Tag Archives: paterson

Gov. David “Dirty Dog” Paterson Will Soon Be Gracing Your Airwaves With His Own Radio Show

The ex-Gov’s got a new gig! Scandal-scorched ex-Gov. David Paterson will get to turn the spotlight on others with his own afternoon drivetime radio show on WOR-AM, the Daily News has learned. “The David Paterson Show” will be announced formally Thursday at a Manhattan news conference, sources close to Paterson said. The engaging former governor has been filling in regularly for WOR morning host John Gambling since leaving office last year. An avid Mets fan, Paterson has also guest-hosted programs on WFAN sports radio. A Paterson spokesman could not be reached for comment, while WOR had no comment. The affable Paterson had a scandal-plagued tenure as New York’s first black governor and first blind governor, enduring ethical and legal investigations after taking over abruptly for the hooker-happy Eliot Spitzer. Congrats sir! We’ll probably never hear your show, but we’re sure you’ll do a great job. Source

Read more from the original source:
Gov. David “Dirty Dog” Paterson Will Soon Be Gracing Your Airwaves With His Own Radio Show

Are There Reporters Caught Up in Gov. David Paterson’s Scandals? [Investigations]

According to the New York Attorney General’s office, there are three ongoing investigations into New York Gov. David Paterson that may be interested in looking at reporters’ e-mails with Paterson’s press aides. Why? More

‘Real Housewife of NJ’ Is in the E Street Band?

Filed under: Teresa Giudice , Steven Van Zandt , Real Housewives Here’s fortune teller wannabe/ ” Real Housewives of New Jersey ” star Teresa Giudice at an event in Paterson ( left ) — and Bruce Springsteen’s E Street Band member/former ” Sopranos ” star Steven Van Zandt back in April ( right ). While neither are… Read more

Follow this link:
‘Real Housewife of NJ’ Is in the E Street Band?

Third Time’s The Charm: Latest NYT Paterson Bombshell Really Explodes [Bombshells]

Well! New York Times exposes on Gov. David Paterson are like Godfather movies: They come in threes. But unlike Copolla, The New York Times saved the best for last. Hypocrisy? violence against women? Abuse of power? It’s all here. Damn. Where to begin? How about with the brutal Halloween beating David W. Johnson , Paterson’s 6-foot-7 driver and closest confidant , allegedly gave an ex-girlfriend last year. From the Times article : According to the woman’s account, Mr. Johnson confronted her in their bedroom, choked her, tore her Halloween costume off, pushed her into the dresser and then continued to choke her with one hand. In her account, she screamed for Mr. Johnson to stop and then screamed for the help of a friend who was visiting. The woman said Mr. Johnson first took one telephone from her to prevent her from calling the police, and then chased her into another room when she went to find a second phone. Mr. Johnson then turned to the woman’s friend and told her to leave, “if you know what’s good for you,” according to the woman’s account. After this altercation, the woman says she was pressured by the State Police into not pressing charges. The State Police confirm contacting her. Oh, and not just any State Police: A member of the special detail which protects the governor—and David W. Johnson. The head of the state police told the Times “We never pressured her… we just gave her options.” Still, according to the Times the woman pressed forward with her charges against her high-profile ex. Until this February, when she got a call from Paterson himself. (Paterson claims the woman initiated the call.) She didn’t show up for her next hearing, and the case was dropped. What to make of this episode? The Times will not tell you, since they are a serious newspaper and print “just the facts.” But the article leaves exactly the right blanks to fill in with a clear case of Paterson using the State Police as his own private Statsi to make a violent problem go away for his sketchy best friend. The Times notes that the timing of Paterson’s call puts it right as the paper was digging into Johnson’s history of altercations with women for their earlier article. Hmm… And the article repeatedly points out that the State Police—Paterson’s police—visited the woman despite the assault being under NYPD’s jurisdiction. Hmmmmm…. Oh, and after the Times visited the woman’s house, Paterson got upset about it during a meeting with the editorial board. Uh huh… Whether it was intentional or not, we have to admire the way the three Times Paterson scoops build on each other to create the perfect Portrait of the Governor as a Real Asshole: In the first installment , we learn of Paterson’s girlfriend-beating trouble magnet aide, David W. Johnson. Maybe Paterson doesn’t have the best character judgment, we think with a shrug. The second article reveals that Paterson pays for his vacations with campaign cash and gives his friend’s ex-girlfriend a job. OK, so he has a little thing with using the power of his office to make things happen for himself and his buddies… uh oh. Then: Boom. Three articles full of interesting facts. Three is also the number of sides of a triangle. Let’s triangulate.

Go here to see the original:
Third Time’s The Charm: Latest NYT Paterson Bombshell Really Explodes [Bombshells]

Third Time’s The Charm: Latest NYT Patterson Bombshell Really Explodes [Bombshells]

Well! New York Times exposes on Gov. David Paterson are like Godfather movies: They come in threes. But unlike Copolla, The New York Times saved the best for last. Hypocrisy? violence against women? Abuse of power? It’s all here. Damn. Where to begin? How about with the brutal Halloween beating David W. Johnson , Paterson’s 6-foot-7 driver and closest confidant , allegedly gave an ex-girlfriend last year. From the Times article : According to the woman’s account, Mr. Johnson confronted her in their bedroom, choked her, tore her Halloween costume off, pushed her into the dresser and then continued to choke her with one hand. In her account, she screamed for Mr. Johnson to stop and then screamed for the help of a friend who was visiting. The woman said Mr. Johnson first took one telephone from her to prevent her from calling the police, and then chased her into another room when she went to find a second phone. Mr. Johnson then turned to the woman’s friend and told her to leave, “if you know what’s good for you,” according to the woman’s account. After this altercation, the woman says she was pressured by the State Police into not pressing charges. The State Police confirm contacting her. Oh, and not just any State Police: A member of the special detail which protects the governor—and David W. Johnson. The head of the state police told the Times “We never pressured her… we just gave her options.” Still, according to the Times the woman pressed forward with her charges against her high-profile ex. Until this February, when she got a call from Paterson himself. (Paterson claims the woman initiated the call.) She didn’t show up for her next hearing, and the case was dropped. What to make of this episode? The Times will not tell you, since they are a serious newspaper and print “just the facts.” But the article leaves exactly the right blanks to fill in with a clear case of Paterson using the State Police as his own private Statsi to make a violent problem go away for his sketchy best friend. For example, the Times notes the fact that the timing of Paterson’s call puts it right as the paper was preparing their earlier, less incriminating profile of Johnson and his past trouble with women and drugs. Hmmm… And the article repeatedly mentions that the State Police—Paterson’s police—visited the woman despite the assault being under NYPD’s jurisdiction. Hmmmmm…. Oh, and after the Times visited the woman’s house, Paterson got upset about it during a meeting with the editorial board. Uh huh… Whether it was intentional or not, we have to admire the way the three Times Paterson scoops build on each other to create the perfect Portrait of the Governor as a Real Asshole: In the first installment , we learn of Paterson’s girlfriend-beating trouble magnet aide, David W. Johnson. Maybe Paterson doesn’t have the best character judgment, we think with a shrug. The second article reveals that Paterson pays for his vacations with campaign cash and gives his friend’s ex-girlfriend a job. OK, so he has a little thing with using the power of his office to make things happen for himself and his buddies—paying for vacations with campaign cash and giving his friend’s ex-girlfriend a job in his administration. Small things, but still… Uh oh… Then: Boom. Three articles full of interesting facts. Three is also the number of sides of a triangle. Let’s triangulate.

View post:
Third Time’s The Charm: Latest NYT Patterson Bombshell Really Explodes [Bombshells]

Let’s Not Forget About David Paterson’s Other Sketchy Aide

The New York Times ‘ David Paterson story centered on his drug-dealing, allegedly abusive staffer David Johnson . But Paterson also employs Clemmie Harris , an adviser who collects $30,000 a year on disability and doesn’t appear to live in New York. Adrian has heard that the Times is working on another story that’s going to be the actual bombshell . But today’s story, which is eliciting yawns from Albany’s chattering class, was focused on Johnson’s troubled past and aired concerns that he has accumulated an inordinate amount of power in Albany: [M]ore than four current or former officials expressed concern that Mr. Johnson and another aide, a former state trooper, had become the governor’s innermost circle and were simply not best equipped to help him tackle the multiple challenges facing him. That “former state trooper” is Harris—whose full, and awesome, first name is Clementine—whom people familiar with Paterson’s office describe as Johnson’s equal in terms of power over policy and control over access to Paterson (that’s Harris in the middle above). And like Johnson, Harris had a nontraditional rise to power—he spent 14 years as a New York state trooper before attending the University of Albany as an adult, and was Paterson’s roommate in the early 1990s. Harris and Johnson’s special relationship with Paterson—they both frequently spend nights at the governor’s mansion—has inspired suspicion and jealousy among the rest of his staff. According to an Albany Times-Union story in September , Harris left the state police force in 1997 due to an “undisclosed medical issue,” and still receives annual disability payments totaling $29,500. Given the fact that he works full-time for the state of New York, and is well enough to rack up travel bills totaling $29,000 in 2008 and 2009, it’s unclear what his disability is. The Times-Union also reported that Harris doesn’t seem to live in New York, despite a state law requiring that powerful officials live in the state. As of September, Harris was registered to vote in Pennsylvania, where he is pursuing a PhD at the University of Pennsylvania, and didn’t have a car registered in New York. And Harris had listed a Philadelphia address on his University of Albany alumni profile as recently as August of 2009. All of which may have explained the $15,500 in hotel bills—mostly at a Westchester hotel—that Harris paid with a state credit card in 2008 and 2009. When he’s in Albany, he frequently stays at the governor’s mansion. Sure, it’s not drug-dealing and wife-beating, but we hope the attention focused on Johnson doesn’t overshadow the guy who appears to be running disability scams and living in hotels on the state dime because he refuses to rent or buy a place of his own.

Follow this link:
Let’s Not Forget About David Paterson’s Other Sketchy Aide

UPDATED: The New York Times David Paterson Story Is Out… Or is it?

So, this is it ? This is THE New York Times David Paterson ‘bombshell’? The whole thing? There’s not a second part that’s good? Jesus, New York Times , why didn’t you say it was going to be so boring. Wed. Update: : Let’s do the time warp again! A knowledgeable source tells us this is not in fact the Paterson bombshell, and that the real story is substantially more… substantial. Our tipster says: I don’t believe this is the Paterson story. The reporters actually did uncover some dirt on him, though nothing of the sexual sort. Mostly stuff about his heavy drinking and loveless marriage. So: Still no drug-fueled orgies… but perhaps fodder for a more substantial scandal than the fact that Paterson has a sketchy confidant? Our tipster says that “there’s an actual profile of Paterson that could run as soon as tomorrow.” We await with bated breath… As for today’s Times article: If you were hoping for the big Paterson-annihilating bombshell that we, in part, led you to expect , prepare to be sorely disappointed. The Times story isn’t even about Paterson, per se: It’s about his driver and closest confidant, David W. Johnson. Granted, Johnson, who started as Paterson’s intern in 1999, has a sketchy past: The Times reports that as a teenager he was twice arrested for felony drug charges. Also, he beats women—Which the Times points out is sort of a paradox, given Paterson’s crusade against domestic violence. The article details a slew of “incidents” including: In 2001, when Mr. Paterson was a state senator, Mr. Johnson, according to a person who was present, punched a girlfriend outside the senator’s Harlem office. But there were no sexy Paterson revelations. No drug-fueled orgies spilling into the halls of the Governor’s mansion. Tell all your friends: Paterson’s closest adviser is sort of a thug. The great phantom David Paterson scandal of 2010 ends with a whimper. (Until we read a tweet about another one.)

View original post here:
UPDATED: The New York Times David Paterson Story Is Out… Or is it?

The New York Times David Paterson Story Is Out, and It’s Boring

So, this is it ? This is THE New York Times David Paterson ‘bombshell’? The whole thing? There’s not a second part that’s actually good? Jesus, New York Times , why didn’t you just say it was going to be so boring. If you were hoping for the big Paterson-annihilating bombshell that we, in part, led you to expect , prepare to be sorely disappointed. The Times story isn’t even about Paterson, per se: It’s about his driver and closest confidant, David W. Johnson. Granted, Johnson, who started as Paterson’s intern in 1999, has a sketchy past: The Times reports that as a teenager he was twice arrested for felony drug charges. Also, he beats women—sort of a paradox, given Pateron’s crusade against domestic abuse. The article details a slew of “incidents” including: In 2001, when Mr. Paterson was a state senator, Mr. Johnson, according to a person who was present, punched a girlfriend outside the senator’s Harlem office. But there were no sexy Paterson revelations. No drug-fueled orgies spilling into the halls of the Governor’s mansion. Tell all your friends: Paterson’s closest adviser is sort of a thug. The great phantom David Paterson scandal of 2010 ends with a whimper. (Until we read a tweet about another one.)

Here is the original post:
The New York Times David Paterson Story Is Out, and It’s Boring

David Paterson Tries to Escape His ‘Kafkaesque Scenario’ on Larry King

When Larry King asked David Paterson tonight if his blindness made it hard for him to read the tabloid headlines about a story he claims doesn’t exist, we understood the true meaning of “Kafkaesque”. David Paterson’s appearance on Larry King Live was his most high-profile move yet to stifle the sex rumors about him that exploded last Sunday—Super Bowl Sunday no less! We were one of a number of outlets speculating about an unpublished New York Times article with sexy revelations crazy enough to force Paterson’s revelation. But it contained no such things, said Paterson’s camp . And Paterson did not resign . But since Sunday, Paterson has been a case study in just how hard it is to take away the chattering class’ delicious rumors once they start getting passed around like a lukewarm shrimp cocktail. He’s issued a number of denials, but each one seems to glance off the rumor mill and fly crazily back in his face: Fighting back against the Post’s claims of extra-marital humping prompted some more unsubstantiated rumors ; his appearance on “Imus” helped keep “keep the larger nuttiness alive by claiming the Times’s phantom story had “hypersexualized” him,” as Chris Smith wrote for New York . And still, the question hangs over everything: What the hell is in that article? Thus Paterson ended up on Larry King tonight, hoping that saying the same things he’d been saying all week to more people would fix things. And once there, Larry King asked him if he had trouble reading the real headlines about this supposedly non-existent story. It’s enough to make a guy want to call a situation “Kafkaesque!” Which he did: Someone did the reading in English class! It’s an appropriate allusion though, since Paterson is approaching this thing with as much direction as Josef K trying to grasp the charges against him. On Larry King, he claimed that addressing the rumors would only strengthen them, when he has been vehemently denying them all week. Then he went on to deny, in great detail, the Post’s best rumor: That a state trooper discovered him and a mystery woman smooching in a utility closet in the governor’s mansion: And when King asked Paterson “Who’s after you?” Paterson’s anti-speculation stance got a little muddled with his own *hint* *hint* *nudge* nudge* : For me to speculate about it would be as wrong as the speculations made about me. I can’t prove it, I don’t know who it is. Maybe those in the media could check their sources more. Maybe those in the media might investiagte why their sources are saying what they’re saying. (Cue twilight zone music!) Paterson’s flailing is a tacit admission that there really is no way to stop a tabloid machine that revved up to peak RPMs—at least not until the Times finally publishes their big expose and we can all see for ourselves if it is or is not a 3,000 word narrative of his night with two state assemblywomen in the garden shed or whatever. And Paterson once again urged the Times to come out with it, or at least “clear the air”. Also, he blamed Eliot Spitzer for making the Governor’s office so sex-rumorific: Probably the most Kafkaesque part about this whole thing is: WHERE THE SHIT IS THAT NEW YORK TIMES ARTICLE!?

Go here to read the rest:
David Paterson Tries to Escape His ‘Kafkaesque Scenario’ on Larry King

David Paterson Tries to Escape His ‘Kafkaesque Situation’ on Larry King

When Larry King asked David Paterson tonight if his blindness made it hard for him to read the tabloid headlines he’d come on the show to dispute, we sort of felt bad for him. David Paterson’s appearance on Larry King Live was his most high-profile move yet to stifle the sex rumors about him that exploded last Sunday—Super Bowl Sunday no less! We were one of a number of outlets speculating about a New York Times article with sexy revelations crazy enough to force Paterson’s revelation. But it contained no such things, said Paterson’s camp . And Paterson did not resign . But since Sunday, Paterson has been a case study in just how hard it is to take away the chattering class’ delicious rumors once they start getting passed around like a lukewarm shrimp cocktail. He’s issued a number of denials, but each one seems to glance off the rumor mill and fly crazily back in his face: Fighting back against the Post claims of extra-marital humping prompted some more unsubstantiated rumors ; his appearance on “Imus” helped keep “keep the larger nuttiness alive by claiming the Times’s phantom story had “hypersexualized” him,” as Chris Smith wrote for New York . And so he ended up on Larry King tonight, hoping that saying the same things he’d been saying all week to more people would fix things. And once there, Larry King asked him if he had trouble reading the real headlines about this supposedly non-existent story. It’s enough to make a guy want to call a situation “Kafkaesque!” Which he did: Someone did the reading in English class! It’s an appropriate allusion though, since Paterson is approaching this thing with as much direction as Josef K trying to grasp the charges against him. On Larry King, he claimed that addressing the rumors would only strengthen them, when he has been vehemently denying them all week. Then he went on to deny, in great detail, the Post’s best rumor: That a state trooper discovered him and a mystery woman smooching in a utility closet in the governor’s mansion: And when King asked Paterson “Who’s after you?” Paterson’s anti-speculation stance got a little muddled with his own *hint* *hint* *nudge* nudge* : For me to speculate about it would be as wrong as the speculations made about me. I can’t prove it, I don’t know who it is. Maybe those in the media could check their sources more. Maybe those in the media might investiagte why their sources are saying what they’re saying. (cue twilight zone music!) Paterson’s flailing is a tacit admission that there really is no way to stop a tabloid machine that revved up to peak RPMs—at least not until the Times finally publishes their big expose and we can all see for ourselves if it is or is not a 3,000 word narrative of his night with two state assemblywomen in the garden shed or whatever. And Paterson once again urged the Times to come out with it, or at least “clear the air”. Also, he blamed Eliot Spitzer for making the Governor’s office so sex-rumorific: Probably the most Kafkaesque part about this whole thing is: WHERE THE SHIT IS THAT NEW YORK TIMES ARTICLE!?

Go here to read the rest:
David Paterson Tries to Escape His ‘Kafkaesque Situation’ on Larry King