placed under security condition “orange,” one of the highest levels of security for the Secret Service, an agency source said. LMFAO! All this guy wanted to do was “see” the President? Ya know? The same way some of us want to “see” George Zimmerman. Image via AP/Shutterstock

More here:
Doing God’s Work: Backpacker Arrested After Scaling White House, “I’m Here To See The President”

Harriet Tubman Allegedly Headed to $20 Bill!

Link:

Rumors have been swirling since last year about Harriet Tubman‘s placement on the $20 bill. Welp, word on the streetz is that there’s a strong chance that it’s actually happening. Sources say that Treasury Secretary Jack Lew is scheduled to make an official announcement as early as today about a decision that will remove Andrew Jackson […]

Harriet Tubman Allegedly Headed to $20 Bill!

Tim Geithner calls Obama’s budget plan unsustainable, still not fired

http://www.youtube.com/v/WdcQGJF_jmY

See original here:

How Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner has a job after close of business today, I don’t know, but yes, this is him in a committee hearing being extremely candid about how unsustainable President Obama’s budget proposal is (don’t mind the sleep-deprived guy behind him): Imagine that. He basically argues, sure! Our budget is unsustainable! But where’s your alternative?” That’s not leadership, and how anyone… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Beltway Confidential Discovery Date : 17/02/2011 22:20 Number of articles : 3

Tim Geithner calls Obama’s budget plan unsustainable, still not fired

Florida School Board Shooting: Clay Duke Facebook Suicide Note

Clay Duke posted on his Facebook profile about his plan and that he never expected to survive. You can watch the Florida school board shooting video below. Full Story Here: http://widetrends.com/florida-school-board-shooting-clay-duke-facebook-suicide-n… added by: widetrends

TIME Person Of The Year – Mark Zuckerberg

For connecting more than half a billion people and mapping the social relations among them; for creating a new system of exchanging information; and for changing how we all live our lives, Mark Elliot Zuckerberg is TIME's 2010 Person of the Year. On the afternoon of Nov. 16, 2010, Mark Zuckerberg was leading a meeting in the Aquarium, one of Facebook's conference rooms, so named because it's in the middle of a huge work space and has glass walls on three sides so everybody can see in. Conference rooms are a big deal at Facebook because they're the only places anybody has any privacy at all, even the bare minimum of privacy the Aquarium gets you. Otherwise the space is open plan: no cubicles, no offices, no walls, just a rolling tundra of office furniture. Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook's COO, who used to be Lawrence Summers' chief of staff at the Treasury Department, doesn't have an office. Zuckerberg, Facebook's CEO and co-founder and presiding visionary, doesn't have an office. The team was going over the launch of Facebook's revamped Messages service, which had happened the day before and gone off without a hitch or rather without more than the usual number of hitches. Zuckerberg kept the meeting on track, pushing briskly through his points — no notes or whiteboard, just talking with his hands — but the tone was relaxed. Much has been made of Zuckerberg's legendarily awkward social manner, but in a room like this, he's the Silicon Valley equivalent of George Plimpton. He bantered with Andrew “Boz” Bosworth, a director of engineering who ran the project. (Boz was Zuckerberg's instructor in a course on artificial intelligence when they were at Harvard. He says his future boss didn't do very well. Though, in fairness, Zuckerberg did invent Facebook that semester.) Apart from a journalist sitting in the corner, no one in the room looked over 30, and apart from the journalist's public relations escort, it was boys only. (See pictures inside Mark Zuckerberg's inner circle.) The door opened, and a distinguished-looking gray-haired man burst in — it's the only way to describe his entrance — trailed by a couple of deputies. He was both the oldest person in the room by 20 years and the only one wearing a suit. He was in the building, he explained with the delighted air of a man about to secure ironclad bragging rights forever, and he just had to stop in and introduce himself to Zuckerberg: Robert Mueller, director of the FBI, pleased to meet you. They shook hands and chatted about nothing for a couple of minutes, and then Mueller left. There was a giddy silence while everybody just looked at one another as if to say, What the hell just happened? It's a fair question. Almost seven years ago, in February 2004, when Zuckerberg was a 19-year-old sophomore at Harvard, he started a Web service from his dorm. It was called Thefacebook.com, and it was billed as “an online directory that connects people through social networks at colleges.” This year, Facebook — now minus the the — added its 550 millionth member. One out of every dozen people on the planet has a Facebook account. They speak 75 languages and collectively lavish more than 700 billion minutes on Facebook every month. Last month the site accounted for 1 out of 4 American page views. Its membership is currently growing at a rate of about 700,000 people a day. (See a Zuckerberg family photo album.) What just happened? In less than seven years, Zuckerberg wired together a twelfth of humanity into a single network, thereby creating a social entity almost twice as large as the U.S. If Facebook were a country it would be the third largest, behind only China and India. It started out as a lark, a diversion, but it has turned into something real, something that has changed the way human beings relate to one another on a species-wide scale. We are now running our social lives through a for-profit network that, on paper at least, has made Zuckerberg a billionaire six times over. Facebook has merged with the social fabric of American life, and not just American but human life: nearly half of all Americans have a Facebook account, but 70% of Facebook users live outside the U.S. It's a permanent fact of our global social reality. We have entered the Facebook age, and Mark Zuckerberg is the man who brought us here. (See pictures of Facebook's overseas offices.) Zuckerberg is part of the last generation of human beings who will remember life before the Internet, though only just. He was born in 1984 and grew up in Dobbs Ferry, N.Y., the son of a dentist — Painless Dr. Z's slogan was, and is, “We cater to cowards.” Mark has three sisters, the eldest of whom, Randi, is now Facebook's head of consumer marketing and social-good initiatives. It was a supportive household that produced confident children. The young Mark was “strong-willed and relentless,” according to his father Ed. “For some kids, their questions could be answered with a simple yes or no,” he says. “For Mark, if he asked for something, yes by itself would work, but no required much more. If you were going to say no to him, you had better be prepared with a strong argument backed by facts, experiences, logic, reasons. We envisioned him becoming a lawyer one day, with a near 100% success rate of convincing juries.” Read more: http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2036683_2037183_20371… #ixzz18Ba3TM4O added by: TimALoftis

Scooped: British Publication Tells Us Uncle Sam Having Problems Unload Citi Shares

You would think someone in the U.S. establishment press would be following Uncle Sam’s progress or lack thereof in getting out from under its investment in Citigroup, especially since the government promised that it would be fully divested from the bank holding company by the end of this year. From all appearances, you would be wrong. It looks like the government may not be able to keep that year-end divestiture promise. For a fair number of news followers to learn that, the UK’s Financial Times had to take an interest (link may require registration), and Drudge had to link to it: US Treasury stumbles selling Citi shares The US government is in danger of missing its deadline of divesting all of its Citigroup shares by the year-end after a fall in stock market trading volumes prompted authorities to slow down sales in July and August. The lull could prompt the US Treasury, which has a stake of about 17 per cent in Citi, to consider a share offering instead of selling the stock in small quantities in the market, according to bankers and analysts. “The sales of Citigroup stock have slowed way down in July and August … The US Treasury will not finish its share sale by … the end of the year,” said Linus Wilson, a professor of finance at the University of Louisiana. “The only option for the Treasury if it wants to exit Citigroup before the year-end seems to be to conduct a large secondary offering of the stake.” The government only seeks to sell shares equivalent to a small percentage of the overall trading volume in Citi to avoid depressing the price. By the end of August, less than half of the government’s 7.7bn shares in Citi had been sold, with the average number of shares sold per day falling sharply, the latest official data show. The Treasury has until Thursday to complete the sale of 1.5bn shares before entering a “blackout period” ahead of Citi’s third-quarter results. … The government’s continued involvement complicates Citi’s efforts to convince investors its troubled past is behind it. The lack of stateside establishment media interest is, as far as I can tell, complete. None of the stories returned in a search on the company’s name at the Associated Press’s main site contained any information citing the government’s stock-selling difficulty. One item in a group of “Business Highlights” at least acknowledges that Citigroup “is still partly owned by taxpayers.” A search on the company’s name at the New York Times also returned nothing relevant. The Washington Post also has nothing relevant , though it does have an item also carried at the AP’s main site on bonuses that are being paid to Citi execs in (of all things) company stock. But there’s no mention of the problems the government is having in unloading its stake. If Uncle Sam is having trouble unloading Citi, imagine the difficulties it might encounter pulling off its planned initial public offering of stock in Government/General Motors, an attempt which has conveniently been put off until after Election Day. It would appear that the establishment press might be interested in keeping a lid on stories indicating that once the state gets in the business ownership door, it’s very hard for it to get out — assuming it even really wants to. Ultimately, that explains why one has to hope that the British and foreign press stay on top of developments such as these — and that Drudge keeps on reviewing their work. Meanwhile, Tim Geithner says that TARP has worked out just fine , almost as if we’re in past-tense mode. Uh-huh. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

View original post here:
Scooped: British Publication Tells Us Uncle Sam Having Problems Unload Citi Shares

Why Is the ACLU a ‘Civil Rights Group’ When It Provides Legal Support for Jihadists?

When the American Civil Liberties Union sues the government for its right to defend the cleric that inspired the Fort Hood mass murder, couldn’t the media describe them as radical, or even left-wing? Instead, the headline in the Washington Post Wednesday was “Treasury sued over edict on radical cleric Aulagi: Rights groups say rule prevents challenge to effective death sentence.” The Post website is more direct: “Civil rights groups sue Treasury over targeting of terror suspects for killing.” Why aren’t groups that oppose terrorists positively defined as “civil rights groups”? What about the “civil rights” of terrorist victims like the murdered at Fort Hood? Post reporter Spencer Hsu lets the ACLU’s Anthony Romero claim that endangering the jihadist’s rights endangers us all: Civil liberties groups sued the Treasury Department on Tuesday over its refusal to permit them to challenge the federal government’s claim of authority to target U.S. citizens suspected of terrorism overseas for killing. The Center for Constitutional Rights and the American Civil Liberties Union filed the lawsuit against the department and its Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) in U.S. District Court in Washington. The groups say that without a change, it would be a crime for them to provide even free legal services to a citizen whom the government has designated a terrorist and is seeking to kill. Human rights lawyers said they were retained early last month by Nasser al-Aulaqi, the father of Anwar al-Aulaqi, a U.S.-born radical cleric based in Yemen whom U.S. authorities have called a propagandist for al-Qaeda who has helped plan attacks against the United States. “The government is targeting an American citizen for death without any legal process whatsoever, while at the same time impeding lawyers from challenging that death sentence and the government’s sweeping claim of authority to issue it,” ACLU Executive Director Anthony D. Romero said in a written statement. “Such an alarming denial of rights in any one case endangers the rights of all Americans.” The Post reporter doesn’t allow anyone to ask in the piece: isn’t it more accurate to suggest, based on real and deadly events, that it’s jihadists like Aulaqi who “endanger the rights” and even lives of Americans? The only real denunciation of Aulaqi is recycled from an old Treasury statement: Stuart Levey , Treasury’s undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence, said at the time of Aulaqi’s designation that “Anwar al-Aulaqi has proven that he is extraordinarily dangerous, committed to carrying out deadly attacks on Americans and others worldwide.” He added that Aulaqi “has involved himself in every aspect of the supply chain of terrorism — fundraising for terrorist groups, recruiting and training operatives, and planning and ordering attacks on innocents.” President Obama got as much grief, from the “human rights groups” in the piece: Human-rights groups say the Constitution and international law do not permit such broad action against civilians, and that lethal force outside a battle zone should be used as a last resort when a threat is imminent. “President Obama is claiming the power to act as judge, jury and executioner while suspending any semblance of due process,” said Vince Warren, executive director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. These radical lawyers can easily convince liberals that they are the true defenders of freedom, not the war-on-terror types, or in Obama’s case, the aftertaste-of-resistance-to-man-caused-disasters types. But the same media that thinks border control in Arizona is “very controversial” can’t seem to think the ACLU and its ilk aren’t doing anything that a majority of Americans might find  to be controversial — enabling terrorists and their “spiritual advisers.” 

See the original post:
Why Is the ACLU a ‘Civil Rights Group’ When It Provides Legal Support for Jihadists?

Chinese Devalues US Treasury Bonds

by Jake Towne If one owes a bank a thousand dollars, he has a problem. But if one owes a bank a billion dollars, then the bank has the problem. From the four years I spent in China, I assure you this truism is not lost on the Chinese, though one must never forget the banks’ ni…. ….China has downgraded our debt and has ceased increasing its Treasury holdings…… http://www.peacefreedomprosperity.com/?p=3693 added by: shanklinmike

Budget 2010: VAT to rise, cigarettes and alcohol unaffected

The government has unveiled the latest budget cuts and called the measures “tough but fair”. The BBC says it's “the biggest package of tax increases and spending cuts in a generation”, so how will this year's budget affect you? Below are some of the changes coming into force. For full details, have a look at the Treasury's website or the BBC. Taxes: From January, VAT will rise to 20%, generating