Tag Archives: whitman

Billionaire Bad Boys Club: Meg Whitman’s Son’s Arrest for Beating Up a Girl [Exclusive]

Does California gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman ‘s violent temper and bullying behavior run in the family? The billionaire ex-eBay CEO’s son was charged with felony battery for breaking a woman’s ankle after her friend said “Fuck you” and “Fuck your fraternity.” More

NYT Reports Whitman’s 2007 ‘Shove’, Ignores Brown Calling Her Nazi Last Week

Americans learned something interesting about the priorities of the New York Times Tuesday: its editors believe a political candidate pushing an employee three years ago is more important than a candidate calling his campaign rival a Nazi last week. Such seems apparent from the Times’ choice to report  California Republican gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman’s alleged employee shoving incident in 2007. By contrast, the Gray Lady has still not informed readers that Democrat gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown last Tuesday likened Whitman to Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels. As NewsBusters reported Saturday, Brown said the following to KCBS radio’s Doug Sovern: Brown boasted about his legendary frugality. “I’ve only spent $200,000 so far. I have 20 million in the bank. I’m saving up for her.” It’s true – his stay-on-the-sidelines, bare-bones primary run cost him almost nothing, at least in California political terms. But he also fretted about the impact of all those eBay dollars in Whitman’s very deep pockets. “You know, by the time she’s done with me, two months from now, I’ll be a child-molesting…” He let the line trail off. “She’ll have people believing whatever she wants about me.” Then he went off on a riff I didn’t expect. “It’s like Goebbels,” referring to Hitler’s notorious Minister of Propaganda. “Goebbels invented this kind of propaganda. He took control of the whole world. She wants to be president. That’s her ambition, the first woman president. That’s what this is all about.”  Although a week has passed since this incident, and Brown has admitted having the conversation with Sovern, the Times has STILL not reported his remarks. Yet, as NewsBusters reported Tuesday, Whitman allegedly pushing an eBay employee THREE YEARS AGO — an incident that “no one else appears to have witnessed” — was something the Times devoted almost 1,000 words to citing exclusively unnamed sources:  In addition to noting that the incident involved has no identified witnesses, The Times report specifically tells us that the matter was settled through mediation, and that “the authorities were not involved.” Former eBay CEO Whitman has no criminal exposure. The report is a gratuitous, politically-motivated dredge-up of a long-forgotten matter. The Times’s Brad Stone and likely other reporters clearly put many hours of work into the Whitman report. In the process, he or they encouraged and ultimately convinced eBay employees to breach ethics and to violate confidentiality agreements. The incident’s alleged victim still works at eBay and has clearly moved on. Yes, everyone involved has likely moved on EXCEPT the Times which felt this three-year-old issue was important to share with its readers. Yet something that just happened last week involving Whitman — her being compared to a Nazi by Brown — is STILL not something Times editors feel readers should be aware of. On a related note, the Times also found Republican Senatorial candidate Carly Fiorina’s comments about Sen. Barbara Boxer’s (D-Calif.) hair quite newsworthy filing reports on the open mike quip Friday and Sunday. As such, a Republican allegedly pushing an employee three years ago or commenting about a campaign rival’s hair is more important to the Times than a Democrat calling his political foe a Nazi. Honestly, this is the kind of media bias one would expect in Cuba and Venezuela – NOT America. 

Go here to see the original:
NYT Reports Whitman’s 2007 ‘Shove’, Ignores Brown Calling Her Nazi Last Week

Newsweek’s Clift Mocks GOP Women’s Pro-Life Views as ‘So Yesterday’

Newsweek’s Eleanor Clift, on this weekend’s syndicated The McLaughlin Group, slighted conservative pro-life women everywhere when she applied California Republican Senate candidate Carly Fiorina’s “so yesterday” description of Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer’s hairstyle to women who hold anti-abortion views in the Republican Party. Clift, in a segment about the primary victories of both Fiorina and GOP gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman began actually crediting Sarah Palin as “Saint Sarah” for the wins as she claimed that the former Alaskan Governor is “emboldening conservative women” and “reshaping the religious right” but then went on to question if pro-life women candidates could win statewide races in California because their views would be seen as “so yesterday.” Incidentally, The Washington Times’ Monica Crowley had to correct Clift as she pointed out her liberal spin wasn’t even entirely accurate as Whitman is, in fact, “pro choice.” The following exchanges were aired on the June 12 edition of The McLaughlin Group: JOHN MCLAUGHLIN: Question: How do you account for the amount of successful women candidates in Tuesday’s political primaries? Eleanor Clift? ELEANOR CLIFT, NEWSWEEK: Well I think conservative Republican women were really the stars this week, and I credit, in part, Saint Sarah. She’s on the cover of Newsweek this coming week. She’s credited with empowering and emboldening conservative women and maybe reshaping the religious right. And I think that looks good in primaries. I don’t know how it will play in the, in the fall when you have a broader electorate. I think the two women in California are genuine business women. They spent enormous amounts of money. Whitman spent, I think $80 million, which works out to about $80 per vote, and they are gonna position themselves as outsiders and business women who are running against classical political insiders. But Carly Fiorina, who’s running for the Senate, got a rocky start when she was caught on an open mic making fun of Barbara Boxer’s hair saying it’s oh, “so yesterday.” And these two Republican women are also social conservatives in a state that’s very pro-choice. So maybe those issues will be cast as “so yesterday.” … MONICA CROWLEY, WASHINGTON TIMES: First of all I need to correct something that Eleanor said. Meg, Meg Whitman is not a social conservative. She is pro choice.

Read more here:
Newsweek’s Clift Mocks GOP Women’s Pro-Life Views as ‘So Yesterday’

Chris Matthews Accuses Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina of ‘Very Hard-right Talk’

With Americans heading to the polls in less than five months, the liberal media have once again adopted their typical strategy of depicting every Republican candidate as being a far-right extremist. Such was on display in this weekend’s syndicated “Chris Matthews Show” when the host began the second segment by saying, “This week’s primaries proved again that this anti-Washington year may usher in Republicans who owe a lot to the far-right.” Matthews then played a clip from his upcoming special “Rise of the New Right,” saying after its completion, “Well, Tea Parties have had some luck with conservatives who have beaten establishment Republicans this year. This past Tuesday night, for example, Nevada Republicans chose a Tea Party candidate to go against Harry Reid. And she’s not shy about her extreme views like killing Social Security and Medicare.” After a brief clip of Sharron Angle speaking at a Nevada debate, Matthews said, “And even mainstream Republicans like Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina who won nominations this week in California have bent to the right in reaction to pressure from the hard-right.” Matthews then showed a Whitman ad wherein she was talking tough about illegal immigration followed by a Fiorina commercial that had the nerve to use “that tried and true conservative line ‘The Democrats are soft on terrorism.'” The host then asked New York Magazine’s John Heilemann, “That’s very hard-right talk; is that the smart talk to win an election in California?” (video follows with more transcription of this discussion): JOHN HEILEMANN, NEW YORK MAGAZINE: Well, it’s not…It’s very clear in California in particular that this is a problem, and you see both sides of the problem. In the Fiorina race, Tom Campbell would have been the better candidate for the Republicans. MATTHEWS: To win. HEILEMANN: To win in, in, in November. Stop the tape. Whether or not Campbell has a better chance of beating Sen Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) than Fiorina does is quite speculative. After all, he got absolutely crushed by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) in 2000 losing by over 2 million votes. He even lost his own district that year by 15 points! But even this is somewhat irrelevant, for the truly conservative candidate in last week’s Republican primary was the Tea Party’s favorite Chuck DeVore. Readers should recall former Alaska governor Sarah Palin taking A LOT of heat last month when she came out in support of Fiorina instead of DeVore. As such, Matthews and Heilemann trying to depict Fiorina as a far-right candidate here were way off base: MATTHEWS: Do they want to win or be right, I mean literally right? HEILEMANN: Well, the Republican primary, the Republican primary electorate seems to want to be right more than it wants to win. Nonsense. Republicans on Tuesday went with the person with the most money that they believe can beat Boxer. If they had wanted the most conservative candidate, they would have gone for DeVore. That is NOT even debatable: HEILEMANN: So you wind up then with Carly Fiorina saying stuff it’s not clear she really believes in order to win against a candidate who probably would have had a better chance. Based on what? Fiorina beat Campbell by 32 points! Unfortunately, Matthews didn’t challenge Heilemann’s ignorant display: HEILEMANN: Then you have Meg Whitman who an otherwise very attractive candidate with tons of money who’s on the fundamentally wrong side as history shows us in California of this immigration issue. These are two candidates who on the surface should be very attractive, very compelling, and they’re both so far off on the right they’re so stranded. Amazing. Like Fiorina, Whitman wasn’t the conservative candidate in her race. That was Steve Poizner, the Golden State’s Insurance Commissioner. Conservatives throughout California largely supported him including Rep. Tom McClintock who said in campaign ads: Steve Poizner is the only conservative candidate in this race and is serious about implementing real reform in Sacramento. I am convinced that Meg Whitman has nothing to offer other than Arnold Schwarzenegger’s third term. That is something California cannot afford. Taking this further, Whitman was John McCain’s national co-chair when he ran for president in 2008. As for her immigration position, Whitman was critical of Arizona’s SB 1070. For some reason neither Matthews nor Heilemann brought this up. In the end, now that the primary season is over, the goal of America’s media will be to make every Republican candidate around the country look far more conservative than they really are. Something they possibly haven’t considered is that in a year when liberal is likely a four-letter word, being branded as far-right might be a good thing. Hmmm. As a post facto aside, Matthews and Company did discuss Fiorina’s open mike hair comment about Boxer. For some reason, as they chatted about all this “very hard-right talk” from Republicans, the subject of Democrat gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown calling Whitman a Nazi never surfaced. Color me unsurprised.  

More:
Chris Matthews Accuses Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina of ‘Very Hard-right Talk’

‘Left, Right & Center’: Primaries Galore

This week’s episode of “Left, Right & Center” features two special guests—Lawrence O’Donnell as moderator and David Frum as Tony Blankley’s right-wing substitute—for a virtual roundtable on … (continued) Related Entries June 9, 2010 A Very Jerry Primary Party: Brown Readies for Battle With Meg Whitman June 9, 2010 It Cost Meg Whitman Only $81 Million to Buy a Shot at the Mansion

More here:
‘Left, Right & Center’: Primaries Galore

Editor Tina Brown Slams Female GOP Primary Winners: These ‘Wingnuts’ Are a ‘Blow to Feminism’

Former New Yorker editor Tina Brown appeared on Thursday’s Good Morning America to deride the mostly Republican women who won primaries on Tuesday as “wingnuts” and to sneer that they represent a “blow to feminism.” Brown appeared with journalist Catherine Crier as part of GMA’s “Morning Mix” segment, a panel that usually includes reporters agreeing with each other over liberal talking points. After Stephanopoulos recited the numerous women who won nominations on June 8, the Daily Beast editor dismissed, ” …The only trouble with this one is, it almost feels as if all these women winning are kind of a blow to feminism.” She then added, “Women, too, can be wing nuts, is the point.” Crier offered the developing liberal line that Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorini’s business experience could now be a liability: “I think it’s quite interesting that the whole CEO movement out there in California. Because, here we are with all the Wall Street consternation and, yet, they’re touting their credentials as major CEOs as qualifications.” Stephanopoulos, a former aide to Bill Clinton, echoed this new talking point: “Meg Whitman head of Ebay. Carly Fiorini ran Hewitt Packard. There’s some controversy there.” In fairness to Stephanopoulos, when Brown offered her critique of Republican women derailing feminism, he did protest, “Well, you could argue they’re different kinds of feminists. They’ve had a lot of success in different fields.” However, the semi-weekly Morning Mix segment is comprised mostly with left-wing opinion. On April 22, 2010 , Sam Donaldson lobbied for Al Gore to be placed on the Supreme Court. On March 12 , the panel featured a chorus of liberal voices to sympathize with disgraced Democrat Eric Massa and retiring Congressman Patrick Kennedy. An odd point not discussed on Thursday’s panel: Included in the list was Meg Whitman and Blanche Lincoln. Lincoln, of course, is a Democrat. Whitman is pro-choice. So, it’s unclear (from a  liberal’s perspective) what, specifically, Brown thought would set back feminism. A transcript of the June 10 segment, which aired at 11:04am EDT, follows: GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: And it’s time, now, for our Morning Mix, where we have some fun with the big stories that everyone is buzzing about this week. Starting with women rule. Huge election night Tuesday for female candidates. They won all the big races. Also, men behaving badly. Joran Van der Sloot and quarterback, Ben Roethlisberger, back in the news. Real questions how law enforcement handled that behavior, too. Here to talk about it all, Tina Brown, editor-in-chief of The Daily Beast. And author, journalist and judge Catherine Crier. Welcome to both of you. And let’s begin with election night. All the big races won by women. Five big winners that night: Carly Fiorina, Meg Whitman out in California. Nikki Haley, surprise out in South Carolina. Sharron Angle in Nevada. Blanche Lincoln, holding on in Arkansas. And this was something remarkable. I mean, every big race won by a woman. TINA BROWN: Yeah, I mean, it was. I mean, in some ways, it’s, again, representation that people are looking for otherness. You know, they’re so disgusted with incumbents, they’re looking for something completely different. And, as it happens, of course, women usually are seen as, you know, an alternative because many more men are in there. But, actually, the only trouble with this one is, it almost feels as if all these women winning are kind of a blow to feminism. Because, each one of them, really, most of them, are, you know, very much, uh, uh, you know, against so many of things that women have fought for such a long time. GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, you could argue they’re different kinds of feminists. They’ve had a lot of success in different fields. CATHERINE CRIER: This is true. This is true. But gender didn’t play as big a role, which I think is the one positive note here. -Is that it wasn’t really a conversation until we got to a hair issue, which I think we’ll be talking about later. Yeah, but I think that’s very, very important. But it’s a great concern that what I’m seeing is people will realize that women can make the same mistakes. And get clay feet, as men. BROWN: Women, too, can be wing nuts, is the point. CRIER: Yes. STEPHANOPOULOS: That’s part of it. But, Nikki Haley down in South Carolina, she faced allegations that she had affairs. CRIER: But she was in the right state for those allegations. STEPHANOPOULOS: I guess. I suppose that’s right. BROWN: Yeah, Nikki Haley beat that back. That was very interesting. I mean, that was actually encouraging, I thought. CRIER: But, there was other scandal that I think dominated that. And other outrageous comments by South Carolina politicians. So, it made that look relatively benign. STEPHANOPOULOS: That’s right. Talking about outrageous comments. Carly Fiorina after the election, getting caught on tape. Men have had this happen to them as well. She didn’t remember she was on camera. Let’s take a look. CARLY FIORINI: Laura saw Barbara Boxer briefly on television this morning. And said what everyone says. God, what is that hair? So yesterday. STEPHANOPOULOS: That’s Barbara Boxer. There she is. There you see it! Uh-oh! I am on camera! BROWN: You know what I love about it so much? It’s like, as we were saying, as Catherine was saying, it was great that it was gender-neutral. Then, all of a sudden, you’ve suddenly switched to absolute claws come out. And it’s like- the women. What really killed? It was so yesterday. It wasn’t just women. It was rich women. That’s the point. STEPHANOPOULOS: So yesterday. CRIER: That’s right. That’s right. I think it’s quite interesting that the whole CEO movement out there in California. Because, here we are with all the Wall Street consternation and, yet, they’re touting their credentials as major CEOs as qualifications. STEPHANOPOULOS: Meg Whitman head of Ebay. Carly Fiorini ran Hewitt Packard. There’s some controversy there. CRIER: And, here, with BP, with Wall Street, is that what the American voter wants, a CEO running?

Excerpt from:
Editor Tina Brown Slams Female GOP Primary Winners: These ‘Wingnuts’ Are a ‘Blow to Feminism’

More on Meg Whitman’s Fratty Princeton Son

A defacto bodyguard lived at Princeton with Griff Harsh to assuage the kidnapping fears of his mom, California gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman , according to a longtime Gawker commenter close to the university.

Visit link:
More on Meg Whitman’s Fratty Princeton Son

David Letterman’s Sexcapades: Who Cares?

There’s a famous moment in Mad Men where ambitious Pete Campbell, who’s figured out Don Draper isn’t who he says he was, spills his boss’ Dick Whitman secret to Sterling &…

Read more:
David Letterman’s Sexcapades: Who Cares?

Walt Whitman on Nature

“After you have exhausted what there is in business, politics, conviviality, and so on – have found that none of these finally satisfy, or permanently wear – what remains? Nature remains. ” Walt Whitman

Read this article:
Walt Whitman on Nature