Tag Archives: media-research

CNN’s Kurtz & CBS’s Logan Miss the Point of MRC/NewsBusters Clip of Media Touting Obama’s ‘Brilliant’ Choice of Petraeus

On Sunday’s Reliable Sources on CNN, host Howard Kurtz played a clip that was posted both on NewsBusters and on NB’s parent organization the Media Research Center’s Web site showing that correspondents on several broadcast and news networks lavished excessive praise on President Obama by calling his decision to replace General Stanley McChrystal with General David Petraeus a “brilliant” decision. The CNN host played a portion of the clip which was played on Thursday’s The O’Reilly Factor on FNC. But, as he brought up the clip with guest Lara Logan of CBS News, Kurtz missed the point as he suggested that the MRC/NewsBusters was somehow complaining that the “liberal media are in love with David Petraeus and they’re falling into line,” when, in reality, the point was that since Petraeus is so obviously well qualified for the position, it hardly takes genius or “brilliance” to name him to the post. Logan, accepting Kurtz’s flawed premise, responded: “Well, if they had said it was a bad decision, then it would be ‘the liberal media hate David Petraeus and they’re not falling into line.’” She later concluded that the decision was, in fact, “brilliant” on Obama’s part: “The only way he had to ensure, to silence the critics and really to move on, this reassured the troops, this reassured the commanders, this reassured people who were in favor of it – the Afghans, the allies. That’s why people are calling it brilliant, maybe because it ‘was’ brilliant.” Below is a transcript of the relevant portion of the June 27 Reliable Sources on CNN: HOWARD KURTZ: Bill O’Reilly, on his Fox News show, played a clip – some clips had been put together by the conservative Media Research Center, the Newsbusters site. I want to show that to you now. CHIP REID, CBS NEWS : Sounds like a pretty brilliant decision really. JIM MIKLASZEWSKI. NBC NEWS : This is nothing less than a stunning development, Brian, and, quite frankly, at a quick glance, almost brilliant. CHUCK TODD, NBC NEWS : Politically, in this town, it’s going to be seen as a brilliant choice by the President- WOLF BLITZER, CNN: -a very brilliant move to tap General Petraeus- KURTZ: So the suggestion is that the liberal media are in love with David Petraeus and they’re falling into line. LARA LOGAN, CBS NEWS: Well, if they had said it was a bad decision, then it would be “the liberal media hate David Petraeus and they’re not falling into line.” The one line is it’s very hard to find something wrong with this decision by the President because there was only one general in the United States Army who has the political weight and influence in Washington to survive this. Anyone else going into that position who wasn’t tested, who wasn’t proven, who didn’t have political connections, would have been a lame duck. They would have been able to do nothing. President Obama faced a serious choice here. Was his strategy going to die with General McChrystal? Because there’s a lot of opposition from very powerful people in Washington who want to move to a very different model of counterterrorism and not counterinsurgency. The only way he had to ensure, to silence the critics and really to move on, this reassured the troops, this reassured the commanders, this reassured people who were in favor of it – the Afghans, the allies. That’s why people are calling it brilliant, maybe because it “was” brilliant.

The rest is here:
CNN’s Kurtz & CBS’s Logan Miss the Point of MRC/NewsBusters Clip of Media Touting Obama’s ‘Brilliant’ Choice of Petraeus

Washington Post, Fox News Cite MRC Vice President Dan Gainor in Weigel Resignation

The inside-the-beltway media world was turned on its head with leaked e-mails that revealed Washington Post blogger Dave Weigel had some disparaging things to say about prominent conservative figures, including Rush Limbaugh, Matt Drudge and Byron York. This ultimately resulted in Weigel’s resignation. However, some of Weigel’s antics have been previously raised by his critics , including Media Research Center Vice President Dan Gainor, who offered remarks to Washington Post ombudsman Andrew Alexander. Alexander included them in a June 25 post on his blog : With bloggers such as Weigel, “I think The Post needs to decide what it wants to be online,” said Dan Gainor, a vice president at the conservative Media Research Center. “Does it want to be opinion? Or, does it want to be news? The problem here was that it was never clear.” “If it’s going to be opinion, it ought to have somebody on the conservative side — something Dave Weigel never was,” he said. If The Post wants to assign a “good neutral reporter” to cover conservatives, “we’d be thrilled,” said Gainor. But quickly added, Weigel “wasn’t one. He looked at the conservative movement as if he was visiting a zoo. We’re more than that.” Gainor raises valid points. Klein’s blog posts clearly pass through a liberal prism. For that reason, liberals have a comfort level with what he writes, and conservatives know where he’s coming from, even if they disagree. In contrast, Weigel’s blog seemed to confuse many conservatives who contacted me. Was he supposed to be a neutral reporter, some wondered? Also picking up Gainor’s reaction to the Weigel incident was Fox News Channel’s June 25 “Special Report.” During the “Political Grapevine” segment, “Special Report” host Bret Baier offered viewers Gainor’s reaction. “A Washington Post blogger assigned to cover the conservative beat has resigned after e-mails he wrote surfaced that included disparaging comments about the very conservatives he was supposed to cover,” Baier said. “David Weigel’s e-mails to  JournoList, a listserv for liberal journalists were leaked Thursday. In them he wrote it would be a better world if Matt Drudge of the Drudge Report would quote, “Set himself on fire.” Weigel also wished for the death of Rush Limbaugh and accused pundits and Republicans of racism. Weigel did apologize on his blog before calling it quits.” “Ben Smith at the Politico blames the paper for hiring what he calls, quote, ‘A liberal blogger under the false impression that he’s a conservative.’ Dan Gainor of the Media Research Center goes further calling the incident ‘a disaster for the Post,’ writing, quote, ‘the Post brought in someone who tried to tear down conservatives and look at the right as if he were visiting a zoo.'”

Originally posted here:
Washington Post, Fox News Cite MRC Vice President Dan Gainor in Weigel Resignation

MRC’s Dan Gainor Responds to Gay Parenting TV on CNN

If you’ve noticed more gay characters with children on television and in movies, you’re not alone. CNN has noticed too, and they’re calling it “the new normal.” In a June 24 segment, Corinne Water reported that homosexuals “hope TV shows like ‘Modern Family,’ ‘Glee’ and the new film ‘The Kids are Alright’ represent a growing trend in Hollywood storylines: gay parents.” The segment featured one opponent to Hollywood ’s normalization of gay parenting: Media Research Center Vice President for Business & Culture Dan Gainor. “ Hollywood has done a great deal of work causing acceptance in American culture for homosexuality,” Gainor said. He added later, “Again, what they’re trying to do is normalize something that a lot of people, certainly in those states, don’t want to normalize.” But Winter’s segment presented Gainor’s view as the abnormal one (even showing his picture in black-and-white for an unexplained reason). Actress Julianne Moore, who stars in “The Kids are Alright,” argued that “the entertainment world reflects popular culture. I think that this was happening in the world. So what you’re seeing in television and in film is what’s going on in our society at large, which is a great thing.” Winter closed the segment by asking a gay couple if they thought they were normal. To absolutely no one’s surprise, they said they were normal parents, and Winter left it at that. However, Winter didn’t mention statistics that suggest Hollywood is not reflecting what’s going on in society, or that gay parenting is not normal. According to Colage , an “national movement of children, youth, and adults with one or more” gay parent, Census data found that that “more than 250,000 people under the age of 18 [were] living with unmarried same-sex couples” in 2000.   Colage argues the number of children with gay parents is higher, but acknowledges that other estimates are speculative. Assume for a moment that a full 250,000 children live with gay parents. They would represent 0.003 percent of the 72.4 million children counted in the 2000 Census. The number itself is extremely small, and it’s not even close to proportionate. Commonly cited estimates guess 10 percent of the population is homosexual. (The Centers for Disease Control found the number was closer to 4.1 percent for each gender in 2002.) CNN anchor Kyra Phillips used the segment to tease an upcoming special, “ Gary and Tony Have a Baby .” Soledad O’Brien’s one-hour special highlights what Phillips called the “struggle” of two gay man trying to have a biological child of their own.

Originally posted here:
MRC’s Dan Gainor Responds to Gay Parenting TV on CNN

Newsweek Blogger: Tea Party Coverage Isn’t Harsh Enough

Newsweek blogger Ben Adler thinks the national media are giving the Tea Parties gentle treatment. “Unfortunately,” Adler wrote in a June 21 post , “what appear to be false notions of objectivity – or perhaps a lack of interest in policy – is preventing that coverage from illuminating what the movement actually represents and what it would do if empowered.” Adler complained that a recent Associated Press article, ” Enraged to Engaged: Tea partiers explain why ,” failed to examine the ideology of the demonstrators in the grassroots conservative movement. “The piece examines how and why a variety of individuals became involved in the Tea Party movement without once asking what precisely the platform consists of,” Adler said, leading one to wonder if he even read the article. The 2,300-word “stemwinder,” as Adler called it, written by reporter Pauline Arrillaga, presented various segments of Tea Party ideology on five separate occasions. In the third paragraph, Arrillaga notes that the purpose of the Tea Party-affiliated Lincoln Club in Yucca Valley, Calif., is “to promote educate and advance conservative principles of fiscal responsibility small limited government, free enterprise, the rule of law, private property rights, and the preservation and protection of individual liberty.” Eric Odom, widely regarded as a founder of the Tea Party movement, told Arrillaga said the group’s purpose was, “to make sure that we’re represented by people who are looking out for our rights and upholding the Constitution… And if they don’t, to make sure we have an infrastructure to really take them out rather than have these thugs that are in there for 30, 40 years.” As Adler put it, Tea Partiers are “vehemently opposed” to raising taxes. “But when it comes to specifics, suddenly every program seems worthier than when demonized in the collective abstract. Which politician wants to cut spending on Homeland Security? Education for students with special needs? (Surely not Sarah Palin!),” Adler said in a reference to Palin’s son, Trig, who was born with Down syndrome. Adler complained that the AP would dare characterized Tea Party demonstrators as “concerned Americans trying to find their voices, and a way to channel their disgust.” He suggested they aren’t motivated by love of country or concern for the future, but by ignorance. Arrillaga’s article refuted the notion that Tea Party activists are “ignorant,” however. Bill Warner, Lincoln Club member, ran his own engineering firm for three decades. Hildy Angius is currently running the Republican Woman’s Club, and is a staunch Tea Party Activist. She is an ex-PR agent with a degree from New York State Albany. Eric Odom started the Tea Party movement fresh out of college. Tea Partiers come from all walks of life and have diverse academic backgrounds. Adler also predictable recycled a tired media-drive stereotype that Tea Party members are racist. He suggested they are too dumb to realize they’re racist. “Might it be possible that the Tea Partiers who profess no racial motivation are, let’s say, not entirely aware of their own visceral motivations? I’m sure if you asked the Southern voters who switched to Republican voting habits why they did so, many would say race had nothing to do with it. But why should journalists take that at face value?” Adler said. Adler’s assertion that the media have been soft on the Tea Parties might come as a surprise to anyone who’s paid attention to media coverage of Tea Parties. From the very first demonstrations in April 2009, reporters have attacked Tea Party members . According to a Media Research Center study , the media at first tried to ignore the demonstrations, but quickly moved into attack mode, portraying Tea Party protestors as extremists. Just last week, MSNBC’s Chris Matthews aired a “documentary” about the Tea Party portraying its members as racists, terrorists and conspiracy theorists. 

View post:
Newsweek Blogger: Tea Party Coverage Isn’t Harsh Enough

MRC’s Bozell: Comedy Central’s ‘JC’ Has No Advertiser Support

Of the more than 300 corporate sponsors who have sponsored Comedy Central in the past, not a single one has indicated their intention to buy advertising time on the planned “JC” program should it ever be set to go to broadcast. That’s the victorious announcement today from Citizens Against Religious Bigotry (CARB), a group co-founded by NewsBusters publisher Brent Bozell and a handful of other social conservative activists. “The sponsors understand what the programming department at Comedy Central does not: Religious bigotry is bad business,” Bozell noted in a statement. “With literally zero advertiser support for this program, the only reason Comedy Central would put it on their broadcast schedule is in an effort to offend Christianity and Christians. There is no valid business reason for airing ‘JC,'” the Media Research Center founder argued.  Full the full press release, click here . For a complete listing of member organizations, and advertisers that were petitioned, visit www.CitizensAgainstReligiousBigotry.org .

Originally posted here:
MRC’s Bozell: Comedy Central’s ‘JC’ Has No Advertiser Support

O’Reilly Discusses Comedy Central’s ‘JC,’ MRC’s Coalition to Ask Advertisers to Not Support It

On last night’s “O’Reilly Factor,” host Bill O’Reilly and guest analyst Arthel Neville discussed the possibly impending Comedy Central show “JC” – as in Jesus Christ. Given the network’s past treatment of Christianity, the portend for this show is hardly positive. Which is why the Media Research Center has put together a coalition to ask advertisers to publicly pledge to not underwrite/support the show.  Citizens Against Religious Bigotry (CARB) (which Ms. Neville graciously mentioned by name) is made up of many organizations – made up of Christians, Jews and Muslims – who would like to see religion not be the butt of raunchy/tasteless jokes, and who don’t think America’s advertisers should help fund said alleged humor. A petition to advertisers (to be found on the CARB website ) has garnered more than 115,000 signatures thus far. And if you aren’t familiar with how Comedy Central does Christianity, watch this video and you’ll get an idea of what can be expected should JC ever make it to the airwaves.

Link:
O’Reilly Discusses Comedy Central’s ‘JC,’ MRC’s Coalition to Ask Advertisers to Not Support It

Christian coalition complains Comedy Central’s ‘JC’ offensive

A Christian coalition is complaining Comedy Central's “JC”, a proposed animated series about Jesus Christ living in modern-day New York, is offensive and discriminatory towards Christians. The only problem is that the Coalition Against Religious Bigotry has yet to see a pilot or script, since “JC” is still in development, and might not even find its way on to the cable channel. The Coalition Against Religious Bigotry (CARB) includes right-wing theocrats Brent Bozell (president, Media Research Center), Tony Perkins (president, Family Research Council), Michael Medved (talk radio host), Bill Donohue (president, Catholic League) and Tim Winter (president, Parents Television Council). http://www.examiner.com/x-10853-Portland-Humanist-Examiner~y2010m6d3-Christian-c… added by: unimatrix0