Tag Archives: friedman

Report On ‘Capturing The Friedmans’ Sex Abuse Case Urges DA To Overturn Jesse Friedman’s Conviction

Jesse Friedman just got some more ammunition in his efforts to overturn his 1989 sex-crimes conviction made famous by Andrew Jarecki’s Oscar-nominated documentary Capturing The Friedmans. Although Friedman, then 19, and his father Arnold, pleaded guilty to several hundred counts of sexual abuse in a case that rocked his hometown of Great Neck, NY, he has long since maintained his innocence, and a white paper issued by The National Center for Reason and Justice indicates that his exoneration is overdue. The report, which is titled   Destruction of Innocence: How Coerced Testimony & Confessions Harm Children, Families & Communities for Decades After the Wrongful Convictions Occur.  was authored by Emily Horowitz, Ph.D. and Gavin de Becker, a violence and predation expert and author of The Gift of Fear.    The 42-page report, which can be found in its entirety  here , contains new evidence and witness statements pertaining to the case and urges Nassau County District Attorney Kathleen Rice to overturn the conviction.   (In 2010, Rice launched a review of the case, which is expected to reach a conclusion soon.) The NCRJ report indicates that the Friedman case contains the 10 hallmarks of false sex crime prosecution: “Police Misconduct; Absence of Physical Evidence; Absence of Medical Evidence; Outlandish or Impossible Scenarios; Prosecutorial Misconduct; Judicial Misconduct; Coercive Interviews by Police and Therapists; Improper Relationship Between Police and Therapists; Use of Now-Discredited Memory-Recovery Techniques and Hypnosis; Police & Prosecutors Fuel Community Hysteria.” It also reveals: No child ever made any allegation or complaint against Jesse until  after  the police launched their investigation; The first 30 children questioned by police said they had not been abused; All charges against Jesse arose from statements of child witnesses – and all were based on statements made after the application of suggestive questioning methods; Children who attended classes alongside every one of the 14 complainants now confirm they saw no abuse in those classes; There was  no physical or medical evidence  ever presented against Jesse Freidman; All of the above and more was known by prosecutors and illegally withheld from Jesse’s defense lawyer, and There was clear misconduct on the part of police, prosecutors, and the judge. In 1988, Friedman and his father Arnold were charged with hundreds of counts of sexual abuse that allegedly took place during a computer class they taught in the family’s Great Neck, NY home.  The charges came after police found Friedman’s father’s stash of  pornography depicting adolescent boys in the house. Friedman, who’s now in his mid-40s,  was released from prison in 2001 after serving 13 years of an 18-year sentence. (His father committed suicide in prison in 1995.) With the help of Jarecki and experts in wrongful conviction, he has set about clearing his name, and in the last few years has made headway. A 2010 decision by the Federal Appeals Court for the Second Circuit declared there was “a reasonable likelihood that Jesse Friedman was wrongfully convicted.”  According to that decision, new evidence introduced by Jarecki and by Friedman’s legal team in the years since,   shows that police and psychologists interviewing kids at the time used hypnosis and other “memory recovery techniques” that have since been shown to produce false memories and accusations.  The court also suggested that allegations were elicited from children as young as eight years old by harsh interrogation methods and that Jesse’s guilty plea was the result of pressure by a biased judge who told Jesse’s lawyer that she intended to sentence Jesse to life without parole, a technique widely held to be “impermissibly coercive. In January,  one of the Friedmans’ alleged victims Michael Epstein revealed that he had lied about having been sexually abused in the computer classes in order to put an end to the therapy sessions and repeated questioning he received as a result of the investigation. [ Social Science Research Network ] Follow Frank DiGiacomo on  Twitter . Follow Movieline on  Twitter .

Continued here:
Report On ‘Capturing The Friedmans’ Sex Abuse Case Urges DA To Overturn Jesse Friedman’s Conviction

Report: Adele To Sing Skyfall’s 007 Theme Song

Roger Friedman of Showbiz 411 reports that U.K. mega-singer Adele will sing the title theme song to the next James Bond joint, Skyfall — though, grain of salt: He’s confirming his own scoop here, and the phrase “I think I can confirm for you what I said some months ago” doesn’t inspire total confidence. But it’s Friday, and a girl can dream! And Friedman’s got it right when he argues that “Adele’s sound is the quintessential James Bond sound.” Also, those other recent 007 themes did roundly suck. Bring on Agent Adele! [ Showbiz 411 ]

Here is the original post:
Report: Adele To Sing Skyfall’s 007 Theme Song

Britney Spears’ Choreographer Calls ‘Hold It Against Me’ Director ‘Genius’

Brian Friedman describes working with Jonas

Tom Friedman Rips Obama: ‘Completely Over-read Mandate…Never Seen Worse Communicating Administration’

New York Times columnist Tom Friedman on Sunday accused Barack Obama of badly misreading his Election Day mandate, and said the current White House is the worst communicating administration he’s ever seen. Appearing on the Roundtable segment of ABC’s “This Week,” Friedman blasted the President saying, “I’m for more health care. I’m glad we’ve extended it to more Americans. But the fact is there’s a real, I think, argument for the case that Obama completely over-read his mandate when he came in.” Friedman continued, “He was elected to get rid of one man’s job, George Bush, and get the rest of us jobs. I think that was the core thing, and by starting with health care and not making his first year the year of innovation, expanding the economy and expanding jobs, you know, I think looking back, that was a political mistake.” Moments later, the Times columnist said, “I’ve never seen a worse communicating administration” (video follows with partial transcript and commentary): TOM FRIEDMAN, NEW YORK TIMES: Walter Shapiro had a column the other day which I think made a good point. Look, I’m for more health care. I’m glad we’ve extended it to more Americans. But the fact is there’s a real, I think, argument for the case that Obama completely over-read his mandate when he came in. He was elected to get rid of one man’s job, George Bush, and get the rest of us jobs. I think that was the core thing, and by starting with health care and not making his first year the year of innovation, expanding the economy and expanding jobs, you know, I think looking back, that was a political mistake. Not surprisingly, Friedman’s colleague at the Times blamed it all on Republicans. PAUL KRUGMAN, NEW YORK TIMES: He needs now to say it’s the other guys who are blocking action. He needs to lay out a philosophy. I’m not sure if there’s any way to save the House, but if he can, it can do it not by actually changing the economy in the few weeks remaining, but by making this an issue. Do you really want these guys’ economic plan? And then he has to campaign for it. Amanpour then referred to an article by Richard Cohen about to be published in the Washington Post talking about Obama as the incredible shrinking president. CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR, HOST: He says, “The folks who ran a very smart presidential campaign in ’08 have left the defining of the Obama presidency to people on the edge of insanity.” But then he goes on to talk about his Oval Office address this week, about Iraq, about turning to Afghanistan and the economy. He says, “It was only his second Oval Office address, and so great importance was attached to it. He should have had something momentous to say.” Is that fair? FRIEDMAN: I think it is fair. You know, one of the criticisms certainly I’ve had and many others have had, this is not I think original, there’s been no narrative to this administration. To me, I think Barack Obama was elected for one thing – which I’m not sure he ever fully understood – to do nation building at home, to do nation building in America. That to me was the central tent pole. Under that was health care, jobs, you know, economy, innovation, education, energy, okay? He’s never tied it together it seems to me under one single narrative. And then, therefore, he’s fought each issue against a different constituency. There’s never been a unifying message. I’ve worked here since 1989. I’ve personally just as a reporter, columnist in Washington, I’ve never seen a worse communicating administration, just at the basic technical level of, hey, we’ve got a good plan, you know, maybe someone out there would be interested in writing about it, since I’ve been to Washington. More and more it’s becoming clear this President is losing his once gushing and fawning press. If only these same folks would have actually examined the junior senator from Illinois’ record before jumping on his bandwagon in 2007. I guess that would have been too much like journalism.  

View original post here:
Tom Friedman Rips Obama: ‘Completely Over-read Mandate…Never Seen Worse Communicating Administration’

Philip Markoff, Accused Craigslist Killer, Commits Suicide in Jail

In a shocking conclusion to an already tragic story, the man known as the Craigslist Killer committed suicide in a Boston jail, according to authorities. Philip Markoff, a former medical student who was accused of killing a masseuse he met through Craigslist, was found unresponsive in his cell Sunday. He was pronounced dead at about 10:15 a.m. The death is still being investigated, but Markoff was alone in his jail cell. Evidence indicates he took his own life , according to a statement by both Boston Police Commissioner Edward Davis and Suffolk County D.A. Daniel F. Conley. Philip Markoff was found suffocated with a plastic bag over his head . In June, Markoff pleaded not guilty to charges that in April he lured masseuse Julissa Brisman to a Boston hotel, then bound, beat and fatally shot her. His attorney, John Salsberg, said Sunday, “I’m shocked and saddened by the news” of Markoff’s death. The accused criminal was only 24 years old. Back in April, Markoff was placed on suicide watch after officials expressed concern that this exact scenario would happen. Sadly, it appears it did.

Follow this link:
Philip Markoff, Accused Craigslist Killer, Commits Suicide in Jail

Patti Stanger, Andy Friedman Call Off Wedding

The Millionaire Matchmaker still hasn’t made the right one for herself. Patti Stanger has called off her own wedding to Andy Friedman, she revealed on Twitter Sunday: “I just ended my relationship with Andy,” she wrote. They had been happy together for a long time, however, “It hit me really hard that I want kids in my life. You have to agree on the non-negotiables.” That seems to imply her man did not want children. The 49-year-old Bravo star, who got engaged to Andy Friedman last year and was with him six years, apparently never mentioned the kids thing between 2004 and right now? It was not to be for Patti Stanger and Andy Friedman. After announcing the sad news, Stanger Twittered, “Thank you so much for all the supportive messages, Tweets, emails and Facebook comments. It means a lot.” NOTE : Don’t forget to follow THG on Twitter and Facebook !

Read the original here:
Patti Stanger, Andy Friedman Call Off Wedding

NYT’s Friedman Defends CNN’s Nasr and Hezbollah Founder Fadlallah, the Alan Alda of the Middle East

Tom Friedman stepped into a journalistic controversy in his Sunday New York Times column, ” Can We Talk? ” protesting CNN’s firing of senior editor of Middle East affairs Octavia Nasr for posting this message on Twitter upon the death of Hezbollah founder Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah: Sad to hear of the passing of Sayyed Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah… One of Hezbollah’s giants I respect a lot. According to Western intelligence, Fadlallah blessed the drivers of the vehicles behind the 1983 attacks on Marine barracks in Beirut which killed 241 Marines. President Clinton froze his assets in 1995 because of his suspected involvement with terrorists. Yet Friedman was dismayed by Nasr’s dismissal by CNN: I find Nasr’s firing troubling. Yes, she made a mistake. Reporters covering a beat should not be issuing condolences for any of the actors they cover. It undermines their credibility. But we also gain a great deal by having an Arabic-speaking, Lebanese-Christian female journalist covering the Middle East for CNN, and if her only sin in 20 years is a 140-character message about a complex figure like Fadlallah , she deserved some slack. She should have been suspended for a month, but not fired. It’s wrong on several counts. Friedman’s omission of the killing of the Marines is especially odd considering he used the massacre to insult Ronald Reagan in an exchange with then-GOP presidential candidate Lamar Alexander in a March 5, 1995 appearance on CBS’s Face the Nation. Friedman downplayed Fadlallah’s hatred of Israel, never mentioning the phrase “suicide bombers” and saying only that he “had some dark side.” I’ve never met Octavia Nasr or Fadlallah. Fadlallah clearly hated Israel, supported attacks on Israelis and opposed the U.S. troops in Lebanon and Iraq. But he also opposed Hezbollah’s choking dogmatism and obedience to Iran; he wanted Lebanon’s Shiites to be independent and modern, and he built a regional following through his social commentaries. …. Of course, Fadlallah was not just a social worker. He had some dark side. People at CNN tell me Nasr knew both. But here’s what I know: The Middle East has to change in order to thrive, and that change has to come from within, from change agents who are seen as legitimate and rooted in their own cultures. They may not be America’s cup of tea. But we need to know about them, and understand where our interests converge — not just demonize them all. Dan Abrams, founder of Mediaite, responded at length to Friedman in the comments section of a related Mediaite article. ….when a journalist who covers the middle east expresses admiration for the leader of a group that is at least partially a terror organization, its not just a small matter. He may have done other amazing things including being more progressive than others of his ilk, but can you imagine what would happen to an American journalist expressing admiration for an Al Quaeda leader who had other, better, attributes? When you work at a media entity like CNN (or the New York Times) and you don’t get that words matter — all of them — then that in and of itself, should be a fireable offense. One would think, from the wailing of Friedman and Nasr’s other apologists, that Fadlallah was defined by his support of women’s rights. But the Times’s July 5 obituary for Fadlallah , which appeared before the Nasr controversy broke, devoted a single paragraph to his “comparatively progressive positions on women’s rights and family law,” while emphasizing his justification for suicide bombings and hatred for Israel. “Comparatively” is the operative word, as the opinions of this Alan Alda of the Middle East aren’t exactly bold by civilized standards: “…he argued that women had the right to defend themselves from domestic violence.” Friedman’s interest in Fadlallah’s feminism is pretty new. His only previous mention of Fadlallah, according to a Nexis search, was a single citation in the last paragraph of a 1984 news story, back when Friedman was a New York Times reporter.

More:
NYT’s Friedman Defends CNN’s Nasr and Hezbollah Founder Fadlallah, the Alan Alda of the Middle East

Who Is Van Jones?

The story of how the President’s Special Advisor for Green Jobs became the biggest, scariest villain of the right wing (this week, anyway) is also the story of how the right wing information delivery process works now. Here’s the biography of Van Jones : he was a bookish black kid from Tennessee who went to Yale Law and moved to San Francisco and became a radical. Then he decided to use his law degree and smarts to clean up and make things better from inside the establishment

See more here:
Who Is Van Jones?

Patti Stanger: Engaged to Andy Friedman

The annoying host of that Millionaire Matchmaker show on Bravo has apparently found one of her own . We’re guessing the guy isn’t poor, either. Patti Stanger is engaged to Andy Friedman, she says.

Read more from the original source:
Patti Stanger: Engaged to Andy Friedman