Tag Archives: castle

Mark Levin: Christine O’Donnell is ‘Smart to Bypass’ Sunday Talk Shows

Conservative radio host Mark Levin thinks Delaware Republican senatorial nominee Christine O’Donnell is “smart to bypass” the Sunday talk shows she was scheduled to appear on this week. As the Associated Press reported Saturday, O’Donnell canceled her appearances on CBS’s “Face the Nation” and FNC’s “Fox News Sunday”: Campaign spokeswoman Diana Banister cited scheduling conflicts and said O’Donnell needed to return to Delaware for commitments to church events and afternoon picnic with Republicans in a key county where she has solid backing.  Sunday morning, Levin told his Facebook followers this was a good decision: Christine O’Donnell is smart to bypass these shows and the O’Donnell-hating media. All they’ll do is try to rip her with cherry-picked clips and the rest. They’ll use Rove, Krauthammer, Weekly Standard, National Review, Powerline, Castle, etc., quotes against her. She owes them nothing. Her goal is to get elected. Now that she’s raised nearly $2 million, she can tell the voters who she is and what she believes, rather than subjecting herself to the frenzy and bias of the media which clearly seek her personal destruction.  As the media are in a full-court press to dig up dirt on Tuesday’s surprise winner, it seems a metaphysical certitude they’ll attack her no matter what she does. With this in mind, was this a good decision on O’Donnell’s part, or are political candidates better served to face the press regardless of their biases? 

Here is the original post:
Mark Levin: Christine O’Donnell is ‘Smart to Bypass’ Sunday Talk Shows

Krauthammer Smacks Down WaPo’s King Over Palin and Tea Party Agenda

Charles Krauthammer on Friday had a heated debate with the Washington Post’s Colby King over what the Tea Party stands for as well as who its leader is. As the panel on PBS’s “Inside Washington” discussed Delaware Republican senatorial nominee Christine O’Donnell’s surprising victory Tuesday, the conversation naturally gravitated towards the conservative movement reshaping the face of politics.   “They [the Tea Party] have a litmus test that goes into being right to life, social conservative issues that they’re strong on,” said King. Krauthammer pounced, “Look, I hate to say this, but I think that is completely wrong.” The battle was on (video follows with transcript and commentary):  COLBY KING, WASHINGTON POST: They [the Tea Party] have a litmus test that goes into being right to life, social conservative issues that they’re strong on. No, they would get rid of the IRS if they could. There is no room, there is no room for compromise because compromise is a bad word as far as they’re concerned. CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: Look, I hate to say this, but I think that is completely wrong. The Tea Party has distinguished itself in being almost exclusively about governance, the reach of governance, taxation, economic issues. It is not the social conservatives. In fact, that is what distinguishes it. And I think the other element that is being missed here is it arose spontaneously as a reaction to an extremely aggressive, extremely ambitious left liberal administration that instead of, for example, attacking tax reform – which had it tried that at the beginning of its administration would have had bipartisan agreement and great success, as Reagan in ’86 – it decided it wants a reform of health care which nobody at the time thought was the major issue in the time of economic recession. KING: You just can’t rewrite the rules. I mean, Sarah Palin didn’t even come to the state of Maryland but endorsed the Republican opponent of Governor Ehrlich only on the basis of a checklist. KRAUTHAMMER: Palin is not Tea Party. She is not Tea Party the titular head or at all. KING: She is a major… KRAUTHAMMER: The Tea Party is a spontaneous, leaderless movement which is economic and not social conservative. KING: I get mail all the time from the Tea Party of Florida for example there, Tea Party spokesman from around the country, they, they exist as a unit. As readers can see, Krauthammer might think the Republican Party would have been better suited if Mike Castle won Tuesday evening, but he still is an outspoken conservative ready to smack down media members when they’re wrong. Despite many Tea Party supporters’ disappointment over his views on O’Donnell, America would be far better off with more straight-shooting commentators like Krauthammer.

Visit link:
Krauthammer Smacks Down WaPo’s King Over Palin and Tea Party Agenda

Cable Nets Barely Cover Christine O’Donnell’s Values Voter Summit Speech

While the mainstream media have been in a frenzy to denounce Christine O’Donnell as a kook for her socially conservative statements on abstinence from the 1990s, the cable news networks had a perfect opportunity this afternoon to let her speak for herself. Collectively they gave her less than five minutes. The Republican Delaware Senate nominee gave a speech at the Values Voters Summit in Washington, D.C. this afternoon from about 3:25 to 3:45 p.m. EDT. Of the three major cable news networks, Fox News showed none of the speech while MSNBC’s Chris Jansing gave viewers just under a minute of O’Donnell audio before interviewing Time magazine’s Jay Newton-Small about concerns some GOP operatives have about O’Donnell being a weaker matchup against the Democratic nominee than Rep. Mike Castle (R) would have been. Only CNN’s Rick Sanchez gave O’Donnell a substantial chunk of time: 3 minutes and 33 seconds. When Sanchez cut away from O’Donnell, he noted that she’s “getting her first taste of the national spotlight” since clinching the nomination and promised that CNN would “continue to follow as the midterms in November draws near.”

Read the original post:
Cable Nets Barely Cover Christine O’Donnell’s Values Voter Summit Speech

Open Thread: Obama, the Musical

As Jonah Goldberg puts it, ” Oh, Dear Lord “. Hey, at least the dancing is impressive. Thoughts? 

Read the original:
Open Thread: Obama, the Musical

NBC Prefers to Put Limbaugh Rather Than Their Own Ed Schultz on the Chauvinist Pig Seat

On his national radio show Tuesday, Ed Schultz took a decidedly un-liberal view on the controversy over provocatively dressed Mexican sportscaster Ines Sainz being sexually harassed by players in the New York Jets locker room. Yeah, she’s going through jock strap heaven. She’s in the locker room! (Laughs) There’s been sexist comments in locker rooms since the day they started having sports! What does she expect?! But when Schultz’s own network, NBC, went looking for a soundbite for the “caveman” point of view on Wednesday’s Today, they turned to Rush Limbaugh for scolding instead. Matt Lauer singled out Limbaugh as the sexist pig: “Everyone from Rush Limbaugh to late-night comedians are weighing in. And much of the attention is on what Ines Sainz wears instead of the football player’s behavior. And is that fair? Does it matter what she had on? We’re going to have more on that just ahead.” When they began the story, NBC’s Peter Alexander put NFL running back Clinton Portis alongside Limbaugh in the insensitive camp: ALEXANDER: But another player, Clinton Portis of the Washington Redskins, may have revealed some of that locker room mentality, making inflammatory comments on a sports radio show Tuesday. PORTIS: You put a woman and you give her a choice of 53 athletes, somebody got to be appealing to her. You know, somebody got to spark her interest or she’s going to want somebody. ALEXANDER: Portis later apologized. And on his radio program, conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh, who had a brief controversial stint as an NFL commentator, addressed the topic, too. RUSH LIMBAUGH: She knows that she has an asset, depending on that part of the country you’re from, boobylicious, bootylicous, whatever. She’s got it. She’s making no attempt to downplay it or hide it. None whatsoever. ALEXANDER: Sainz says what she wears is part of her on-air image. Both she and her network post provocative pictures of her on their Web sites. The 32-year-old is a celebrity back in Mexico where many female reporters dress far less conservatively than their American counterparts. It should be said that when Meredith Vieira and three female pundits began discussing Sainz (complete with lots of seductive Sainz photos), they verged on agreeing with Limbaugh that Sainz was clearly playing up her sexiness as part of her TV persona. Clearly, they agreed, Mexican media culture has a little more machismo behind it than America’s. But Limbaugh, not Schultz, still became NBC’s icon of insensitivity.

Here is the original post:
NBC Prefers to Put Limbaugh Rather Than Their Own Ed Schultz on the Chauvinist Pig Seat

Chris Matthews Bets Lib Guest Christine O’Donnell Will Win in November

Chris Matthews on Wednesday departed from the liberal media conventional wisdom that Tea Party candidate Christine O’Donnell’s defeat of Republican favorite Mike Castle was good news for Democrats and President Obama. Quite the contrary, the “Hardball” host has become extremely pessimistic about Democrat chances to retain Congress in the upcoming midterm elections, so much so that he likened his Party to the Titanic. “The boat is sinking,” he told fellow liberal David Corn. “The establishment is sinking.” When Corn tried to push back on Matthews’ view, the devout liberal said, “I take O`Donnell. How many points are you going to give me?” (videos follow with transcripts and commentary):  DAVID CORN, MOTHER JONES: Two points. First, you have — we have to see how these Tea Partiers do with a general election audience. And the second point — CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Oh, you`re taking the – CORN: No, no, no. MATTHEWS: You are trying to deny — (CROSSTALK) CORN: See what happens. MATTHEWS: You`re still denying it. CORN: I was on last night. You know I`m not denying it. I think they`re major threats to the Democrats. But we got to see what happens. MATTHEWS: Well, let me get this straight. As the Titanic sinks and it`s all the way up to the top decks, and it`s already up to the top decks, well, let`s see how it affects the first class passengers. The boat is sinking. The establishment is sinking. CORN: Listen, Leonardo is still holding on tight. And we see how — what happens to him. (LAUGHTER) CORN: But the other point is, you know that presidential primaries are like family holiday gatherings. All of the internal dysfunctions get played out. And so, really what happens right now, whether the establishment comes and supports people like Christine O`Donnell or not, those passions are going to be really stirred up and if you see Karl Rove continuing to battle with the Tea Party forces, then I think it will put more pressure and create more anger on the far right that will turn into explosive. MATTHEWS: OK. CORN: You know — it will be explosive. MATTHEWS: You`re using a lot of words, David. Usually, you`re much more punchy. The reason you`re taking a lot of words — CORN: I`ll make it simple — (CROSSTALK) CORN: I think it`s still hard for the Republicans. MATTHEWS: I look at Rand Paul, that the guy is going to win. I look at Pat Toomey now and I hate to say, this is a guy who`s going to win. I think the right has got the upper hand now going into this general election. And I`m looking at these numbers — CORN: But they always — they always did. MATTHEWS: They have the upper hand. Your thoughts. Wow! Matthews now thinks Paul and Toomey are going to win. But it gets better: MICHELLE BERNARD, MSNBC POLITICAL ANALYST: But if you look at the people who have been basically sent running from the Republican Party this year, we`ve got Crist, Arlen Specter, Lisa Murkowski — there is definitely a lot of dissension within the Republican Party, and, quote-unquote, “establishment people,” could literally see themselves completely knocked out of Republican politics by the time we get to 2012. CORN: But at the same time — but at the same — MATTHEWS: So, the establishment lost every one of these races, they`re at the bottom of the league. The people that are winning are all the challengers. And I just — every night it happens, I say, this can`t happen. Castle can`t lose. Specter can`t lose. They all lose. The establishment of the politics of America is playing defense now and they`re losing. CORN: The Republican establishment — all those Republicans who are beaten, most of them would probably have done very well in general election. What we`re worrying about now, what some people are worrying about is that — is that Castle would have done better than Christine O`Donnell. I mean, Murkowski would have an easy walk to re-election, right? Joe Miller probably will win, but he has a smaller chance of winning, at least that`s the constitution wisdom at the moment. MATTHEWS: I take O`Donnell. How many points are you going to give me? CORN: How many points will I give you? MATTHEWS: Yes, how many you give. Because you keep acting like this is all over, that she`s going to lose. CORN: No, but I don`t believe it`s all over. MATTHEWS: Right. CORN: But I do believe that the Republicans have this internal split — MATTHEWS: OK. OK. I get back to this. CORN: — that they still haven`t dealt with. MATTHEWS: I can`t see the Republican convention meeting, wherever they`re going to meet, in Tampa, right? They`re down there and they`re thundering in there with delegates, one of these Tea Partiers after another, storming the gates, all excited about they`re going to get rid of the 14th Amendment, get rid of, what, the 17th Amendment, energize the 10th Amendment, love the Second Amendment, and then they go pick Romney, Tim Pawlenty. CORN: But who`s the Tea Party candidate? MATTHEWS: I don`t see how it happens. CORN: But who`s the Tea Party candidate? Sarah Palin? Who else? MATTHEWS: Yes. CORN: Well, what if she doesn`t run? MATTHEWS: Well, I don`t know what happens. CORN: What happens to them? MATTHEWS: I don`t see what — I`m asking the question. BERNARD: I don`t — I don`t think this is the death now for, quote- unquote, “establishment people,” like Mitt Romney. He`s a good guy. I think — we just don`t know. I know you think it`s funny — (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: I think you like establishment-type Republicans. BERNARD: I do. CORN: He also knows — he knows how to change his skin. He already sent money to Christine O`Donnell. BERNARD: But he`s also never going to campaign like Christine O`Donnell. We are never going to see that type of a flip-flop, I hope, from Mitt Romney or others, I hope. (CROSSTALK) BERNARD: We`re not going to see someone like Christine O`Donnell — MATTHEWS: — abortion rights. CORN: These guys run the way they run and then they look to the vice president to sort of send that message. BERNARD: We will not see a Christine O`Donnell on the Republican ticket in 2012. (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: The tea point is boiling and steaming and it`s going to make that whistle sound when it`s ready to coffee. BERNARD: Absolutely. MATTHEWS: The whistle is making that sound. (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: You try to put a lid on that (INAUDIBLE). In the final segment of “Hardball,” Matthews really drove this point home: MATTHEWS: Let me finish tonight with a question. Just where do you think this explosion of voter anger we saw last night in Delaware and have seen growing in voters in Pennsylvania, Florida, Utah, Nevada, Kentucky, Colorado and in just about every poll across the country is going to take us? Last night, as the dust began to clear, I heard progressive glee that the anger was on the verge of burning itself out, that the victory of Christine O`Donnell in Delaware like that of Sharron Angle in Nevada, was throwing away the election. How could voters in the general election go so far as to elect one of these candidates the angry primary voters have kicked pup? I supposed I had my eyes on something different. While others were seeing dead people, the defeated Mike Castle, who was supposed to be strong this November, I saw the strength of the flames that consumed him and will consume many others this rapidly approaching election night. I have waited all my adult life for an election in which voters have the fire to reach up and burn those who have been running the show for decades. But I didn`t know it would come from the right and center. 2010 could be the first year in modern times when being in office in Washington and part of Washington is the worst possible credential when facing voters. I don`t know how far the fire will burn. Based upon last night`s returns, I expect it has a long way to go. It could topple the House and, yes, the U.S. Senate. It could bring the defeat of people who feel even now they are not endangered. It could produce an election night spectacle of name brand politicians standing before stance supporters saying their careers are kaput. Why is this happening? Because this economic system is failing to produce the security and opportunity people have come to expect in this country. In this middle-class country, the middle class are scared and when people are scared, they get angry. They sense a rot at the top and are ready to chop it off. If the plan of those in power to raise a ton of cash and run nasty TV ads saying you can`t vote for this new person, that he or she is flawed — I expect the voter will say, “Are you telling me I have no choice but to vote for you? Are you saying that I, this little voter out there, dare not take a chance on someone who has not yet let me down as you have? If that is what you`re telling me, that I have no choice, well, Mr. Big Stuff, you just have to wait — stay up late election night and see what I have done.” Wow! It appears Mr. Matthews is starting to understand just how strong this anti-Democrat, anti-big government movement is. The only question remaining is when will the rest of his liberal colleagues in the media? Will they get it before Election Day? Stay tuned. 

Read more:
Chris Matthews Bets Lib Guest Christine O’Donnell Will Win in November

George Stephanopoulos Touts Attacks By O’Donnell Opponents: She’s a ‘Nutty,’ ‘Mentally Unhinged’ ‘Liar’

Liberal journalists don’t usually highlight Karl Rove as an authoritative voice, but that’s what George Stephanopoulos did on Wednesday’s Good Morning America. Interviewing senatorial nominee Christine O’Donnell, the ABC host touted the conservative strategist’s dismissal of the Delaware Republican for saying “some nutty things.” Stephanopoulos also played up charges by Delaware’s Republican Party Chairman Tom Ross that O’Donnell is a “liar” and “mentally unhinged.” The ABC host wondered if her primary victory could “help the Democrats.” Stephanopoulos noted only negative news for the surprise winner of the Delaware senatorial primary, asserting that “…The national Republican Party is not going to give you any funds.” (This later turned out not to be true .) Later in the show, news anchor Juju Chang would label the liberal Mike Castle, O’Donnell’s defeated primary opponent, ” a mainstream Republican .” During Wednesday’s interview, Stephanopoulos never mentioned Castle. Instead, he parroted, “We saw that the Republican Party chairman in Jon Karl’s piece there, he went on to say, that you’re ‘not a viable candidate.'” Piling on, the host continued, “…You ‘cannot be elected dog catcher in Delaware.’ [Ross] went on to say that you’re either a liar or mentally unhinged.” Stephanopoulos then played a clip of Rove, on Fox News, slamming O’Donnell. When candidate Ned Lamont beat Joe Lieberman for Connecticut’s Democratic primary in 2006, journalists gushed over the insurgent “anti-war” politician. The Washington Post deemed him a “fiscal conservative.” A transcript of the September 15 segment, which aired at 7:04am EDT, follows: 7am tease GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: And this morning, Tea Party shocker. CHRISTINE O’DONNELL: No more politics as usual. STEPHANOPOULOS: Another Sarah Palin mamma grizzly wins, this time in Delaware. But, could this victory help the Democrats? 7:04 STEPHANOPOULOS: And the big winner joins us now. Christine O’Donnell from Delaware. Good morning. Thank you for getting up so early. And congratulations. Did Sarah Palin make the difference here? CHRISTINE O’DONNELL: Thank you, George. Yes, she did. All summer we’ve been working very hard to get out there. Give the voters an opportunity to meet me, to know me. So that I’ve been asking them that when you vote for me, I want you- I want the vote to mean something. I want it to be a vote of confidence. So, when the mud-slinging started, I was very encouraged that what a lot of people said was, “We knew what your opponent was putting out wasn’t reflective of who we know you to be.” And when Governor Palin stood up and so boldly made a statement that she supported me, it allowed them to get past the politics of personal destruction, to look at the message and look at the fact that I wanted to make this race about the issue. How we’re going to get jobs back in Delaware. How we’re going to defend the homeland of our security. And she helped to get it back on track. STEPHANOPOULOS: You’re going to need all the help she can give right now. She’s going to need to raise some money for you. ‘Cause we just heard Jon. Karl say the national Republican Party is not going to give you any funds. O’DONNELL: Well, that’s a shame. But they never thought I could win this race. And I believe that we can win without them. This is about giving the political power back to we, the people. And we proved the so-called experts wrong. So, I think a few of them, perhaps, may have their pride hurt this morning. But, you know, I didn’t count on the establishment to win the primary. I’m not counting of them to win the general. I’m counting on the voters of Delaware. And we’re going to work hard to make sure that we take our message to them. STEPHANOPOULOS: But- But you are going to have to answer some questions. We saw that the Republican Party chairman in Jon Karl’s piece there, he went on to say, that you’re “not a viable candidate.” That you “cannot be elected dog catcher in Delaware.” He went on to say that you’re either a liar or mentally unhinged. And Karl Rove, President Bush’s former political adviser, was on Fox News, very tough, talking about your checkered background. O’DONNELL: Right. STEPHANOPOULOS: Saying you say some nutty things. And, listen, he went on to say, you have to answer these questions. KARL ROVE: Why did she mislead voters about her college education? How come it took her nearly two decades to pay her college bills so she could get college degree? How did she make a living? Why did she sue a well-known and well-thought-of conservative think tank? STEPHANOPOULOS: Can you answer those questions? O’DONNELL: Yeah. Everything he’s saying is unfactual [sic]. And it’s a shame. Because he’s the same, so called political guru that predicted that I wasn’t going to win. And we won. And we won big. So, I think, again, he’s eating some humble pie and he’s just trying to restore his reputation. But, again, I’m counting on the voters in Delaware. Like I said this, is about giving the political process back to the people. People are tired of what’s going on in Washington. These failed policies that don’t represent them. My Republican opponent did not have a record to stand on. He supported the Democrats more than he supported the Republicans. And when we started gaining momentum and we started gaining credibility in this race, it made the Republican establishment look like lazy people who did not care about their principles. But I hope that we can put that behind us because if they’re really serious about winning, I was ahead in the general election, according to Rasmussen, before this Republican cannibalism started. So, if they were serious about winning, we could repair the damage done and move forward. And that’s the challenge I put out to them. But, if not, I truly believe we can win. STEPHANOPOULOS: You call it Republican- You call it Republican cannibalism, saying that what Karl Rove is unfactual. But it is true that you had conflicting statements about your college record. That you had- That the big issue in the campaign was failure to pay back taxes. O’DONNELL: That is not true. STEPHANOPOULOS: Failure to pay campaign debts. Failure to pay your mortgage. So, can you clear that up? O’DONNELL: That’s simply not true. We addressed all this stuff. Absolutely. Absolutely. And first of all, they also said that Ronald Reagan wasn’t electable. We’ve addressed all of this stuff on our website. It took me 12 years to pay off my college loans. I’m not a trust fund baby. Most Delawareans can relate to having to work hard to pay for their own college education. I was never dishonest about that. They made up an accusation about an IRS tax lien. The IRS said, “Oops, it was a mistake.” They cleared it up right away. We presented my opponent and the republican administration, showing them that the IRS had admitted to a computer error. They chose to ignore the truth because they don’t have a record to stand on. And it’s humiliating when the party gets behind this guy who they say is the only one who can win. But doesn’t stand for anything that the Republican Party stands for. So, they have to cling to these baseless accusations. And it’s a shame because I want to go into this general election telling the Delaware voters the proposals that I want to introduce in Washington to get jobs back into Delaware, to get our economy back on track. To take care of our veterans. And as we move forward, I hope that my Democratic opponent learns the same lesson that my Republican opponent learned. That dirty politics will backfire. In a state like Delaware, where it’s small enough to get to know all of the voters, that’s exactly what we intend to do this next month and a half. It didn’t work for Castle. It won’t work for the Democrats. STEPHANOPOULOS: And we will be watching. Congratulations again. Thanks for your time this morning.

Read more:
George Stephanopoulos Touts Attacks By O’Donnell Opponents: She’s a ‘Nutty,’ ‘Mentally Unhinged’ ‘Liar’

Christine O’Donnell: AIDS Gets Too Much Gov’t Money, Condoms Wouldn’t Stop It

Long before Tea Party backed candidate Christine O'Donnell won the Republican primary in Delaware and became the GOP Senate nominee, the conservative firebrand was arguing that the government was spending too much money fighting AIDS and said condoms wouldn't stop the disease from spreading. You already know about O'Donnell's extreme views on sex and porn, and you've seen the video of her campaign against masturbation. Now TPM has unearthed a 1997 C-SPAN video that shows O'Donnell voicing concerns that a drag queen ball “celebrates the type of lifestyle which leads to the disease,” objecting to terming those with AIDS “victims” and calling AIDS a consequence of a certain “lifestyle which brings about this disease.” After complaining that “there is a gross disproportionate allocation of funds” going to AIDS treatment and prevention in comparison to resources designated to combat heart disease, O'Donnell compared living healthier to changing the “lifestyle” that she said lead to AIDS. “When somebody finds out that they're at high risk for heart disease, they cut out the fatty foods, they start exercising, they quit smoking. However, our approach to AIDS, when you're in a high risk behavior, is to eliminate the consequences so that you can continue in your lifestyle which brings about this disease,” O'Donnell said. Referring to people who get AIDS as victims, O'Donnell said, was “the kind of spinning with words and manipulating words that empowers the bias when it comes to AIDS.” O'Donnell also took issue with government spending on preventative programs. “A lot of the money that we're spending goes to things that we know will not prevent AIDS, but indeed will continue to spread the disease,” she said. “A lot of our money goes to distribute condoms in high schools, and a lot of our money goes to distribute material that is literally pornographic.” She said that individuals could bring their chance of getting AIDS down to almost zero if they didn't have sex outside of marriage, by having a monogamous marriage and by not using drugs that can spread HIV. O'Donnell also claimed that there was a “powerful political agenda” that was not allowing AIDS to be looked at fairly and objectively. O'Donnell also noted on C-SPAN that while her organization, the Savior's Alliance For Lifting The Truth (S.A.L.T.), was eligible for funding as an abstinence program under the welfare reform act, they made the decision not to accept federal funding “because we don't want to be put under the bondage of the federal government.” It's not the first time O'Donnell has dipped her toe in the gay-baiting pool. During the primary, she called her opponent Rep. Mike Castle (R) 'unmanly' and distanced herself from a former campaign organization aide who put out a video that questioned Castle's sexuality (even as she repeated the charges in order to distance herself). http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/09/christine_odonnell_aids_gets_t… added by: TimALoftis

Big Brother 12 – Britney Haynes House Burns Down – She Doesn’t Know!

The Big Brother 12 finale is happening tonight, LIVE on CBS. The last female standing was Britney Haynes who was the last house guest evicted. http://backseatcuddler.com/2010/09/15/big-brother-12-season-finale-britney-hayne… added by: MacKenzieFox

Tea Party…First Ignored and Laughed at Then Discounted. Now Lookie Look… Move Over Status Quo

One thing has become abundantly clear from Tuesday night's primaries: Sarah Palin's endorsements matter. Palin and Tea Party-backed conservative Christine O'Donnell pulled off a stunning upset over nine-term Rep. Mike Castle in the Republican Senate primary in Delaware 53% to 47%. O'Donnell gave a nod to the former Alaska governor during her victory speech on Tuesday night. “Thank you, Gov. Palin, for your endorsement,” the Tea Party candidate said. “Because she got behind us war-weary folks, and gave us a boost of encouragement when we needed it.” O'Donnell wasn't Palin's only win on Tuesday. In Wisconsin, Palin-backed Sean Duffy — an ex-district attorney and castmate in MTV's “The Real World” — handily won the Republican primary Tuesday for a U.S. House seat. And in New York, Michael Grimm defeated his opponent in the Republican primary for a House seat representing Staten Island. And then there are other winning candidates, particularly in the Tea Party, that Palin has endorsed this election season — demonstrating her ability to catapult nobodies into virtual stardom. There's Joe Miller in Alaska, Rand Paul in Kentucky, and Nikki Haley in South Carolina. Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2010/09/15/2010-09-15_sarah_palin_score… added by: congoboy